The Frogs Have More Fun...

Flowers



"All the names I know from nurse:
Gardener's garters, Shepherd's purse,
Bachelor's buttons, Lady's smock,
And the Lady Hollyhock.

Fairy places, Fairy things,
Fairy woods where the wild bee wings,
Tiny trees for tiny dames.
- These must all be Fairy names !"

(from Child's Garden of Verses
by R.L. Stevenson)


"Anyone can write a short-story.
A bad one, I mean."

(R.L. Stevenson)
----------------

"Science without conscience is the Soul's perdition."
- Francois Rabelais, Pantagruel
- Acc to/above is citated from: Medical Apartheid. The dark history of Medical Experimentation on Black Americans from Colonial Times to the Present, by Harriet A. Washington (Doubleday ; 2006 ; p. 1.)

----------------
"In the high society of the first half of the century, marriage, despite it's bestowal status upon the wife, was the most absurdity. Marriage, conferring instanteous rank or money, ... lost most of its prestige and moment right after the wedding. ...By the end of the century, spurred by Rousseau's moralistic Nouvelle Hèloíse, a contrary cult, that of virtue, arose. After 1770 conjugal and maternal love became not merely admissible, but, for some, moral imperatives. ...

[...]
...Rousseau, who sought for himself the crown of morality in ostensibly defending marriage, presents in his Nouvelle Hèloíse the most enticing and extended defense of illicit love ever penned. The root of the problem is that as the century progressed sensibility became confused with morality: passionate feeling, if expressed in a highly civilized mode with grace and nuance, makes us forgive the Rousseau of The Confessions, for example, his pettiness, his jealousies, his betrayals. This moral-amoral byplay, present already in the novels of Richardson, was to be more intense as the century unfolded."
-
Madelyn Gutwirth : Madame De Staèl, Novelist. The emergence of the Artist as Woman (10,15.)

;
"...As the social contract seems tame in comparison with war, so fucking and sucking come to seem merely nice, and therefore unexciting. ... To be 'nice', as to be civilized, means being alienated from this savage experience - which is entirely staged. [...] The rituals of domination and enslavement being more and more practiced, the art that is more and more devoted to rendering their themes, are perhaps only a logical extension of an affluent society's tendency to turn every part of people's lives into a taste, a choice; to invite them to regard their very lives as a (life) style." - Susan Sontag , on 'Fascinating Fascism' (-74; p 103;104-5 at Under the sign of Saturn)
; "Anyone who cannot give an account to oneself of the past three thousand years remains in darkness, without experience, living from day to day." (Goethe) - as cited by Sontag (on same compile; p. 137.)

;
"It is widely accepted that we are now living in the 'Anthropocene', a new geological epoch in which the Earth's ecosystems and climate are being fundamentally altered by the activities of humans. I loathe the term, but I can't deny that it's appropriate."
; (Goulson), Silent Earth : Averting the Insect Apocalypse (2021; p 47.)
;
"It is sometimes said that humanity is at war with nature, but the word 'war' implies a two-way conflict. Our chemical onslaught on nature is more akin to genocide. It is small wonder that our wildlife is in decline."
; (Goulson, 2021 ; 118.)
;
----------------
"If we believe absurdities, we shall commit atrocities." (Voltaire)
- Citated from; (Joy, Melanie), Why We Love Dogs, Eat Pigs and Wear Cows : An Introduction to Carnism(2010; p. 95.)
;

"In the presence of the monster, you have eyes and ears for nothing else."
; (Flora Tristan) : London Journal of Flora Tristan: the Aristocracy and the Working Class of England ; 1842-edit. (tr: 1982. ; p. 71.)

;
"Every minority invokes justice, and justice is liberty.
A party can be judged of only by the doctrine which
it professes when it is the strongest."
Mdme de Staêl
(on) 'Consideration sur le Révolution de la Francaise' [1818]


Showing posts with label sustainable production. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sustainable production. Show all posts

8/28/11

The New Power Generation...

; Mulskinner Hi-Tec Review XV ; [ V / 2011 ] :

 Re-chargeable Batteries 
[Gp 2500 & Moixa USBCell 1300 Ni-MH]

It's probably true that every new invention brings along both benefits and (some) negative consequences, even if for the latter usually is given less thought. (Always is also not too clear how those two balance). Of course, any new invention tends at begins be loaded with positive expectations, assumed soon to replace any former technology, etc.


According my memoirs, 'break-through' of the rechargeable batteries - them been adopted in common use - took place about some 10 years ago, mostly within the new 'computech era' and the increase on amounts of hi-tech electronic bought for homes by people. (At least here on MSW; Perhaps the re-chargeables, like inventions sometime do, were taken at someplaces more commonly used even prior the early 2000s.)


The advantages from rechargeable batteries are very obvious: You can reload them innumerable times (producers seem promise about 1000 cycles, but in practice the figure is perhaps more often counted in hundreds... either way, for consumer that anycase appears lot cheaper in the long-run than buying new case of batteries each time). Also, the environmental aspect is indeed significant, the extra waste from batteries is minimized considerably

So ...inspired by the emerging new hi-tech world and the countless adverts from big savings (for me and the Natures) I bought those rechargeables and charger for them around that time. Later, having noticed that there also was batteries reloadable via USB-port (or, if wish to use the charger that goes too, USB-charging is little slower, but permits leaving charger at home when on the move). So I bought some those too. And - I cannot avoid mentioning - that the decision was by no means based on coincidence that the earlier bought some (those reloadable only by charger) happened to resign their contract a lot before than the assumed (about) 100s rechargings. (...After all, that felt so usual in this MSW-world - where nothing ever was been allowed as unproblematic as it in the normal circumstances would - And so I was merely surprised that them weren't been completely forbidden from us because of his Ungracefullness unmercyfull demand...)


...However, it's of course quite as well recognizable that not before the emerging appearance of power-consuming products and devices, Ie before the early 2000s (about), this kind of batteries weren't very popularly at any wider uses. But then there started to appear devices like digicams, game-consoles controllers, etc., ...to name a few.  There had been some re-chargeable batteries on market already prior that, although probably lot less commonly, (and them also were still less durable and less practical earlier.) As often the case, new inventions gain wider acceptance only when they meet the actual need from majority of consumers. Or something like that,  main point at this is that anyone from this can clearly notice a certain similarity on the typical manner on human made inventions and their relation for the environmental questions. (Often) new  inventions - no matter if there's any technical burdens needed solved prior their breakthrough or not - only gain acceptance on markets (and of the consumers) when their shown beneficial for the people, or when the people notice having some use of them by themselves. That's of course quite obvious - would be rather contradictional sell people new devices and advertise them consuming less energies and at the same time to advice people not to use them because of general increases on energy consumption. However, the fact is, that the rechargeable batteries (an environmentally recommendable alternative) probably wouldn't yet still be so commonly acquired and found of uses by peoples unless there weren't nowadays increased amount of techs and devices having use for those.


Whether that's just a part of the truth on this is naturally question open for argumentation; ...But quite much the human energy uses follow similar problematics, and in any case them are tied to a question from how it is hoped most effectively reducing the actual energy-consumption. If one just seeks to find some compensations to the projected increases on energies used (and, to the uses of Natural resources) that not showing any actual answer(s) for the original problem
(Or, so I see that, the comparison in this case maybe is little 'far fetched', or it's not too relevant a case example on this; Re-chargeable batteries are of course more recommendable alternative to non-rechargeable some, simply from reason of reduced waste generated from used batteries.)   (W-G.)


-------
( The latest posts! - @ Mulskinner Blog @ )


----------
Powered by ScribeFire.

5/4/11

My wild bicycle...

; Mulskinner Hi-Tec Review XIV ; [ IV / 2011 ] : Bicycle
  
Biking is (probably) the cleanest man-made invention to movement from since a few past century's history of time.  In the same breadth it can be praised also a healthy and refreshing method for movement (It's also good for the body and mind...at least as long as you don't, from bad luck, happen drive off-side, or the bad weather doesn't appear as particularly troublesome, say...). 
  
Biking also is popular, so one doesn't have to say much more words from it's other good characteristics. The usual preferred alternative (driving cars) of course is so obviously known from it's harmfullness to the environment (Not to mention that it's generally lot more expensive a habit, and will only become more so in the expextable future, no matter from which view you look at that). Walking, on the other hand, is often recommendable but not practical on every imaginable circumstances, fx when you have some stuff to carry along. 

This view-point only becomes more understandable when you think about all that trouble (at any city) when by car ...searching for that parking place, paying for that parking, paying road-taxes [in case there's such], all those bad smelling gases, and all the trouble of driving at a typical street traffic [in Italy that's particularly awful...]). With bike - no such troubles at all, or at least lot less of that.

Bicycle has also changed lot since the earliest around 1870s; 'Whippet' by Lindley & Brigss from 1885. Looks pretty modern..
In fact, it's also quite truly so that those few places in the world where there's (widely) populated regions that still lack the modern roads (carways, or highways), would make a greatest service for both environment and the people from not building some. Or at least for to wait until any better inventions (fuels) for movement would see the day. Roads are usually considered as a ticket to modernization of the country-sides and places, but it's possible to think about the turnsides of that as well. The typical sightings of the animal corpses (of mammals, birds, reptiles as well as the insect), usual view on the roadsides, are not the only aspect that we notice on this. Roads also, more or less, permit peoples increased movement and within increased traffic they usually bring as well  pollution along other typical stresses for the ecology. Where ecology is stressed people usually also get more stressed. 


And, if observed from the life-style or cultural view-points, cars are just as boring as the adverts and sales magazines made to sell them. A common joke, but usually the sole messages they seem say goes like: 'We actually think you stupid enough think that spending such sum of money and changin for this years model would make any big difference (at your own life).' Or, from the ecological view-point; 'Now we're even agreed to make these things a little less pollutive and you should believe it's all for the better of natures and you as well...'
(...Of course, it can very well also be said that I'm probably privileged of saying all this just from the reason that I own and drive a car as well.)

...Cars have changed too. This futuristic "auto" dates back for 1899. Supposedly it was even on real manufacture.(?)


One can't necessary go anyplace or any distances on bike. But (at least on summers),  there's always a good possibility of choosing when to use some. So, as I have only a few kilometres to shops, I nowadays prefer just to take the bike (it's actually even funnier to pack foodstuffs at it's baskets than on a car). On a travel to and from shops one can then enjoy the benefits of that (the landscape, sunshine, flowers, chance of having some exercise, the fresh air, etc, etc.) And not that much waiting on traffic lights, none from the stress that always accompanies driving the gasoline-hungry monster, and even not having to bear behaviours of the equally stressed co-drivers (of cars)... In the ideal world...there would be no cars, only bicycles. (G.U.J.)


--

( The latest posts! - @ Mulskinner Blog @ )


----------
Powered by ScribeFire.



1/3/11

That important further step on recyclement practices...


; Mulskinner Hi-Tec Review X ; [ I / 2011 ]

Tree and (and the leaf) favored logos on environmental prods...


Recycled Print Paper [ Xerox ; A4/80g/500 ]
(for Lasers, Copier and Inkjets)




While the paperless office has been advertised and trumpeted for some time, I find it still highly questionable if any modern society would do effectively without use of paper (on prints and copies, ao). I'm not sure either whether the mentioned, lot advertised solutions actually make any significant saves on the excess uses from energies, wasted time, or, even what comes for the work-hours (...etc, but perhaps the useless printing may have somewhat declined nowadays. And maybe there's also some benefits gained from better movability of  the machinery and programs, fx...) But, as I'm not in any position to make estimates on that, here's now a few words on printing papers, makes a best use from recycled waste papers and pulp fibers (it said).


This recycled paper seems advertised (at least on manufacturer's informations) made 100 per cent from the post consumer waste. Additionally, as well a significant benefit for the environment is that it's not bleached. Noticeable aspect, as the paper manufacture's singularly is one large stressing factor on waters quality (for the worse,  in form on uses of chemicals. Chlorine, ao, used on bleaching of paper pulp is some of the most often said such pollutant.) Papers production causes lots environmental harm, even if the effects are not always directly recognized and even if the industrial methods maybe(?) have advanced  on that until our times. 
 

...Package-txt shows inkjet prints just 1 star, however...
So, inspired from this recycling solution, we therefore picked a wrapping of these (print )papers from local shops and after some brief but intensive testing period on consumer uses, product seems to redeem  it's promised words (ao, good quality). Printing on laser gives satisfactory results on both normal and scaled size (Color graphics I've not tried printing since I had no device around) – as good as prints on 'regular' whitened paper. On prints made with inkjet there's no difference either (tried with normal and quick print). Of the graphics, it's noticeable that results with inkjet as well appears as good (by quality), only noticeable difference being that the photo on whitened paper maybe seems slightly 'shinier'. Little surprisingly, when trying photo-copies with laser printer, results weren't on just quite the same level. (But not far from, and generally still satisfactory, the final result might also depend on the printer used... Any professional copier machine to test with I have not.) So, on the printing uses there seems be no actual difference on quality.

Therefore, feels like very recommendable solution for the everyday household prints, etc. 

Any office probably generates a lot more (ie several times greater) amounts of paper waste than my home printing uses, but as number of singular households causes also quite an amount, it's just better if the source materials originated from recycled paper than straight from cut forests - and also so, for I find myself quite regularly printing these texts for the paper too... 
There's of course sustainable labeling systems for papers used on products nowadays, and a reader likely has encountered books carrying that FSC-labeling on first pages. However, from recycling practices (on home uses too) this is at least equally important ecological step; At the words from co-information seems say that a ton of paper produced from recycled materials saves about 2-3 times the amount paper pulp that otherways would be needed taken from forests use. As I kind of remember having read similar figures from elsewhere too, there seems enough logical reasons start using these Recycled papers more commonly (Actually, there seems also be other solutions with similar ecological benefits for the manufacture of papers, but let's leave them for mention on this...)


Obviously these also have been around on sales for some time now and maybe also from  competive makers...but surprisingly I've not much seen them on sales elsewhere on MSW. And as the consumer usually selects from what's available, haven't even particularly looked for some. (There's also papers with FSC-certificates, manufactured at least partly from the recycled woods or fiber, labeled orginate as Mixed sources.) As many small steps often together generate a greater impact (on ecological  aspects too), it would feel good if these would gain grounds on sales and appear more widely accepted by consumers. To some very high quality prints, or publications from a limited pressing I might still use whitened paper, but, fx for the draft prints, letters, archive copies, for any regular use, recycled paper is perfectly good choice. With significantly reduced environmental effect. (G.U.J.)


-------
( The latest posts! - @ Mulskinner Blog @ )


----------
Powered by ScribeFire.

10/10/08

Fair- and Eco-labels



As any vigilant observer might easily have noticed, our Sustainable Production Abbreviative Directory contains a lot rather complex terms. In spite of its usefulness, in many ways, most of those terms are quite rarely needed in everyday shopping. So, we decided to give some space for most common eco-labels too, or, shall we say: some regular labels of fair/sustainable production a common consumer most often (and easily) can recognize at markets.

So here's a few generally renown labels (pics have our own short informative side-by texts within). Most of these are used for provisions labelling (and more or less available even here at Muleskinner World), but we've added some other fields of production too. Also there exists spesified labelling fx for organically manufactured and chemicals free textiles.



Fair Trade Label; Maintained by The International Fair Trade Association (IFAT), the FTO Mark identifies the stuffs produced by fair trade organizations worldwide. The production is monitored to fullfill certain criteria. Briefly, the label guarantees that the products producers in developing countries receive fair share of trade, but also that working conditions are foreseen to meet the standards (as well as wages), no child labor used and the production is carried out environmental friendly. Certification itself is done by an independent international certification company. FLO-CERT GMBH is responsible for the inspection and certification of producer organisations and traders against the Fairtrade Standards.

Over 150 organizations are registered as Fairtrade Certified Producers. This is propably the most well-known eco/fairshare label. The label in picture has been in use since 2004, products are often also recognizable for a characteristic packing too. FLO-homepage. FLO-CERT Gmbh.


Rainforest Alliance Certified; Easily recognizable for the frog. Originally US-based, Rainforest Alliance is a non-governmental organization, aiming (ao) to conserve biodiversity and ensure sustainable livelihoods by transforming land-use practices, business practices and consumer behavior. Based on 1987, the Rainforest Alliance launched a worlds first sustainable forestry certification program in 1989. It also participated in creation of Forest Stewardship Council (FSC), a non-profit organization that promotes responsible forest management worldwide.

RA-label, similarly as FTO, is meant to improve sustainable production and responsibly produced goods in developing countries. RA works both with small and larger companies worldwide. However, according to our understanding, the production is not as stricktly organically carried as compared to Fair Trade Association standards. On the other hand, the Rainforest Alliance also has other programs to see that the ecological needs are considered, like their sustainable forestry program, and also similar projects for more ecological agriculture and tourism exist. Rainforest Alliance-homepage.

MSC ecolabel; Principally a global environmental standard for sustainable and well-managed fishing. It is maintained by independent non-profit organization Marine Stewardship Council. The blue MSC ecolabel in fish packaging, should guarantee that the fishery operates in an environmentally responsible way and doesn't increase the global environmental problem of overfishing. Basically, the mark also should indicate that the supply chain from fishing boat to point of sale ensures that seafood sold bearing the ecolabel originated from an MSC certified fishery. Greenpeace has sometimes criticized MSC-labelling for too low standards, but anyway its propably the most renown eco-fishery mark.

The MSC was founded in 1997 by the World Wide Fund for Nature and Unilever, but has since become fully independent. Marine Stewardship Council-webpage.



ROHS label; Mostly used in computer and high-tech products (these standards apply to household electronics and lightning equipments too, fx), ROHS is a marking to indicate that the device/product in question meets the standards for removal of hazardous chemicals from production. European Union directives (RoHS) for this labeling doesn't generally guarantee that the product would necessary be environmentally otherways "better". Fx, as energy-efficiency concerned, there's different standards like Energy Star program.

ROHS principally guarantees that the product which falls into category, doesn't contain most poisonous toxics (= they are substituted for safer alternatives.) Until 2007 ROHS free products should have became more standard than exception, but so far we quite rarely see that marking (here at MSW, at least). So, we are not aware if these criterias are actually achieved, in reality. As the EU directives concerned, most recent information can be found from this British information site (among other places). Greenpeace publishes around every quarter a year The Green Electronics Survey (it is available as Pdf to download), which gives much of an up-to-date knowledge from current situation in greener electronics (and ICT).


There also seems to be some variety in ROHS-labels, the text is sometimes differently printed, color differs, etc. We've chosen this one as its propably close to the official one (if there is some).






On eco-textiles labelling there may be different kind of labels in use, and in fact, one can check for more information also on other labels mentioned on Ecologist web-magazine. So we just list some most common in use here and include some basic information. You can read more on them elsewhere if wish so.

The Institute for Marketecology (IMO) is one general instance most renown among the certification of eco-friendly and organically produced goods, especially textiles. They have the GOTS(Global Organic Textile Standard - No pic here, you can check the IMO-site for more details) -certification to ensure textils organic origin, that fx should guarantee the product to be free from usage of chemicals. They also announce standard for organic textiles to cover the production, processing, manufacturing, packaging, labelling, exportation, importation and distribution of all natural fibres (in the final product). It has two sub-labelling: 1) 95 per cent from fibres originate to certified organics (remaining 5 may be synthetic etc. needed in manufacturing process), 2) 70 to 95 per cent originate from certified organics, remaining 30 may be non-organic in origin.

From the more locally used labels The European Eco-Label (flower) is in use on most non-food products (including textiles). It takes on consideration a wide variety of topics in the products whole life-cycle and is therefore quite reliable sign of 'greener product'. Different countries may have their own national markings, like German Blaue Angel and Nordic Swan included below. Also, pictured below, the oeko-tex standard label. Typically, it guarantees that the products manufacturing is free from use of human harmful chemicals, but not that its supply chain would be in any manner free from deprivation economics(= may be produced in sweat shops, fx).







...And for an additional information here's (below) also the FSC (Forest Stewardship Council) label, propably best guarantee (in many cases) from the products safety for worlds forests. Also, as the pic is from partly recycled paper-origin, here's presented also the 3R-logo, often included in packaging when materials used originate from different sources. There's basically (in papers) two more specific markings under tree-logo; Recycled, when its made completely from used materials. Another (Mixed Sources) must contain at least 70 per cent of material from recycled paper of FSC-certified forestry (no guarantee from the origins of the remaining 30 per cent, it seems likely...)









Subsequently, here some links to organic food producers; (Label left, is of british organic foods labeling, there's several around, in some countries more than one, and some companies may sometimes also have their own, so this one here just as an example...)

UrteKram -
Danish well-known organic food supplier (other products as well)

Clipper - Teas (they also have organic teas...other products as well)

Biona/
Windmill Organics
- Seems to have also some (Fairtrade) products under the BioFair-label

Green and Blacks - Another british comp. (they've got fx fair trade cocoa and various forms of chocolate available, also receipts in their pages...)


8/10/08

MuleSkinner Book Recommendations No 3

The Eco-Products Directory 2008
; For sustainable production and consumption (2008)

The Directory published by Asian Productivity Organization comes with paper version and Pdf. According to their website the pdf version (available anywhere, but most originally from their site of course, check under Resources ; e-books on green productivity) is said to contain a selection of more than 700 products and services, so the list seems but overwhelming and respectable.
We are not in knownledge if other such a directories exist, but a quick look on this one shows that it well deserves a place here on our recommendations. Of course, our reviews are based on pdf version.


The directory is propably most valuable for small scale entrepreneurs, though vast list of eco-products (fx from materials and spare parts onto the refrigetors and air-cooling systems) makes it useful for any corporative buyer. Nevertheless, the directory is wellworth getting to know for common consumer also. As the Directory is of Asian origin, so are most of the products listed. So one naturally first notices that certain ecologically renowned producers like Hitachi and Toshiba also participating in editioning the catalogue are well represented in the list of products. Also, if one keeps in mind the area included (everything ”eco-saving”) the vastness of directory becomes merely a matter of taste. In fact considering that there are multitudes of uses and varieties of human generated products the catalogue seems actually quite modest.


The Pdf-version contains 393 page including prewords on climate change and the background of catalogue + the database & indexes(few pages for advertisements not included). As an funny example we can mention that theres as many (three pieces) of eco-friendly rice-boilers as vacuum cleaners. On products on sale at European market we can at least mention the Megaman lamps, advertised (by the company) as worlds first completely ROHS-free energy-saving lamps. Recommendable for everyone (see picture below:)



From practically limitless list of products we also like to give some attention for the auto-insurance system where each contract made benefits the nature by plantation of two trees (thats a good start, why not make it four...).


In catalogue foreword, first of all, theres some pretext on climate change and necessary actions taken by producers on the Asian area. The catalogue itself comprises of Datasheets for each product in it. Each is given continuous ID-number, along within the product in question is linked (by colours)to the category it fits: (eco-) materials, components, products, services. ID-numbers are further divided into subentries, so: ES-4-032 would be: Eco-services -- Management -- related services -- (spesific) single product ; (as usual, a picture here would be more telling than words can come up to...but see for yourself its quite easy to use.) Although, as an electronic catalogue theres limitless amount of space available but books index is managed according to different manufacturers. Therefore, searching products of certain kind is not quite as easy as it could. Better products-index would be of use for both private and company reader, especially if (when) the catalogue in time goes on enlargening.


Continuing, each datasheet contains an icon showing the category of ecologiness and/or certain topics its econess is connected (by which, how, when/where as described in catalogue). On each sheet theres also circular line, showing points in its "life-cycle" (only two points marked on each product considered) concerning when/where products econess fits (scale used: resources - materials - design - production - use/repair - end-of-life). The rest of the of the fields included in each datasheet are textual fields containing information from products econess in details, manufacturers contact information, sales territory (availability: worldwide/ certain areas). Extra details comprise of product-photo and the brief specific description of it (fx. the product model special number) or the short explanation of the precentages/comparisons/charts presented in pictorial tablatures from the products uses.


Conclusively, most apparent interest for consumer reader is naturally the eco-products section. The criteria for selections is based on choices for products that ”help clean and conserve the environment” and ”products with high performance, yet creating a low enviromental effect”. Socalled ”eco-design” is noted in products and the main points taken in consideration are: effective and efficient use of materials, energy saving and toxics. Because the characteristics of eco-products are mostly decided during design stage, more concern is given to that. Increasing in knownledge of environmental labels is hoped to develop an low environmental impact-society (so that manufacturers in response to consumer demand make further efforts in environmental development). Noteworthy goals, and important to notice the range of products included is quite wide: there´s all kinds of stuff from food to hybrid toilets, from natural gas fuelled busses to clothing and furniture. Not everything is available, however, but in time...:)...As last few (additional) remarks we can also just note that perhaps an additional catalogue with a selected list for consumer customers would be useful.