The Frogs Have More Fun...

Flowers



"All the names I know from nurse:
Gardener's garters, Shepherd's purse,
Bachelor's buttons, Lady's smock,
And the Lady Hollyhock.

Fairy places, Fairy things,
Fairy woods where the wild bee wings,
Tiny trees for tiny dames.
- These must all be Fairy names !"

(from Child's Garden of Verses
by R.L. Stevenson)


"Anyone can write a short-story.
A bad one, I mean."

(R.L. Stevenson)
----------------

"Science without conscience is the Soul's perdition."
- Francois Rabelais, Pantagruel
- Acc to/above is citated from: Medical Apartheid. The dark history of Medical Experimentation on Black Americans from Colonial Times to the Present, by Harriet A. Washington (Doubleday ; 2006 ; p. 1.)

----------------
"In the high society of the first half of the century, marriage, despite it's bestowal status upon the wife, was the most absurdity. Marriage, conferring instanteous rank or money, ... lost most of its prestige and moment right after the wedding. ...By the end of the century, spurred by Rousseau's moralistic Nouvelle Hèloíse, a contrary cult, that of virtue, arose. After 1770 conjugal and maternal love became not merely admissible, but, for some, moral imperatives. ...

[...]
...Rousseau, who sought for himself the crown of morality in ostensibly defending marriage, presents in his Nouvelle Hèloíse the most enticing and extended defense of illicit love ever penned. The root of the problem is that as the century progressed sensibility became confused with morality: passionate feeling, if expressed in a highly civilized mode with grace and nuance, makes us forgive the Rousseau of The Confessions, for example, his pettiness, his jealousies, his betrayals. This moral-amoral byplay, present already in the novels of Richardson, was to be more intense as the century unfolded."
-
Madelyn Gutwirth : Madame De Staèl, Novelist. The emergence of the Artist as Woman (10,15.)

;
"...As the social contract seems tame in comparison with war, so fucking and sucking come to seem merely nice, and therefore unexciting. ... To be 'nice', as to be civilized, means being alienated from this savage experience - which is entirely staged. [...] The rituals of domination and enslavement being more and more practiced, the art that is more and more devoted to rendering their themes, are perhaps only a logical extension of an affluent society's tendency to turn every part of people's lives into a taste, a choice; to invite them to regard their very lives as a (life) style." - Susan Sontag , on 'Fascinating Fascism' (-74; p 103;104-5 at Under the sign of Saturn)
; "Anyone who cannot give an account to oneself of the past three thousand years remains in darkness, without experience, living from day to day." (Goethe) - as cited by Sontag (on same compile; p. 137.)

;
"It is widely accepted that we are now living in the 'Anthropocene', a new geological epoch in which the Earth's ecosystems and climate are being fundamentally altered by the activities of humans. I loathe the term, but I can't deny that it's appropriate."
; (Goulson), Silent Earth : Averting the Insect Apocalypse (2021; p 47.)
;
"It is sometimes said that humanity is at war with nature, but the word 'war' implies a two-way conflict. Our chemical onslaught on nature is more akin to genocide. It is small wonder that our wildlife is in decline."
; (Goulson, 2021 ; 118.)
;
----------------
"If we believe absurdities, we shall commit atrocities." (Voltaire)
- Citated from; (Joy, Melanie), Why We Love Dogs, Eat Pigs and Wear Cows : An Introduction to Carnism(2010; p. 95.)
;

"In the presence of the monster, you have eyes and ears for nothing else."
; (Flora Tristan) : London Journal of Flora Tristan: the Aristocracy and the Working Class of England ; 1842-edit. (tr: 1982. ; p. 71.)

;
"Every minority invokes justice, and justice is liberty.
A party can be judged of only by the doctrine which
it professes when it is the strongest."
Mdme de Staêl
(on) 'Consideration sur le Révolution de la Francaise' [1818]


9/10/12

The Muleskinner Bookrecommendations # 34 ½ /"The time before time")



 
In fact recent use of radiocarbon dating in the cave Cougnac
has shown that there may be as much as 10,000 years
between the earliest and the latest prehistoric paintings.
Among the earliest images is one of a megaloceuros (giant deer),
a creature that was apparently extinct in the region
by the time of the later painters. It is quite reassuring
in a way to think that these later peoples
would have been as perplexed by these images as we are today.”
From Secrets of the Stone Age, p137. (Rudgley, 2000)


The Land of the Painted Caves
(p. on 2000s; 661 p.) ; The Earth's Children-series
by Jean Untinen-Auel

...and some suggestions of (possible, accompanying) co-reading(s):
Aczel, Amir D., The Cave and The Cathedral (p 2000s; 242 pages)
Scarre, Chris (ed.), The Human Past. World prehistory and the development of human societies. (Thames & Hudson 2009 ; 784 pages).

[Recommendation(s) / 2012]


I guess, greater part of our selections from recently published fiction literatures/novels, etc., has represented popular fiction. Has it's reason, of course; I'm not very much reading past half the century's ”serious” fiction, and recently I've actually found most enjoyment from this field of fiction (say it then...”easy” fiction. Anyway, I don't also much care to draw any line between those, as you might have noticed).


I also formerly considered that these reviews wouldn't contain other books from prehistoric topics. As I meant w. that only science books et similar, leaves me some means of escape from that definitive sounding statement...and select this book for the additional recommendation of that stuff. Of course, the novel belongs for frustratingly well-known serie, but with my limited familiarity from the 'prehistoric fiction', I've not much alternatives. Most of the 'popular prehistoric' is crap, anyway (acc. my finding,). To the merit of the book, it's also so that prior Untinen-Auel's series, written from since 1980s, there wasn't (much) anything noteworthy of it's kind. Finally, favors the selection also my liking from historical fiction/novels, this ranks well as a 'prehistoric historical novel'.

About the book/serie itself I'm to say not very much. Possibly, if one wishes point out some weakness, book would've been better some 200-300 pages shorter. (I feel) the strongest elements in book/series are the depiction/description of prehistoric people for the emotional, living beings (wasn't so common prior it). On the other hand, selection of a femine character for it's main 'heroines' probably was equally important choice at the time of series early begin. Also, some of the main themes or elements in the books/series is the possible/likely  interactions of the anatomically modern humans - that's probably nowadays the usual term preferred from our Homo sapiens ancestors, believed have developed ca 200000 to 150000 y.a. in the Africa - and the Neanderthals. (Latter, of course, means Homo neanderthalensis-peoples).
The human hands - from The Human Past (book cover)



...Although I've even in the past sometimes seen an additional .sapiens 'stamped' for the first mentioned 'species', ie: H. sapiens ”sapiens” - notice my apostrophes. ...I actually think that occasionally used addit. definition in question only to serve for some ridiculence. In particular, because it so obviuosly seems meant for to separate us, the humans of the present days from any preceding periods peoples or (human-) 'species'...and to emphasize our (imagined) great differences if compared for those distant ancestors. If you ask me – and in lack of any precise knowledge from how to relate the species mentioned, not just biologically, but also culturally (the latter knowledge we are perhaps unlike ever reach) – I think the only valid 'categories' are .sapiens and .neanderthalis. (Further still, one could also question the usability of those terms too, but them are the most generally used. ...whether we'd think the Neanderthals for a separate human lineage; as the co- or subspecies genetically or morphologically defined, doesn't really matter on this). 
 

Anyhow, both 'species' are known have co-existed in parallel close-by through a minimum of some 100000 years. In the prehistoric pasts, the .Neanderthal- and .Sapiens-humans are also known from have lived subsequently, or in turns at parts of the N.Africa (Levant), and for a briefer period on the post-glacial Mid-/S. Europes (at the southward range from the edge of the retreating ice-sheets during that period). Probably both also lived at scattered mobile groups (more or less) adjacent to each other. So, seems at least possible, if not likely assuming, them (more or less) having had cultural contacts and effect for each other. Famously, relative soon after the end of the latest glaciation, the Neanderthal disappeared and during roughly same time the Sapiens seem have dispersed for their former areas at the European continent. (Neanderthals latest known regions of stay from different parts of Europe seem generally timed for - smtgh like – 45000 to 26000 y.a., BC, so noticeably, that covers a huge time-gap. Some newer genetic studies seem also say that the Neanderthals are believed been generally relative few by numbers; The estimated figures based on DNA-researches, I've noticed ranging for between 10000 to 70000 at the most...but I don't take that for too granted, it's an estimate still.) 
 
...Like one should except from a good (pre-)historical fiction, this recommended book (Untinen-Auel) don't offer any simple answers for that embarrassing mystery, or a question about Neanderthal the disappearance...debated ever since the wider acceptance (late 1800s) about existence of the human species having preceded our own ”race” (...here too, pay some attention for apostrophes). I'm neither claiming to have, or favoring, any theory for to explain that...but lots of theories exist. Anyway, also was (at least earlier) a lot discussed about the aspect if Neanderthals might have possessed any symbolic culture (and if they did, whether they mostly just might have adopted it from the 'modern humans'). As I personally believe them to most certainly having developed their own forms of symbolic culture, I leave it for anyone make one's own opinions about that (and read from topic by yourself). The Neanderthal burials containing pollen of various plants are most famous (indicating placing the flowering plants along w. deceased, although explanation is said bit controversial); But, also there's other 'clues' one often sees referred for; the sophisticated tools, burial objects, decorative shells, coloring the body w. ochre, etc... (Also, an informative box on The Human Past – on listed books above - seems state: ”...the emergence and spread of 'modern human behaviour' was more complex than a replacement of Neanderthals by Aurignacians.”)
The prehistoric research also seems divide that late ice-age era for various periods (Based most apparently, on various different stone-age 'technologies' used; lithics, projectiles, etc., but also established on finds of cultural objects, as well as what known about the behavioral traits) - Ie the most important cultural periods are separated for (All these just roughly timelined for this): Aurignac - ca 40000 to 20000 y. in the past; Gravettian, ca 29000-14000, and Magdalenian - generally from so called glacial maximum at 22000 to 19000 BC until the early Holocene. 
 

The early (anatomically modern) human ancestors at the European area/close regions are most widely known by term the Cro-magnons (named on basis of the places of first finds at 1800s, likewise were named the Neanderthalensis too). As the archeological history also sometimes might have focused too much on that – so called ”Cro-magnon myth”, acc. my own terms and opinion - I leave that also for anyone to think by oneself in particular, too (...With the preceding, I mostly refer for that sometimes claimed 'remarkably different symbolic culture of the Cro-magnons, if compared for the Neanderthals, fx. And, from their exceptional capability for the speech – that Neanderthal's didn't possess similar means for spoken language, it was also formerly debated lot about, but now studies (from the anatomy of their vocal tract) seem said indicate that there was no reason why Neanderthals could not have produced complex range of sounds needed for speech. It seems even now confirmed that they possessed similar gene that permits speech on us.) ...But in combined, of course, very little about such distant times is known too well. Seems it also that surprisingly much new information they've been able acquire during the few recent decades (with the aid of newer molecular techs, ao other methods). Most what I can gather from that seems (to me) to favor a view that, very possibly, our direct human ancestors were equally influenced on that interaction and not just 'played' the influensive role.


...After our lenghtysome pre-thoughts, for the prehistoric cave-art (main theme on our book-recommendation), we can only devote a few lines here. Aczel seems in passing notice that in fact there's not any direct evidence from that all (or most) of those renown paintings would've been created by Cro-magnons and not Neanderthals (However, also says the location of most caves, and their closeby camp-sites known, fx, seem link it for the cultures of 'our species' - or more correct term maybe is 'our direct human ancestors'). Seems it also that there's now datings from some of the oldest paintings, suggesting them older than formerly believed/and therefore (possibly) been made by Neanderthal peoples...But probably all that's still quite controversial.
 
More interestingly, is fx that it's believed with some certainty (there's fx found remains of some musical instruments from caves) that those places likely served also for ritual/ religious gatherings during when the paintings were accompanied with other art-forms; music and dance, spoken words fx, likely. ...In that sense Cathedral seems indeed quite suitable term for name of the book about cave-art. The book itself appears most readable introduction to that, although not too comprehensive guide, if very 'enthusiastically' interested for and about. Along w. it I cursorily read some chapters concerning these topics from The Human past - mostly it's, say, some 'middle-of-the-road' knowledge about many topics it covers...And along our other recommended reading(s), the Rudgley-book, referred on begins, is also interesting. It makes some effort for questioning the 'general consensus' from human evolutionary history and to exhibit quite a lot contradicting evidence. (So also occasionally does that The human past-book, but naturally it aims cover/discuss lots other stuff, too.)

The cave-art, been created during a very lenghty period of time, finally came to end at early Holocene (ending along with the hunter-gatherer cultures that produced it.) Similar to many later regionally outlined phenomenoms/cultures there wasn't any clear cultural followings for it (/recognizable successive resembling art-styles). All of that, and the vast distance of time the cave-art covered, adds some part for it's great mystery; Precisely, the question (any viewer) could need ask is perhaps not just what kind worldview those painters had, but how did they know their environment. Did they thought it coherent or complex? Were them merely communicating or transmitting? Etc...)

...Finally to mention; I find this selection nicely fitting as some 'continuation' of our prehistoric recommendations: First was that book from the mammalian early days. Then a book about the primates/species ancestral for the later emerged 'human lineage'. And now this novel from the ”recent” prehistoric pasts, an era when all those major cultural transitions described were taking place (the story is situated at about 30000 y. BC.) If we shall then have any additional recommendation on this 'serie', following our (accidentally emerged) timeline, it should likely be smtgh about emergence of the civilizations. ...No scarcity from possible alternatives, some contenders I could think for are fx the Mesoamerican/pre-Inca Andean cultures, ancient Egypt(/the Nile valley), Indus civilizations...

...And additionally (to mention), any of these 'XXX & half''-recoms could quite well represent actual parts on this serie (I guess I could 'elevate' them all for those as well). I've mostly ranked them this way, just because I'm having time to write only a fewsome paragraphs from each of these... (;W-G.) 
 

( The latest posts! - @ Mulskinner Blog @ )


----------
Powered by ScribeFire.