: MuleSkinner Book Recommends # 32½
(Familiar Studies of Men and Books
by Robert Louis Stevenson, 1882)
[Recommendation I / 2012]
"...And the meek will inherit."
(Holy Bible)
...On some paragraphs at Walden (1845), Thoreau (Henry David, 1817-62) - for whom we've referred quite often recently – writes (smtgh like) that if humans really wished to live in balance with the Nature, forests would begin right out from our own backyards or from gardens of the houses. I've rarely read an opinion truer, or say, a better expressed view about man's relationship for his adjacent environments. Of course, most people in this modern World of our times, hardly can even consider anything like that. I mean, now over some 160 years later, with much different landscapes and world's population count on current levels. Also, in practice it would turn from quite some drawbacks, not the least that living that close for the wild natures enforces one to tolerate it's disadvantages too; Fx, one can think of roots and stems of the plants at garden, eaten by the animal 'harvesters', or threats brought by predative species (at least endangering for dogs of the household, say.) ...But, very apparently the words on that book were at context which is meant interpereted in the symbolical sense.
Actually, I've lately come to think about these things quite much (About the 19th century views about Nature, mostly). So, I find, it must be no coincidence – as I've also come to think, there ain't no coincidences in this World ...That Stevenson (RLS, recently presented on our recommends) happens have written an essay about Thoreau. Originally the text seems written during Stevenson's journey/stay at New Mexico/US, but it was also published on the Familiar Studies of Men and Books, some 'early essays' collected by Stevenson himself at 1882. (Indeed quite a coincidende – unless we should assume this for some fallacy by his Majesty's making. Unlikely, but not that unforeseen possibility in the light of our experiences about this MSW-world... :)
Making the (said) coincidence even more hilarious - or humorous, should we say– appears that Stevenson mostly 'condems' and criticizes Thoreau and his opinions on that essay.
How could it be? These great 19th century critics' of the Bourgeiose morales and them should appear hold such "disagreement" to each other ? (...The "disagreement" on paraphrases, of course, considering that it is only the Stevenson's appraises or opinions from the other we have here. Thoreau had been dead by some 20 years earlier). It appears that the essay is mainly written on basis of reading most renown writings from Thoreau, which he (RLS) also mentions on the forewords for this essay-compilation. (I've only read Walden, so my excuses if I manage to miss some important aspects at this brief commentary.)
Stevenson's words are indeed, not only quite harsh, theyre often filled with negative expressions; Thoreau is termed fx for a "skulker", and "prig"...And to make his opinions even more clear, at the end of essay that "eccentric and independent mind" is also described "part gymnosophist, part backwoodsman" - All the expressions by italics are from the Stevenson's used words (or, so we at least should assume...). ...Perhaps it is not too surprising find such a lively words and expressions from that 'word-mill', but I feel he (RLS) at least misses a main points about Thoreau's 'philosophy' (rather odd marriage, or a mixture from the Orientalist philosophies, antique classics, ao), when he disapproves that 'lack of action' (by T.) with words: "If nothing were to be done but build a a shanty beside Walden Pond, we have heard altogether too much of these declarations of independence. That the man wrote some books is nothing to the purpose, for the same has been done in a suburban villa."
...On the other hand, has to be reminded at this too, that Stevenson actually devotes quite much space on collection's forewords for this essay in particular (With quite apologizing words, including, fx; "[…] Thoreau's theory, in short, was one thing and himself another.)" Also, noticeable that on none other from his [RLS's] essays at these 'short biographies' is there so much citing from writings of the subject discussed (It's quite useful introduction for Thoreau's thinking, actually.) Whatever one thinks as main reasons for the Stevensons first-hand impressions, the reader has feeling that he (RLS) had some devoted effort for understandings views/philosophies by his subject of study. So, I leave it to anyone interested figuring out what the actual reasons for such judging arguments. (I suppose, it would be too easy an explanation trace them for Stevenson's own views of the Nature, often enchanting and impressive, but also sometimes typically 19th centurian romantical looks for the surrounding environments and the 'undisturbed' wilderness of the countryside.)
How could it be? These great 19th century critics' of the Bourgeiose morales and them should appear hold such "disagreement" to each other ? (...The "disagreement" on paraphrases, of course, considering that it is only the Stevenson's appraises or opinions from the other we have here. Thoreau had been dead by some 20 years earlier). It appears that the essay is mainly written on basis of reading most renown writings from Thoreau, which he (RLS) also mentions on the forewords for this essay-compilation. (I've only read Walden, so my excuses if I manage to miss some important aspects at this brief commentary.)
Stevenson's words are indeed, not only quite harsh, theyre often filled with negative expressions; Thoreau is termed fx for a "skulker", and "prig"...And to make his opinions even more clear, at the end of essay that "eccentric and independent mind" is also described "part gymnosophist, part backwoodsman" - All the expressions by italics are from the Stevenson's used words (or, so we at least should assume...). ...Perhaps it is not too surprising find such a lively words and expressions from that 'word-mill', but I feel he (RLS) at least misses a main points about Thoreau's 'philosophy' (rather odd marriage, or a mixture from the Orientalist philosophies, antique classics, ao), when he disapproves that 'lack of action' (by T.) with words: "If nothing were to be done but build a a shanty beside Walden Pond, we have heard altogether too much of these declarations of independence. That the man wrote some books is nothing to the purpose, for the same has been done in a suburban villa."
...On the other hand, has to be reminded at this too, that Stevenson actually devotes quite much space on collection's forewords for this essay in particular (With quite apologizing words, including, fx; "[…] Thoreau's theory, in short, was one thing and himself another.)" Also, noticeable that on none other from his [RLS's] essays at these 'short biographies' is there so much citing from writings of the subject discussed (It's quite useful introduction for Thoreau's thinking, actually.) Whatever one thinks as main reasons for the Stevensons first-hand impressions, the reader has feeling that he (RLS) had some devoted effort for understandings views/philosophies by his subject of study. So, I leave it to anyone interested figuring out what the actual reasons for such judging arguments. (I suppose, it would be too easy an explanation trace them for Stevenson's own views of the Nature, often enchanting and impressive, but also sometimes typically 19th centurian romantical looks for the surrounding environments and the 'undisturbed' wilderness of the countryside.)
...From the other essays of this collection (Familiar studies...) many are also as much interesting, it is fair to say. It is also as much correct to say that Stevenson can't by any means be merited as the most accurate 'historian', or being very precise from the historical detail(s). Or, a 'historian' at all (even in the 19th centurian sense of the term) ; But - he never even too seriously intends to be.
However, read as some fictional, well-studied portraits the essays are (mostly) very good. Not any 'lazy man's history', but perhaps some for an 'easing man', one could say. (Or, readings of the literary vagrant, to use Stevenson's own words.) There's equally much that romantical historism - rather typical for the 19th century, at literature and on scientific historical study - but, at least as much sarcasm on his (RLS's) words. If seeking any uniting element, perhaps most noticeable feature is that major part is from the poets or literary authors. (Of course), may also be worth mention that all - like the name says -are familiar studies of men (and books).
Anyway, that lot appreciated essay from Robert Burns (1759-1796, Scottish poet) I only did find mostly over-romantical and -patriotic (to the level of the 'flags, cash-boxes and parades', nowadays equally common, but more often seen fx at cartoons for kids et similar entertainment, also typical for those movies triumphing some 'americanisms') But, of course, each country has it's own literary heroes and revivalists of traditional languages. (Only that those more rarely appear of similar importance from the outsiders view-point, ie for a foreigner). To the contrary, fx the essay 'John Knox and his Relations to Women' is a more rewarding reading even today, at least acc. my judging. (Knox, Scottish reformator, 1510-92, wrote a famous pamphlet about controversity of the female rule...a hot topic at it's own times and seems have inspired Stevenson for his essay.)
...For the fun of it, reader is advised to have a look on some (or any from) those essays. What makes them still most readable is that skill on words by Stevenson, his 'wordyness' actually. Collection contains fx the following delicate 'gems for the sentences' on art of assessing cultural and religious 'ethos' of any past era by few words (to pick just a few examplary sentences here...):
(From Charles of Orleans) ; "And I think it scarcely cynical suppose that religion as well as patriotism was principally cultivated as a means of filling up a day."
Anyway, that lot appreciated essay from Robert Burns (1759-1796, Scottish poet) I only did find mostly over-romantical and -patriotic (to the level of the 'flags, cash-boxes and parades', nowadays equally common, but more often seen fx at cartoons for kids et similar entertainment, also typical for those movies triumphing some 'americanisms') But, of course, each country has it's own literary heroes and revivalists of traditional languages. (Only that those more rarely appear of similar importance from the outsiders view-point, ie for a foreigner). To the contrary, fx the essay 'John Knox and his Relations to Women' is a more rewarding reading even today, at least acc. my judging. (Knox, Scottish reformator, 1510-92, wrote a famous pamphlet about controversity of the female rule...a hot topic at it's own times and seems have inspired Stevenson for his essay.)
...For the fun of it, reader is advised to have a look on some (or any from) those essays. What makes them still most readable is that skill on words by Stevenson, his 'wordyness' actually. Collection contains fx the following delicate 'gems for the sentences' on art of assessing cultural and religious 'ethos' of any past era by few words (to pick just a few examplary sentences here...):
(From Charles of Orleans) ; "And I think it scarcely cynical suppose that religion as well as patriotism was principally cultivated as a means of filling up a day."
- (Pepys) ; "...When he began the journal, he was a trifle prim and puritanic; merry enough, to be sure, over his private cups [...] Tag, rag, and bobtail, dancing, singing, and drinking, become his natural element; actors and actresses and drunken soaring courtiers are to be found in his society; until the man grew so involved with Saturnalian manners and companions that he was shot almost unconsciously into the grand domestic crash of 1668."
- (Knox) ; "Ministers placed Berwick and such places might seek their converts equally on either side of the march; old enemies would sit together to hear the gospel of peace, and forget the inherited jealousies of many generations in the enthusiasm of a common faith; or – let us say better – a common heresy. […] A new creed, like a new country, is an unhomely place of sojourn; but it makes men lean on another and join hands. It was on this that Knox relied to begin the union of the English and the Scotch." .
(And soforth, etc., ...) ; W-G.
-----
------------