; Mulskinner Hi-Tec Review X ; [ I / 2011 ]
Tree and (and the leaf) favored logos on environmental prods... |
Recycled Print Paper [ Xerox ; A4/80g/500 ]
(for Lasers, Copier and Inkjets)
While the paperless office has been advertised and trumpeted for some time, I find it still highly questionable if any modern society would do effectively without use of paper (on prints and copies, ao). I'm not sure either whether the mentioned, lot advertised solutions actually make any significant saves on the excess uses from energies, wasted time, or, even what comes for the work-hours (...etc, but perhaps the useless printing may have somewhat declined nowadays. And maybe there's also some benefits gained from better movability of the machinery and programs, fx...) But, as I'm not in any position to make estimates on that, here's now a few words on printing papers, makes a best use from recycled waste papers and pulp fibers (it said).
This recycled paper seems advertised (at least on manufacturer's informations) made 100 per cent from the post consumer waste. Additionally, as well a significant benefit for the environment is that it's not bleached. Noticeable aspect, as the paper manufacture's singularly is one large stressing factor on waters quality (for the worse, in form on uses of chemicals. Chlorine, ao, used on bleaching of paper pulp is some of the most often said such pollutant.) Papers production causes lots environmental harm, even if the effects are not always directly recognized and even if the industrial methods maybe(?) have advanced on that until our times.
...Package-txt shows inkjet prints just 1 star, however... |
So, inspired from this recycling solution, we therefore picked a wrapping of these (print )papers from local shops and after some brief but intensive testing period on consumer uses, product seems to redeem it's promised words (ao, good quality). Printing on laser gives satisfactory results on both normal and scaled size (Color graphics I've not tried printing since I had no device around) – as good as prints on 'regular' whitened paper. On prints made with inkjet there's no difference either (tried with normal and quick print). Of the graphics, it's noticeable that results with inkjet as well appears as good (by quality), only noticeable difference being that the photo on whitened paper maybe seems slightly 'shinier'. Little surprisingly, when trying photo-copies with laser printer, results weren't on just quite the same level. (But not far from, and generally still satisfactory, the final result might also depend on the printer used... Any professional copier machine to test with I have not.) So, on the printing uses there seems be no actual difference on quality.
Therefore, feels like very recommendable solution for the everyday household prints, etc.
Any office probably generates a lot more (ie several times greater) amounts of paper waste than my home printing uses, but as number of singular households causes also quite an amount, it's just better if the source materials originated from recycled paper than straight from cut forests - and also so, for I find myself quite regularly printing these texts for the paper too...
There's of course sustainable labeling systems for papers used on products nowadays, and a reader likely has encountered books carrying that FSC-labeling on first pages. However, from recycling practices (on home uses too) this is at least equally important ecological step; At the words from co-information seems say that a ton of paper produced from recycled materials saves about 2-3 times the amount paper pulp that otherways would be needed taken from forests use. As I kind of remember having read similar figures from elsewhere too, there seems enough logical reasons start using these Recycled papers more commonly (Actually, there seems also be other solutions with similar ecological benefits for the manufacture of papers, but let's leave them for mention on this...)
Any office probably generates a lot more (ie several times greater) amounts of paper waste than my home printing uses, but as number of singular households causes also quite an amount, it's just better if the source materials originated from recycled paper than straight from cut forests - and also so, for I find myself quite regularly printing these texts for the paper too...
There's of course sustainable labeling systems for papers used on products nowadays, and a reader likely has encountered books carrying that FSC-labeling on first pages. However, from recycling practices (on home uses too) this is at least equally important ecological step; At the words from co-information seems say that a ton of paper produced from recycled materials saves about 2-3 times the amount paper pulp that otherways would be needed taken from forests use. As I kind of remember having read similar figures from elsewhere too, there seems enough logical reasons start using these Recycled papers more commonly (Actually, there seems also be other solutions with similar ecological benefits for the manufacture of papers, but let's leave them for mention on this...)
Obviously these also have been around on sales for some time now and maybe also from competive makers...but surprisingly I've not much seen them on sales elsewhere on MSW. And as the consumer usually selects from what's available, haven't even particularly looked for some. (There's also papers with FSC-certificates, manufactured at least partly from the recycled woods or fiber, labeled orginate as Mixed sources.) As many small steps often together generate a greater impact (on ecological aspects too), it would feel good if these would gain grounds on sales and appear more widely accepted by consumers. To some very high quality prints, or publications from a limited pressing I might still use whitened paper, but, fx for the draft prints, letters, archive copies, for any regular use, recycled paper is perfectly good choice. With significantly reduced environmental effect. (G.U.J.)
-------
----------
Powered by ScribeFire.
No comments:
Post a Comment