The Frogs Have More Fun...

Flowers



"All the names I know from nurse:
Gardener's garters, Shepherd's purse,
Bachelor's buttons, Lady's smock,
And the Lady Hollyhock.

Fairy places, Fairy things,
Fairy woods where the wild bee wings,
Tiny trees for tiny dames.
- These must all be Fairy names !"

(from Child's Garden of Verses
by R.L. Stevenson)


"Anyone can write a short-story.
A bad one, I mean."

(R.L. Stevenson)
----------------

"Science without conscience is the Soul's perdition."
- Francois Rabelais, Pantagruel
- Acc to/above is citated from: Medical Apartheid. The dark history of Medical Experimentation on Black Americans from Colonial Times to the Present, by Harriet A. Washington (Doubleday ; 2006 ; p. 1.)

----------------
"In the high society of the first half of the century, marriage, despite it's bestowal status upon the wife, was the most absurdity. Marriage, conferring instanteous rank or money, ... lost most of its prestige and moment right after the wedding. ...By the end of the century, spurred by Rousseau's moralistic Nouvelle Hèloíse, a contrary cult, that of virtue, arose. After 1770 conjugal and maternal love became not merely admissible, but, for some, moral imperatives. ...

[...]
...Rousseau, who sought for himself the crown of morality in ostensibly defending marriage, presents in his Nouvelle Hèloíse the most enticing and extended defense of illicit love ever penned. The root of the problem is that as the century progressed sensibility became confused with morality: passionate feeling, if expressed in a highly civilized mode with grace and nuance, makes us forgive the Rousseau of The Confessions, for example, his pettiness, his jealousies, his betrayals. This moral-amoral byplay, present already in the novels of Richardson, was to be more intense as the century unfolded."
-
Madelyn Gutwirth : Madame De Staèl, Novelist. The emergence of the Artist as Woman (10,15.)

;
"...As the social contract seems tame in comparison with war, so fucking and sucking come to seem merely nice, and therefore unexciting. ... To be 'nice', as to be civilized, means being alienated from this savage experience - which is entirely staged. [...] The rituals of domination and enslavement being more and more practiced, the art that is more and more devoted to rendering their themes, are perhaps only a logical extension of an affluent society's tendency to turn every part of people's lives into a taste, a choice; to invite them to regard their very lives as a (life) style." - Susan Sontag , on 'Fascinating Fascism' (-74; p 103;104-5 at Under the sign of Saturn)
; "Anyone who cannot give an account to oneself of the past three thousand years remains in darkness, without experience, living from day to day." (Goethe) - as cited by Sontag (on same compile; p. 137.)

;
"It is widely accepted that we are now living in the 'Anthropocene', a new geological epoch in which the Earth's ecosystems and climate are being fundamentally altered by the activities of humans. I loathe the term, but I can't deny that it's appropriate."
; (Goulson), Silent Earth : Averting the Insect Apocalypse (2021; p 47.)
;
"It is sometimes said that humanity is at war with nature, but the word 'war' implies a two-way conflict. Our chemical onslaught on nature is more akin to genocide. It is small wonder that our wildlife is in decline."
; (Goulson, 2021 ; 118.)
;
----------------
"If we believe absurdities, we shall commit atrocities." (Voltaire)
- Citated from; (Joy, Melanie), Why We Love Dogs, Eat Pigs and Wear Cows : An Introduction to Carnism(2010; p. 95.)
;

"In the presence of the monster, you have eyes and ears for nothing else."
; (Flora Tristan) : London Journal of Flora Tristan: the Aristocracy and the Working Class of England ; 1842-edit. (tr: 1982. ; p. 71.)

;
"Every minority invokes justice, and justice is liberty.
A party can be judged of only by the doctrine which
it professes when it is the strongest."
Mdme de Staêl
(on) 'Consideration sur le Révolution de la Francaise' [1818]


8/18/09

Muleskinner book Recommendation #20

Mammoths, Sabertooths and Hominids:
65 Million Years of Mammalian Evolution in Europe

(Agustí, Jordi / Antón, Mauricio)


p. 2002 (N.Y.), 313 pages [+ 16 Color illustration plates]


[Recommendation 10/2009]


Anyone, having followed our recent series here (even in a haphazard way), might have noticed we've repeatedly referred for this book. Not surprising, since we've also recently a lot focused on topics of animal prehistories and distant evolutionary pasts. This actually has been, perhaps from two reasons:


First is simply because of Mammoths, Sabertooths and Hominids is very good introduction to those things, concerning (mostly) those millions and millions of years before species named sapiens(es) ever walked on Earth. And like the subtitle says, book covers mammalian evolution from Paleocene period (ca 65-55 Million years ago) to the most recent epoch preceding current times, the Pleistocene (about 1.8 Ma to 10000 BC) - actually the subtitle more correctly gives impression from books contents than the well-known species mentioned in main title. The book takes in closer examination vast number of those foregone creatures, most of them from more distant origins.


The second mentioned reason is equally meaningful (for myself). It is from the reason(/must confess that) in schools having skipped the course about the mentioned subject. So, therefore I've found myself desperately in need to fill some 'blackouts' on my knowledge from this field of study. And, as it being so I never finished the course, I'm often in these text borrowing a bit from more peculiar sources that are loosely connected characters in the archeologic history and past, early architect-archeologist's or similar innovators of the study – fx some famous ones like Frederick Bligh Bond (1864-1945) and Sarah Winchester (1839-1922). But returning to the recommendation here, this book is only presented here as an example from more modern (/more recent) researches and readings. (And, I'll also have to add that likely our aim to focus on female authors in these subsequent posts will now have to be delayed for a little further.)


The book may be in use as course-book or additional reading at universities, and as such it's not perhaps the first text to start from, if looking to read from the 'evolutionary roads' preceding the present environments and ecology. But it's not too complicated or difficult if having some basic knowledge from the earlier prehistoric periods. And they mention in the forewords its main purposes being fx offering a presentation from mammalian evolution (in Europe) for wide range of readers; from geologists to students, scholars, etc. As it focuses on study of the fossil fauna, things are presented rather chronologically, an aspect that also makes it somewhat easier to follow, if sometimes little boresome from the unprofessional readers view-point.



But, like said, it is still very recommendable as presenting a carefully structured picture from the prehistoric animal evolution (mammalians especially, of course). In overall also fx what is known from the climates in during past geologic periods. Perhaps the more recent techniques/molecular studies isn't that much covered in the book, but as I kind of remember having read the DNA discriminated from fossilized bone giving reliable clues only somewhat a million years to the past, this is only logical. Also the classification of those ancient species, especially nowadays foregone genera, isn't at all clear in every case, and the information of course sometimes changes in times with further studies. But I guess this must present quite much the most recent knowledge and foundings (mainly) on the basis of these 'traditional' research methods.


The larger parts are devoted to the earlier (faunal) periods in the prehistory - Paleocene, Eocene, Oligocene, Miocene, Pliocene. Also, the reader finds major part of pages dedicated for the more distant periods than the ones closer to our times. This is also only logical, and quite as well underlines how recent actually is the age of man - and - how much more further reaches the history of most other creatures of the Earth (and the book only concerns youngest of animal orders, the mammals).


Not even trying to describe any of those periods discussed in the book with more detail, we're only mentioning here some things that were most of interest to us. Of course described are the evolutionary paths in behind of the current existing species, like the origins/lineages of Perissodactyls, Artiodactyls, various carnivorous mammal genera, and, as well fx the Lagomorphs (rabbits/hares) and Rodents. As well, one also learns quite an amount of information from many lineages that once existed, but now are known only from fossil remains: fx Multituberculates, Machairodonts, Chalicotheres, Creodonts – An interested reader can of course read a quite deal from them also in the net, though not explained as much with detail and throrough way. Going the further for the past, the less clear/sometimes differing in views are also these classifications concerning the (groups of) species, like in the case of the latter mentioned (Creodonts), as is described here (the post also has pic from painting that funnily 'jokes' on this question). Of course, one has first to be somewhat interested from all those foregone times to enjoy the book largely focusing on explaining the changes of individual species and mammalian families during the path of some 60 million years evolutionary diversification.


But, then in the book are also mentioned some interesting 'zoo geographic problems' and geologic effects that has been able to show having happened in the past and had their affluence on all these things. I only mention here some briefly since they aroused interest in myself : The presence of Eurotamandua in Eocene faunas (of Europe), supposedly resulting from the existence of Iberian-African corridor in the Mid-Eocene ; the sudden appearance (from out of nowhere) of the early Chiroptera (bats), in the early Eocene ; the “Gomphoterian land-bridge” (early Miocene). And, other things that one is most delighted to read from, if having some interest on these distant times. Exciting especially since all of it predates so far in the past, and yet can still be reasoned and studied in our times.


Finally, we'll only mentioning the book being only better from the many good drawings (by an artist M.Antón). Like usually is the case in this kind book from specialized field – where the readers (us at least) aren't much in beforehand knowledge about presented things – they offer an easy informative view for those many odd and distant species that would be more difficult to imagine otherways. (Even, if we remember any of that being based on assumed looks and reasoned conclusions, mostly on the basis of excavated skeletal record). So, I must say, it was very useful book to read, even if I'm not much familiar with any relevant examples/comparable presentations from these subjects. Perhaps its also so, that I found the book such inspiring 'cause it mainly concerns the lesser generally known and more distant (evolutionary) times than the usually popularized imaginery from the prehistory. Although - if we in the future select some anthropology or prehistoric research to our series - them will probably be concerned on more recent periods.

----------
( The latest posts! - @ Mulskinner Blog @ )


----------
Powered by ScribeFire.

8/17/09

Cooking Companion IV


...fROM The gARDEN Of eARTHLY dELIGHTS...



It being harvest time, August, and so our Cooking companion this time utilizes vegetable that is not only easy to cultivate but also very high-yielding, the Squash (- I guess that's the english name, the particular pumpkin I mean one can see from pics of this post). Our favourite choice in the home-gardening, though one needs to make suitable growing soil and also they need plentiful sunlight. Otherways, it's not too demanding and I noticed this year the flowers are also beautiful, even though they only blossom a short time, some hours perhaps. Also, some of the flowers(ones that don't grow straight from the fruit) can be prepared for to eat.




These are easy made home cooking recipes, and one can of course invent more of them from ones own imagination. From the better known ones Ratatouille is perhaps the best recipe in which some squash should be used. As I like to eat it in this time of year with all kinds of meals, I often make ratatouille for an additional serving, only that I rarely remember to make lots of it to prepare some to be kept in freezer and eaten later. (W.-G.)


Sliced baked pieces


Ingredients: 1-2 Squash (yellow/green - doesn't matter in any of recipes although I sometimes think yellow tastes a little more sweeter, but I really don't know if thats just a feeling), olive oil, garlic, curry, black pepper, (white vinegar),(feta cheese)


Slice the squash alongside for suitable pieces. Then pour some 2-3 spoons of oil on pan (add that according to need), add a garlic glove(s) and perhaps some white vinegar. Let be for some 3-5 mins, turn around them a little, add spices and also add some feta over each. Fry for some minutes more and they're ready to serve.



Soup


Ingredients: 1-2 medium Squash, 1-2 dl cream, white pepper, ¼ tsp salt, vegetable oil/butter, 1 small onion, 3 dl-0,5 L water/vegetable broth, (add other spieces acc. To taste)


First slice squash(es) for small pieces, then keep them in butter/oil at kettle for a few minutes. Add broth and onion crushs + other favored spices and bake for about 10 mins. Finally smash the contents in the kettle and pour along the cream. Heat, add also pepper if wish. Offer with some bread and/or with other veggie delicatessen.


Pizza


Ingredients: 1-1 1/2 medium squash, various other vegetables (I used broccoli & pepper slices), (black) olives, tomato crush, salt, olive oil, grated cheese, some honey, (+other spices one wish to add)

This one prepares easily if you first have made a dough for pizza ready. Then just cook in the kettle some oil, crushed tomato's, add little salt(soya, perhaps), honey and spices. One's coollen a little, pour sauce over the pizzas you have made for rounded pieces. Add lengthwise sliced squashes, pepper, and small rounded broccoli pieces. Olives and grated cheese finally and then I also added some spoonful of olive oil to make it even more tasty. 250 C and some 15 min. (Can well be eaten coollen as well, but I think its better straight from the oven).


----
And, since we don't want pretend being vegetarians...I guess we'll then make the subsequent recipes (whenever they're posted) from fish, chicken and something not yet decided (not the beef anyway, but that's just for the reason that I find most of the sold meals and products tasting every imaginable way inferior to the well-prepared, freely grown stuff. Not to mention the Mad-Cow, Carsinogens and other various by-products like animal diseases, but that's another story.).



----------
( The latest posts! - @ Mulskinner Blog @ )


----------
Powered by ScribeFire.

8/10/09

Oh God! It's raining technologies...

: MulSkinner [Hi-]Techs be-bop-a-lula : IV/2009 (Late summer)



Like goes the phrase - don't know how spells the quite correct alternative for it in english - but I guess kind like 'What goes around, goes around', as usually is the case. However - not the least - that we've been so much stressed with all these projects, but especially from the reason that our most recent effort to execute this tech review only left us bored and frustrated from MSW tactics in general, we've not much bothered to follow all the latest tricks and chipmunks from the advancing hi-tech fields.



So, we're really not much this time waving the flag for advanceful or even greenery technologies; actually we've not even checked the recent(?) Green electronics briefing from Greenpeace this time (As well, unchecked goes also the F-secure cybersecurity reports Q2/09 and we'll only noticing that surprisingly Adobe's files were gaining a lead from Word-docs as the most vulnerable and most targeted with attacks – Oh, save that good old Pdf-reader with necessary fixes and replacements, soon.) - And as consequence from all this, this tech review now goes purely by guessing...


From the news, about dot-Eco-com we only hear those inspiring words '.eco should mean something more than just another domain.'(T.B. as cited on BBC-news), but I guess the question must have been solved years ago and there now should be plenty more than only few domains devoted and labeled with the "-".eco. As well...The long-awaited Win 7 wasn't yet available here, but we noticed it's rise and shine in the gleaming outer looks of some other software's...Equally as well, from the recent trends we can only guess that the Ipods were still (occasionally) bursting on flames but steadily selling like hell. Likely, the big consumer question was re-emerging in form of Microsoft's contender for the device, Zune HD, costing probably not so remarkable sums anymore - the largest, 32 Gb model was presented to us buyable with some hundreds of $'s – I guess that much storage capacity is a minimum needed for all these new space-consuming film and media files...But hey: they say the improved Pod will even have camera(?). Who really needs a camera-Pod in these days of miracle and wonder, long-distance-net-calls , camera- and music-phones altogether? ...But perhaps we're just envious in our newly found enthusiasm from the players, even sold without entertainment taxes. However, like an answer to our prayers for futuristic storage space needs comes the news from this Kingston 256 Gb-Tiny Tardis USB-drive, which goes easily for pocket and with the more advanced technologies could serve as re-changeable storage in those more forward-looking devices cleaning the table from competing copied players, etc., ...Only that the price is too astro-physical to even be mentioned here, but in time - and if our predictions are to be trusted and correct -, by some five years it should cost less than the cheap MP3-players these days do (rough guessing some 80 per cent price cut in 7-8 years)

...And as well handheld business was probably (we guess) growing on steadily and more steadily in spite of the already passed roadside warning 'oversupply on the market' (and also we noticed emerging new fields expected fx in form of the arrival of Nokia 2720-30/7020 models, targeted for growing consumer markets of the developing world, especially for the users of mobile email, etc). From the more front-end phones we were introduced to the wonders of Samsung GT-S5230 that has qualities starting from fx the 3.0 WQVGA touchwiz LCD and (programmable?) add-ons for the services/net. Seems quite a recommendable choice and probably usable for realistic period of time (but perhaps we'll consider taking a closer look for it in the separate post...)



Other things we in passing noticed were from less Earthly aspects; Concerning our slight interests on A.I.'s emergences and even in knowing the Roszak's (The Cult of Information) early warnings from the prophecies and foresees presented on this field time to time, it's actually advertised being closer than we expected, as they say “It is not impossible to build a human brain and we can do it in ten years.” (IBM blue gene machineries etc involved makes me little suspicious on the expectable horizons from this project...), but they also mention it could fx have use to finding treatments for the mental illnesses and their supposing it will even be capable to answer the questions...what a gift from gods...Is there a thing human brain couldn't invent...From completely another field of inventions, on the cyberworldly affairs we find equally non-material existence of the flash-cookies (Local Shared Object - LSO), which they claim to retain those little information bugs, even if having been destroyed by user...however, it isn't even illegal, surprisingly, but who would be/is the first offering a browser to erase those tiny little monsters...And then there's even more advanced fields of physics and high-techs, namely “Hidden portal concept: First tunable electromagnetic gateway” (if I understood the concept correctly it yet only means something similar as the artificial invisibility techniques we noticed in the Newspost(17-08-2008) almost year ago/or the invisibility cloak of the Potteresque universe and novels, although they've got the nerve to loan in the headliner a comparison to the teleportative entrance to School of wizards in Potters...Anyway, or about so, as I interpreted this oncoming direction of modern physics from those sentences;) “[the Gateway]...uses transformation optics and an amplified scattering effect from an arrangement of ferrite materials called single-crystal yttrium-iron-garnet that force light and other forms of electromagnetic radiation in complicated directions to create a hidden portal.” - But go and read the newsies in question at ScienceNews, or for further information check the link to complete article published on New Journal of Physics...it's only a few pages. I guess one don't need to imagine possible commercial uses and profitable markets in this instance, but it also kind of reminded me of and from the Hyperion/Endymion (1989-1997) series of novels by Dan Simmons where people are using Far caster-transporters, River Tethys flowing uninterrupted through those ports (but it's some time I've read the book and it's quite a complex invention to describe even in form of it presented at those scifi books).


Finally, and as entertainment ease for our otherways heavily techs and physics oriented briefing we have some information from worlds most entertaining ape, Cheeta (that being a correct spelling, I noticed): 'The character was actually a composite role created by use of numerous animal actors'...what? Isn't the one and only Cheeta the one and only? ...No, but notably devastating is that this variety of chimpanzees playing the character isn't (surprisingly) reflected in the fictional autobiography Me Cheeta (2008) that claims to be authored by only one chimp also acting the role in all the films as well. Since preceding information sounds highly controversial and offers opposite claims, we ourselves recommend - at least for the reputation of that remarkable actor - it being cleared up that the directors didn't use doubles, triples or even couples in the movies (obviously, there can be only one Award-winning Cheeta).




----------
( The latest posts! - @ Mulskinner Blog @ )


----------
Powered by ScribeFire.

8/1/09

Prelude, August 10.8.2009



In the days of the August, we're not quite at the end of summer yet. However, in some sense this makes it closer to the end of certain period on this blogs wrtitings. So without too many words, we're preparing for the future with this little funny post, a prelude as we've named it this time.

Like has been our usual manner, including a disc recommendation under the pretext of this. Without questioning, it's QuickSilver Messenger Service and Happy Trails LP from 1968. There's several classics worth the mention; Mona, Who do You love (-Suite, makes the whole of side A). And Cavalry...And I even close my eyes and imagine those days of fantastique and nostalgics; '...Rhett Butler galloping in front of the Blue coats with his white pony, on a way to pick up Scarlet O'Hara from her residence of withdrawal and remorse ...or Johnny Weissmuller riding his herd of elephants, Maureen O'Sullivan lazying on the back of another, Cheetah giggling ...And then I think about John Carter and hope to be absorbed for the Mars through space miles like he did and ended riding on a Banthan(I guess that's the correct spelling/name of the species?...), Dejah Thoris, her red hair flowing from the distant winds, and that Gigantic Thark with his four-hands and those impressive canine tooths...'

...But it also goes without mentioning that the disc also contains some of the greatest guitar sounds ever recorded (besides, the cover is also great...)'



----------
( The latest posts! - @ Mulskinner Blog @ )


----------
Powered by ScribeFire.

7/26/09

Species endangered (MS-Blog series from) VI / 09


Hawksbill Turtle


  • Class: Reptiles
  • Order: Cheloniidae
  • Latin name: Eretmochelys imbricata
  • Range: Atlantic, Pacific and Indian Oceans ; Shallow tropical/subtropical seas, coral reefs, mangrove bays and estuaries
  • IUCN Status: CR (Critically Endangered) / Cites: Appendix I

(2009 situation).



All from the living Sea turtles are counted among the oldest of currently existing animals, since earliest known ancestors for them are believed to have distinct from other turtles at least 110 Million years before our times. Likewise comparable to length of that evolutionary history is the species relatively long life-ages; an individual sea turtle can live up to 80 years, in natural circumstances.



Hawksbills 'justified' 'qualify' among the most threatened of sea animals and the level of endangerment isn't much differing in case of the other existing marine turtles. In fact all are threatened from their main surviving family Cheloniidae - that means; Green turtle (Chelonia mydas, EN), Loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta, EN), Kemp's Ridley (Lepidochelys kempii, CR), Olive Ridley (Lepidochelys olivacea, VU) – the Flatback Turtle (Natator depressus), endemic for 'seas closer Australian continental shelf'' is listed as DD (data deficient). Another family of sea turtles, more evolutionary distant Dermochelyidae, includes as its sole surviving member only (equally Critically Endangered) Leatherback turtle (Dermochelys coriacea) - The largest from sea turtles, as individual specimen are known to have weighed from 250 kg to almost 1000 kg. (But smaller sea turtle species regularly weight under about 50 kg. To the comparison one can see the estimated size of turtles from Leatherback's extinct co-family, Protostegidae, which included fx Achelon, largest marine turtle and only found from fossil remains – although according to current knowledge they (perhaps) existed in the period of sea turtles early evolutionary beginnings, closely 100 Million years in the past.)


The sea turtle populations are only known by estimates, since they can be only counted from the turtles that come ashore to leave the eggs on breeding seasons(female specimen). As the Hawksbills are widely scattered around the oceans of the world, their nesting sites include sites on the coastlines of at least 58 countries. As turtles often, they are slow breeding reptiles (Hawksbill Turtles reach maturity not until 30 years age). A single turtle can leave about 140 eggs on one clutch in their breeding time, but from that number only few if any reach the maturity age. In addition to human actions, turtles eggs and hatchlings are predated by fx monitor lizards, crabs, dogs and seabirds. The interval between the breeding periods is about 2-3 years.


Since historical times, sea turtle shells have been collected by humans for decorative purposes, like jewelery, ornaments, glasses frames (and in our more luxurious days this has led even for such products as guitars made from turtle shell, like explained on this WWF-page briefly). Although the turtle trade nowadays is prohibited, the illegal market still flourishes. As well, turtles meat (and their eggs) are still preferred food sources in some countries. Also, many of the fishing nets still are 'non-turtle safe' where they get trapped (safer ones are fx those equipped with TEDs - so called turtle excluder devices). A sea turtle has to breath on the surface, otherways it drowns, and although they can sometimes remain hours under surface when sleeping/in rest, if in movement this time gap shortens a lot, for only some minutes.

And, other threats include fx also the marine pollution (marine debris, environmental contamination, etc), erosion of sea-side lands, non-native vegetation, and the destruction of coral reefs from silting and human building purposes, artificial lighting (last mentioned is threat since new-born hatchlings by instinct go towards the brightest source of light, and very often human lights on beaches etc leads them for the opposite direction ie they don't head for the sea) - and, as well diseases like FP (fibropapillomatosis), whose formation is not completely understood (/or: here in MSW a search from its causes fx from Wikipedia didn't return much information/researches post 1995), but likely the main reason is related to human caused pollution on coastal areas. (For more information see fx Aguirre-Lutz(2004)Note 1., and the other articles found we listed in the end of this, though due the aforementioned reasons we can in this case only advice to check for more recent information as well...) Anyway, in the 1990s the disease was even feared to ultimately cause sea turtles complete extinction, but nowadays is believed that in favorable conditions they (marine turtles) can recover from the disease in question. And...(the list continues) oil spillages for the sea waters of course, which in some parts of the world (middle-East, fx) is major problem. One enlargening harmful co-factor in the recent times has been the increase of tourism, since turtle breeding sites, sandy beaches have often been taken for the use in human purposes (most recently in the tropical coastlines of Asia). Mechanical beach vehicles, even walking can trouble turtles breeding and destroy the eggs/hatchlings. As peaceful beaches have continuously become rarer, also sea turtles nesting sites have declined (in during 20th century).


The effects of global warming on them are not yet known very adequately, but coral bleaching is one consequence believed to lead for losses in their natural habitat, coral reefs. Another, supposable consequence, although yet far less known with certainty is the possible effects from the warming of sea temperatures. For the migrating species, such as the Leatherback turtles, this can possibly cause changes for their usually preferred sea and terrestrial sites. Because the sea water temperature affect for the migratory routes turtles take, it is fx feared to also complicate already difficult conservation efforts - But since that's only researched nowadays, see (fx) "As the Seas Warm" from selected texts below. Also Hawksbills are migratory and one individual turtle can make rather complex journeys during its life-span.


Also, (many) sea turtles are dependant on the seagrass mats, growing close to reefs. Seagrasses are often considered having an important role as 'ecotone' in between the reefs and mangroves growing closer the coastlines, not the least because they have potential to adapt relatively easy for impacts of climate change and offer some protection from other factors, like fx the soil erosion of coasts. However, seagrasses also face several environmental problems, ao in form of declining water quality and chemical pollution, usually caused by herbicides and pesticides originating from coastal agricultural uses.Note 2(p. 35-6) (Question also has some considerable economic importance for humans since fx WWF 'The Coral Triangle"-Report notices the Climate Changes destructive impacts on coral reefs affecting some 150 Million people living in the region of Coral Triangle, about two thirds of them dependent for income coming from the biodiversity of the reefs, commercial fisheries by largest part but also some directly from fishing and from tourism as well. Also, importance of reef as biodiversity rich area is no less remarkable; the fishes, corals, etc., are mentioned appear there with greatest numbers of species worldwide.)Note 3(p. 36-43) Especially concerning the particular one species here, Hawksbill turtle, sea turtles are noticed also having important part in the reefs ecosystems, since their diet often contains various small invertebrates (that somewhat varying between the different species, but includes sponges and mollusks, snails, jellyfish, crabs and seaweed, and also algae). Therefore they have their part to do in the maintenance of healthy coral reefs – fx Hawksbills in various sea areas by controlling the spread of sponges which otherwise can out-compete reef-building corals for space Note 4.


Human caused pressures for sea turtles probably originate from rather long time, but especially they have been noticed in the recent 50 years time. As result, the Hawksbills are calculated as Critically endangered, mainly because in most of their populations there likely was/is noticed 80 per cent reduction during the past three generations – earlier, until about 1970s species was listed as Endangered. (To the comparison: Supposing turtle average life span about 40 years that would mean about 120 years period. For some other threatened species like fx Cheetahs [Acononyx jubatus, EN] period for the same three generations time is a lot shorter, about 42 years. Often, the time needed for the succesfull recovery may take even more time than that and species with longer time for maturity age naturally take more time to recover from continued overhunting, etc. Of course, doesn't prevent us to mention the Cheetahs being almost as much endangered, and some subspecies are also counted as CR.)

According to estimates in during that about 100 years, some millions of individual Hawksbill turtles were slaughtered for uses of the Europe, United States and Asian markets. Nowadays, as the declining trend has been noticed for some time, the conservation actions include fx establishment of protected areas for the nesting. Also, sea turtle trade was prohibited and species listed in 1970s with Cites appendice I (from the earlier appendice II; however, a largest buyer of tortoise-shell market, Japan didn't ban the shell imports until 1993). Since the international ruling is not always considered as binding agreement in all coutnries, the illegal trade still continues in some parts of the world. And the regular fishing too, which causes large number of turtle deaths, yearly. Juvenile Hawksbill turtles have also been noticed probably more vulnerable to be harmed by fishing nets than some other sea turtles.


All these things considered it appears by no means surprising that they're endangered by most populations. The changes on human use of the seasides would greatly benefit their chances for recovery, fx reduction in the building of new beach sites and/or coastal residents. Since no-one believes that to happen, and can't expect the marine pollution to lessen either, supposedly the protected marine areas and decline in the illegal trade are their best hopes. Not until recent times there probably hasn't been much such conservation areas, similar to those on land (But because we don't claim to hold any uttermost knowledge from the subject/marine conservation, etc, reader is also adviced to view further readings from fx the links/texts selected below.)



And, as we at the moment haven't searched any suitable Hawksbill picture, can possibly finally in this post see that creature swimming in its natural habitat (video from Arkive):






------

Notes/further reading:

Coral reefs:


[Notes 2 and 3] The Coral Triangle and Climate Change: Ecosystems, people and societies at risk. WWF. (pdf) available fx here.



Fibropapillomatosis(FP):


Herbst, Lawrence H. ; Klein, Paul.A., 1995, “Green turtle Fibropapillomatosis: Challenges to Assessing the Role of Environmental Cofactors”. Environmental Health Perpectives 103:28-30.


[Note 1] Aguirre, A. ; Lutz, P., “Marine Turtles as Sentinels of Ecosystem Health: Is Fibropapillomatosis an Indicator?” EcoHealth 1, 275–283 (2004), doi: 10.1007/s10393-004-0097-3

(summary – obtaining complete text requires payment.)


Mascarenhas, R ; Iverson, P., "Fibropapillomatosis in Stranded Green Turtles (Chelonia mydas) in Paraiba State, Northeastern Brazil: Evidence of a Brazilian Epizootic?", Marine Turtle Newsletter 120:3-6, [2008?]


Marine Turtles:


[Note 4.] Mortimer, J.A. ; Donnelly, M. 2008, Eretmochelys imbricata. IUCN. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2009.1. www.iucnredlist.org


Stiles, D., “The Marine Turtle Product Trade in Viet Nam”. Marine Turtle Newsletter 124:6-9, [2009?]
(Also one can check Seaturtle.org for Marine Turtle Newsletters overall and other related information.)


From http://www.swan.ac.uk/bs/turtle/hays_publications2.htm :

(fx:)

"As the Seas Warm". Science 313/2006.(August) [Pdf]


Hays GC, Broderick AC, Glen F, Godley BJ (2003). Climate change and sea turtles: a 150-year reconstruction of incubation temperatures at a major marine turtle rookery. Global Change Biology 9, 642-646. [Pdf]


Aiken JJ, Godley BJ, Broderick AC, Austin T, Ebanks-Petrie G, Hays GC (2001). Two hundred years after a commercial marine turtle fishery: the current status of marine turtles nesting in the Cayman Islands. Oryx 35, 145-151. [Pdf]



...And as additional mention, there's probably a lot from marine turtles at the Mongabay (fx), from where we find fx this article from plastic garbage on seas and it's words of wisdom (by Dr James, some kind of authority on this field apparently): "...hopeful aspect is that humans can easily begin addressing the solution, without major lifestyle changes...it's as simple as reducing packaging and moving towards alternative, biodegradable materials and recycling."


----------
( The latest posts! - @ Mulskinner Blog @ )


----------
Powered by ScribeFire.

7/18/09

Species Endangered (MS-Blog Series from) – V / 09


Mammoth




“When aiming to depict a world, that once existed, 30 000 years in the prehistoric past, and from where not any concise written word can't reach our times, one has to rely on: 1. Known facts 2. Conclusions based on those facts 3. Imagination “

(Björn Kúrten, 1984, Mammutens Rådare)Transl; W-G.




  • Class: Mammal
  • Order: Proboscidea
  • Latin name: Mammuthus (Primigenius /Columbi)
  • Range: From Mid-Europe to Northern parts of Asia (Siberia) ; North American continent
  • Population Status: EX (Extinct), the time varying regionally, about 14000-8000 B.C. on continents [~1700 B.C., on Wrangel island])
(a 2008 situation)

It may feel a bit inconsistent and obscure, that we are including an extinct species in our series. However, there's innumerable animals which have disappeared from the evolutionary continutation in the prehistoric pasts, during millions of years. This renown species particularly we've selected to represent a larger phenomenon, extinctions timed for the end of last ice age (or in wider sense usually described as the Quaternary extinction event). (Our selection) also has reasons from the fact that mammoths are among the better/best known species from that time.



If we now allow ourselves this exception, and it's selected from mammals it has to be the mammoth. At least from the terrestrial animals, from among sea mammals there could possibly be alternative choices. (In fact we might also consider some examples from disappeared insect and reptile species, but on this logic the latter would then have to be a dinosaur and that doesn't really much fit for the ecological or evolutionary limits we're trying to keep...and as well I notice my knowledge from dinosaur consisting from the three earliest parts of Jurassic park...) It seems also we've quite slipped for to present solely mammals since there's now already 4 of the total 6 so far in our series. Nevertheless, not the least because human family tree derives from mammals by origin, I'd still like later to include an example from some sea mammal (likely the whales), one from the carnivorous species and perhaps still yet another one from primates, our closest relatives according the evolutionary theory.



What makes most arguments on behalf selecting mammoth as species in this series is their long common path with humans in prehistory, reaching culturally even the present. In during couple decades mammoths have become a popular subject of many famous novels, most forcefully since the 1980s. The mentioned dinosaur films pushed them little away from spotlight in 1990s, but more recently there's afresh found popularity in films and books, fx such as Stephen Baxter's Silverhair (1999) and the followed novels in the serie (Icebones, Longtusk), which combined the recent knowledge and the mythical status of these animals.



But, not less important, the mammoths strong relationship to humans in (pre)history is found from the cave-paintings and sculpted art (see picture above), also there's many prehistoric tools and objects which are carved from mammoth ivory (as well the vast bone founds, mostly from Siberia, that still make a feasible industry for the specialized handicraft), and – not to forget - of course the archaeological founds, plenty of them made even before the 19th century. If there had to be one animal species in connected to the humans in the ice-ages, most people would by first impression probably think about mammoths (although, fx deers, horses and as well as perhaps the cave-bears probably may have had equal place in the mythical and spiritual world of those distant ancestors).


Like goes the phrase, mammoths were the 'shaggy beasts' and the mammoth image mostly is settled for the best known/most common species, Mammuthus Primigenius(the wool mammoth). But in fact, they weren't beasts at all, not carnivores but large herbivores1 that tramped on North-American and Eurasian continents during the recent glaciation periods. Contrary to sometimes misleading belief, mammoths did not inhabit the glaciers which at the time reached from North-pole to middle of those continents, but instead lived on plains that were limiting to the edges of glaciers (areas usually called as the mammoth steppe). In general that steppe is known to have been more rich from plants and animal species than similar areas today, although it was also very harsh from climatic conditions. Its vegetation probably was various enough to offer diet for several large grass-eating herbivores. At least on the southern parts also occasional trees would grow in the middle of grasslands. From preserved mammoths stomachs fx trenches of willows and birch have been found. Various animals lived on steppe, a lot more than are found on todays northern tundras, including deers, reindeers, wolves, and as well carnivorous lion-sized cats. Various smaller species too, fx marmots and lemmings were just a few examples. The mixture of elements from tundra and more temperates grasslands was characteristic for this steppe. Mammoths which were gigantic in proportions, about the same as elephants, are not believed to have had much predators. Possibly few carnivours that could occasionally threaten them were the sabretooth cats (Homotherium ; Smilodon). Injured or young smaller individuals may have gotten for their prey (ao animals), sometimes. Also, mammoth was among the most common species (from that the name, 'mammoth steppe'), only more abundant were horses and prehistoric bisons – the latter also larger in size than the surviving ones today. As is also quite renown, mammoth bones, tooths and skeletons, and even frozen individuals have been found from the Siberian permafrost in numbers (best preserved example being the Dima).


The wool mammoths evolutionary road goes back some 300 000 years when it evolved from the earlier mammoths (preceding species M. Meridionalis originated in warmer latitudes, and as it's successsor then about half million years ago evolved M. Trogontherii). From the latter further evolved the mentioned wool mammoths. On the North-American continent, since about 1.5 M years ago evolved slightly different comparable mammoth species, M.Colombi. It was (considerably) larger than M.Primigenius(wool mammoth was about 2.5 to 3.5 m tall and weighed about 4-6 tons). Also is supposed that M. Colombi might have lived on a bit warmer regions than wool mammoth, though not on the South-American region. With most probability species ranges not overlapped each other, although from some places remains from both have been found, and the wool mammoths skeletons (and frozen ones) have been found also from Alaska. In Any case these two presented the most abundant species before they both disappeared at the end of the latest ice-age, soon after the retreat of glaciers in the continents.


What has still remained somewhat unsolved (and as the most debated from mammoths for decades) is the question from their disappearance. Overally Pleistocene extinctions are known having followed supposed human arrival on various continents which makes a quite convincing argument on human participation on event (see the above Wikipedian link from that). In spite of that, on different continents this may have had more complex reasons too.


A well-known theory (among others) since the 1960s, is so called Overkill-theory, as such somewhat displaced nowadays. It focused largely on mammoths, since its main assumption was from the larger animals having been quickly annihilated by earliest arrivals on American continent, who (supposedly) were big game hunters (as the theory was concerned on N.A. and the first human settlement was earlier believed to date around 11200 B.C.). Originally, theory relied (largely) on founding of Clovis points(/Clovis spear points) first discovered at 1928, and since that from various places at mammoths skeletons and/or close their remains. More recent research has pushed the time of the first settlement further past(basically proves the theory inadequate). Also, Clovis people more likely were typical hunters and relied at least as much for various kinds of smaller prey, including fish, mussels, collecting grains and peanuts. They are known having inhabited large areas from the western part of continent, but little else from the culture is preserved until our times. The spear points have been found all around the Northern America, including Canada which also makes overkill-supposition more unlikely, as only about dozen mammoth kill sites at continent are known with certainty. (Fagan, 2005) So the theory becomes reasonable only if one thinks the arrivals having spread around continent surprisingly fast, and the spear points presenting a highly advanced paleolithic technology compared to preceding methods (of hunters). To certain level they perhaps might, but as the founds are such rare it only proves early humans having killed and eaten mammoths(as well as other herbivores), and as did also fx the Neanderthalians at least 100 000 years ago.


Since the mammoths disappeared only after the most recent glaciation, this also has given some argument on behalf the human causes. However, at the end of the Pleistocene climatic changes are known to have been more dramatic and varying by many ways, fx about 13000 years ago there might have been a sharp decline of several degrees in global temperatures in just couple decades (Lister-Bahn 1994) and 1000 years that followed were a period of cooler climates (in the middle of slow overall warming towards the end of glaciation)(Fagan 2005). That may have had many effects, but fx because the mammoths were large grass-eating animals it is reasonable to suppose that disappearance of ice-age tundra and spread of forests may have diminished their living area - It is also sometimes stated that mammoths might have become out-competed on those fewer remaining plains and grasslands by other herbivores, bisons mostly. The last mammoth populations might have evolved too specialized for the earlier conditions and therefore did not survive post glacial changes.



On the other hand it seems that these species were able to migrate in between regions, as one research notices that there may have been a 'return movement' of wool mammoth populations from the Beringia to Siberia. The likely cause for mammoths return via Beringia, could have been the climatic changes and in any case this seems to support a view from drastic changes in temperatures at the time(reason why the 'newcormers' replaced the earlier Siberian mammoths is not known, likely various possibilities exist). As other studies (DNA-researches) also seem to give an argument that also the populations of bisons in Beringia were affected by climate and declined in genetic diversity, it strenghtens the supposition that the dramatic changes (in climate) may have had serious effects on many species (and their ecological ranges). But even so, it is also often stated that no climate theory can adequately explain the total amount of the large species died out worldwide in about same period of time (the late Pleistocene).



From mammoths is also known that they may have survived somewhat longer on islands than on the continent. Best known example is from the Wrangel Island in Arctic sea, near East-Siberian coast, where the mammoths survived until about 3400 years before the present (most recent timing known they existed anywhere), but finally were – probably – wiped out by human, since human arrival on island has been timed close that (it's not known humans having hunted the mammoths there, though). As well, on St Paul Island near Alaskan coast, the mammoths survived until about 6000 B.C., extinction having followed from natural reasons, since humans are ruled out due that they first arrived on isolated island at 18th century (Lister-Bahn [2007], p 163). Finally, from the examples of (dwarfed) isolated island mammoths, there is the Channel Islands 'pygmy mammoth' (subspecies M. Exilis), which had evolved to a lot smaller size in islands (during about 40000-20000 years period) after having swam to islands. Sea was then lower and the islands originally larger forming in the ice-age a 'super island', where mammoths would have grazed. It is believed that the disappearance closely correlates to (supposed) human arrival around 12900 years ago(Lister-Bahn [2007], p 160). Although, one feels likely the islands might well have been populated even earlier (how regularly is perhaps less clear). Whatever the most recent knowledge, I think any of preceding still gives only little explanation on behalf or against, since islands are isolated cases by any means. Yet, many believe the survival of several (prehistoric) animal species on islands long after the disappearance on mainland as strong argument (pro human caused event).


More recently (perhaps), as the most likely cause, has been raised the co-effect, where human hunters might have replenished last surviving populations. Seems logical to think so, largely because humans are known having extinct a number of animals, either remnants from earlier abundant populations declined from other reasons(like Steller's Sea Cow, Hydrodamalis gigas, Extinct at 1770s), and/or as well species which may have originally been numerous but vulnerable like Passenger pigeon, Ectopistes migratorius (last specimen died in captivity, 1914) - though concerning the latter mentioned, it has also been speculated the abundance of the bird having resulted from human caused changes in the ecological balance(Mann, 2005). In both cases, however, when species populations had weakened and become vulnerable the final period of annihilation(human caused) didn't take much longer than some 20-30 years. Even after loss of most of the suitable living habitat, mammoths disappearance would have taken a far longer period of time.


Last mammoths were disappearing from final parts of the Europe around 14000 years ago estimated, and the last founds, from Sweden and Denmark, are timed around 13000 years ago(Nogues-Bravo, 2008). Overally, mammoths vanished from across most of their known range in about 14000-10000 years ago. (But, in the southernmost places, South Europe and China they were gone already about 24000 years past). On the North-America the timing is closer to 11000 ago, supposedly M.Colombi having survived little later (about 500 years) than woolly mammoths.(Lister-Bahn [2007], 146).


Finally, a recent study seems to offer a combined explanation from the climatic and human caused influences, and it presents that major part of the most suitable climatic areas for (woolly) mammoths reduced continuously from 42000-6000 B.C., the species geographic range disappearing about 90 per cent during that time. Humans might have then finished the remaining pockets, where mammoths perhaps could have survived - like they did from earlier glaciation periods. According to that even limited hunting and low human population density might have been sufficient to cause final disappearance. The view is also supported with the last non islands mammoths founds located at northeastern Siberia, in the area classified by model as most suitable remaining living area 6000 B.C. The Wrangel island is believed to present an exception where vegetation and climate resembling ice-age tundra could have remained sometime longer (though according to model it wouldn't have been counted among those best suitable 'pockets' left in about that time, 4000 B.C. (Nogues-Bravo, 2008) Mammoths (species that come in the question here, M. Primigenius and mostly also M. Colombi), were from the evolutionary perspective species that roamed numerous and flourished during past the ice-ages, but it is supposable that whether there had been humans or not, might have after it either disappeared or been forced to adapt for somewhat more limited range/environments. And basically, it seems as most logical conclusion, so forth, case closed (at least for the wool mammoth); 'Increase of anthropogenic impacts in the Holocene are most likely to have been 'coup de grace' that set time and place for the extinction', like concluded in the research.

But since I feel some healthy suspicion - equally for statistics, quantitative analyses and lab-techs - I think it is worth the effort also consider all this from yet another perspective. At least because our series here mostly is focused on the endangered animals, not yet extinct.


As was noted, it is believed mammoths were not adapting for the spread of forests that increased in the end of last glacial, this being a (one) main cause for their disappearance. However, to the contrary it is sometimes assumed that their 'cousins', African savannah elephants (Loxodonta Africana) might have survived the recent (glaciation) periods because of the large forests that also existed in during ice-ages, though somewhat smaller in range. The glaciation(s) affected the African rain forests by reducing their geographic area, but they existed even during the so called glacial maximum (ie coldest period, when the sheets were at their largest). As consequence, todays savannah elephants therefore (supposedly) might have evolved from forest elephants for current species, only after ice-age(s) having populated the savannahs. The view is (was?) based on that from preceding times there is some 2 million year gap in the fossil remains of Loxodonta species (and rain forest conditions effectively prevent the formation of fossil remains). In during the same time Elephas-species were prevailing ones, their disappearance having happened in during those glaciation periods (Gamlin-Rohan, 1996). (The mentioned elephant species most probably include Elephas recki, abundant species in the past and E. antiquus which were found habitating even the European ranges still some 70 000 years ago - I guess there's plenty research about them too, though they seem less studied than mammoths) Be the elephants (recent) evolution and ecological ranges gone that way or not, the supposition doesn't completely hold because a study from current African elephant species DNA (forest and savannah), finds it more likely them being different species, that supposedly a result of the several millions years evolutionary divergence (Eggert-Rasner, 2002).


In any case, it is somewhat interesting because much from what is known about mammoths behavior is assumed by known/observed from the elephants. Also, it seems that both may have been common species in their particular habitat, but the post ice-age period (conditions) shows completely opposite. Not comparable with each other, since the geographic regions much differ and so did the climatic effects, but as mammoths disappeared, the current African elephants populations probably increased (and became as well very successful species in their habitat, like can be read from the following).


According to DNA-researches mammoths were found more related to Indian elephant, (Elephas maximus), but differences in between the three are relatively small. Mammoths fx were similarly slowly reproducing species (for an African elephant, as much cousin for mammoths as Indian, gestation period takes about 2 years, fx), a thing likely to increase species vulnerability. Nowadays less threatened from the two surviving elephant species, African elephant had populations counted in tens of millions still in the beginning of 19th century. Today, the numbers are around half million specimen (in the early 1970s there were still about 2 million, but as result of increased killing for ivory, the species was conserved in 1990). If one then thinks that about 500-1000 years on most geographic ranges would have been 'needed' for the final days of the mammoths (that a direct following from human caused pressure or not) the similarities in between the two start to seem almost too alarming. In fact, the elephants are actually more in process of rapid endangerment than our prehistoric example ever was. The process only seems somewhat backwards, earlier major hunt largely having reduced their populations already. There's conservation areas today but they can't cover the whole of species ranges and as well the illegal pouching still is mentioned an existing threat.


So, perhaps our effort here was a little too devoted for these most interesting prehistoric questions and distant pasts. But all the same, it of course also quite well reflects that mythical image humans have always felt connected to mammoths. As the species is among the most researched ice-age topics, one feels it also makes quite convenient selection to this series. Even though there are various other (more peculiar) surviving species in existence today (not to forget the colourful frogs, birds, etc). And probably a reader, thousand years from now, would much agree with this last paragraph (not that I would suppose anyone reading this that far, or that being likely even...)



Pic (from Lister-Bahn, 1994) ; Mammoth-engraving in the Rouffignac-cave.
----

Notes:


1. (Actually, seems that, we must have stolen that last sentence from somewhere, though I don't quite recollect from where...) But, on the other hand it can be remembered: mammoths were close relatives to elephants, animals that are not just among the most intelligent, but also known as one of the most (potentially) dangerous of them. So, on that basis the image of 'beast' can be argumented although not proven as most correct definition. Also the species huge size and proportions give some grounds for the view from humans point-of-view (not any beast of burden, anyway...)
------

Reference (literature):


Lister, A. and Bahn, P, 1994, [2007], Mammoths - the Giants of the Ice-Age.


- Much of this text actually is based on information from the book. It's the best general source, likely. The newer edition contains more up-to-date knowledge and can be viewed on Google's book search (though, I've mostly relied on the older edition, from the reason that it's equally informative). However, one interested from mammoths easily finds lots researches, (also) sometimes from different views / focused on other aspects than the ones presented in the preceding.


Eggert, L.S., Rasner, C.A., Woodruff, D.S., 2002, The evolution and phylogeography of the African elephant inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequence and nuclear microsatellite markers. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2070 Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 7 October 2002 vol. 269 no. 1504 1993-2006.
(Pdf - here) ; From Royal Society Proceedings (Biology)


Fagan, Brian, 2005, The long summer ; how climate changed civilization. NY.

Gamlin, L. and Rohan, A., 1996, Mysteries of the Rain Forest.


Kurtén, Bjorn, 1984, Mammutens rådare. (Fictional)


Mann, Charles C., 2005, 1491. New revelations of the America's before Columbus. NY.



Nogués-Bravo D, Rodríguez J, Hortal J, Batra P, Araújo MB (2008)
Climate Change, Humans, and the Extinction of the Woolly Mammoth. PLoS Biol 6(4): e79. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060079



----------
( The latest posts! - @ Mulskinner Blog @ )


----------
Powered by ScribeFire.




7/11/09

MuleSkinner Book Recommendations #19


Weird Tales

(a facsimile selection...)


(By various writers)

-Ed. And foreword by Peter Haining.


264 pages.

Carroll & Graf 1990.

- Collection orig., p. in 1976.


Recommendation 9 /2009



Following our usual custom in favoring the alteration between fiction and popular science/other cultural books, the subsequent review is a collection of horror short-stories. These, notably are more in the realm of the early horror than our more commonly presented literature form(s). And so its kind of natural expansion of our earlier pick from that field, Shelley's Frankenstein. Also to mention (if only briefly) that the legendary magazine short-stories originate from, Weird Tales (W.T.), actually served as earliest mediums for the many important 20th century science-fiction authors (included are – though not with scifi exactly – Edmund Hamilton, Ray Bradbury, Theodore Sturgeon, Fritz Leiber, fx)


Weird Tales was a pulp-magazine, which flourished in the beginning of last century and was popular reading when there yet wasn't television to compete with (and the pulp as medium lived its premium time, 'a golden era of pulp' timed about 1910s-1940(?, perhaps). Pulp was first created (to loan a definition from Peter Hainings forewords) by Frank A. Munsey, who put out a paper magazine for weekly stories with the sole criteria that “story published had to be more valuable than the paper it was printed on”. Horror and fantasy literature were part of pulp publications regular material from the earliest decades. This collection, probably one of fthe first efforts to collect W.T.'s legendary shine in single volume, appeared in 1976 (for the later collections of stories, see the end of this page). Differing from many comparative horror-pulp W.T. was always extraordinary magazine and has remained in the memory long past its times.


If the W.T. was exceptional in its own, so were many from its appreciated writers. Magazines a bit macabre imago was created intentionally to offer something for horror interested public, a feature that likely emphasized its rise and shine in the eyes of its limited buyers/readers at the time. The sales were only marginal and therefore W.T. – according to Hainings foreword – made its fame by keeping strict quality in times when the similar competing editions chose more often tasteless, violent and sexist content to present. Early editors were also able catch many yet less known writers, later to achieve more famous place in the realm of horror, scifi and/or fx that 'Sword-and-magic'-stuff. Forewords also give a pretty good picture from the variety of authors it published in and so we're mostly basing our comments here on Hainings statements.


Not surprisingly some of the best stories in anthology are from renown authors like H.P. Lovecraft (1890-1937), Ray Bradbury (b. 1920), etc., (Lovecraft was also offered a place as editor of the magazine, although he rejected the offer). But, actually I think among the best there's also several written by more or less unknown names, or, they are now less remembered. Many stories carry the characteristics of being written for the brief magazine form, but sometimes it even makes them better in some sense. Of course usually the main topics are from ghosts-, monsters and superstitious beliefs, latter often typically spiced with voodoo and other such mystification. Nevertheless, among the selected there's almost none boring or dull example from the genre.


From the famous authors each is presented with one story - actually there's one from each author presented, a choice that speaks on behalf the variety of them. Similar 'heavy-weights' to above mentioned include also Clark Ashton Smith (1893-1961); with The Garden of Adompha – text from an ancient kings garden where his wizard has spelled plants to grow...horrors. And as well one from creator of Conan, Robert E. Howard (1906-1936) - a dark voodooed early 'action-story' situated in region of southern Illinois(it has rather striking racist tones, typical for Howard and found in several of his other stories too. Other ways Black Hound of Death contains very powerful narration, Howardian tales in his best.) Book also contains a poem by Howard. From magazines other early writers there's Seabury Quinn (1889-1969), who invented detective Jules Le Grandin (amongst the most popular characters at W.T. earliest days). Quinn was also the most popular - and most prolific with his 182 tales - from the early Weird Tales writers.

From others actually the ones most interesting are by less renown writers. Most are equally as good a horror, so I'll just present a list with of some favorite texts: Frozen Beauty (Seabury Quinn); Passing of a God (Henry S. Whitehead); The Valley was still (Manly Wade Wellman) ; The Phantom Slayer (Fritz Leiber, Jr). Ooze (Anthony M. Rud). And others.


Also female writers are well presented from magazines pages - Weird Tales editor from 1940 to 1954 was Dorothy McIlwright, but in stories selected by Farnsworth Wright as well there's some by women, mainly G.G.Pendarves (with The Black Monk, very good one a story) and C.L.Moore (1911-1987). Also, from magazines famous covers most were drawn by female artist, Margaret Brundage (1900-1976), and fx Brundage is also mentioned as the only female cover artist of the Pulp era. From the McIllwright's selections we find Mary Elisabeth Counselman's (d. 1995) Shot-tower ghost, efficient but perhaps bit conventional ghost-tale. Texts from Alison V. Harding and Margaret St. Claire (d. 1995) (The Little red owl)are more psychologically oriented and better therefore I think, especially the latter.


To more underline the novelty of the magazine its editors, Farnsworth Wright mostly, published adverts for readers (from magazines famous writers texts, fx). Intentionally perhaps (It seems to me), were then circulated also rumours of the exceptinal authors, who sometimes really were more strange in their backgrounds. Fx Haining mentions that Whitehead (Henry S., 1882-1932) - who based his stories a lot for the folk-stories from West-Indian islands he had traveled - was presented with authors portrait telling; '...it being widely believed two of his personal friends being werewolves.' From the above mentioned adverts Haining notices that there is a whole variety of life presented on magazines pages. W.T. struggled financially most of its publication time, which also explains this for the most part. But there's really funny side-by-side variety in these ads; some selling included authors back catalog, but also there's adverts from forest jobs, tombstones, law study home courses, portable garage, medicine for asthma, rheumatism, etc. And in between all those advert of the Weird Tales Club, a medium to get together with other fantasy and science-fiction fans, as well as the brief notice for contact if anyone having information from Wendigo, Sasquatch, Pomola, Cadborosaurus, (etc). ...And more of the same. In addition to that this collection also contains some original b/w artworks for the stories.


Finally, like we've repeatedly said, the quality is very good concerning this is stuff written for and published in semi-popular magazine. Even if some of it feels a more conventional in style than it originally was. And I also think much of stuff being that old-fashioned, presenting perhaps less violence and bloodbaths than most later creations makes it also gain some extra points. Basically, its ghouls and more regular 'creatures from behind'. Bats from hell. Wizardry spells, but as well active detectives and 'bush doctors' in case one's interested/in need of popular mysticism of the 1920'/30's. (But, of course we don't wish to give the impression of recommending any of the cults and sorceries related to such things, but presenting these as good popular fiction – just short-stories, horror being their main subject but equally often that's been created from the terrors of the inner mind.)


...and as the other anthologies are sometimes also mentioned equally good selections, I've listed some older published collections, though not in knowing from their level of quality.

----

Other books:


Weird Tales 1-4 (collections), Ed. by Lin Carter, [Zebra books]; (p. 1980, -81, -83.) - Contains earlier unpublished stuff from new writers and selections from magazines classics, probably.

Weird Tales32 Unearthed Terrors. Ed. Stefan R. Dziemianowicz - Has a story from each year the magazine was published(1923-1954).


...Probably there's more comprehensive and newer ones also available. The Weird Tales magazine also was revived in 1988 and is still published, it even recently received the Hugo Award.


----------
( The latest posts! - @ Mulskinner Blog @ )


----------
Powered by ScribeFire.