; The 'emblem'-pic this time, I selected not from that I'd consider ginger esp. usable to anything, or that I'd wished advert it here. (But the Tea did provide some help for my soared throat, so maybe has it's good qualities).
”It has indeed cost no a little trouble to make ourselves as wretched as we are. When we consider, on the one hand, the immense labours of mankind, the many sciences brought to perfection, the arts invented, the powers employed, the deeps filled up, the mountains levelled, the rocks shattered, the rivers made navigable, the tracts of land cleared, the lakes emptied, the marshes drained, the enormous structures erected on land, and the teeming vessels that cover the sea; and on the other hand, estimate with ever so little thought, the real advantages that have accrued from all these works to mankind, we cannot help being amazed at the vast disproportion there is between these things, and deploring the infatuation of man, which, to gratify his silly pride and vain self-admiration, induces him eagerly to pursue all the miseries he is capable of feeling, though beneficient nature had kindly placed them out of his way.” ... from (Jean-Jacques) Rousseau's Discourse on Inequality (1754)
; Here further brief words on Rousseau (see of the previous post, book recom. No 39), just due because it's indeed remarkable how much ahead from his own times the man seems been. And not meaning that I'd discover all the Rousseauisms so admirable, or anything. But, in contrary to the usual appreciation and praise ('the great man', 'natural genius'), and all the else mostly meaningless post mortem stuff...I've actually found that his words on simple things have most to say, equally as much to the modern reader. (; Funny, but some quite renown bio from JJcQ, having appeared around the 1990s, seems then carry as it's name The Restless Genius. Not that I'd had read the book, though.).
;
Obviously,
these few lovely natural
flowers accompanying the post don't bear any relation to the
'Baudelairean
gloom and decline'
(...of
the late 19th
centurys). No, they're here only from respect for that 'great Rousseaun invention', the appreciation of an unaltered
nature (As I find that)
;...However, our first little 'decorative' here is the (common)
Columbine
(Aquilegia vulgaris),
which not actually appears native plant at Fennoscandias. In spite of that, seems it
written that the aquilegias
natural range reaches almost for the eastern regions of the Finland.
So actually fewsome of the species are supposed maybe native
by origin, or at least having arrived/spread early along w. arrived inhabitants. (Noticeably, the flower of the pic is from the naturalized
variety, since there are white blossoms too. Natural specimens
all bear blue as the color. On pic it also looks slight too
dark, in the natures were closer for clear blue.) Poisonic, but
has the most lovelieth blossoms. And, also there's of course numerous garden varieties from the Aquileas.
Yet,
seems to me also, that on much from later historical writing, large
part from what was central at Rousseaus thinking, so revolutionary and new, often was been intentionally tried nullify or
disprove - Esp. the views concerning the society, or what he was saying from it. First brings for the mind the Great
revolution of the late
1700ies (and its 'great failures', ever since discussed and argumented from reason to). ...But I think
I also paid some attention for (smtgh) similar having taken place in the
general discussion, afterwards the 1830s, or the 1848-revolutionary movements. At
least it seems been typical on 'late imperialistic'-era of the 1890s (or about), perhaps was even common. (So if one thinks of the
misunderstandings or the overflowing appraisal of that ideal 'Rousseuan
savage', from that 1750s essay, the views later formulated by himself or by the others, it's at least
noticeable that the targeted underrating has been equally
common. But all from that here only very superficially examined, I eagerly admit...)
However, lines quoted above (and the whole Discourse actually),
relates it's main theme from the JJcQ's assertations against Hobbes's
(Thomas, 1588-1679) theories about the man and society. I don't mean
to say anything from that, as I already mentioned that the text (of
Rousseaus) is often described served for some origins to the ideas
later developed on his Social Contract. But, acc. my finding, it's
indeed remarkable how
modern thinkin' this
particular paragraph seems reflect. How obvious and reasonable (that
is), how simply and understandably it says the essential of it ! (Of
course, here separate from the actual context, or from it's original
chain-of-thought.) (W-G.)
;
Another usual but casual species, is a flower loving light
and sunshine; Field
Scabious (Knautia
arvensis). In the past it was a
most typical decorative of the suitable fields (...like it's name also says) – During the times
when the good old flowering meadows
were more common and the modern effectivity agriculture not yet so
overwhelming. Nowadays it's most usual at the shiny, warmer
roadsides, acc. my noticing. Flowers around the late mid-summer.
(Also, it's one of the few plants from the Dipsocaceae-family here.
Majority from those also seem said more numerous in the warmer
Mediterranean climate.). During that time there's usually various
very different-looking blooms, even on a singular plant,
for that depends from which part of the flowering cycle any
particular flower appears be on. Most various insects also love the
plant.
-------------
; Our singular 'pick' from the water-plants here appears Amphibious
bistort (Polygonum amphibium). Also has actually very
enchanting bloom, although one doesn't too often pay attention to
those as they're rather small, not so recognizable than fx the Water
lilies. ; Name of the plant is due because can also
grow on sandy shores, that are only temporary covered by water. Seems on places considered to a harm of some sort – for it grows at
many types of water and quikly can overpopulate, the small leafs filling
fx canals and gaining ground from other water plants. Yet, in
the past it also had some herbal uses, even.
...A
few specifications about our uses from the punctation marks
(...et sim, briefly).
;
In case we've here quoted anything, that – almost w. no
exceptions – appears placed in the apostrophes (I-O-W,
between quotation marks, Ie: ”...”). Just like the
usual custom on most written text. I write no fiction here, so if
there's any dialogue presented w. the apostrophes it's only random
case. Frankly, if (anything) appears quoted directly, word by
word, it should be in the quotation marks. In the quotes - like also usual custom - the few dots (...) mark that I've omitted some sentences/paragraphs in btw as not so important concerning what meant (on that).
;
However, if chosen to use some phrases or otherways emphasized
a term (or perhaps even stolen some words/few words - just like that,
it's very usual and common), from any place, it's then presented in
btw singular apostrophes (Ie: '…', like fx that
'Rousseaun savage' in the text). ...Possibly I've cultivated
those singular apostrophes so often that there's no danger of
confusing these to any direct-loan (the actual quotes priorly
described) ...mostly, there might be an occasional cases from the
slight alternate manner.
;
...Some other frequently used punctation marks are: brackets,
(Ie, the: [ ] ) - mostly placed in the paragraphs where I've added
(smtgh) in btw sentences that already are on parenthesis. (Not
very recommendable manner, I should admit...but what can I do,
there's often a things one likes to specify...). Alternatively, some
cases used when the regular parentheses don't feel practicable. ;
...Then, there's often these sentences separated w. the use of syllables,
(Ie, the: - ). Last mentioned, I suppose mostly are used in the same
manner as the above mentioned (parenthesis and brackets). ; ...And, as you might
notice from this paragraph, I've recently begun using (quite much) of
the semi-colon (Ie, the: ; ) at begins from the topics/paragraphs, or
in the middle if there's discussed about slight separate aspects,
topics, whatsoever. It's also not very recommendable manner
on writing, but I actually noticed Stevenson – on those essays of
his, ao – cultivating the manner much. Using cautiously that appears
quite practical - but like one can also learn from his uses, one
don't necessarily need to stick for any rules when writing; 'The obedience marks the path for boredom' (like is the case also about various other things). The semi-colon has
some benefits and downsides...but let this suffice about it. ; Of
course also used occasionally the 'semi-paracolon'
[Ie: :) ] - but those having universal meanings I don't care to
explain them more esp. (Besides I've not used them very often.)
;
From the other terms and
manners of expression,
I suppose the italics,
bold,
and underlinings
are quite self-evident by themselves. Likewise from the ...'s
; ?'s
; !'s
; etc's
;
et sim's ; vice
versa's ; ao's
; b-t-w's
; I-O-W's
; w.'s
; occasional sentences/words/sophisticated terms on some alternative
languages (mostly french,
I suppose) ...And other similar 'terms'
– Mostly;
'Our intentions w. this have not been from to move any mountains, but
for to enrich and
elucidate our
art-of-words cultivated.'
; ...And
then we've even got here some Pansyes
(Viola tricolor).
Possibly, it perhaps could've been left unmentioned of me hating all
the cultivated varieties from Pansies
(...without exceptions, in practice, etc., soforth...). ...But, let me specify: I know
them to be quite favored as the garden/ household plants, I just
can't figure for any reason to that. Honestly, I really don't
understand why someone by origin ever must have gone breeding those
many popular varieties of the Pansy ? (To me their larger flowers only look boring
and like having lost of smtgh...Yet, I fx can well sympathize number
other usual cross-bred creations among garden flowers.) ; Anyway,
it's a completely different case from the Wild pansies -
what the Nature does, it
always does well – and
the common viola probably most eye-catching from the species. (Albeit some spec. less
common are perhaps more exciting from outer looks – Pansies also contain
rare and scarce species, some even are counted for the threatened.)
------------
; And, a 'late addit': Cowberry
(Vaccacium vitis-idae). ...This also was originally meant to appear here, but I hadn't the pic around when the post was written. Represented not because of it's renown berries (They're indeed very healthysome and it's leafs
also were commonly used to make some kind herbal-tea, in the old folk tradition, etc.) - here mainly and only because it having so lovely flowers..for the flowering times around mid of the summer, apparently, so it often easily tends pass by without payin' much noticement (at least from me, I've noticed). Anyway, I say not much
else, since it's quite a common species. Is perhaps most usual at the (slight) wetter places, but also dry 'semi-open spots' on the typical northern heath forest. Cowberry needs quite much light, otherways seems it appear not very demanding.
------------
( The latest posts! - @ Mulskinner Blog @ )
----------
Powered by ScribeFire.