“We live in a strange world, where all the united science tells us that we are about eleven years away from setting off an irreversible chain reaction, way beyond human control, that will probably be the end of our civilization as we know it.”
;“We are in the midst of the sixth mass extinction and the extinction rate is up to 10,000 times faster than what is considered normal, with up to 200 species becoming extinct every single day.
Erosion of fertile top soil. Deforestation of our great forests. Toxic air pollution. Loss of insects and wildlife. The acidification of our oceans.
These are all disastrous trends being accelerated by a way of life that we, here in our financially fortunate part of the world, see as our right to simply carry on.
But hardly anyone knows about these catastrophes...” (Greta Thunberg) - No One is too Small to Make a Difference (2019) ; p. 41 ,48. (...of) 'A Strange World', and, 'Cathedral Thinking'.
;
(pic), on the above. ; Nemi – our most latest discovery at the comic book heroines. (Or, maybe she actually inhabits some reality too. Sometimes you come to think, her at certain ways to quite as 'realistic' a realm – Lives on some parallel universe, perhaps?) But here now shown in a 'pondering', contemplative mood from....
“... The first country to industrialize and produce greenhouse gas on a grand scale, the United Kingdom, is expected to suffer least from climate change. The world's slowest-developing countries, producing the least emissions, will be among those hardest hist; the climate system of the Democratic Republic of Congo, one of the world's poorest countries, is scheduled to be especially profoundly perturbed.
The Congo is mostly landlocked, and mountaineous, but in the next generation of warming those features will not be protections. Wealth will be a buffer for some countries, but not a safeguard, as Australia is learning already: by far the richest of all countries staring down the most intense, most immediate warming barrages,it is an early test case... changes likely to hit the rest of the well-off world only later this century. The country was founded on genocidal indifference to the native landscape and those who inhabited it, ...In 2011, a single heat wave there produced a significant tree dieback and coral bleaching, the death of plant life, crashes in local bird populations and dramatic spikes in the number of certain insects, and transformations of ecosystems...”,
“...When the country enacted a carbon tax, its emissions fell; when under political pressure, the tax was repealed, they rose again. ...” (; Wallace-Wells: The Uninhabitable Earth. A Story of the Future, p. 132, 133.)
;
“The extermination of biological diversity and of indigenous cultures that know how to live in peace with Mother Earth is part of one extinction, one interconnected war against life. Ecocide and genocide are one indivisible process, and they began with the idea of the colonization of the Earth as the 'civilizing mission' of a 'superior race'.” (Vandana Shiva), foreword to Extinction rebellion Handbook (2018; This is Not a drill ; p. 6.)
; ...On a little further from that is wrote (p. 7), ao the following noted; "...In 1492 the estimated population of indigenous people in the continent north of Mesoamerica was 18 million. By 1890 the native American population had dropped to 228,000.” [...And the paragraphs by middle these above 'selected' for presented - those seem cite from the U.S.'s then (y. 1833) president Andrew Jackson's 'annual message to congress'.; Of (his) 'declarations' to an advocated 'colonialistic' – and exterminating – 'grasp' of the lands and resources originally 'owned' by those said peoples. ...in that speech where the said demands were 'manifested' (/also not very much veiled) under the claim for the needed '...favorable change in their condition'. From behalf of the more "intelligent', and "superior" civilization.; That, of course, is a quite familiar 'page' to anyone w. reads for those notorious eviction policies during the Jackson's two terms...]
When the coming of Spring had awakened everything – the 'early' birds, the ground-worms, along w. rabbit (of course it didn't sleep but tried to fool the fox an all Winter long), the leafs of the trees, in their first buds by the season (flowerings also, at least on willows, earliest by the March/April...), we seemed to be obliged leave ourselved for some time to the rest as well. (Sleeping, I mean.) ; In a way, the best Summer season – from growth of the vegetations - and from everything else being still from the several weeks away.
(Or it was. As now we're already to a few weeks after – And a Summer too is well on it's begins already, by this moment.)
('...I could sleep for a'...) THOUSAND YEARS ; ...Also, as it has been most part rather more to the 'regularity' in the weathers – this year, much of my Springtimes were from spent in the garden-side. Or, for the 'most part'. ; As the consequent – These writes then weren't to so much from. More for some 'secondary interest'. (And therefore, there's actually a some bit referencing for the observance of Spring, already wrote during the now past Months.)
; Although, I've not been to so 'buzy' in a garden either, the truth said. Not on 'every day', at least. I'm probably also so much lazy and too indetermined from to maintain any that sort activity, 'for the scheduled', cons my gardening activities.
Besides, I so like as an idea that garden from good amounts is left to develop by it's own.
For the occasioned, in a buzied 'intervals' I'm, anyways, now doing my several tasks there; From increasingly more during by this now lived most lovely early-growth season here. I-o-w: As we now are already in the May, the experience tells me that the June would be from surprising soon for the approaching. Early part that – There's usually, necessarily quite some more for do. ; But 'till then I'm actually, the most part, just keepin' some care of my most from my new seedlings. Alongside, doing a fewsome sowings and 'preparations' on outdoors that already can be done. ; And, by this moment (30.4 – in fact a week after that, like was said...) it seems that the squashes we're having for to, most probably, need now be sowed. By the next, in about some few weeks time...
And there's then some other cultivations - even some new plants I've decided from to grow and plant by this year. (More 'bout them on a latter 'section' from this posting.)
And along w. those tasks, is then some 'clean-ups' in garden - and 'check about' from some perennials that were by last planted. Fromafter the Winters passing seen to emerge from under snows. ; Not for very many those seemed been harmed by the (slight) more severe Winter frosts we now had – from the “severe” only if I compare that to our former, maybe to the some 5 most recent years from. As the Winter now wasn't exactly for very cold – it was just, happily, from more colder than the previous few.
As some 'essentials' – like usual in anything having to do w. the plants; those garden 'cultivables', the household-plants, or from some as the ornamental ones...; I wouldn't actually find there any haste now from any good at all. As the plants naturally tend best grow acc. to some natural 'pace' to their own. Or say; they favor to following from their own 'rhythm' in that – the growth. - And so we're basically at these earliest Spring Months, here, only awaitin' the somewhat steadier warmer season from make it's more permanent 'stays'. (On here 'Northern soils', too.) ; Now mostly awaitin' the nightly temperatures to reach, about, smght like by averages over the 5 to 10 Celsius-degrees. But it still takes some weeks from any good growing to start, acc my any recalls from. For the “usual” from ca some 5 to 6 weeks more.
(photo, beside) ; ...Water container. Having that in uses for my collecting from rain waters. ...By this Spring, so far, we've not had any scarcity of the waters for these gardening uses. But from learnt of the earlier seasons, I've actually acquired the additional number these plastic containers. (Here some reason: The Squashes esp., for lot more favor the rain water than tap water, As they don't like so much the lime that's added for a last mentioned.)
(By the moment when that previous said was written – for by now, actually, in any 'good Summer' it would be only some Month away, from after this day. As it tends still for take until around the middle by June before it for adequate favoring from most perennials growth. And before the soil becoming to warm enough for that.)
----------
;
“Everything
we see online is there because of some sort of design decision.” - by Peter Pomerantsev ('a
propaganda expert')
;
“...In 82 percent of countries around the world, less than half of the public express trust in the media, and this is contributing directly to the rising cynicism towards governments. The governmental institutions of the European Union and Washington DC are viewed as centers of elite privilege, which serve themselves rather than the public. Such feelings often hold greatest sawy among communities that also benefit economically from those governments' policies.”;
“... The emphasis on 'real time' knowledge that was originally privileged in war has become a feature of business world, of Silicon Valley in particular. The speed of knowledge and decision-making becomes crucial, and consensus is sidelined in the process. Rather than trusting experts,...we have come rely on services that are fast, but whose public status is unclear. A 2017 survey, for example, found that more people were willing to trust search engines than human editors.” (William Davies) - Nervous States. how feeling took over the World. ; on 'Introduction' (xiv, xvi.; italics are Davies');
'The God didn't dare to create Valentina, so I had to do that instead...' ; (Crepax) ; SOME FORGERY, as the comment by, as any 'words by'. - Acc to any (my) knowing, Crepax never said anything like the words – And this only does originate from our own wrote few sentences from...
; (Obviously)...that latest (citate) given here only to an example on how much of the usual propaganda works – It prefers from the plainest untruths for told and circulated in the most likely sources for peoples 'daily' informations, perhaps hoping gain the claimed some 'credence' and reliabilitet. - But, even more preferable is said for thought it found, if possible, to conceal those 'untruths' in midst from something where is some 'bit of the truth...' (Hence them became, sort of, parts from the shared ”truth”.)
(pic) ; ...Crepax's Valentina (of 'In Poco Loco'. Guessin that story by originally drawn at the y., ...67?) ; Anyway – Here (also) as some addition, for our continuing Big Wimmen-series.
(...As any friend of the Valentina's adventures would know; her 'frivolous', often s/m-oriented, deeply imaginary dreams are a some reality to their own - do 'visualize' some psychogical 'thematics', and not much on any 'common-place' manner. ...Guessin' that the dr Freud would've been, post mortem, also bit 'shaken' when Crepax perhaps by earliest had some ideas that then ultimately did lead for this 'Big Girl'...)
And it said that often does work, the propaganda to succeed for the surprising often.
We all probably tend possess at least some complete falsified 'beliefs' originating from that type 'propaganda'; From the biased – or mistaken – sources from. (I don't think I'd to know any lot for about the God – But thinkin' that the reading the Orwell taught me some good lot on cons from the propaganda...)
(photo) ; Tree – photographed on a cold evening by last January here. ; ...Think I recall that from been some of the coldest earliest very coldest days during a last Winter. Nearby for the minus 20 Celsius, maybe. Might have on Feb, though. Not too sure of which the day, not too certain from. ;
...Consider this, if wish, instead to one selection on that Big Wimmen-series. (Trees like women, often, appear little mystical..At least..in the 'best of circumstances.') ; On the other hand – open for consideration – it's being a species of the Betula, the birches. Belongs to the broad-leaved trees therefore. They're actually the more often 'sexless', maybe – Or at least I can't tell from the birches any of that what comes for the individual trees. ; Guess we can think this tree then for an Androgyne from any 'sex'.
(Whichever. – Also, it's so birches oftenmost look tend have the more feminine 'look' than from 'male'. Whatever the any worth by this argument.) But indeed, during by some coldest days the trees here again seemed near in their looks some 'other-worldly' dimension. (If that by some exaggeration. But only little...)
(on these few...) 'Unmoralities...' ; BY the same (...'breath'), having to confess from yet another thing:
Didn't actually read that book cited at the above quots (That by Davies', a 'political economist and sociologist') And frankly said. ...I find that aspect on this making - from a view-point by (these) writings - for the 'slight bit', from the 'more or less', remarkably - hilarious.
By no way I'd for to think, from to think that such would appear somhow as anything defendable – As fort any 'deed'. Not very well serves any my own 'needs for know', and – let me use as the words rather – needs for to 'find out'.
The both from selected paragraphs (on above, from that book) only seemed for to provide us easily some very important view-points to being pointed out; And hence those chosen on that place. Important as some p-o-w's from thinkin' anything 'bout this further continuing social fragmentation an this increase, 'in general', a distrust towards much of any the 'established' political 'facades'. Or; towards those agencies of the official 'expertise' on informing, indeed. – Often information sources which the most (,'from us') are, maybe, apt to think as somehow, anyhow reliable sources. ; As for having, 'till lately', represented an important part in the present organized societies, say...
; But, the curious discovery in my any recent readings for the sociology – Or again, better said; the social sciences, the political science, and also the futuristics about and on that 'information society' theory, are that there by now so many simultaneous ongoing directions from - All that lot seemed (a lot) for stress that one same particular aspect: that present speed of the change.
How that - generally known as, fx by term from 'the digitalization' - now operating on 'all levels' seems, by the enfastened rate, how it seems so much said for to undermining any 'firm ground' below the 'human feet'. How it ('nowadays') by constantly projected to ('soon') exceed any the capacities from our regular, formerly "trusted" human systems to handle that change. Or, our previous and 'safely usual' ways for 'coping by' with any changes. (How we regularly do 'come by'.) All of those biologic, mental...ao, human capacities from. ; In short, anything from with we'd gotten used to react and response for all the newer innovations, the constant social - and more later - from the self-evidently 'necessity' those technological changes now promised to commpletely re-arrange our former 'human condition'.
(Sometimes you even start to imagine that idea as something from very seriously envisioned a 'tomorrows' from: All about the lot of the drum-beat for those 'Wellsian' master-race, now 'on it's making' might make one think that - already having taken place; happened while we were...from watching the telly? See - I am not much of believer for the 'self-evolved' humanity...; Often even thinkin 'bout that 'master-class', from as some 'masters of deceit'. With a bit of the envy, naturally -And particularly fromafter my few above given public acclaims...)
...But, from why that then become a bit hilarious, also was due because from...W. a thought that fromafter all my (plentiest) recent reads and constant newsings of been at least 'glanced' for – I'm then also finding myself (personally,) in the recognized sort hurry and 'haste' to try reach some ('decent') understandings about the said prior noted 'change' from - So much so, (that) I'm having not any place to reads for the more profounds on it. Just for selecting a few interesting sounding social 'stats' and of researches for cited and then presenting those tellings, 'alongside'. - It then becomes a merely funny discovery of what are most apparent 'limits' by this present age of information. (Or the cult of that information, to use Roszak's already quite distant, aged terms for about something like that digital 'information-haste'...)
...Like some distrustable 'Google-motor'. Or, from (bit jokingly said) as some devotedly partial, a 'non-interested' false-news advocacy. (A “Big biller” for an endless flow of stacks and 'parcels' of what permits the lots to say, but little for any knowledges – At least if by that knowledges meant for something what you'd think for somehow...useful. For as something one could 'rely on'.)
Yet - I'm then also actually finding my this little slip for the “unconfirmed” informations, from a bit more excusable. (While that “omission”, of course, doesn't speak too well behalf my own reliability from...) Doesn't appear for represent me from anything like someone who'd inclined to towards something you'd think from the honest interests. Not for as someone trying to represent oneself for (somehow) impartial an 'informant'. Or for the 'devoted' and comprihensive for what comes to one's principal ideas or ideals.
; But...yet, from to little more defend (my) rejections at this (here - 'in time'); The few given quotations, of that Davies - Them seemed provide us a few rather important viewpoints on cons just this aspect, aspects for discussed.
All from that what should/would concern this information speedway (world wide web), by the presently. (Or even if, 'by the recently'.) That said mass-increase in the mischievous 'informings' - And cons all the same sort 'malleable' little malpractices. Some that seem said from become by the more common. ; Both feats seem 'surface' as some often recognized 'recent' characteristics on it; 'False news' bots, the misinforming campaigns (prior election times)...etc. - And indeed, why not then call for all that by something like the real term for all such sort: propaganda ?
Better still - as some defense, of course - is, that I'm certainly not alone on w. such mischievous practice. (That what now was on above here – in a few examples, was for revealed.)
Should we even think that as a some...'sign of the times' ? Something actually defensible then, perhaps...therefore? ; Also, the similar (of course,) surprisingly often does take place. (As I've that discovered.) As we're then finding (that), in during this constant more 'speeded-up' age, period - The surprising much from, for the 'devastating' many, in the some present written books seem appear be comprised by – With the similar manner.
(Quite number from those at least.)
In a many typical bookstalls. On the 'street shops' – Or, in most the actual indoors sales of the books. (Is the...bookstore, even anymore some proper name for such places ? It sometimes does make you wonder from...) -------
; Yet, some even lot more dishonest practices - like fx the direct forgeries and plagiarizations, on other peoples more proofs-oriented writing from, of course, always been found for happen. Both too some real 'scourges' - slaps in the 'face' for some idea from any honest knowledge. Both at the means from that to purpose from all literary expression - and cons to their very similar (many) uses at the other human communication(s). It 'always' having existed. From the days since by the first invention of the written word. (In during all writing times, and through the periods, eras known to us as for some such times.)
Sometimes often one even comes to see that in the most unexpectable places. Sometimes presented as an authentic 'proofs' for a some most unexpectable things. (But let us not go for all that.)
(However, by this certain timing, cons these few noted 'betrayals' from...I don't feel for too much any moral resentment, not for some afterthoughts by embarrassingly 'knocking'. ; Having learnt somewhat of my own past mistakes. – Had I not told about, most wouldn't probably had noticed anything particularly vile at those places... :)
By anycase, it well now in place for to end these personal confessions of this lack in my 'own' morals.
Hope still that (any) from you wouldn't do anything similar, of the resembling sort even...
----------------
“Even when it comes to war, historical memory has a sadistically short half-life, horrors and their causes gauzily evanescing into familiar folklore in less than the span of a single generation. But most wars throughout history, it is important to remember, have been conflicts over resources, often ignited by resource scarcity, which is what an earth densely populated and denuded by climate change will yield. Those wars don't tend to increase those resources, most of the time, they incinerate them.” ; (Wallace-Wells; p. 101.)
;
“And so, in the peculiar and still insular mythology of Hawaii, the dislocations of war became the promises of progress. Whether or not the promises have been fulfilled depends of course upon who is talking, as does whether or not progress is a virtue, but in any case it is war that is pivotal to the Hawaiian imagination, war that fills the mind, war that seems to hover over Honolulu like the rain clouds on Tantalus. Not very many people talk about that. They talk about the freeways on Oahu and condominiums on Maui and beer cans at the Sacred Falls and how much wiser it is to bypass Honolulu altogether in favor of going directly to Laurance Rockefeller's Mauna Kea, on Hawaii. ... Or, if they are on a more visionary turn, they talk, in a kind of James Michener rhetoric, about how Hawaii is a multiracial paradise and labor-management paradise and a progressive paradise in which the past is now reconciled with the future, where the I.L.W.U.'s Jack Hall lunches at the Pacific Club and where that repository of everything old-line in Hawaii, the Bishop Estate, works hand in hand with Henry Kaiser to transform Koko Head into a $350 million development named Hawaii Kai. If they are in the travel business they talk about The Million Visitor Year (1970) and the Two Million Visitor Year (1980) and twenty thousand Rotarians convening in Honolulu in 1969 and they talk about the Product. 'The reports show what we need,' one travel man told me. 'We need more attention to shaping and molding the product.' The product is the place they live.” ; (Joan Didion), of the “Letter from Paradise, 21* 19' N., 157* 52' W.” (Of a famous y. -68 essays-collection – at that, on p. 202-3. - ...If/whether that then not published in some other places, too. ; But, the felt like, somehow, a quite fitting an 'analysis'. (Maybe) due because it seems to 'draw aforth' some ideas and impressions. A lot of what – Only by the later seems for become as the more common from...'recognized'?. Or from 'discovered'...)
As for some another p-o-w's...
(Btw; I use this abbreviation, quite regularly to mean: Point-of-view. ; Therefore, not to be confused for the 'Prisoner-of-war' – As that's perhaps a more usual meant by with abbreviation from it. In my uses, almost always to the first mentioned)
...we're then having here as some links;
As the said questions about an untrustable sources (at 'web', or more in general') - and the former ethical contemplates seemed a little from 'preparing' us on these noting.; Here's then a some link/newssing (, by the 'recently published'...?), on (about) Twitter(...? - really...??) ;
Perhaps a some exemplary 'case-in-point' - cons all that which we said on above at least. (As the resemblant issues around by the questions from the Net's very 'typifying', limiting and often also, even 'distorting' nature having become to so much by lately discussed. Such as I read, ao, from via that Bridle's book (2018) – Also wrote on a little from, now some Months past at here.)
; ...In related, can be noted, even for that having become elsemuch too more often for remarked about the paradoxical invalidity on an information at a global/local WWW(s). - Concerning those several, many seen critiques; Often the sometimes surprising impartiality found in an information/news is more often is from covered in the more critical articles.
; If I should (then) trust for this source(s) here – Indeed a failure of the sort, at least in a level by what nowadays also is more often for talked about; The demand from thr better 'transparency' concerning anything that's then put from available to the public. (As the 'news'. Or smtgh similar.) ; In that light, indeed, quite some Ideological and Ethical failings, in very brief. (...And also leavin' the rest to any readers own finding from and about, around that. 'Around' from this particular topic - as by ourselves we did have 'discovery' only via of this singular, one newssing...)
Guess, we'll then also obliged here further of to add that the (above) link only caught my attentions on reading the (recent?) lenghtier newssing at that Guardian. ; On a 'long read', as they seem call those. As the noted link picked only via from the reads from Roy's article at that. On the India's health crises...
; ...Also guessin', still, that from all the lot that for the constant happening – in a 'global world' – by increasingly, nowadays, at least does find some 'coverage'. Not the less due because the said informations-highway, 'web', must've now have become ever further places available. (In the more of the places anywhere in the world. In more of the countries.) ---------
Some another article viewed by the lately on that serie (ie, from those 'long reads'.) – was this. (The article named as: 'Invention of whiteness'.) ; Thought that for quite worth reads, some look - if the aspect for an interest, to anyone readers interests. (...Some views on how far the so called 'racial' origins of the 'modern', ie of the better 'known', by during the 1800s/20th century's formulated racial 'segregations', and accompanied race theories actually reach – Acc. the said, essentially, it about how novelty such attitudes actually appear in a more close historical look.)
...Not too much anything to add or say cons that. Except, from a some passing mention perhaps - At following few paragraphs.
; About from that...this otherways rather informative article didn't offer any words, not anything from 'premarked'/for the mention 'bout an (american) Indian slavery. (In during by the years for it's existence with the some centuries by a trans-Atlantic slave trade. Ca, by from the early 17th century onwards – if for thinkin' that on an N.America's part.) But the article seemed to only for, alongside the 'mains' on it, from refer to the somewhat lot better known histories from African-American slavery. Precisely said, on that what for a more often goes described by the word of a same notorious history of the chattel slavery. Across the N. Atlantic/for the West Indies, etc. ao. But an indian slavery, in the early colonial years acc to Newell's writing, also did feat from 'much the same'. (Only that from preceding the Atlantic 'cane sugar economies', and of that thenafter around from the midst/late 1700's still more keenly become connected to the 'invented' discrimative racial prejudice, also w. the invention by that 'whiteness' - as a normative, in other words – the Indian slavery history has become somewhat 'declined' in memory, from 'forgotten' under the more later histories and times.)
As I read by recent several few 'chapters' on that indian slavery from Newell's book (that, Brethren by nature, 2015) – There is a few passages from it (the book) also on a 'left-margin' here. (Ie, on amongst those plentiest selections that 'decorating' the flow by this main content in blog's posts.)
; ...Newell, fx, among the other details told from a N.American Indian slavery, describes as well it's social and economic 'motives'. It's nature in related to the early juridistical and colonial practices. Or, also form w. the then prevailed christian religion. (In that colonial context, sort of...) ; So, on a below is some compact passage, for some example of. (Not for too carefully selected, though. As I just by the recent even read that book.) ;
“Desire for Indian labor generated demand in the 1640s far beyond what the Pequot captives could provide. European in-migration to New England slowed to tiny trickle after 1640. The calling of Parliament in 1642 and Puritan successes there and in the English Civil War not only removed the reason for leaving England in the first place, but also drew many New Englanders back to England to participate. The region's worsening reputation for religious intolerance and tough treatment of servants and non-Congregationalists further discouraged servant migration. A small number of Scots prisoners of war and convict laborers arrived in the 1640s, but, with a few exceptions, New England's ongoing labor pool would have to be generated from within, or from the ranks of the involuntary: slaves.” (;on p. 119.)
; The topic itself indeed, also, might've only by more recently become under some comprihensive studies from. That meaning, by the latest decades. After the turn for 2000s, maybe. Or so now from supposin'...
Which, in fact, neither appears much surprising.
- Despite that, one of course cannot quite complete avoid for having noticed the occasional mentionings for the issue on my previous reads (Of the 1800ian 'texts'). I've myself perhaps not 'come by' to so many from...but it still often apparent in the context. From via the later studies, sometimes 'non-direct' in the mention. (And also via some material I earlier happen of taken to my reads, by during the few latest years.) ; William Apess, for a just one example, at his renown speeches by that 1830s naturally makes the more of a mention. – At least in the mention from about the captives' fates on after “Pequot” war – of whom the numbers were enshipped and enslaved to the Barbados-isle. Where, also, the slavery already by then (the 1600s) was for lot harshes and from punitive sort than at continental 'mainland' (/the 'New England' towns.) And indeed, there's prob. plentiest more references to it in other 1800ian texts too...
; In overall, can't but notice there for from a 'more about' it all - At that Newell (2015), among others perhaps. Which also was then our main reasons for this (briefer) mentioning. On this instance, here place. -------
“['that']...what Bostrom calls 'posthumanity' and others often call 'transhumanism' – the possibility that technology may quickly carry us across a threshold into a new state of being, so divergent from the one we know today that we would be forced to consider it a true rapture in the evolutionary lilne. For some, this is simply a vision of nanobots swimming through our bloodstreams, filtering toxins and screening for tumors; for others it is a vision of human life extracted from tangible reality and uploaded entirely to computers. ...
It is hard to know just how serioously to take these visions, though they are close to universal among the Bay Area's futurist vanguard, who have succeeded the NASAs and the Bell Labs of the last century as architects of our imagined future - ...”
;
“For Bostrom, the very purpose of 'humanity' is so transparently to engineer a 'posthumanity' that he can use the second term as a synonym for the first. This is not an oversight but the key to his appeal in Silicon Valley: the belief that the grandest task before technology is not to engineer prosperity and well-being for humanity but to build a kind of portal through which we might pass into another, possibly eternal kind of existence, a technological rapture in which conceivably many – the billions lacking access to broadband, to begin with – would be left behind. It would be very hard, after all, to upload your brain to the cloud when you're buying pay-as-you-go data by the SIM card.
The world that would left behind is the one being presently pummeled by the climate change. And Bostrom isn't alone, ... ...yet it is perhaps a sign of our culture's heliotropism toward technology that aside perhaps from proposals to colonize other planets, and visions of technology liberating humans from most biological or environmental needs, we have not yet developed anything close to a religion of meaning around climate change that might comfort us, or give us purpose, in the face of possible annihilation.” (Wallace-Wells; p. 174; 175)
; ...'heliotropism?...toward technology ?' ; ...Unfortunate that I didn't pay more attentions on how this referred passage – those sentences cited from their 'middle' actually does begin. Not the book on my hands also, anymore. So can't now check for, by afterwards. (Some good point more from concerning the points of view; Of the people's general 'distrustability' - It sometimes can take places, 'almost', from accidentally.)
Let us guess, that it not would've changed anything meaningful on that. (And again - only for my words of the 'good intention', that the said 'cutting' of the those sentences was by no other means carried.) ; ..The above actually for the mentioned, as I'm this Summer now growing some heliotropes for my gardens – Somehow it then feels like a peculiar 'coincidence', that word. Well...we have no needs for to stick on any words.
- Thought for that 'example' on capital limits in the Bostrom's envisioned 'ideal' to the mankind's next stage; that about an 'evolved' tomorrow's 'super-humans'. Indeed, looks it lot more like (a “future”) that'd leave no place among the “chosen ones” to some/any who'd only by now entering this digital-era/the global networked world via means of some 'pay-as-you-go data'... ; Brings also for the mind, fx, those some '144,000' first-born 'lucky' whom allowed to enter an authentic 'heavenly paradises', in after-life, acc the teachings by the church from Jehova's Witnesses. Or, also the Dianetics – As it too some “church” acc the 'believers'. In essence, more like from a pyramid scheme. (And not a some authentic religion.) ; There is a bit of the same on all that (Bostrom's) view, or the so called 'transhumisms' in more generally...
(a) moral disaster...in the multitudes, at it's 'multinational making'..? ; ...THOUGHT then also by some amount for a fewsome more pages devoted on Climate – that what usually has become 'equipped' , for automatically must begin w. that "big C." On most/any of writings from 'bout, suppose - Such a big issue, by nowadays. ; And also thought then for at least as much, plentysome of the environment(s).
From 'foremost' – as I came happened as well consider for some number other aspects that'd appeared necessary discussed from within that (the 'Climate'). All actually the worth from even more of a thought, I'd actually to think. After all we live on, acc Wallace-Wells's termings, period of the 'residual climate rage'. (In other words, I guess, it would also translate for the century's foreseen - global - climatic disasters. A period of uncontrollable, and 'uncalculable' global weathers, already in the realisation...And not for just some 'local', or by otherways, the more limited environmental setbacks and minor problems. So, what then could be for a amore important topic...?
I
repeat: The period of changed global climates already seems for be
here. Or so about it nowadays the usual to how that seems told. The
more unstable conditions generated w. the humanity's longterm past
burning of the fossil fuels. Realised and compromised by 'our' long
years in the arrogant, indifferent cultures on the Nature's part.
(That of course meaning the coals, oils and petroleums foremost –
But also are fx the cultures by 'endless' constructions, in the
humankind's making; the over-expanded meats and poultries 'sectors';
all the wrong methods in an agricultural overuses for a many from
said areas. Incl. several 'ranges' that appear often thought to a
humanity's 'bread baskets'.)
Doesn't probably matter whether or not we now take all from ('given') future views to their more optimistic estimate from - or stress more for the major parts negative. (As the most expectable – or to smght like – to a 'worst prospects'- scenario. Alternatively, if thinkin' to the more likehood smght nearer to the more 'limited' a climatic scenario.) ; I also think, in spite all the lot climatic 'informations' – it's also increasingly more talked 'bout, as well, from animal extinctions, the erosion, that 'more unpredictable' (than before) weatheric phenomena, the droughts, the heats...Indeed, I think there does appears a very keen connection in all of that for the 'overall' alienation from the Nature's part. In this capital-devoted cultural age. In a threat by it evermore increased having become apart of the cultural 'way-of-life' to ever more increased numbers of peoples. As some significant reason why we're apparently living in a period where the climatic disaster already seems progressed a way too far. (So far. By the presently, for a 3rd decade in the 21st cent from it's beginning.) ; In essence a some 'Ecocide and genocide' in the making - If I'd for a litte remind the expression on mind, of the citates on the begins from this posting.
So it would seem also us for (be) much past a 'point' where most (,by 'us') would've still for found themselves capable too to recognizing some – say, the sort of – Nature's signs from all it's forewarned deteriorations. (Which found gone beyond some 'critical point'.) That 'point' is probably is on the past now. And hence – We're then also relying for quite much on an information constant provided by any 'professionals'. The climatic knowledges that the scientists and environmentalists tell us. (At this connection, previous that said w. "all the respect", obviously...) Gradually the more alarming findings – If one would only look at the data from the timeline by a few most previous decades lenght. ---------
'...(some) moral capital' ; ...As a citizen for these advanced, developed Northern regions; 'child' to these 'progressive' economies, with all the benefits and “privileges” of that - I've perhaps until recent happened pay the relative little concern on the ongoin' climate deterioration. (; Though', one could think the opposite basis the some number written post, if to 'glancin' on their contents.)
;
In short, it not for taken to some
'moral betrayals';
not, of course, to express from some defends behalf (any sort) moral
denials from. (The preceded little 'carelessnesses' and 'lack of concern' on the topic, that meant for say...)
(photo, on beside) ; ...A piece of, apparently, plastic litter that this culture of pollution seems find itself to so hopelessly 'stuck on to'. (A lid for some soft drink or maybe cup-a-coffee.) Thrown/flown on aside to 'blemish' the surroundings, in midst the 'rubble' and dirt of some parking mall. I think there read PET on it (the lid), so I guess it's basically recyclable plastic - But that case not decomposing. ; ...They nowadays also talk much 'bout various 'naturally' decaying substitutes on materials used at this culture of life-style-littering (for that is what that essentially represents...) - Remains to be seen if that is to lead for an actually meaningful change for the better. - And, admitted said, that I'm not anyhow against the fast food-sales firms having still more started use the more compostable packaging materials on their "meals" ('Though, I wouldn't call such foods as meals...) - On some history by, say, 30-years time, that reduction on a non-ecologic packaging seems the sole really important "advance" those firms having achieved make. (Let us hope that 'change' at least does continue...)
And for a one example – considered as well in the accompaniment from to this writing...was by the recent reading of a one newssing; As acc to that: Only '3 percent' from Earth's (vast) surface remains on it's ecologically undisturbed, “safe and sound”, condition. In how . Most else having become more or less human-'compromised' 'till this day. (Resultantly all else, or much part, for long since even been on at it's 'original state' - Whatever the criteria used from defining that.) All else – at some point or time having gotten under the human disturbances. ; No wonder the climates then won't feel like it perhaps 'used from be', should be – For one thing - the ground hasn't been for long time, either! ------
One could of course make a number of good pointed arguments how the present deterioration was reached. Rich's past years book (...by 2018?; Losing Earth) combines some issues from the multinationels, fossil-fuel companies years long climatic denials on the followed few passages, 'nicely'. Soforth, we're citing that for these 'endings' – or for to cut this passage now in brief:
“...The rot extends, however, beyond the most cartoonish forms of denialism – the snowball brandished on the Senate floor, the 'educational' videos sent to elementary schools, the actors hired by the local utility to pledge support for a new power plant [...a p-ow: replace that 'idea' w. the word 'Nuclear energy plant' – and think from whether from the any essentials, of this sentence, at all, would change...(For a view-point - W-G.)] at city council meetings. The failure to acknowledge the problem is itself a form of denialism: a gaslighting by omission. The moderator of a presidential debate who neglects to pose a single question about climate change [...read/consider that, instead from as the word for: 'global warming' ; (W-G.)] ; the editor who declines to devote regular coverage to the issue because there is no immediate 'peg,' believing that a perpetual existential threat is not sufficiently newsy; the school board that skirts the topic because it seems too political or scientific – all make their own humble contributions to the thickening of the public ignorance.”
[...]
The greatest trick of the professional denialists is not to convince the world that global warming is a hoax. The world remains unconvinced; even three-quarters of U.S. voters are unconvinced. The denialists' greatest trick is to convince us that they are convinced - that they believe what they say. ...”(; 194-5.)
(...So I've thought too. Never thought for all these seen hoaxes to too much convincing...)
(A 'moral decline'...) ; Yet - on from anything more on the Climates said, by us...Perhaps it best admit that any too 'specific' coverage at this point wouldn't even had from turned too good in the making – Or for from too 'fruitful'.
And therefore, a reader having to do, by the latest, with those several quots from that Wallace-Wells at this post. Which, I think, might serve actually that purpose far better than my own few efforts would've had in any case.
Although,
it probably would appear a correct guessin' if much in addit from
those – devastating - pasts in nuclear histories (...on by the
1950s, 60s, -70s, 90s, 2000s...) still having been in the more lately
brought for a 'surface'. ; My few notices, prior writings here on it,
mainly (,or for their 'largest part') were basis to reads of those
few books by Brown (from 2013, and 2015.) ----------
(Supposin' our 'scheduel' now so...)
(pic, beside - below) ; ...apparently some "fatal attractions" ; ...w. slight modifications in the txt-bubble (words at). the source for; no to the orig. vampy-mag, by earlier we must'd already mentioned...
-------
; That 'Final Section' - ie now continues... ; w. the, ['2nd part']
“But carbon is, more or less, the least of it. Going forward, the planet's air won't just be warmer; it will likely also be dirtier, more oppressive, and more sickening. Droughts have a direct impact on air quality, ...By the 2090s, as many as 2 billion people globally will be breathing air above the WHO 'safe level'. Already, more than 10,000 people die from air pollution daily. ...“ ; Wallace-Wells, (on) The Uninhabitable Earth. A Story of the Future. (...at page 76. ; ...I think, that was.)
;
“...In the nineteenth century, the built environment of the most advanced countries reflected the prerogatives of industry – think of railroad tracks laid across whole continents to move coal. In the twentieth century, those same environments were made to reflect the needs of capital – think of global urbanization agglomerating labor supply for a new service economy. In the twenty-first century, they will reflect the demands of the climate crisis : seawalls, carbon-capture plantations, state-sized solar arrays. ... - even in a time of climate crisis, progressives will find ways to look out for number one.
We are already living within a deformed environment – indeed, quite deformated. In its swaggering twentieth century, the United States built two states of paradise: Florida, out of dismal swamp, and Southern California, out of desert. By 2100, neither will endure as Edenic postcards.
...We have simply crowded – or bullied, or brutalized – every other species into retreat, near-extinction, or worse. E.O.Wilson thinks the era might be better called the Eremocine – the age of loneliness.”(; Wallace-Wells; 128-9.)
;
“When my mother was born, in the early 1960s, in the nomadic indigenous communities, Lake Chad – which gave its name to my country – was covering 25,000 square kilometres between Chad, Cameroon, Niger and Nigeria. This is the equivalent of the size of a small country in Africa, like Rwanda. Today, this lake, which is the heart and soul of the Sahel region, covers only about 2,500 square kilometres. In fifty years, we have lost 90 per cent of this resource so essential for the life of one of the poorest regions of the world.
[...]
Everywhere on the planet, more than 370 million indigenous people who live according to the rhythm of nature, in symbiosis with their environment, tell the same stories. These stories tell a tale about the end of the world.
[...]
Water is not the only problem. Because with it, plants and animals essential for ecosystems and biological diversity disappear too. Women see their traditional medicines evaporate, preventing grandmothers from passing on to their daughters and granddaughters the names of plants than can cure diseases.
With this knowledge disappearing, it is part of the memory of humanity that is threatened with extinction. All knowledge that is lost, every ancestor that goes out, is a book that burns, or a library that disappears,... [...]
If tropical forests continue to be replaced by crops, if we are excluded from our lands, if the oceans are filled with plastics, if the chemical pollution that goes with industrial agriculture does not cease quickly, then our peoples will disappear, and with them millennia of knowledge of listening to nature.” ; (Hindou Oumarou Ibrahim) 'Indigenous peoples and the fight for survival'
;
“...Digital platforms have turned an already exploitative and extractive matketplace (think Walmart) into an even more dehumanizing successor (think Amazon). Most of us became aware of these downsides in the form of automated jobs, the gig economy and the demise of local retail.
But the more devastating impacts of pedal-to-the-metal digital capitalism fall on the environment and the global poor. The manufacture of some of our computers and smartphones still uses networks of slave labour. These practices are so deeply entrenched that a company called Fairphone, founded from the ground up to make and market ethical phones, learned it was impossible. (The company's founder now sadly refers to their products as 'fairer' phones. [...]
...If anything, the longer we ignore the social, economic and environmental repercussions, the more of a problem they become. ... [...]
When the hedge-funders asked me the best way to maintain authority over their security forces after the 'event', I suggested that their best bet would be to treat those people really well, right now. ... ” (Douglas Rushkoff) , 'Survival of the richest'
- (On...) that Extinction Rebellion Hand-book. (p, 54-5, 56, 57. ; 67.) Also cited on begins for to this post.
;
“What Silicon Valley technology giants share with fascism is an insistence on fixing problems immediately and not bothering to debate them first. That is mentality with popular appeal now.” (Davies; p. 203)
'Some omissions...' ; ...Doesn't probably do bad if prior to these following topic/the few quotates provided these circumstances somewhat explained: I chose at this place, by the first at least, devote the mains on this paragraph for Orwell – As for given his always remarkable actuality, the political importance, and everything else concerning – these seemed appear still, the 'spectacularly' useful readings by the present day. 'Still', as ever.
From the particulars; Reasons for the above told decision are actually 'two-fold'. ; First for the mentioning, may be that in during this “meanwhile” I took some 'flee', or a small trip (biking) for the elsewhere at country. And as from it's direct followings, my 'precious time' (...hah!) then somewhat passed on – on that and on few other tasks (, like the gardening...) Soforth – By now we're already closely approaching of the June. The intermission had a 'double-fold' consequences for my writing devoted about the garden-part: What I'd wrote already by the April now is already gotten quite hopelessly 'aged' – also in terms from the Nature's, and natural gardens summery 'growth-cycle' – As we're almost in the warmer Months here. A complete different tasks for do, the complete different plants emergin' on the flower, fx...
And so I suppose' can't too well return for to those thoughts, easily, without doing some insidious violence om the manner how them were wrote in a first place. How them, sort of, originally were meant appear for 'intertwined' – the climatic p-o-w's (point-of-view's) and the soon after represented garden-observations and discoveries in during that Spring.
The Second reason: ...relates partly for that same aspect. It merely being from, or foremost as I should of course admit, w. all the justifications – that the said much of the various hazzle-dazzle in that 'meanwhile', and before, made me then from so exhausted that at the moment. I'm not really finding the 'interest' for anything to so much considered and represented. Hence any 'lot' here in the followed, largely avoids most part my own estimatings and 'judgings' given on anything much.
Well, not from the completely of course...
Soforth; those merely for the explanations why I've not gathered on this much anything specifically for the Climate's-part.
(Said, maybe as I also feel, somewhat, the amount 'climatic' - or call that a 'moral'-, guilt from that 'choice' – We should, could've perhaps made still some mentions on that the far lasted, devasting left-afters of the present consumeristic 'life-standards' in the same. From the all'bout that long lasted greed – and how it, somewhat, still seems of continue – all from what seems still falling on a bearing by the many 'poorer' parts of this world.
; Or for from those most forewarned from Climate's 'random' alterations, also, it would've been in place at to have some 'discuss' of the aspects economically, environmentally, or, ao, fx for the socially considered.
; Nevertheless, these for to relieve the conscience...my own, or yours from. There of course would've as well been, apparent, then present seen number for as the 'more positive' signs - More than maybe just on a fewsome years past was. ; Such as what seems made the mains at this one Guardian-article. (Just as a one example, on the various seen.) New innovations, the renewals development... -------------
But, for these considerations, what here to the next - shortly - is merely a collection from some Orwells' political anecdotes.
History's 'lessons', if for some 'category', given/needed on the said examples.
...And if you'd then to think that idea to well cover (that) history for all the now renown centuries from a lasted capitalistic expansion, and – indeed - from it's more brutal, rapid latest growth-period, by the recent. If to think can learn also some lot of the past from how to the usual (present) 'co-followings', in many places, the said sort more 'unpleasant' co-histories apparent often tend get from, 'intentioned', a some wiping out by some 'regularity. (What now in the more usual treatment, often cons even these 'chapters' of the world wars part...Or, call that as for the formerly common 'asiding' - in words, w. one word.) ; Nevertheless, in the present-day webbed world', some lot that formerly wasn't so much recognized probably more better gains, seems achieve a more 'visibility' at least. (Fx in all these many recent movements and also the elsemuch often seems brought 'alight' from that longlasted colonial - or a postcolonial - past. Of it's many 'pasts', often from still continued. And from it's simultaneous 'exploitation' history, in particularly...)
; Soforth, I then also 'by the recent' read this another article. (Or a sequel in the former mentioned series' at the Guardian.) ; So can you, fx...'Although I not myself quite felt to had had, at the moment, the decent time to read through all that – But from the most parts. -----
...And then for the slight return to what was for the 'promised' 'bout - the Orwellian writings. (As those always tend, do feel from so actuelt.)
; ...I by the recent also paged some amount this following quoted collection. (From comprising of the Orwell's political writes, essay, ao's...) Noticed that the 'compile' been published by the 2001, while my readings only from it's – apparently – recent re-issued printing. (By the last year, perhaps...)
Finding then not any too much for complaining to it's contents. Combines in same volume some number the essays I'd read on that older collections I sometime a lot paged. (The one edited by Sonia Orwell, around by that (early?, was that...) 1960s.) ; Yet, what comes soon clear of what shall follow, this new 'edition' concerning – Don't expect any whole-hearted' acceptance for that of my part, my any finding. - As I don't, either, like to 'play' some 'cheap'. (...More like a few “kills” here given – As the view-point on around what the said 'compile', seems, mostly, aimed from having 'memorized' of about the Orwellian “past”. That from noting on what was 'lacking'. 'Cause from that reason...it merely feels like aimed like published to 'shift' – or enstrenghten – an image where all that best seen as only for some 'lived up' 'pasts'...)
; That what meant, sort of, by the above given words, 'fatal attractions'.
(Apparently) the man (George Orwell) a too fatal for except a, somewhat, impartial readings of. The same seems fit on the 'idea' given on that particular historical period (1950s-). - And hence it too actually seems somehow like been 'tied down' to some of the interpretations already made of, about the man (George Orwell.) But there is of course always more into that.
...Hence I then offer here these fewsome selections by myself - for the antidote. Mainly are those few cites of what Orwell's remarks cons the fascism – and for about it's reception. (Before the war, and fromafter that 1939.) -----------
Some examples; (The books cover, ie the 2020-Penguin edition...It seems use a some 'paste and stick' method; Has a bit of the English flag on the background - and then is a photo-illustration in a foreground of an East-Asian, 'dimly' lit personnel, a peasant prob. from of the stray-hat concluding walking beside some 'archaically' built bamboo-stick construction. Apparently it carrying some camera, perhaps?. ; ...Suppose that must appear a (recent, relative) famous a historical picture – perhaps having accompanied a some journalistic reportage, assumedly. But, as I can't quite recall for which the circumstances, nor can't recall for which years exactly, which the country...Even if I'd by some guesses, likehood for the 'origin' for it. So, I'm not making any conclusions for that basis.)
Finding therefore, at this case it more practical consideration that, that thinkin' bout an 'Orwellian present', this photo could here symbolize – almost – any corner of the world. ; ...The same cover seems also shows us then words 'Liberalism, Socialism' ... and a detail of some other -ism. (As much else but that first word in the list not is included at the picture.)
(Photo, beside) ; Don't remember if I'd already mentioned, before - But decided to plant the Tagetes this Spring. (ie the Mexican Marigold.) ; But...as I noticed from ran out of the containers for an early growing - I took the yoghurt-cans for replacing ones that I was lacking in number.
(Works for quite perfectly - with these, as w. some others too.)
Fromafter
a short look for the (compile's) context it soon seems show – on my
finding – to a quite a massive failure that there ain't not
from provided several such important pieces. - Such as, fx, the
article 'Not counting the niggers'
(by, from -48? if I would guess, remembering that y. of
publication...)
; And, then it seems also completely omit (Orwell's) that very political statement, essay/piece of writing, named as 'You and the Atomic Bomb'. – Written for some “first-hand impression” on after the Hiroshima, and relative soon after a discovery 'bout the begins for the - so called - 'atomic age'. So it's omission too, a major disappointment in the selections by first impression.
; Obviously there wouldn't been any lack of these sort materials...Number other 'essays' anyone who ever read Orwell, could've, no doubt, find for the recommending. ...That not the most significant p-o-w, leading us for these few “advices”.
It seems to me not a near so 'problematic' that the Animal Farm gains a place in these selections - but there's then not a single 'selection' of the Homage to Catalonia, fx. ; Some ways that, of course, maybe, appears the more easily defendable – being a briefer book, the first said might more 'easy fit' within all otherways briefer texts. Yet, it's quite obvious that just the Orwellian 'fable' remains still for so frustratingly “over-represented” in the 'most places', bookshops by that meant... It also quite unimaginable that the text wouldn't appear be available on some other print, in any shops, where this collection might also be found. Most usually there, in fact, often are just that Animal farm, and, the 1984 (1948).
; But, for the record: I've personally never felt any need of to buy that first said. (Having read the book maybe once, or perhaps second time at begins from my more serious Orwellian reads around by the some 10 y. ago.) Still more unfortunately to the editors selections, almost anybody – if living on our 'late capitalistic' “West” – also might recall having from seen that, at least once or twice, as a tv-cartoon. (Was popularly presented in some now long ago backyears. Maybe around those 1980s years when also Pink Floyd's “The Wall” was quite similarly, 'irregularly but regularly' presented on a TV – While that, perhaps, from somewhat less often, ...supposed'.)
; Also, in the collection is then some passages from the war years (-41) 'The Lion and the Unicorn' - But as them happen comprise only of the most usual seen 'first section' from book (Or, 'pamphlet', as that could also has been 'termed' for to. Besides, those parts in all bear the name: 'England Your England', so one almost automatically is lead for think – that flag in the front-cover of the collection – If from, maybe, this 'compile' then was put together especially the English reader-ship in mind...
...But like said – besides these few major flaws pointed-out - I'd from not so much any additional complains to offer from. - Obviously, would've made a several differing 'choices' by myself. But it feels me too, at these days from ours (some 60-70 y. later...) – Maybe it's still at least good that some 'combined version' of the Orwell's essayist-writing would then deserve it's place in being available. To 'common readers', meaning. On “cheap” prices, as some 'pocket'-edition. (The editorials make a mention that selections are of the larger 'semi-volume' Collected Works from...)
[Addit ;] For an afterthought might add, say that...'No doubt', the politics ; Or from still better said: the political writing(s) - often are a somewhat 'flexible' issue. (The opinions typically tend differ, a lot.) BUT, unfortunately for the compilers, editors of this present collection, Orwell - in brief - isn't.
There are, of course, also many alternative 'compiles' available...While my very limited familiarity, indeed, w. those doesn't either lead me necessary from think that any 'selective' would so well having 'outplayed' that 4-volume collections I mostly read Orwell's essays from. (Above mentioned. That 'Essays, journalism, letters...'.) ; But it naturally depends for about how far your/anyone's interest might lead him/her at this “horn of plenty”... ---------
However, then – We still have to reject that 'Introduction' (,by Timothy Garton Ash, in the discussed modern 'edition', 2001/-20.)
For, w. that in mind, thought from...the book seems succeed to leave me w. somewhat less elevated feelings (Than it from otherways would, maybe.)
Mostly, the introduction contains some lot 'dwelling' built around that already (enough) addressed text (ie, so boring to repeat, that Animal Farm). Of course such not of so much does surprise. ; Yet, I raise aforth a one sentence, most repellent in my any finding. Almost at begins, that (from) '... Yet the world of Nineteen Eighty-Four ended in 1989.' - And then it continues, ao with followings said; 'Orwellian regimes persisted in a few remote countries, such as North Korea, ...But the three dragons against which George Orwell fought his good fight – European and especially British Imperialism, Fascism, ...; and Communism... were all either dead or mortally weakened. ...'
...Quite possible that those above said 'historical monstrosities' (my terming...) were the majorest evils that Orwell opposed, in during those days prior to his death, the 'most'. And wrote the large part his words to object those. Probably, could've considered the said totalitarisms for the most 'gnawing' things that threatened world peace, by his late years. (Doesn't really matter cons at this argument.)
In a present view – by 2001 or 2020s – it being a complete untruth to claim that the totalitarism in (any) state politics would've ended for 'till that said particular year. Such as we fx, from the 1990s, and, the followed decade('s) capitalistic- and say, post-colonialistic, wars easily may already – and well adequate – learned for, about.
(; Quite as well, I could myself – w. similarly argumentatively, the 'proofs' given - while that would demand too much effort in the lenght and limits of this text - for express that in a year 1986 began a new period in a totalitarism. In that modern era which we're apparently nowadays living – An 'era' from a climate-totalitarianism. And most everyone would automatically know what I'd mean by that year given. ; Obviously, as some 'time-post' - it's almost as arbitrary and from little 'enlightening' to some year chosen - as the timing for the ends of the 'global' communism given for some 'timing' for the ends by the totalitarism', in the world. Or even in the, so called, “West”.)
; Let us close these 'remarks' in short – In the mention that by this saying you are also lead subsequent, as the 'main idea', for from comprehend that I not bothered to read the books Introduction for it's ends. Not any further fromafter these recognitions of mine. As the above said finding(s), proved already what it would been the worth. – For the record, therefore didn't think that of to any 'my worth'.
– And I'm even not saying that any reader wouldn't be (relative) happy from to spend some arm-chair hours w. these 'offerings' at the said 'compilation'.
; ...Only saying that anyone interested on might do good if they'd to bother about even this much to some personal estimating – of 'this sort' – by their own. Bother for some considerations about what comes to these apparent limitations and omission in the said 'edition'. (From Orwell's 'essayist'-writings.) ; And besides, a more comprihensive understanding is this case by relative easily achieved – read alongside a fewsome 'Orwellian' biographies, or, some impartial histories on the post-war years. (One then obviously needs to know which would appear good choices, of course...)
; Better yet, some fiction by Orwell's own wouldn't do any bad either: Actually his novels seem to me the very best place for to start – for this aspect in mind.
And...well I guess that point already made clear.) ---------
(Photo - beside) ; ...the roots shown, from that preceding pics tagetes-seedling, grown on a former yoghurt-container. ; ...As you can see of that photo, it's roots aren't for near completely developed. (The idea in pregrowin' of plants 'indoors' being, mostly, that the roots reach enough growth prior from brought outdoors and planted.) ; But as the Tagetes are indeed very rapid to grow - in compared to most/many garden seasonals, even - I not often care to await their 'full growth', but was planting those already a week before (Now the 31st May.)
; Acc. my some experience that 'haste' may somewhat enslow their emergence for the flowering - But not so much that'd it would for too much matter - this case. (As it grown by now, about 1 and half Months. Some perennial flowers - in some difference - may need even a mere 4 Months pregrowing for good results.)
(...and now), 'finally', some selections. (...on those 'bestial' back-pages...) ; Or say – these to fewsome 'Appetizers' - If the previous got you thinkin for some 'Orwellian' repast. Or, a “meal”. ;
“On the face of it, Mussolini's collapse was a story straight out of Victorian melodrama. At long last Righteousness had triumphed, the wicked man was disconfited, the mills of God were doing their stuff. On second thoughts, however, this moral tale is less simple and less edifying. To begin with, ...
... The list of charges is an impressive one, and the main facts - ...are not denied. Concentration camps, broken treaties, rubber truncheons, castor oil – everything is admitted. The only troublesome question is: How can something that was praiseworthy... ten years ago, say – suddenly become reprehensible now ? Mussolini is allowed to call witnesses, both living and dead, and to show by their own printed words that from the very first the responsible leaders of British opinion have encouraged him in everything he did. For instance, ...
[...a full list has many as a five singular examples, that are quoted into that – we are satisfied here, for only to some 'gimmicks' from, w. a two – and them aren't by no means, are not selectively chosen, of course... ; ]
Here is Winston Churchill in 1927:
If I had been an Italian I am sure I should have been wholeheartedly with you in your triumphant struggle against the bestial appetites and passions of Leninism... Italy [– 'abbrevit' is as on the compile the text for here 'reprinted' – Ie; those 'three dots' – on this place, not added by us...] has provided the necessary antidote to the Russian poison. Hereafter a great nation will be unprovided with an ultimate means of protection against the cancerous growth of Bolshevism.
[...the “daily” - 'talks again'(?) ; W-G.]
Here is Mr. Ward Price, of the Daily Mail, in 1932:
Ignorant and prejudiced people talk of Italian affairs as if that nation were subject to some tyranny which it would willingly throw off. With that rather morbid commiseration for fanatical minorities which is the rule with certain imperfectly informed sections of British public opinion, this country long shut its eyes to the magnificient work that the fascist regime was doing. I have several times heard Mussolini himself express his gratitude to the Daily Mail as having been the first British newspaper to put his aims fairly before the world.
And so on, and so on, and so on. Hoare, [Sir John] Simon, Halifax, Neville Chamberlain, Austen Chamberlain, Hore-Belisha, Amery, Lord Lloyd and various others enter the witness-box, all of them ready to testify that, whether Mussolini was crushing the Italian trade unions, non-intervening in Spain, pouring mustard gas on the Abyssinians, throwing Arabs out of aeroplanes or building up a navy for use against Britain, British government and it's official spokesmen supported him through thick and thin. ...
Now the book is a fanciful one, but this conclusion is realistic. [...at the omitted part, expression above, ao says: 'The net impression left by this part is of the trial is quite simply that Mussolini is not guilty.'] It is immensely unlike that the British Tories will ever put Mussolini on trial. There is nothing that they could accuse him of except his declaration of war in 1940. ...
The history of British relations with Mussolini illustrates the structural weakness of a capitalist state. ...
[...]
When one thinks of the lies and betrayals of those years [meaning, onwards from a y. 1934-], the cynical abandonment of one ally after another, the imbecile optimism of the Tory press, the flat refusal to believe that the Dictators meant war, even when they shouted it from the housetops, the inability of the moneyed class to see anything wrong whatever in concentration camps, ghettoes, massacres and undeclared wars, one is driven to feel that moral decadence played its part as well as mere stupidity. By 1937 or thereabouts it was not possible to be in doubt about the nature of the Fascist régimes. But the lords of property had decided that Fascism was on their side and they were willing to swallow the most stinking evils so long as their property remained secure. In their clumsy way they were playing the game of Macchiavelli, of 'political realism', of 'anything is right which advances the cause of the Party' – the Party in this case, of course, being the Conservative Party.
...“ ; (Orwell) - on (Review of) 'The Trial of Mussolini by 'Cassius' - (Orig. appeared on Tribune, 22 Oct 1943) ; The quotates here – means this and the following one – are via Orwell and Politics (Penguin Classics, reissued ed. - Originally, seems that, was published on 2001.)
;
“It is a sign of the speed at which events are moving that Hurst and Blackett's unexpurgated edition of Mein Kampf, published only a year ago, is edited from a pro-Hitler angle. The obvious intention of the translator's preface and notes is to tone down the book's ferocity and present Hitler in as kindly a light as possible. For at that date Hitler was still respectable. He had crushed the German labour movement, and for that the property-owning classes were willing to forgive him almost anything. Both Left and Right [...noticeable (, that) both are written beginning w. the big Initial...] concurred in the very shallow notion that National Socialism was merely a version of Conservatism.
Then suddenly it turned out that Hitler was not respectable after all. As one result of this, Hurst and Blackett's edition was reissued in a new jacket explaining that all profits would be devoted to the Red Cross. ...
... But Hitler could not have succeeded against his many rivals if it had not been for the attraction of his own personality, which one can feel even in the clumsy writing of Mein Kampf, and which is no doubt overwhelming when one hears his speeches. I should like to put it on record that I have never been able to dislike Hitler. Ever since he came to power – till then, like nearly everyone, I had been deceived into thinking that he did not matter – I have reflected that I would certainly kill him if could get within reach of him, but that I could feel no personal animosity. The fact is that there is something deeply appealing about him. ... The initial, personal cause of his grievance against the universe can only be guessed at; but at any rate the grievance is there. He is the martyr, the victim. Prometheus chained to the rock, the self-sacrificing hero who fights single-handed against impossible odds. If he were killing a mouse he would know how to make it seem like a dragon. One feels, as with Napoleon, that he is fighting against destiny, the he can't win, and yet that he somehow deserves to. The attraction of such a pose is of course enormous; half the films that one sees turn upon some such theme.
...” - on (Review of) 'Mein Kampf by Adolf Hitler, unabridged translation' (Orig. on New English Weekly, 21 March 1940 (; Ibid)
...And then, suppose we can as well 'nail down' this argument, via from having still a fewsome more examples here for 'offered'. From Orwell's written, penned examples during those war-years...
(One of course needs remember that the followed too having been written by some 75 y. ago.) ;
“Of all the unanswered question of our time, perhaps the most important is: 'What is Fascism?'
[...such as, by our days, one could well for outline, instead to 'express' (Comparably, use as the words) : '...what (exactly) is the Global warming ?' ; Or, 'What is...the Climate Change' - If you'd rather allow yourself, at this view, a similar sort play w. the words. ...Or, I say so, since w. the words, that's some allowance never free of charge. ; Yet, for the sake from my own admittin', anything – here merely just leads us to the last section, on this post - that moral ground...) ]
[...]
Here I am not speaking of the verbal use of the term 'Fascist'. I am speaking of what I have seen in print. I have seen the words 'Fascist in sympathy', or 'of Fascist tendency', or just plain 'Fascist', applied in all seriousness to the following bodies of people:
Conservatives: All Conservatives, appeasers or anti-appeasers, are held to be subjectively pro-Fascist. British rule in India and the Colonies is held to be indistinguishable from Nazism. ...
Socialists: Defenders of the old-style capitalism (example, Sir Ernest Benn) maintain that Socialism and Fascism are the same thing. Some Catholic journalists maintain that Socialists have been the principal collaborators in the Nazi-occupied countries. ...
Communists: A considerable school of thought (examples, Rausching, Peter Drucker, James Burnham, F.A.Voigt) refuses to recognize a difference between the Nazi and Soviet régimes; and holds that all Fascists and Communists are aiming at approximately the same thing and are even to some extent the same people. ...
Trostkyists: Communists charge the Trotskyists proper, i.e., Trotsky's own organisation, with being crypto-Fascist organisation in Nazi pay. This was widely believed on the Left during the Popular Front period. ...
Catholics: Outside its own ranks, the Catholic Church is almost universally regarded as pro-Fascist, both objectively and subjectively.
[...for Orwell's limits – and also if to say smght about on his own backgrounds (the 'religious', or 'national' background) – this is being the only section that I didn't needed be enshortened at it's 'reprinting' here. (Due from) - he puts the whole argument in one sentence, without finding any need of the further explains...]
War-resisters: Pacifists and others who are anti-war are frequently accused not only of making things easier for the Axis, but of becoming tinged with pro-fascist feeling. [...No, dis-remembered 'bout that : This one too avoids any further 'comments', even of other some sentences lenght from.]
Supporters of the war: War-resisters usually base their case on the claim that British Imperialism is worse than Nazism, and tend to apply the term 'Fascist' to anyone who wished for a military victory. The supporters of the People's Convention came near to claiming that willingness to resist a Nazi invasion was a sign of Fascist sympathies. The Home Guard was denounced as a Fascist organisation as soon as it appeared. ...
Nationalists: Nationalism is universally regarded as inherently Fascist, but this is held only to apply to such national movements as the speaker happens to disapprove of. Arab nationalism, Polish nationalism, Finnish nationalism, the Indian Congress Party, the Muslim League, Zionism, and the I.R.A. Are all described as Fascist – but not by the same people.
[...On this point, I...can't avoid to make a reference 'bout the Orwell's better known (1945-)article, 'Notes on Nationalism' – For, it happens contain fx this one sentence (among others): “By 'nationalism' I mean first of all the habit of assuming that human beings can be classified like insects and that whole blocks of millions or tens of millions of people can be confidently labelled 'good' or 'bad'.” (...In a one sentence after, Orwell also ads the more common-place notion: 'Nationalism is not to be confused with patriotism' ; ...Which for some aid at his modern reading.– On cons his character... or from the more conveniently said, to some 'clues', understandings on about his own times.]
(...And then rest for what we still chose for this quotation:)
It will be seen that as used, the word 'Fascism' is almost entirely meaningless. ...
Yet underneath all this mess there does lie a kind of buried meaning. ...
[...]
But Fascism is also a political and economic system. Why, then, cannot we have a clear and generally accepted definition of it? Alas! We shall not get one – not yet, anyway. To say why would take too long, but basically it is because it is impossible to define fascism satisfactorily without making admissions which neither the Fascists themselves, nor the Conservatives, nor Socialists of any colour, are willing to make. All one can do for the moment is to use the word with a certain amount of circumspection and not, as is usually done, degrade it to the level of a swearword.” ; (Orig., ...seems said for published on his famous war-time column, 'As I Please', as the seq. named 'What is Fascism?' ; Tribune, 25 March 1944) ; ...On this 2001[ie; 2020]-collection, of p.: 321, 322-3, 324.)
(And here, at this point 'the case closed'.) ------
Or, as for in addition a little, 'accomp.' climatic 'co-argument'... ; On which we may then express that on moral grounds any words appear be also rather costly.
Hence from, they often seem say nowadays, that 'big polluters' and -companies increasingly by the more recent having advanced favoring an alternative 'tactique' for the 'climatic denial' – that often noted as for an 'easy adjustment'. Or in still other 'terming' – since for that seem indeed lately become to evermore popular in uses – meaning by that a now constant increased seen greenwashing. In the adverts, stories, 'reports', cons often how any histories now seem from increasingly often wished seen.
(Anyone, of course, might feel there a place from developing that idea a some bit further...From thought basis those above given Orwellian definings on chacracteristic uses for the word, fascism, on his times.)
And, certainly the totalitarism (, in thesocieties, at the 'modern states'), certainly not died out w. the fall of the most communistic 'systems'. By around the 1990s, in that decades, during those 'back-years'.
...Otherways, fx, you wouldn't had had the two-Iraq wars – at least not in the manner those were executed – and neither all the now so apparent climatic stealths. (That what'd often now been recognized taken from the peoples and Natures any 'reserve', on a that period, now seen most negatively in it's still after continued fossil-fuel pollution. All the capitalistic and anti-ecologic stealth through the Bush's two periods. Stealth from the future generations mostly. And from ourselves, in the present already evermore aware of, from - forewarned and increasingly more often alarmed from these climatic followings.)
...Otherways, 'anything like', it wouldn't so outright have continued to this far. Until “this day”, 'till yesterday – Or however, 'bout that timing, it's some timing by the specifically - the year, decade, doesn't really by now of to that much matter. Of cons this present climatic problem.
; Whether of the latter 'all the blame' could be laid for against the 'western powers', and our developed 'capitalistic world' - I don't exactly think possible, or needs of the contemplating w. any further words. Not at this point. – But thinkin there every reason for say that the whole lots of it – it's totalitarism, that climatic fascism, and even what can be still found for the very apparent failings at this present technological 'fixation' for to always seek some 'countermeasures' – All that totality there was, it wouldn't elseways lasted so far. Obviously there was not any practical 'end' to the guarded, 'Orwellian' social oppression in societies by the early 1990s. Or, an end from such 'organization' of the 'state', countries in a so called "West" also. – Fromafter that loosely given timing (,'year 1990'.)
Not even if we'd for to think the (so called) cold war from had ended at that time.
More so, there was a notable continuence. In all (much) on that said're-invented' imperialistical totalitarianism. Climatic neglect and undervelopment in a common 'global scaling'. (It's 'global' scaling, realised in a seen 'new level' of a bestiality' in form some capital greed.)
;
So – for to prevent any chance from mis-interpreting the above
said, or it for the recollectings sake; Was a (some) period of the
(climatic) totalitarianism, ...capitalism, ...fasc... ; [W-G.] ------------------------------------
Simple subjects, ...'mostly' ;
[ the '3rd part', section...]
“... In a 2018 paper, forty-two scientists from around the world warned that, in a business-as-usual scenario, no ecosystem on Earth was safe, with transformation 'ubiquituous and dramatic,' exceeding to just one or two centuries the amount of change that unfolded in the most dramatic periods of transformation in the earth's history over tens of thousands of years. Half of the Great Barrier Reef has already died, ...” ; (Wallace-Wells; p. 226)
; “...Supreme symbol of the Southwest, the saguaro is a giant among cacti, a 20- to 50-foot-high fluted columns of chlorophylled plant flesh that comes in as many different shapes and sizes as human beings do. Like planted people, no two alike, individual and idiosyncratic, each saguaro has its own form, its own character, its own personality. Or so it seemed to me then; and now, more than 25 years later, it still does. When nobody else is around, I talk to them. On simple subjects, of course.” ; (Edward Abbey), from the Cactus Country (by 1973; p. 22.)
(Photo, beside right) ; ...While I've no cacti/cactuses grown in the garden, I've a one 'shrub' that quite (, well...a little) resembles those in looks: the 'Oregon Grape' (Mahonia aquifolium). ; ...It would be, perhaps, quite possible to grow cacti in that garden greenhouse - now that whole construction 'bathes' in a most direct sunshine, and the day-time temperatures on it's hottest corner seem to vary btw 30-60 degrees C. - during the warmest summery Months. (So you get the idea that there's not so often much use keepin there grown flowers or staples postward from mid-June. Depending of the summers, though.)
; Then, of the mention, that my Mahonia (.aquifolium), on above pic, not grows at greenhouse - For its a completely over-wintering garden plant here too. I keep the 'bush' mainly due because of it's very lovely flowers. (Another good p-o-w is that the shrub can be kept, almost as well, in the darker enshaded part at garden.) It grows rather slow - Of that part too is, 'almost', like the cacti. ; Wikip., seems offer us fx the following few details more; "...evergreen shrub growing 1 m (3 ft) to 3 m (10 ft) tall by 1.5 m (ft) wide, with pinnate leaves of spiny leaflets , and dense clusters of yellow flowers in early spring, ..." - At the time, decided to acquire this as I liked it much better to here nowadays much more common cultivated Rhododendrons. Well...those maybe the most parts on it's 'story' - so far. ---------
'My
garden left to fight'
(,from the Left and
from the Right...)
Or, maybe we'll prefer – as the 'subtitle', to this 'last round' - (On the,) 'Moral Grounds'...
A some point of notice... : As I took the former remarked brief pause from these writes, during our 'meanwhile', anything from the following said still was consisting mostly to what I'd written around, before the early from May. – And now we're already almost at the June. (Approaching pretty rapidly are Summery seasons and from the more warm Months here....)
(Photo, beside/above left) ; (Common) Dandelion (T.officinalis) - a most typical 'weedy-some' flower that numbers of bees visit. Here ones sees those, maybe, ca from by the midst of a May. The insect looks little like a small 'bumble' - But more likely it must appear a some solitary bee. (Don't know which. But one sees those to relative often, by the occasional, around fromafter the said timing. Which must be - like a very good thing. )
...It also has so far been generally relative cold, still to this far of the Spring. Since it been promised now to follow a more warming in the local weathers - there appears then also the most rapid growth of the plants, right now most visible, apparent. Actually, as just previous was some very rainy days, and also was the occasional rains even for prior that, the growth by that vegetation seems make everything to turn for the very 'lush', by the looks. (At this moment, on a 29th of May.) Which is good – from thinkin' it does feel rather more unlike that any longer Spring-period 'dry spell' could now make it's stay, by this year. ; On the other hand, it of course still not a complete impossibility that the June – most often formerly used to be/was a best favourable Month in that overall 'greenery' – wouldn't still turn for show the sort too heated weathers from.
By anycases, as those rains often now seem also from pouring by some notable 'force' – which seems, to quite much, in accordance to what it for now been 'forecasted' - the usual said prediction – that's assumedly quite in similarity w. what seem now believed to occasional for happen, along the said climatic 'extremes' now becoming more common. ; (So, whatever that outcome by this year; Indeed also this present year's conditions, even while so far it of bit colder been, seems for quite 'fit' in anything former said cons for that criteria.)
It perhaps still needs be recognized that despite those general cold(s), there was not much any real frosts in during the 'late Spring' here, either.
From the plants observed, all in all it seems as well been rather favorable now. (In particular as my most cultivations are of the more warmth-demanding garden species. ; Both for concerning the 'domestic' and “foreign” perennials, or some for the 'groceries' - in generall all the lot I've planned for cultivated this year.)
; From my part (also) the good thing is that (likely) these bit colder conditions seem of permitting the growth at the greenhouse to remain a more favorable for the plants. (At least a bit longer. ;...For the too much of a direct heat tends affect negatively, and the place ain't now similarly 'enshadowed' than how it formerly used for be.)
Recently I was already also gathering the Summers first salads there, from this timing.
...On 'outdoors' you by now find, to the much part/most of the 'Springly'-blooming trees, as well as some early ground-plants, already well in flowering.
Supposing, or I think, it perhaps largely due that of the former colds them at first were little 'delayed' for, to. – And then those occasional heated days taken places, the general temperatures already got warmer in during nights (over the former 'average', say) – then some 'late Spring' flowerers also seem already got from emergin in bloom. Hence also the said early 'lush' in vegetation by this timing. Matter a fact, the similar sort weathers seems become typical, or to the more regularity, already from a few most recent, previous years here. -------
(Photo, beside) ; Oregon grape-/Mahonia -flower. ; Such as one sees them are very enchanting watched in at May-morning/evening sunlight. Bees visit too; 'Though, apparently, not by so many. At least I've seen not those in any 'vast' numbers to. Among other reasons why - When it blooms it being still quite early, not so many from around...
; Yet, acc my any previous estimates it now seems perhaps still more probable the weathers realised would also show a bit similar variance between some shinier days, or 'periods' and – then also those rains. (Which might then also appear to quite favoring my plans at gardening – As I'm also planning to be away a few weeks by that June.) Nevertheless, that late Spring can still turn for the less favoring from the weather condition. Only now it looks we'll finally having some warmer weeks...
Of the last Winters part – It seemed that my any older, well-rooted garden perennials very well enjoyed those now better snows we had. By the timing for begins of this post – Which was, already by the 18th April - Them seemed only for a bit too fast on their starting from emerge in growth. (As we had after that somewhat warmer 'phase' around that Months turning, but after – say - that 1st by May it then soon got generally from the slight more colder weeks again...) ; Like said, in general nothing was very unusual on Spring-weathers, either. (But the slight divergences still – Actually perhaps more noticeably than now on these summer Months.)
A few good 'benefits', of the gardening considered, are that despite the some 'slowness' in any growth at these 'latitudes' (meaning, on an early season, during Spring-time until, ca, the 'midst by May'...) - on a natural garden you still find already plenty nice flowers from earliest to those Spring Months. – I-o-w; you already can feel pretty assured that there shall appear for more continuous flowering soon after the bit more warmer weeks have arrived, the soil having from warmed-up enough. (As I've also have been caring this garden of some years now, planting and relocating, weeding and 're-arraging' - I've gotten quite used of noticing which timing any plant will 'start' it's period. And there is always some plants in flowers allthrough the warmer seasons.)
; And the best part, definitely, at this gardening seems (that) by selecting some proper ones – also some that appearing here native growing species - Or, at least some that maybe from longer pasts have got here on 'naturalized' from...You can also then be quite sure for during the Summer Months there being seen some plenty of insects coming for visits to them.
For, if there are at least a some natural plants on your garden their good 'arrivals' become almost 100 percent sure. ; For the other good reasons, to those also belongs that the native flowers, at their proper environments, almost never miss from flowering. No matter what the weather in generally. So one tends always see some insect even during this 'earlier part the year'. When there's still less of the insects at air, in general. (Matter a fact, by the first 'real' warm period one usually notices how the numbers of the insect seen quite soon, 'quickly', from increase. In any regular year, of the weathers - And then that usually keeps to an araise until by the most warm weeks of the late Summer.)
Also - like the increasing evidence seems now having for proved – the numbers by many insect are often found for declined. (Esp. apparent said for many similar sort 'urbanhoods' as mine.)
(...We're possibly, though, having an enough 'wildsides' and everything 'relative' natural lands still for to maintain them in good numbers. ; My garden wouldn't actually populate quite so good numbers, unless the forest wasn't so close. Still, some 'relative scarcities' are quite apparent, easily noticed – Like I've noted before, fx the number day-time butterflies one tend see here is quite limited – In fact, very much indeed, consisting of the 'typical' ones. Practically the commonest, and nothing much exceptional else I would've seen...on these gardens.)
Here as elsewhere, there are (,no doubt) several that once were very common – But nowadays there numberfor that'd become the more or less threatened. (Usually that to originating for the various reasons. Let us not go for any details of that, now...) ; ...For, who's ever to say, who's to know too sure, by any moment, from followed decades on that?
; ...So, even for the more 'commoners' it's good to cultivate some good nectar-sources that them are more familiar with. (The usual urban sprawl and an accompanying more common human 'neglect' about such things surely to affect for the negative, for that part thinkin...)
Yet, hence reasons, or often from, much at my recent planting and of 'selections' to the garden. (Like said, often the funniest part in this natural gardening.) It not nears any multivariety that could, in a good day, be found at an old meadow, in plentyful from feeding on good natural flowers...But then, often those become easily observable w. less trouble on a this sort flower-garden. – And you tend surprise a lot, of whatever new 'once a while' seems from to 'come around', in form ofany new insect arrivals seen... -------
...I've also sometimes thought it could be nice for have some flowers at bloom already by this early Spring (ie: it when still was the early Spring, now almost 1.5 Months ago...) - I've then tried for think some good selections to be grown of the particular timing in mind. ; ...At this season, or maybe even little earlier, when snows were from 'almost gone'. - Yet, it actually tends proven for quite (which is actually, somwhat surprising) – a difficulty to finding for some suitable choices for grown. The flowerings to this period in mind (March/April)
Or, at least my any successes on that part haven't been the very great.
(Photo, beside) ; Crocus-flowers, on an early Spring. The ground was still almost devoid of the grasses (or from other visible, constant vegetations). The bumble must've been some earliest seen in garden. The Crocuses tend usual increase in dividing from their bulbs (I think) - So they form small 'clusters' on various place around the lawn - and are indeed the very first to flower, usually. (Of late March/April, oftenmost.)
; Yet, I'm fx having now some Corydalis (.cava) of planted just to that 'task' in mind. - The early June coming, I'm still to see from whether there had been any successes cons from those. Sowed already at the last Autumn. (I'm not actually too in knowing 'bout why so. Maybe I've not just 'identified' any those in midst by my somewhat...messy “growin box” on where them were sown. As it being 'populated' by, also by some regular weeds and random other 'self-sowing' species of the garden. Or maybe the said only would just take the more time...) ; Anyway, once for identified, I plan for relocate them in the garden. Most likely under some treecovers, perhaps in 'midst' the grass-yard.
Of course, there are also some bulbs which regularly tend flower rather early (Crocus, for example. And the Snowdrop, ie G.nivalis – both tend be my first-at-Springs joys - of sighted for already earliest at April). And then there is the Cowslip (Primula vers). (While those only bloomin' from somewhat later. But them also flower lot longer time.) – Cowslips also seem of (very) capable to spread themselves at the every other 'spot' available, often are found also to grow nearby any larger perennials, bushes, etc plants. In fact, it a very practical natural flower. ('Though those 'cultivars' on garden are maybe of some 'hybrid' variety, as their so large ones.)
(Photo, beside) ; ...A Cowslip-flower. ; From formerly I thought not to seen any insects on those - But the reason may also been from that it's small 'tubulars' seem of easily hide their visitors when only w. a cursory sighting. (Had a photo of a bee on it - But unfortunately I seem not have that amongst these fewsomes...)
; ...That then seems bring on mind also the Pansies, by former mentioned, which also now (, the May/June) in blooming. ; And that, furthermore, also brought for the thought the Forget-me-nots (Myosotis-spec.) ...On which actually some very nice blooms by the moment (ie, that June again...) Those Forget-me-nots also were seen arrived at garden in a natural manner, ie 'by their own'. – But as them also tend to take places in any good soils for 'undersides' of the actual garden-perennials, I'm then often weeding a large part those off in time.)
And then; Like from former mentioned was, I'm also fx just for the early-of-Spring seasons sake having the Hepatica brought for a few spots in garden. (On the gardens, actually...) It too flowers sometimes, even early as late March - but more commonly on a some weeks after. At April. Usually when there still would remain a 'few heaps' of the snow on a most enshadowed 'corners' or spots from.
; So at a few occasions also having considered some other native species which could be brought for the good choices into this early-Spring. – No doubt, that could be arranged, if not so soon – Then in during some time in the further years. So far I've actually mostly not paid the much of attentions on that part...for I've always havin' had the more of other cultivations. That meaning, (those) grown for to flowering during the more 'favorable' Months. But you see some 'fly-byers' ever since when there earliest flowers. (Brimstone, fx, occasioned is seen even on March, on any very warm day by then.)
(Photo, beside right) ;...Almost forgot to add: One other 'bulb' that we early see at flower, appears that Muscari (or, Grape Hyacinth). Them seem orinated from Greece, and Near Asia. But the modern varieties, perhaps are hybridized ones. Anyways, surely among first bumbles there a few species that often seen on this.; And - like typical to some bulbaceous 'garden escapees' can also be found at places that seen some (slight) human disturbance. Like here, for example, growin beside roadsise, next to the heavy 'granite stone'. (Luckily, it has no potential of to become any invasive harms from...)
Along from w. those... the aspect still brought for mind that now we're having some blooms of the Creeping Noverlwort (Omphalades verna) – A quite early flowerer too. (...on early May). Said also from easily of naturalising. Or, seems said it can spread for the some typical environments 'to the nearby' - Such as are the '...gardens, yards, wasteland'.
; Although, I think it from a quite rare I've seen any insects on those. Yet, it's 'sky blue' (or, some say 'navy blue') flowers indeed very nice of watch. (At this period, when there not to so many others even.)
; Actually, many to those earliest Months flowerers do appear represented blue in color – Don't know too exactly why...But that aspect has, prob., a some much to do w. the insects. (...Quite assured from that. Not even for 'supposin'...)
; ...And (,still to a mention...) - despite that I'm not particularly any favorer for the bulbs – The 'Snakehead Lilies' early too (on May). On a some post formerly described. Those also might appear almost the sole ones of bulbs I'd by myself planted for these garden(s). Of course, w. the bulbs one could very easily add some numbers at these early-Spring season cultivars, flowers of early Mmonths... ------------
-------------
Soforth, like it was noted, the Winter seems had lasted 'till rather late in thepresent year.
I was, for examples, still skiing on a week before that timing I former said from this text already having begun. (on April the 18th. ie: ...was skiing still for a prior before that week, timing.) And, would I for had wished to, could've still gone on my tracks as late as on a week after, even. Although, the tracks and temperatures weren't then anymore any tolerable by the said time coming, and hence, I didn't. Not after for the said week.
; After that, the snows also were seen from more rapid melting (On during some more sunshiny early days...or weeks by. Can't quite recall too particularly, anymore.) But the (over) plus 10 Celsius was 'regular', during for some those days already in the April, I noticed. And any leftovers from the remained snows, in the open were prob. gone in fewsome days after that. Of the woods, at the most shady spots there, I guess them still remained a much bit longer – Well 'till the 'labour day', anyways. (That being on 1st from the May.)
Basis all that, it seems actually been on this year – pretty much/near to the former regular. Even if from a bit colder than it usually tends been. Except: It now seems being very apparent that the snows seem from arrive some much later than during any former decades. And for some 'excepting also'; There certain was a more notable 'irregularity' in weathers, easily recognized, during by this Winter too. – Yet, indeed, the season seemed prove for a more cold than during some for previous years. It's still not too clear, or not so easy say from how the Summer then this after shall turn to. – That in mind, I also think for the little after this described fewsome new cultivations from. None for the very demanding ones, the most from at least are not. ---------
'Not just physical, but sensical...' (...or smght like that.) ; From my skiings 'part', as the few more reminders, them then next briefly mentioned: In that previous Winter my kilometers finally did reach to as much as 1478. (Congratulating[!] for myself, by myself..., 'Te Deum !') ; Or, as the afterthought we may think about (that) of just as merrily...Due because from; No bones broken, in during the period, neither did I get on any period of this winter from to complete exhausted. – Though I wasn't also much avoiding any potential 'threat' by that. (From liking so much of the said sport.) Yet - guess' we may think that too for a sort reason for some merriment. (Or, for to raise a 'toast'.)
; ...Well, in truth said at the (cross country) skiing there more rarely any accidents. If you only pay some regular attentions to. - Besides that, I'm also a pretty cautious on skis when of goin' the downhills.
...So, as for those skiing distances, this year, also that said figure (of km's) even then well exceeded my any former estimates to. (May appear be a bit 'artificial' sounding figure, of course. It not from too precise a counting. Not any distances too exact measured, w. fx on some runner's 'watch', or w. the anything similar. Only were my own overall estimatings from.) ; I didn't also by any intentional manner, fx, try of exceed that so 'close-but-not-quite' 1,500 kms “milestone” at my winter hobby. - One thinks it often even better leave smght for the targeted during by the oncoming year, or years from.
Hope we'd for to have any similar luck in the skiing conditions, for very subsequent years from follow too... ; But whatever about those conditions in the futures seen - I've actually also decided devote some amounts more a time for winters part and that cross-country. Here or at some places elsewhere for the more Northern regions. (And/or alternatively, perhaps, on some sort Holiday resorts there – 'by the occasion'. In any likehood the Winter period might not always turn out even as favorable as it by this lastest was.)
Guess' these plans also smght to do with the discovery by the previous year from about how deteriorated the Winter now can turn out – at some worst years now.
(...Said w. all my curses offered still for to the previous years 'flourished' petroleum-economics, along w. the all other climatic 'betrayal' that'd brought in effect. As it's obvious downside, having for brought us then these described sort inferior winter-weatheric 'conditions'...) ------------
'The New Batch...' (No. Not from the Gremlins...Of plants.) ; Unlike that Abbey (on an above quots, begins this last 'section' cited) - I can't take glory of talking for the cactuses. (Besides, such as noted, would be difficult as none species would survive the winters by this far North.) But that idea feels actually rather familiar. I by occasionally discovered myself to spoking some words for the animal variety, when those met on any my walks by the woods. Or in a garden-part. Due of some reason, perhaps it because that I generally devote more for my any 'hobbies', time to them, I not ever so often catching myself of talking to the plants. Anyway...
Of the garden plants I had to sowed and planted by the last year - and of the few now grown new 'varieties' from - should it for suffice say the following:
Mostly, my (common) Evening Primroses (O.biennis), by the latest year planted in various places of garden, seemed overwintered very successfully. Only in a fewsome spots I did notice that their 'rosettes' hadn't for survived. – Of those few there now is seen only dark “knots” that look like them might've gotten harmed by too much frosts, then died out in the winter. ; If them should've died (,and indeed that must be so, 'cause now by the turn for June there seems nothin' from emergin...) - Then a reason to that could've well been for my fertilizing of too much the plants nearby for those. (The vines, or some similar cultivars there...). Ie, their too late continued 'feeding' might've then negatively affected the Primroses. Or, maybe the place then just was on a too open spot and them got freezed some week. Or, alternately I'd perhaps forgotten for to cover those particular ones more better w. the leaves, 'litters', etcs... But, at least I'd actually from expected that the ones in a garden greenhouse would've survived? (...However, false hope, seems that them also died off.)
; But, from the 8 to 10 that were planted in the garden at least some 6-7 must've now well survived the Winter. And anyway, those being the biennials, we should then expect to some scenty flowerings from around – after the Mid-Summer? Maybe, can't recall around what the timing that seems promised for. ; But their stems are already in quite good growth – Apparently that telling my other seeked places for those having appear the proper ones. (A bit uncertain I'm still whether them might receive too much the fertilizes in result the some 'nearby', adjacent perennials needing those. - But hence from same reasons, I'm having a several 'groups' now, that'd been planted in the different parts of garden. ; Sometimes is difficult to find any good places to all the new flowers from the garden – As the most for any (very) 'good places' tend always appear be already reserved !
Since Primroses are also said look very lovely in the evening light. – I'm eagerly waitin' for see 'em to flower. (Whichever then was said the time given for that...)
By not more surprising that those Yellow Sweet Clovers (Melilotus officinalis) – also planted on the last year - seem survived the lot better. Some on the warmest 'spots' (and seen emerge already by that April) now are growing the new stems - And I'm therefore cuttin' any last year's remained stems off. Actually I've probably also having to seek some more proper places to those some too. As they proved to so large plants. (; Well...also proved for the more interesting that during by this turn-for-the June – that it was, then – and, as I was 'diggin' a place for plant one of my 'early grown' Squashes, closely of that 'spot' where in the greenhouse that one M.officinalis last year grew, I still discovered a one half-a-meter root still of remaining there. (Apparently) of that same Sweet Clover-specimen ! So not only the plant on overgrounds but also it's roots naturally seem to grow for pretty massive ones. For a Clover, I mean.
Not neither it being any surprises that of my other 'clovery' additions, the Lotus corniculatus, (ie the native 'Common birds-foot trefoil',) seemed all also very well lasted the Winter.
; Photo: ...And here beside also is then some yellowy bloomings of the mentioned, said (Common) Birds-foot trefoil. (These ones are growing on inner by the greenhouse windows,at the most direct heat and light, always tend develop bit earlier than ones on 'outdoors'. The underside is there very ideal to those also, mostly sandy layer w. little other sort dirt.) Won't take the very many days 'till others too shall for join them in blooming. It being so warm period just now. (During the early June.) The night temperatures already seen got over for/ about, around the 'strategic limit',plus 10 Celsius-degrees...
; Inspired by these successes – and thinkin' on some further arrangements in the garden for the bees in particulars. (And/or from the hymenoptera more generally...) – I'm then now planting also some Red Clover (T. pratense) there. Them are thought being for placed, 'here and there' – On edges of other plantings to a some decoration and 'temptations' to those bees. Since of them the pregrowing even wouldn't been anyhow necessary (, and could be planted directly at the soils, from May perhaps) – I Suppose we can find those at their places already as soon as prior midst from that June. I sowed some for pregrowing, ca, at begins the April. ; (Actually, by this timing I was already 'relocating' most those at the garden. It seemed as the somewhat best manner for those. Or a timing.; Of being the native plants – and, Clovers from - they seem to quite easy for 'adapt' in any decent open sunshiny planes.)
Another good view-point from those: Since they should attract several 'bumbles', also some that are not to the 'most regular' ones, we're by any likehood having many photos on 'em and hopefully of some 'new arrivals' in during warmer Months by this Summer...
Photo (beside left): Ragged Robin (Lychnis flos-cuculi), flowers. ; ...From (my) smaller natural flowery-meadow. (ie, growing in the garden). ; ...Sometimes the native flowers, when sowed, take somewhat long time 'till germinated on a place where meant -– And I've noted this (one, few) flowers of a 'Robin' only during few most recentyears. ...Or, it just might instead appear so that I'd for brought that first one of somewhere as an already fulll-grown one – Can't recall that about too exactly, now anymore. ; Anyways, the Robin still regularly grows on some farther distances away (,but not too far...) Usually in some more damp, 'semi-wet' roadsides. And at other such places. The Summery rains may have now here enfastened my few plants.
(The "blue-eyed" flowers seen on a background are Forget-me-nots. The species - 'apparentliest', not 'obligatorily' - Myositis Sylvatica.) -----
; ...From cons my other last year's sowings anything on Hollyhocks (Alcea rose, var 'The Watchman') seems too early to say. – Or, I'm not quite sure from whether I'd figured out the places for them as some adequate protected ones. Maybe there's also smght else I've not happened of thought priorly carefully enough... ; Shouldn't appear to any demanding...But, they seemed not near so 'gregarious' for emerge in during their first season. (Last Summer, ie.) Apparently...I may (must have?), from kept those at first too much enshaded by the some other growths. ; The said Yellow Sweet Clovers actually proved for so rapid emergin' in front to them – Soforth, those I then relocated for elsewhere places. Maybe that too did affect the Hollyhocks. Or maybe they just don't flower here during by the first year.
Yet, as them are 'biennials' I'm now at least expecting some from, by this Summer.
From those few surviving, in their 'early begins' seemed at first to quite 'nurtured'. But 'suppose there been as a logical reasons on that 'Winter spell' kept remaining w. us now to several weeks longer. (At least during the nights it still recent was very cold...) So now I'm only awaitin' what should happen...
; Well, the actuality proved that I, perhaps, wasn't finding most ideal places to those –Only two plants seemed of survived Winter. But their now growin steadily. – It maybe that a too direct, too 'scorching' sunshine might now become the more of any 'hindrance' to their better successive blooms considering. (Than anything else, by this year.)
Photo (below) ; ...Matter-a-fact, it seems I might need to still seek some new places for the additional Yellow Cone-flowers (E.paradoxa) too. (As one can see of a pic below, the ones on this places tend begin from an earliest warm period very well - But then usually become enshadowed by other perennials at where their now. (Of where for these anymore open, shiny places left...that's the problem. If...I'd to gather all these ones...in a one 'lump' ?)
But we 'shall see' about that. That the best guess...I guess. ------------
Then - still having a fewsome more 'new additions' from flowers grown. (For which I've also already selected the some proper places left in beforehand.)
While any my new selections weren't too many by this year, I've already a bunch of my newly planted growin' at the small 8x8 'boxes'. (ie, again; That how the case was, did wrote so by around that early April...)
The first from these fewsome the Heliotropes (ie, Heliotropium, Boraginaceaea). I already sowed them on an early from March. Guess we'll provide those in several pics by around when a warmer season has arrived. – As them can't be planted on the garden but perhaps after by the Mid-June. (... 'cause are so vulnerable on colds, under the 5 C degrees can damage the plants.) But, from the weather for much warmer by now, I already actually planted a few in the 'bench'. (Thumbs up!)
; Then, I'm also growing this year again, some Tagetes - Simply because from the reason they're so easy and fast to grow. Also tolerate some amount drought, not anyhow demanding by otherways either. ; ...After from the late by May been changed for more large vases and kept in the greenhouse warmth. And I notice, that it doesn't even seem to very much matter whether them being on a more of the sunshine or in the (slight) shade. By both cases, seem from grow as 'steadily'.
In a few pics on above from this text, also, so no more for here said on...
; The most part from ones that I'm having this year are only for seasonal garden plants. None from meant to last longer than 'till by the ends from the Summer. Except from mentioned Red Clovers. (That are said to remain, the 'several years'.) ------------
Along w. the above mentioned, 'though, I also did sow some African Aloe (U.frutescens) – Which are then meant to be grown for the household plants. So far nothin much I've learnt cons to those. 'Expectably', maybe, them seem for prefer quite warm and are the lot of sunshines demanding. So, possibly(?) I'll also having to seek for 'em some particular practical more large vases. ; One also happens notice that in during a pregrowing period them seemed need be rather careful watched due because for the 'multi-directioning' stems. As (these) Aloes grow for rather delicate thin 'sticks' and them are really easily bend. (Ie as those apparently quite vulnerable, at first when only w. fewsome stems, one tried for particular avoid not so much moving the small seedlings...) ; But otherways I'm now just relocating them at bit larger vases, waitin how them shall adapt for that, etc...
Also, I had on plans, for to grow - Instead from the Tomatoes, and for once in a number of some years I'm not having any those grown, by this season... - Had instead some 'Tamarillos' of sowed. (...However, I also read that the plants, perhaps, are known from the actual name as the Tomatillo. Logically, as it a species belonging on the same family/group of plants as are regular Tomatoes. By anycase, them by the lat. name are Solanum betaceum.) Actually I don't now quite recall, not bothering from check, from which the correct name of those I sowed.
But anyhow, are called also to the 'Tree Tomatoes', simply.
Yet, that task of growing proved to somewhat more 'tricky' than I'd from the first expected – None to my Tomatillos, so far, seemed for germinate. As it now gettin' for relative late by this Spring, guess'll then only having from manage without any those this Summer. ...As I also find it not very enthusiasting an idea from to buying some one plant/tree of the shops instead. Would from spoil any interesting parts at this 'experience', or on an experiment. (That by sowing and growing the plants by oneself.) --------
Then I'm also of the herbs, fx, growing some Basils and Garden Parsleys. - Of the seeds already by the last year acquired.
; The best developed of the Basils (I regularly do pregrow those...) took a slight surprising turn during from my former noted 'short leave'; As had it moved to a quite large vase by the prior of that, when returning on a week after I discovered that a 'seedling' had from withered. Indoors kept, perhaps it was from been left in a too little of light, or...from smght else.
But my other Basils, replanted now on bit smaller vases, seem be doing from just fine. (Of course them not grow very rapidly, as yet. But I've learned that them are quite easy keep and grow in the vases too. – As long as one doesn't forget any from to outdoors for the nights. Not until the mid-summer day been passed.)
And that was the most part on what comes my garden plants this year. Not of very particularly, any 'exceptionals' from. – But at this time of year tends keep one from happily - 'buzy'.
...The Beans and fewsome additional Summery flowers are still waitin' to be sowed. Of the Squashes (C.pepo) I already, like was said, have a few plants waitin' to some better warm seasons now. Carrots I also sowed – Inside the greenhouse (In a same 'bench' that actually now has one already planted Squash too.) ; Probably I'm not for much any new 'arrangements' in the garden this Summer. – But there shall be a good amount of the flowers, so guess'll we would be returning on these subjects in form of a some 'coverage' for photos about all that. - By some timing next, in during/after the warmer Months at this season... -------
Yet to mention:
...Along those others, I've also thrown a fewsome seeds of couple native flower directly at any 'proper thought' places there in garden. Such as seeds of the S.pratense (The 'Devil's bit Scabious'). It seems, however, merely it a random likehood if anysome from those would by the first year be seen germinated. And whether any for those places were of any suitable to them, etc...
That brings on mind the interesting little remark on about those some. Or more in particular the nowadays slight more 'scarcer', native old-time flowers.
; (I think) that plant (.pratense) grows best in a somewhat more moisturic soil. It seemed also said for prefer a little 'loamed' parts for the best sort Natural spots. As well, also was said by some levels, for dependable of the human interaction w. environments. – Iow, isn't so usually found at the most 'untramped' forest-sides or more 'dense' meadows from. ; Anyway, formerly for some years now, I used from walk past some nearby where in a said sort meadowy-path that seemed to grow, in some numbers of the plant. One time, I then also noticed there a fewsome rather interesting lookin' bumble-bees (There were, of course, usually on a some variety insect and bees seen at the S.pratenses, when a June or July - Or during by it's time of the flowering.) Indeed, those were a more particular lookin' ones – and I always regretted that I had then not any camera w. me. So I had no photos from that walk, to compare, check about what those exactly were.
; Anyway - Happens that them by more recent decided of to build some biking-walking route which goes by the forest's edge, and just over my said particular, little more 'wetty spot' – And there were gone this nice and apparently very favorable one 'spot' where I know this one plant for used to still have it's small 'appearance' here. (Might well still exist in any 'remnants' by that a more moisturic place, or on besides from that 'bikeway', nearby by the place it goes over that path. I've not checked about, never using that built 'route' now across on that place.)
But that's not the main point-of-view on this, however.
...It may well be that the plant from being 'dependable' on just such sort, 'little human-affected' environment, might represented for some 'remnant' on here nearbye's. The point-of-view (that) even when such a small – in any typical scales, as from what comes to the more typical human 'activities' from – just a small 'intervention' - can cause an important changes for the environmental part. Even such a limited change can actually affect, easily, for the more scarcer natural species. (Of course, the said plants seem not for so particularly scarce – But I don't much see those here, at any places. In the more rural regions, there probably still are the more often seen.)
...Supposin' them might also remain w. the some specimen there some else places. Haven't checked. Well a possibility too the plants may well appear on besides that road, in any nearby the little similar places for this more wetted place. Or on othersome few parts of that path from still remaining. ; But interestingly, that natural 'spot' isn't anymore also from quite the same. ...Wasn't exactly any very 'pristine' part of the Natures, by formerly ; While at my walks past that place I used from little after it always offer some glances to some rusting wreck of a car on that forest edge. It'd from somehow gotten ended up in the place. Complete mystery to me how – Not any real road was to be sighted leading to where it'd ended up. There were all kinds of the hays and other plants that were growing in midst the steeling wheel and on through the car's passenger-benches. I sometimes thought that it had a quite 'homely' look. Like some old abandoned town or ruins found at the 'jungle'.
; The car was a rather small vehicle, maybe from 1970s/early 1980s. Some sort 'wreck in the Natures', in resemblance w. that one from Dori Seda's mini-modelled sculptures, I'd often thought. (The one named imaginatively for the 'Wreck in Heaven'.)
Which of course neither was the main p-o-w on this.
The example seems now look like some minor 'incident' in the fragmentation of the Nature's 'original' habitat(s). If described by some ecological term. Yet people, perhaps, not so much even tend think there much consequence in the sort construction - a biking road on a byside, to 'improve' an already limitedly human used 'thoroughfare' - No cars allowed, and the bikes generally ecological way of movement; Minor conseqeunces. Still, such things that aren't near to so usual recognized as for anything to problematic - as are the more often talked and warned 'bout extinctions of many other species. (In the tropics, and on many similarly exotic 'ranges', w. unique species there does exist.) – Yet, it seems increasingly by nowadays forewarned also for how in many human 'localities' also formerly relative common species may be on their way of decline, too. ; You also hear lot less of any plants cons that sort aspects – Especially if their not to anyhow very particularly, impressive lookin ones. Or among any to more seriously endangered.
But the said sort flourishing natural 'spots' are also often the most enjoyable parts in a wide Natures, I mean (for say.). Also are exactly the sort places where a human-Natures interaction most best takes it's place, 'functions'.
; For an additional mention, a park – or a garden neither – can never really achieve quite the same. Gardens, fx, are often called to the 'transitional environments'. At their best. Yet, them not ever can exactly 'replace' any actual natural range.
; ...Would of course continue my 'relapse' for these memories and some 'nostalgies' to much longer – But I guess there were already main details 'bout this incident. Merely I wonder from whether anyone else even happened even notice this one aspect. ; Yet, that also just for a few reasons, of why I'm now trying cultivating also the said Devil's Bit Scabiose on the garden. (Even that them, if succeeding to grow there, not would do for any 'substitute' on that 'semi-natural' spot where I discovered those - At least would permit the 'chances' if from see the same 'bumbles' I there one time noted. A very slim chance – given that this urban locality situates on some distance away of the said 'forest-edge'. Judging from their outer look weren't to much resemblant for any 'bumbles' more usual here seen, besides...) --------
Photo, beside right: ...This certainly seemed like one queen-bee. (It was so large.) Looked most like would've appeared the Early Bumble-bee (B.pratorum) - One for the most widespread, quite common species at whole from the European/Palearctic range. But the problem in it's identification, I noted, that it lacks the 'lower yellow belt' - And the queen on said species should look rather similar to workers by colouration. Maybe...
...Another good 'contender', 'though, if that - matter a fact, by most likehood was - apparently, the Bombus lapidarius. (...Albeit, that Wikip.-look, seems give as well a few other choices on it's identification...) ; Also a very common species for much part the S.Fennoscandian ranges, and found with presence for well past the 'middle' of the country.
; The flower is a Mountain cornflower/M.knapweed (Centaurea montane), seen growin' on a bank of the roadside ditch. (I have a few on gardens too - While I don't too much like plant. Reasons to that...Well, nevermind...)
And for now – Let's call this one post for 'quits' in any good time. The shovel and a pitchwork are awaiting. The 'hay-stack' and the plough as well. Well, only kidding from the fewsome last mentioned...'artefacts'? (Or whatever the good term on about those.
From returning on this blog...on after 'some timing'. Maybe a few weeks. Maybe more like a Month after. Maybe two weeks. (During by this Summer, anyway.) [; G.U.J.]
-------------
(Addit,
'section', by 10.6.21) ;
'Even for desert rats, however, there are limits. ...At least in the Southwest, the Pinacate desert is the final test of desert rathood; it is here we learn who is a true rat and who is essentially only a desert mouse.' ; ...Yet, maybe, still here to a few more sentences. At this 'Spring'-post – from finally nearing it's end.
For some alternative 'ending', maybe – but let's just call this to a small 'Epilogue'.
Of this present posting. ...On which, we are only citing the few more passages more of that Abbey (Edward, 1927-1989), writing from the desert wildernesses.
(At that Cactus Country, publ. on back the years by -73.)
...(Kind of,) I'm having the impressions that Abbey would've – or could be for said, sort like – to had got his 'official acceptance' as a writer (/authority), maybe even to the more particularly as an environmentalist writer - via the said book. (The book also has very magnificient photographs of the 'sceneries'; From the desert landscapes, about the cactuses, the animals...etc. Book did belong to a serie in the Time/Life-books, by 1970s. Still, maybe more apparent that it having remained past the years to ever so popular reads of the many.)
But who knows on all for it, of the more particular...Not myself, as I didn't think here so necessary of goin' to much further on any aspects related that. Ie, I not fx read any biography on the man. Neither else much of his book I've for read. Not much any other 'materials' either. Except, for that in the prior chapters mentioned Desert Solitaire (, from...the 1968, I think to recall) The Cactus country, basically, finds Abbey on much the similar subjects -or 'ranges' at. Only that there's bit less 'philosophy 'of a wilderness (/deserts), perhaps – And, ao, perhaps bit more on those animals and plants. Cactuses, of course. And these particular 'ranges' and regions of the said area. The arid areas from the US South-West. ; Along w. his some other 'mentors', Abbey also on begins one chapter seems quote the Mary Austin too. (From that Land of the Little rain, 'desert classic'.)
For the long story short, and without too much explains; Of the many other good passages in the Abbey's writings, in the some that I've for read, selected then this followed just due because it well does 'mix' several elements of his 'style'. Same 'elements' that still feel from rather original, making it often enjoyable reads. Unusual even at it's times, and - of course – it to that way still remains. ; Some of the...'characteristics', maybe, ao, are those referees from the old 'classics', that nostalgy for the 'old times' (such as on below the 'anecdotal' mention for that 'Seldom Seen Slim'); and, it's plain sharp analysis/descriptions that always come 'alonside' – on here and there, as the additional 'bonuses' for anyone w. some environmental (or historical) interests for. (Such as what it says on those past century's major industrial 'sins', in practice all the environmental crimes then made against all sensical means. Often also for taken their places in under an 'open daylight'.)
Photo, beside right: ...Don't know if that was by 'pure coincidence' - more usually not - but one from my sowed African Aloes got for flowering after from writing the above 'sections' on plants. ; As it said for originating for the Cape, an arid region w. lots of quite unique or specific 'flora', feels like the pic needed a place from feat here.
; ...Perhaps even more so, as I by recent 'glanced' parts a documentary how the uranium-mining having polluted the environment(s), waters, livinghoods, there. ; Regions in the Cape-area, on S. Africa by renown of their heavy mining, to variety of resource extraction. (Since from it's begins during the early colonialistic period. The origins of the - so called - industrial 'wealth, and it's already a centuries long 'counterpart' in the Africa's impoverishment.) For the mining-pollution, from uranium esp., often seems noted permanent - At least that also always seems create areas that are difficult, very costly for cleaned-up.
(...On a one remark at begins this post, I think, there was mentioned the study/coverage for the actual remaining “pristine” lands on an Earth to calculated only 3 per cent from all. – As any lands that practically not at all 'tramped' by the man, totally unpopulated, seriously importantly to remain for 'unvisited'. In practice, that meaning. And for unvisited by man, obviously. Birds, cave bears, muskrats, squirrels, hedgehogs, not counting...) ; There's of course 'levels' in the human caused stress, 'uses' of the environments. As the typical example our Fennoscandian wood-cover is often noted for the best 'preserved' in an European range – ca the nearby 75 per cent of forested areas still remaining. (I think it indeed makes a big difference, in a climatic and environmental senses; For examples, in the British Isles seems mentioned only to little over the 13 per cent of the original forest cover to still remain, by today.)
;
...Yet, wouldn't do without mentioning, in the same, that any given figures
also always somewhat lie on these aspect(s), the 'more or less'. In the climate-stressed world the quality of the woods also matters, indeed increasingly.
On the begins this post considered it to feature, smght, on the 'grim prospects' now predicted to the formerly widely cultivated Fennoscandian Spruce-woods. Within this century, they seem now lot predict that the majorest negative climatic impact (,such as dry up) and pests-effects would fall, precisely, on many former established one tree-species stands of the - Spruces. Already by any walks one can easily notice – and I've paid attentions on the many places - there Spruces that seem gotten the more harmed by a present change in climatic conditions. (Those more continuous heats and the now seen 'swashbuckling' rains.) ; For any it's particulars the mains for 'bout that “gloomy grin” by (only) the past decades economic forestry 'management' is, of course, the bit more complicated. ...You might fx notice that it near so much not of the tree species, by itself – I've paid attention also on 'spots' and places where them seem not near so easily harmed by that climate effect. But from the type of the environments created as well. For examples, in a proper sort soils – or say, at the proper 'conditions' – the old-growth Spruce woods seem not quite so vulnerable to all that. ; The most harmed 'parts' also often representing the some 'patches' established in a complete wrong manner – For the all one-tree species woods, or, as the other example from where the spruce-forest planted from all too dense. ...For a positive side they seem at least say that from the 'man-made' planting from the woods already been largely abandoned as some forest management practice (,as 'method').
; If I should've predict, or say, that been a one main causes found leading to the more severe vulnerabilities on the heat, drought, pests.
(Along w. the forests clear cut logging. Along with the 'one-tree' species patches creating. Add to that fertilizing of trees - either w. the by 'organic' manner, as it still by present seems continued - or , for the even more harming on them, w. the chemial products - And you get the pests-stricken stands.)
But on here no more spaces to us go on w. further remarks from. Maybe in some next posts, later timings, at any of the subseq. chapters to follow.
As the return for that Edward Abbey, then of his book the said little quotation. - It also must to serve for the brief example about all the else lot what Abbey might've written...As there, of course, the several more books by. Along w. these couple mentioned well interesting for the reads, too. Possibly, very prob. ;
“There was once a spell of fine romance attached to prospecting and mining, especially in the realm of gold, as anyone will testify who has read books as J.Frank Dobie's Apache Gold and Yaqui Silver, or that marvelous novel by B.Traven, The Treasure of the Sierra Madre. But the romantic period in metal and mineral extraction has long since passed. The eccentric and fiercely individualistic types who worked alone, towing a burro over the hills, are mostly gone: the legendary Seldom Seen Slim of Death Valley, for example, will never be seen again – he died a few years ago.
Today almost all serious prospecting is carried out by teams of college-trained geologists on the payroll of giant world-girdling corporations such as Kennecott and Anaconda. Nor do they waste much time seeking out gold and silver; today's prospectors are after things more basic: copper, zinc, iron, manganese, coal, oil shale, sand tars, molybdenum, titanium, uranium. When they locate something salable they will butcher whole mountains to remove it from the earth.
... What these mountains really need from us is to be mostly left alone, neither exploited nor – perhaps equally dangerous in the long run – loved to death. That the sheep may safely graze. That the lion may lie down with the lamb. (In order to eat him.) That islands of relative peace, order and sanity may remain amidst the chaos of a mindless industrialism. Tranquillity, I reckon, like water or money or seed corn, can usefully be stored away in safe places.” (; p .125.)
- Added italics for that one sentence. (The one before last sentence. Unfortunately, quotations on italized, so that doesn't show, of separately. Underlined those words, therefore.) ; Tranquillity, indeed how true. (And how Thoreauvian the expression on that one sentence.) And the Tranquillity...
-----------------------
; Approved by Doktor Doc-to-Power...
Powered by ScribeFire.
No comments:
Post a Comment