“...The
outbreaks have so far been confined to localized areas and lasted
just hours, but they are increasing in frequency and intensity, say
the authors. The study appears this week in the journal Science
Advances.
[...]
Analyzing
data from weather stations from 1979 to 2017, the authors found that
extreme heat/humidity combinations doubled over the study period.
Repeated incidents appeared in much of India, Bangladesh and
Pakistan, northwestern Australia, and along the coasts of the Red and
Mexico's Gulf of California. The highest, potentially fatal,
readings, were spotted 14 times in the cities of Dhahran/Damman,
Saudi Arabia; Doha, Qatar, and Ras Al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates,
which have combined populations of over 3 million. Parts of southeast
Asia, southern China, subtropical Africa and the Caribbean were also
hit.
The
southeastern United States saw extreme conditions dozens of times,
mainly near the Gulf Coast in east Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi,
Alabama and the Florida Panhandle. ...” ; [on Phys - 2020 may ]
;
(Photo), beside right - Nettles...are natural plants here. So nowadays I tend for to leave some them unweeded, from growing in the garden. (These photographed around the April, maybe the first week.) Some species of day-time butterflies favor them. Some people believe in the very nutrient contents from the netttles leaves - It's nowadays also, already to some time, been available in a various ingredients from the 'natural apothecary'-stylish health shops, and as an ingredient on number of herbal product.
(Photo), beside right - Nettles...are natural plants here. So nowadays I tend for to leave some them unweeded, from growing in the garden. (These photographed around the April, maybe the first week.) Some species of day-time butterflies favor them. Some people believe in the very nutrient contents from the netttles leaves - It's nowadays also, already to some time, been available in a various ingredients from the 'natural apothecary'-stylish health shops, and as an ingredient on number of herbal product.
“The
Kremlin had been quite successful at keeping previous large nuclear
accidents under wraps, remaining silent about radioactive pollution
and the dangers it posed to Soviet citizens and the rest of the
world. That was the case with an accident that took place in 1957 in
the closed city of Ozersk in the Urals, better known to the Soviet
leadership under the code name Cheliabinsk-40 – the home of the
first Soviet nuclear fuel plant producing weapons-grade plutonium. On
September 29 of that year an underground nuclear waste tank had
exploded, blasting a concrete cap weighing 160 tonnes from the top of
the steel and concrete container and releasing 20 million curies of
radioactivity into the atmosphere. The authorities had had to
resettle 12,000 people, mostly from the twenty-three villages of the
region that were considered no longer fit for habitation. The houses
and agricultural equipment used by the former inhabitants were
buried, and an exclusion zone was established in the areas that had
suffered the most.
The
Soviet leaders refused to release the information about the Ozersk
explosion, thereby endangering the lives of hundreds of thousands of
their own citizens, who went on with their daily routines not knowing
how to minimize the risk caused by the accident. ... American
military and civilian officials learned about the 1957 accident
but...Both sides had a stake in keeping it under wraps so as not to
frighten their citizens and make them reject the nuclear power as a
source of cheap energy.
The
Obersk accident led the Soviet authorities to develop a number of
strategies that would be employed at Chernobyl thirty years later.
The use of military conscripts to deal with the consequences of the
nuclear explosion, decontamination techniques that included burying
contaminated equipment and covering contaminated areas of the nuclear
plant with concrete, mass resettlement of the population, the
creation of an exclusion zone, and the handling of large number of
patients with symptoms of acute radiation poisoning – all those
strategies had first been employed in Ozersk. ...”
;
(Plokhy),
Chernobyl.
History of a Tragedy.
(Penguin books; p. 173-4; 185, 187.)
;
“Soviet
physicists knew the RBMK reactor was hard to control and had a fatal
flaw, the positive void coefficient. They had other reactor designs.
Why did they use the unreliable RBMK, plugging in dozens of them
across the USSR? They built RBMK reactors only in the USSR, not in
Eastern Europe where they constructed safer, light water reactors. As
the historian Sonja Schmidt pointed out, the RBMK was cheap to build
on-site, easy to scale up, and 'uniquely Soviet,' a point of pride.
The top-secret Politburo transcript reveals one more reason to deploy
the RBMK.
At
the Politburo meeting, Valery Legasov, a nuclear chemist, agreed with
his colleagues' poor assessment of the Chernobyl reactor: 'The RBMK
reactor does not meet international and domestic standards on several
levels. ... The poor rating of the RBMK reactor has been known for
fifteen years.' So why use the faulty reactor ? Legasov explained:
'We are carrying out the Zaslon mission, and the
RBMK is more reliable for that project.'
The
code word for Zaslon means 'screen' in Russian.
... Politburo transcript shows that before the Chernobyl accident
Soviet leaders secretly were building their own missile defense
system. In 1984, Reagan ordered that the long-mothballed Hanford
Plutonium Plant in eastern Washington be dusted off and returned to
production for the Star Wars project. In his cryptic comment,
Legasov was alluding to the major advantage of the RBMK reactor over
other designs. In addition to generating energy, the reactor could
produce plutonium, the fissile material at the core of nuclear bombs.
The more Soviet engineers ran 'peaceful' RBMK reactors, the more
plutonium they could potentially stockpile for the 'screen.' There is
no evidence of the Chernobyl fuel to produce [plutonium,
etc] ...
In
deciding to prosecute a few operators rather than designers and
industry bosses as scapegoats for the accident and in resolving to
continue to operate accident-prone RBMK reactors, Politburo leaders
took a vote for secrecy because there was no other way to justify
these decisions other than by covering up these basic facts. ... When
the truths of Chernobyl came to light three years later, the load of
public skepticism and doubt would speed downhill like a runaway
truck, knocking out Gorbatchev and his administration with it.”
(Brown), Manual for Survival. The Chernobyl Guide to the
Future (Allen Lane; p. 53-5; italics, Browns)
;
“On
February 16, 1989, ...the Rukh program ... included an extensive
section on ecological issues, with special attention on Chernobyl
disaster and its consequences. ... The Rukh program called for the
shutdown of the Chernobyl nuclear plant and of all the other RBMK
reactors in Ukraine; a halt to the construction of new nuclear power
plants in Ukraine, no matter what reactor type they were designed to
use; medical examination for entire population of Kyiv and other
regions adjacent to Chernobyl power plant; and rehabilitation
measures for those adversely affected by the disaster.
The Rukh program was
published in time for the first semi-free elections to take place in
the Soviet Union since the Revolution of 1917. ...
Throughout
the Soviet Union, the leaders of the new awakened civil society,
distressed by economic hardship but encouraged by Gorbatchev's
political reforms, turned to eco-activism. It soon took on the
features of eco-nationalism, ... In Lithuania, controversy emerged on
the Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant, which ran on Chernobyl-type
reactors. In September 1988, Sajudis, the Lithuanian popular front,
... mobilized close to 20,000 people to form a human 'Ring of Life'
around the Ignalina plant. The plant was perceived as not only an
ecological but also a cultural threat to the Lithuanian nation: like
the Chernobyl plant, it was staffed largely by Russians and
representatives of other nonindigenous peoples. In Armenia, a
December 1988 earthquake triggered mass protest leading to the
closure of the Metsamor Nuclear Power Plant, which was built in an
area of high seismicity only 36 kilometers from the capital of the
republic, Yerevan.” (Plokhy;
p. 304-5.)
------------
'...The
fact that at least one million species are at risk of extinction.'
; ...The
Spring-period
got on relative late (June, for now...) until I bothered returning to
these writes of mine.
Guess'...I've
for been to slight lazy from turn on my (these) doings. Thenagain, not much
else was originally to be said on this, the most part on it meant
concern my this season's cultivates. Also, as for usual was the case
from this early, here; Even my last year's garden sowings weren't yet
of flowering. 'Though some those tend now emerging for...
;
Therefore, this 'section' now combines of a fewsome examples to
observed species on their 'natural' environments, plus the fewsome
more words on the global nuclear doomsday-'pasts' – Whether or not we'd
think it for most actuelt an issue by presently, or not. (The fact about, being it from unavoidably remains only more actuelt, at this present world.) And, even
if I'm also for little hesitating to say anything further on that
subject, by now. – We've, perhaps, already for a bit too repeated
returned on that lately. Well, in any aspects to think it's
an...issue of importance.
----------
Pic (photo) : ...maybe from some time by the late Spring this year - early of May, perhaps?. ; ...The 'Queen Bumble' that I spotted had flown in my garden greenhouse. (Lookin' for flowers, mostly in vain, since actually weren't anything so early growing in my benches.) ; ...Lookin from the books I noted it must've appeared the queen. (Due that was a large one, and by this early 'on the move'.) Of the species my best guess - almost no other alternatives - the 'identification' of the species was to Bombus terrestris. ; However, must from slight correct my earlier remarking that maybe (about) 2/3, or at least half from our domestic bumbles would by 'regular years' now from appear visit my gardens - In fact the major parts to the seen bees are some of the commonest ones, such as this. Or, for maybe few other 'standard' ones, most often seen and easier recognizable, must from containing mostly to the B.lapidarius, and B.hypnorum. ...Which must be some for the commonest ones, along w. the variety from those often very resemblant lookin's yellow-striped bumbles (In their several separate species) ; ...Or, then it's quite as interesting to recognize: Fx, that the one species I earlier had for pics on this blog appears been of formerly relative common, now maybe only 'regular' (not rare or endangered) species here. But, the pic I had was taken on one 'low-grass' field not so close-by - And I've actually not ever 'spotted' that species on this urban 'gardenhood' of mine. (The species must've been, either, B.veteranus. - or, then it might've appeared B.sylvarum. For both seem for appear species adapted more keenly for the 'old-time' environments, woods and 'country-side', sort of. ; The.sylvarum seems also to have an Eng name, quite descriptive of that aspect, too - For that's the Knapweed carder-bee. ...and then of that it's fx said that fx been at UK for '...common until the midst 20th century.' - but now later seen of had been declining '...across it's European range'.) ; ...So you sort of notice, also, that there's limits from how 'comprihensive' one's gardening can be noted of of 'support' or serve as some 'substitute' to an original ecology.
...Anyway, due that (fx acc Goulson, such as I read) the B.terrestris being some to commonest species of bumble that cultivated in uses of pollination at commercial greenhouses - And from that it's, in several places of world, actually having naturalized and seen of become a somewhat problematic - due from it so effectively can spread on the surrounding natural environment(s). ; ...Not from noted to any such 'trouble-maker' here - But it's then to somewhat interesting of discovering that on here too, it's also a very recent 'arrival' for bumble-species. The local 'data-base' mentions that B.terrestris was discovered (/and, later gotten noticed for the increase and spread by the southern coastal areas here) from only after the 1990 (, 'about'). From the noted reasons, it would appear, those being the said uses from those for pollinating agents in the commercial 'farming', and apparently, then also because from the warmed climates. So, while it's now presently a 'regularity', that would as well (perhaps) trace itself for the fact it being, for the 'bumble', largely a generalist.
Was still from a nice sighting, despite any of these notices.
; ...Actually, just recently 'spotted' also some of it's 'sisters' on my Lilacs (Syringa, here right now from flowering). Didn't have the camera along for pics, but that was slight more darker by it's main coloration, and, perhaps for even more of a 'robust' specimen - So I assumed that for a queen then, too. (But for some other species.) Otherways, despite that it's already quite warm, the garden is most part rather devoid of bumble-bees. In fact, I'm not usual seeing from so many at this early Summers. Wonderin from whether they're not so plenty after that latest (very) weak winter (...?). Or whether it's just from that, by presently, it been from to (relative) windy...
But first - a few remarks on my last winter skiis – as the usual, by this time of the year, fromafter our winter season's ending.
; The
season/winter period didn't prove to quite so frustrating than one
would easily assume of the noted serious lack in the snow here - On
this last winter. (For, as one might have read from news and the
weather-reports – this last winter certainly was the worst I can
remember what comes to any snowy-conditions. Unhappily. Never before
having for experienced even a resemblant winter here, not on any year
before. (Situation was for acknowledged already early as Jan. - as I now notice from had bookmarked this weather-report page. Well,
apparently wasn't exactly that page I was seekin' to this – But no
matter, seems from cover that timing, the
snowless winter.) ; ...That said, reminded me that by the latest worst year 'in
record' it was, I guess, the 2015-6, when also was considerably
little of snows. But even then, I recall, we at least enjoyed the
'tolerable' skiing conditions for a weeks time, by the mid-winter.)
Yet, the more notably, on this year (winter) – On a natural 'country' here latitudes, on here then wasn't anything
to ski on – Not even on during the Feb. (Which usually is the
coldest and for occasional snowiest Month.) Only those boring
constant wetted rains from, and, 'occasioned' some often melting
shorter snow-pours.
You
did't exactly need any firmer confirmation from that the global
warming's advancing.
However,
despite the said conditions, I actually did ski for amount from the
'decent' 575 km's this year. (Between the periods from 6th
of Jan to until the 23rd
by March.) ; In essence, the few times I was already on 'tracks' at
that January were merely during it's earlier coldest week. And, still
even during the Feb it was pretty snowless until the middle of Month
– Actually I might been on skis during that March the most part
from what for counted.)
;
...The obvious contradiction (,you maybe recognize) at the above
said, becomes easily explained:
Due
for reasons described, there practically was no cross-country,
at all, by this year. I finally 'distanced' that mentioned amount
kilometers (Or, from a slight bit more/less, 'suppose, by
exactly...). But it was almost all on the shorter 'built'
track here.
(Plus a few trips to adjacent regions winter sport-centers – Where
situation wasn't to any considerable manner better.) ; Like I must
have said on the very before post, to me that lack of snows did felt
like having lost from smght 'integral' and inherent to my very
identity. Guess many people might've felt quite similarly. 'Though
not so many perhaps would bother concern themselves on
that,
by this much...
All
in all, obviously, the difference still was for quite apparent for
anyone that does the cross-country. Now only hoping that we're still
for to have some better winters during any for to subsequent
following years...As the 'climatic' estimate, 'prediction' either
doesn't promise any sort recognizable 'turn' from the better. More
from an opposite. Unless one now takes the route by some 'migratory'
species, and changes locations to further distances north.
But
that much on that. Wrote down just for some reminders.
(I
also remember, fx, of having had during this latest season a
conversation 'bout how we used from - only by a few years ago –
from to curse these constant near/little over zero-temperatures and
their resulted unpleasant 'wetty-snows' for the skiing surface. But
for now, during that Jan.-Feb. - I was merely hoping it would at
least to a some brief time turn to an 'actual' winter. But it didn't,
on this Winter.)
;
And yet, nevertheless; Despite my any remarks, I was still pretty
thankful of those artificial 'tracks' and routes. From permitting me
to keep on w. my hobby, sport...
...To
be honest, I don't also at all understand the people who choose to
talk about the 'adaptation' and some adjustment for this (man-made)
climatic change. When you are loosing the 'natural' weatheric
conditions, it predicts/realises to be in scope from (always) a
bigger loss than what can be 'regained' by a few 'saved' harvests -
Or what one recognizes gained in some otherways 'engineered'
solutions now created as the (temporary) 'adaptations'. How they
would show in the light of the big Question: That constant warming.
From briefest expressed; Now losing Winter - In that you are also
actually loosing something at an invaluable, un-rediscoverable,
'connection to'. And, that can't be 'bought back'. – No matter how
much one would've from wish from.
---------------
Pic (below) ; '...Pearls on swingin, the bells on ringin...' - from Lee's ('et al' - Ditko?),
Dr Strange-story "Eye of the Beholder" (; on mag Dec 38/1979.) - Night time, at the night club named Hells Bells
; ...Having to...'express' (that) it makes me litte doubtful is it from too 'proper' to have at this (particular) chapter these the now encontained 'amusing' comics selections, and, the nature photos. - From after finding for how serious the aspects discussed at this in general are. (What it contains, representing, for a bit discusses...)
Thenagain...won't choose to think that it'd to be for us any very good motive to write 'these stories' just in a (very) serious-minded 'view-points, foremost at what to our...remarked from, about. ; At least w. the recognization that any-one sometimes 'needs a break', every once in a while. So, a slight 'apologize' of these 'contradictions' - But not at all because of some remorse. (But of, some 'courtesy'.)
Pic (below) ; '...Pearls on swingin, the bells on ringin...' - from Lee's ('et al' - Ditko?),
Dr Strange-story "Eye of the Beholder" (; on mag Dec 38/1979.) - Night time, at the night club named Hells Bells
; ...Having to...'express' (that) it makes me litte doubtful is it from too 'proper' to have at this (particular) chapter these the now encontained 'amusing' comics selections, and, the nature photos. - From after finding for how serious the aspects discussed at this in general are. (What it contains, representing, for a bit discusses...)
Thenagain...won't choose to think that it'd to be for us any very good motive to write 'these stories' just in a (very) serious-minded 'view-points, foremost at what to our...remarked from, about. ; At least w. the recognization that any-one sometimes 'needs a break', every once in a while. So, a slight 'apologize' of these 'contradictions' - But not at all because of some remorse. (But of, some 'courtesy'.)
...In
spite of on above said: Having have to also notice that the
overall warming (warmed winters mostly here latitudes) haven't
exactly realised, in my eyes, from solely to w. a negative consequence. So far, that
means. Such as on all environmental change, some species suffer –
and some apparently do benefit. At least if you consider some short
term changes. Some that's by usual the more easily observable.
I've
to this Spring-season recognized there in my urbanhoods, as well as
elsewhere 'nearby' (the woods, esp), the more of the songbirds than
at any former year. Even more apparently, seen for this Spring the
more plentier small offspring of those. Both in numbers and, I
suppose, as well the different species than from before. Of course (,
I guess) it would've representing only the local condition – Birds
in general don't appear recognized of their any remarkable numbers to some similar
increase. Or, so one at least would conclude on viewing the 'official data', etc... ; However, I can't also think for that (aspect) any other
explanation than the said mild seasons during our latest winter. By
regular 'standard' the birds that can overwinter here 'ranges' are of
the selective few species from – But, apparently, the more of these
might've perhaps now chosen from stayed here past the winter. So - I
suppose - many of them, perhaps, also were now having their
chicklings by somewhat earlier. Or, maybe them more from the ones
that'd arrived by earlier. (As I think not for seen much those, by
any comparable periods just to this early.)
It's
also some fact, that even of the most 'regular' ones here a larger
procentual 'average' (maybe from 40 to 80 per cent) yearly born tends
from perish during their first few years. After that the survival
'rate' in any yearly 'generation' from the more significantly, rises.
But by now, w. the less cold spells and otherways less 'inhospitable'
winter temperatures, the amount from those to survive last winter
must've in numbers been well above usual 'average'. Leading to also
more from the newborns, this Spring.
Of
course, has to say: Not being any bird's specialist, can't say to
appear any too sure on my findings to that.
Of
the alternative reasons for, I could also imagine that – maybe –
it due for the reason that more species of bird nowadays havgin
become adapted on the(se) urban habitats of mine. And so you'd
perhaps now see more from the chicklings too. (And also more of a
variety by these days.) The forest uses, along w. the forestry's
Nature 'scavenging' methods aren't of to so much changed for the
better, by the lately. (But perhaps some of the more typical
forest-species also now may have gotten here slight more 'urbanized',
from resultively. Cant' say.) Difficult to 'confirm' for me, as my
findings mainly are based on an aspect that I only recognized of
seeing several more to those now. Also some that I just don't
personally recognize by species. Maybe it's only having gotten
somewhat more to walks on Nature to this early. More constantly than
for usually.
;
...Yet another “explanation”, that I could think for, being the
reduction in the overall uses by chemical pesticides: Along w. (that)
the now for some years said advanced 'favoring' in the more organic
farming methods, there now perhaps are also the more insects. -
And the local birds too may indeed having increased in numbers then.
This isn't any 'plain suburbia', as there are also agricultural
fields and the more forested environments, also situating to quite
near. (Like must've said by priorly before...) ; (Addit; Thenagain...that issue about the 'amount' by insects from increasing, due of the warming, ain't not at all quite so straightforward than of this kind 'assumption' you'd easily be lead for think. Such as earlier here and on this writing, by somewhat, is for remarked. ...You could easily, fx, pay attention at the increased numbers by honey bees, cultivated w. the purpose from some crops pollination, and then also visiting your garden flowers - And of not recognize that in the actual domestic insect 'fauna' there was the constant loss occurring...)
Yet (anyway)...I
still think that this unusual warm winter period seems for the
likeliest cause to the enjoyed multitude (early) song-birds. Even if
my other remarked assumptions would for be correct, them wouldn't
exactly explain why I've noticed of seen the so many separate
species. Numbers of some that I couldn't by first look easily
identify. ; Also it would/could then seem for the most typical
'sign', some to often mentioned relating to this current climatic
'shift'.
Of
course, would from feel to a pretty logical consequence: Birds, w.
wings, appear as well the more adjustive to move their ranges of
appearance – Perhaps they then are also now the more 'rapid' for
arrive, and hence there were noticeably, resultant the more early new
'breeds' too. (Meaning that, it might've also resulted of that for
late Spring-cold: From the trees having not so much coverage, leafs,
still recently – The more of the small bird could be seen, as well.
Maybe that better visibility the more reliable explanation...)
Besides,
it's as well nowadays often remarked to some new mammalian species,
occasioned or to more 'semi-permanent', arrivals and/or 'visitors' for here being discovered. ; But not
to this anything from the Golden Jackals, wild boars,
or – perhaps? - invasive frog-species from noted of the 'arrival'.
Be those possibilities or only for some random 'chance' cases resultsnt of
their more frequent occurrences...
...Comes
for mind also, that I've also the more often now recognized of had
seen hawks too. Some larger and (mostly) the smaller. (From distance
usually, of course.) A fewsome notices of eagles too ('though, not by
here region.) ; And lately, I even observed a raven on an edge
of one natural forested forested spot. Which certainly was for pretty
much a surprise sighting on here 'ranges'. It seemed for a pretty
impressive, large black bird. (A 'messenger' of some kind...?)
Pic (beside) : ...Also that from Manara's X-Women comics-album. This time the speak-bubble contents are just excluded...not of replaced (w. anything.)
Pic (beside) : ...Also that from Manara's X-Women comics-album. This time the speak-bubble contents are just excluded...not of replaced (w. anything.)
---------------------
“...Armed by the United States during the cold war, Turkey set up the largest armed forces in Europe, and the second largest in NATO after the United States. In a reckless gamble the United States in 1961 stationed even nuclear missiles in Turkey targeting the Soviet Union. When Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev a year later copied the reckless strategy and stationed nuclear missiles in Cuba targeting the United States, the Cuban Missile Crisis ensued and pushed the world to the brink of nuclear war. President Kennedy resolved the crisis peacefully by promising to remove the Jupiter missiles from turkey in return for Krushchev's promise to remove his nuclear missiles from Cuba.”; (Ganser) : NATO's Secret Armies: Operation Gladio and Terrorism in Western Europe ; ...of the chpt 17 in a vers online available, at Google-books. (Routledge/ Frank Cass, 2005.)
...On
the past, presently high costs of the “option” ;
On his book Upheaval.
How
Nations Cope with Crisis and Change (Allen
Lane/Penguin) Diamond makes the more extensive
nuclear-energies 'favorable' argument than for a 'standard' most tend
appear be. (On the book, btw the p. 383-91.) Or at least it for the
wider look for a nuclear (/'atomic age') past than is more regular at
what usual one more often now sees to any 'compacted' story 'bout the
nuclear retaliatorial and confrontatorial pasts.
(...W.
the 'confrontation', meaning that history by a two “global”
blocks in during those renown latter decades of a 20th century.
Most often goes nowadays known as the 'cold war'-era; Yet, they
equally often nowadays also stress that the 'cold war' wasn't
actually not cold at all, but more open some, w. the violent wars and
'territorial battles' in any places for the 'conflict zones' – Any where the US and Sovjet-blocks aimed for to increase their own
influence, power from. Also, having encontained the mainteined strategies by
both 'blocks' for purposefully benefitting themselves of the natural
resources at those areas in question. ; Or, it of course also relates
to the simultaneous/preceded purposes to independencing in the former
colonies, smght that was to stubbornly objected by the former
(European) colonial powers. The oils, the rare minerals, plus other
established cheap sources for the 'valuable material', as well as some
other motives behind the noted said negative developments – during
the “cold war”, amongst some it's many negative 'side-effects' from.)
And
indeed, for having originated in that same cold war-era, during that
confrontation by the Sovjets and the US-lead 'coalition', the nuclear-ends can be said to probably remain still the most dangerous 'caveat' on humanity, by this 21st century. (Even considering all the present concern from the global impact of the fossil fuels, the emissions 'build-up'. That also so, because the former mentioned having
of represented itself as the described threat now for near to 75 years – So, it seems of
had enshadowed the humanity's general futures and seek instead from 'anything better', by now to well past half-century's time.)
Without
goin' for any wider histories, or from referencing on those, it then also
fits here fx shortly remarking of that renown Cuban 'missile crisis', in the y. 1962. (...But, for that reminded; have also a look
on a citation right above this section, as well.) ; The period
commonly is noted the years when a global nuclear-doom (-war) said of been
the closer than ever before that, also than everafter. ; ...Diamond then
discusses on to that historical timing as the most exemplary case for a
scenario where - among few other 'scenarios' to 'that sort' - an
'...escalating series of
miscalculations of rival government's response' could've
alarmingly and irreversibly (such as we know, still could) led for the
use from nuclear weapons against peoples, the second time in human
history. Quite obviously, the likeliest result thenafter also would meant the practical destructing of all else life on Earth, too.
I
also think to this from apparent, that nowadays, before all present
talk on that global warming/climate 'change' (or 'climate shifts',
that somehow here sounding like a term more descriptive) – any
divide between the favorers for the nuclear(-energy) “option” and
it's opponents used for to be lot more clear. Quite simply, because
all that present, recent decades talk on the Climates seems
made the nuclear 'option' for the less feared one – on it's
“peaceful” uses, obviously – from the global climate problem
becoming the increasingly more of an urgent aspect. But, also
obviously, the whole scope of the nuclear-energy seems along that
gotten to ever more obscure – It, sort of, not similarly exists at
the 'centrum' for all environmental debate. Which, feels a bit
uneasing. Also, that recognition, it leaves me a quite peculiar
impressions about.
[Addit ;] ...In the conclusive chapter(s) of that Plutopia (2013-book. ; on btw pages 319-38. ), last one aptly named 'Futures', Brown seems somewhat discuss these noted 'connections' - Which feels useful for to mention at this 'reminder'. (Although on that she doesn't of course quite so directly 'point-out' from that 'fateful' and inhuman bond in the nuclear "renaissainces" and it's only recent pasts. - As I do at this, of considering that noted connection btw the "peaceful-", and a warring 'nuclear-businesses'. (Book fx has a brief informative chapter named 'Nuclear Glassnost', on the Russia's post-Sovjet developments, of 1990s-.) ; ...And in more generally also to cons these recent histories, or present, the book proves for a more rewarding than probably anything I could add on this. Soforth...after reading it, thought for a few quots more added on this write. - But possibly we now have not the chances - this text also having, did enlenghten for "over the haul", already quite much in this few pages, originally meant for 'compact'...
More so, as we've also already noted before, there actually ain't any self-evident manner how for separate the militaristic and 'peaceful' forms of production in the so called nuclear 'option'.
More so, as we've also already noted before, there actually ain't any self-evident manner how for separate the militaristic and 'peaceful' forms of production in the so called nuclear 'option'.
...And,
for one other related aspect: There were in the obscured 'early days'
from a nuclear energy-”form”, to so many obscurities and
secrecies around that 'production' (in general), the arms-race and
militaristic competition even to the levels that – probably –
from all cases to the early 'failures' and accidents, there still
ain't uncovered all to the most unbiased informations from, about.
(Of the time the knowledges still, perhaps, not ain't for 'all from' it's
'completeness' still being around.) ; ...Or, by nowadays perhaps are, quite a lot. For at least about the early history, like on what at above
said, of that 'fatal connection', fx the formerly referred other book by
Kate Brown's (Plutopia. Nuclear families, atomic cities, and the great Soviet and American Plutonium Disasters. ; 2013. ), seems to make the most comprihensive discussion I've for come by, cons this. ...On that. (And on other issues from.) The health issues, -'histories', esp,ao...
[Addit]; ...Just for some example (not meant to too directly related on anything by this writing, or these few pages), on it one fx reads of that clean-up from that US plutonium-producing facility - Hanaford - of past those cold war years, till as far as 1990s, when it's 'contract' and production seems from finally seems from ended. Happily or unhappily - at least from the noted decontamination costs, and, not only from that. ('Unhappily', thinkin what seems noted of the mentioned discoveries and finds, one would fx think... ; And this briefer reference only, only fx representing the US's part, of from these "yesterdays" to the country's nuclear warring-histories, the production pasts.) So, reads on that fx; "The uncharted nature of the assignment compounded the technological problems. Auditors realised that the site held three times more plutonium than originally reported." ; Also, (that continues w.) "Workers came across surprising discoveries such as a buried train car loaded with the contaminated carcasses of lab animals, a storage room of dirty baby diapers, and soil so radioactive it could kill on contact." (And also, continues w.) "In the nineties, Hanaford contractors ran through scores of billions of dollars only to admit that they needed twice as much money and time. ..."(; p. 294 - italics were added by me.)
[Addit]; ...Just for some example (not meant to too directly related on anything by this writing, or these few pages), on it one fx reads of that clean-up from that US plutonium-producing facility - Hanaford - of past those cold war years, till as far as 1990s, when it's 'contract' and production seems from finally seems from ended. Happily or unhappily - at least from the noted decontamination costs, and, not only from that. ('Unhappily', thinkin what seems noted of the mentioned discoveries and finds, one would fx think... ; And this briefer reference only, only fx representing the US's part, of from these "yesterdays" to the country's nuclear warring-histories, the production pasts.) So, reads on that fx; "The uncharted nature of the assignment compounded the technological problems. Auditors realised that the site held three times more plutonium than originally reported." ; Also, (that continues w.) "Workers came across surprising discoveries such as a buried train car loaded with the contaminated carcasses of lab animals, a storage room of dirty baby diapers, and soil so radioactive it could kill on contact." (And also, continues w.) "In the nineties, Hanaford contractors ran through scores of billions of dollars only to admit that they needed twice as much money and time. ..."(; p. 294 - italics were added by me.)
(...No more said, or pointed from - for I only recently even become any better aware 'bout the said Hanaford factory's former existence. ; ...To these reads, actually that Ozersk felt not near so 'obscured' chapter on these pasts - at least I have a vague idea having read 'bout sime lot to that by formerly, time-to-time. But, perhaps surprisingly, not nearly anything for the same level of cons that US-'comparable'.)
--------------
--------------
...From those nuclear 'pasts', only to it's early endangerements, earlier also read (of a one other book)
that during those decades of an armaments (and, when it was from constant assumed only how soon that feared IIIrd world war would for break up), by the 1950s to 1960s mostly,
U.S. army planes fx had some closer 30-40 accidents where nuclear
bombs carrying planes did crash. Either right after their taking off from airports.
(Which, did represent the most common case-examples, prob. Several
cases where then a relative 'safe' emergency-landings taken on a same base.) Or,
alternatively then, cases where there were accidents at their landing on arrival to the destination bases. - Or, sometimes the same in the 'midst' from their flights.
(...Accidents w. the varying severity. Ranging ftom the total
crash-landings to the said 'quite successfull' emergency-landings on
a same take-off airport.) And some cases, which were noted of been
the far more devastating. (For example, a few cases where the whole
plane crashed, within it's pieces and the carried materials from
'scattered' for areas 'wide over'.)
;
As from acc the general safety regulations none of the bombs carried
weren't ever tuned on (to detonating), there were not further
'accidental' nuclear-explosions. - But fx, in many those
occasions, cases the carried nuclear bombs could've been from
completely lost. ; So, fx from one singular accident I recall to
having read, that in the circumstances; '...the
pilot, the plane, or the bomb' were never to be discovered'.
(Addit) ; ...Don't know whether the british media, ie "Russia's 'slow-motion Chernobyl' at sea", would necessary appear the foremost comprihensive source on informations on Sovjet/Russian nuclear histories and accidents; But at least that then seems inform that (finally) there now is decided from effort to lifting up some those sunken nuclear submarines. (Which still remaining to the continuing threat, at the bottom from the several arctic seas.) - And, no question about, to the more catastrophic realities 'prospecting' is the articles' concluding, it stating that w. the current rate of building more nuclear-powered 'vessels'; "...there could be as many as 114 nuclear reactors in operation in the Arctic by 2035, almost twice as many as today."
Also; ...On another source that I did only come to view fromafter writing the most parts this post seems have a 'catalog' [...??, anycase at Atomic Archive ; on https://www.atomicarchive.com/almanac/broken-arrows/index.html] from the disappeared and (in some cases still later) unlocated nuclear carriers, from the past years - the accidentally 'lost' planes and submarines w. weapons. A typical 'accidental incident', or, just one entry on that list for the examples:
" Date: March 10, 1956
Location: Exact Location Unknown
Carrying two nuclear capsules on a nonstop flight from MacDill Air Force Base near Tampa, Florida to an overseas base, a B-47 was reported missing. It failed to make contact with a tanker over the Mediterranean for a second refueling. No trace was ever found of the plane."
(Not all of the cases, though, feat the accidents, crashes or 'wreckages' where nuclear devices were from completely lost.)
Consequently,
by now, it (all that history) might be realistic a reminder that accidents more rarely
'ring the bells', of priorly (beforehand).
- Not on that paranoid 1950s, nor any later known cases from. Anycase the whole of it, post world-war era, there (smght) recognizable in all the former 1950s cold-war paranoia. Smght in it that seems known of had 'captivated' and kept the recovering populaces, along w. their 'leadership', in a sort futuristic 'atomic faith' and determination. ; Something which we now presently see from it's total devoid even in anything to any realistic logic, for which the whole of the futures (were) estimated 'expendable', even. – Even from all the modern 'threats', by that realisation 'bout how wide-spread was then that strive for endangering of 'all of a human-kind', in the early arms-race period, you can't also avoid of that (rather common, standard) thought 'bout: ...Some 'suicidal tendencies' in humanity ? Such as is the often presented, (and simplifying) Freudian post-conclusion to all in that 1950s?
----------
Anyway...to
return for that Diamond. ; Also on his book presents, along w. a
discussion on climatic aspects (little later on pages), some views
that seem relate only to the more regular, 'standard notice'.
;
Fx, for such I find the claim that after a Chernobyl-accident the peoples
global opinions largely 'shifted' to oppese the nuclear energy (and,
that then led on a halting of it's developing, nuclear 'renewal') –
Esp. so, in the Americas, such as one familiar for history of
accidents might know, of remember. ; ...Nevertheless, I also then
kind from recall read that during for somewhat few years later (2000s),
that, along w. Bush's governance from strongly backing and putting on
effect it's (globally) climate-disastrous fossil energies favorable
politics - There as well was the extensions 'admitted' on an
operational life-times for the then existant american nuclear plants. ;
However, we've also remarked of that priorly – In which the
view-point, simply, was about (the) similarly to the airplanes,
that on during their 'take off' (and when landing) are more 'prone' to accident (Or from any 'emergency' taking place.). Also then, the nuclear plants seem
of recognized to the more vulnerable for accidents any times during
their begins of the uses – And, then the closer the ends by their
operational time periods. (Tend from become, by 'average', for the more risky.) ; Of
generally, relative few from the world's nuclear plants seem to had "ended" in this manner - Since not so many have reached the 40, 60 y., their original 'operational age'
so far.) Probably(/perhaps?), there is more numbers in some that'd,
'during the years', got closed due because of the safety
reasons...'ao' reasons. (Don't know 'bout...won't actually bother to 'dig up' the relevant information cons that...so my guess, only.)
But
by anycase, it's quite resemblant than what would concern roughly any
technical 'device' – their potential for malfunctions and 'fails'
always becomes the greater just at the begins and 'shutting down', on
early and latter part the maintained time of use.
(beside) - Some Ants, photographed at some of the earliest warmer days to this Spring. - Maybe around by mid/-early from an April. ; ...Actually, those were seen for warming at the sun rays, over a some black (hard plastic) tube, left in the one wooded spot here I was walking on. (And well, little 'investigating'.) The tube lead for the ant-hill, and guess, them were then on 'walks' too, makin' a sort of a 'ant-road' over that, such as ants often have - they actually form paths or 'roads' like humans. The ant-hill was certainly the largest I've from seen at anyplace on here to any 'semi-woods', some at the 'midst' my these "near-by's". ; ...But that made me then think about what the difference at the uses from that 'material' - which was generally an unecological, not decomposing, not in any practical time-scales 'renewable' at least. The ants used it to 'warming' themselves (or whatever that early activity, 'road' meant for - But as a typical sign from some former human 'activity', it represented itself merely as some extra rubbish, having been left or forgotten in the midst of that small wood.
(You perhaps got the view-point: Some say, that the H.Sapiens being for the most stupid of species. I often agree, but the claim can also give some 'inspire' for this kind contemplations...Whom actually, at the final 'instance', appears the more adaptive: 'Man' or an...Ant ?.)
--------
“Reason
that we did this job is because it was an organic necessity.”
(Oppenheimer)
– on (some) speech, can't exactly remember for when...
-
Perhaps that claim/expressed given right after the infamous 1st
nuclear explosion in the World, by that y. 1945. (...suppose that
it's correct origin? For, I didn't actually bother to look about
that, by precisely.)
'The
Merchant of Death' (phrase...) ; ...Doesn't
mean that the en-lenghtened 'use-times' of the nuclear plants
would've for automatically to predict their likehoods for any serious
disaster – but in the world there at least used of be some
500 plants in operation (When I last glanced about, to a several
years past), then you by some logic estimate that in many cases there
must a large number the older ones too. And their risks
certainly can't represent the decline in any 'risk factor', merely to
represent some increase in that, the longer them to remain
been or maintained at use.
(Photo) : Daphne (-mezereum) - A very poisonic natural plant..and so the kids are to usual 'early education' for serious forewarned from not to eat the Daphne's bright-red berries. (...Mezereum has some endangering toxic contents from. From eating those the 'effect' is said lead an aching, felt 'burnings' in the body's physical organs. Eating any larger amounts from cause a subsequent painful death.) ; However, such as often typical/occasional to the poisonic plant - It's flowers are for the most enchanting by their appeareance. Grows as a small shrub, or 'twig'. It takes some time for it's growth, but flowers emerge in some years(?) old shrubs when there's still (...usually) some snows in the ground, ie already on March.
Of
course, also, when reading the particulars of that most famous
accident (the Chernobyl-disaster) in the pasts, one can't quite avoid
the impression that apparent (that) at 'Sovjet-system' of nuclear
energy some for more serious flaws existed. And that'd, afterwards,
can easily be read for had 'pre-set' the better known from major
disasters, which was already there “in the making”.
Similarly than any nuclear histories could be viewed, in cases from
any accidents that seen take place - before and postafter that
Chernobyl. ; Anyway, consequence then was the more serious
accident – And now more renown than others usual seen as for some
from it's 'comparables'.
;
Reading, even a little on those histories of the Sovjet, one then
can't also much escape of notion that the possibility to the more
serious disaster in some from RBMK-reactor models would've been only
a matter of some time. Such as then happened, after those innumerable
plenty, several 'lesser' faults and smaller-scale disasters -
Including that one on above noted above noted at, that Ozersk
-57. (See of the quotations above, on begins. Also, again, Brown (2013-book) offers the plentyful 'backgrounds' on about accident's formerly for quite little known history. ao histories.) ...Interestingly, as some examples of
a present public 'little known' – or perhaps from only to own
inadequate reads prior this writing - I actually, formerly had
assumed the noted Ozersk-case (the radioctive waste container
'spill'), and that Maiak-accident by same year meant the very same
incident. ; But, in the more 'precise' look, fx acc the referred book
(Plutopia, of 2013) it seems noted that in an only 'official' record of that (plutonium)
plant at Maiak, there said been at least 3 separate major accidents, in some varying “severity” form. (Plus, all from it's even more vast environmental and human sufference, it's contamination histories maybe in some later 'page' covered at this, on this writing.... ; Matter-a-fact, probably I'd formerly confused that -57 accident to a -55 case, some prevented in the 'last-minute'.)
(Addit.) ; ...In fact, from now reading that, I notice that Brown seems provide on that an even more compact decscript., some that leaves not a place for any 'partial view'. (Or say, little room to any misinterpretating.) ...The paragraph begins w. noticing that in Chernobyl, post-accident, the Ukrainian 'liquidators' in area discovered that soon arriving 'specialists' had 'uncannily knowledgeable' to consequent actions in the cases from the radioactive accidents. And so (those specialists) ; "...They recommended burying cottages in pits, shaving away the top layers of soil, spreading fertilizer to stave off radioactive mimics of essential minerals, cutting down forests turned red from exposure, and rinsing streets with special chemicals devised for radioactive spills. How did they know so much? Most liquidators in Ukraine had no idea that Chernobyl was not the nation's first nuclear disaster or that, from a scientific perspective, there was little that was new in the Chernobyl cleanup. The emergency actions in Ukraine had all played out before in 1951, 1953, 1955, 1957, and 1967 in the Urals.
In other ways, too, Chernobyl repeated the experience of its progenitors in the military nuclear industry. The Chernobyl RBMK reactors were designed to produce both electric power and plutonium. The Chernobyl plant exploded because of problems that had plagued the Maiak plant for decades: irresponsible management, poorly trained workers, rushed and faulty designs, and procedures that emphasized the economy over safety. As in Ozersk, the sole whistle-blowers at the Chernobyl plant were KGB agents, who had wide powers to access classified records... [but, whose warnings of, ao, an 'alarming accident records' were 'largely ignored'] ... The compartmentalisation of information, the secrecy, the failure to inform the public of radiation dangers, the evacuations that occurred with critical delays, the deployment of expendable prisoners and soldiers on the most dangerous jobs, the failure to inform these 'jumpers' and other employees of ways to protect themselves, the unpredictability of radioactive fallout in concentrated hot spots outside the neat zones of concentric circles - all were eerie repetitions of the plutonium disasters of the previous four decades. The only new feature in 1986 was that the catastrophe occurred while the cameras were running." (Plutopia; p. 284-5)
So, pretty much that traces the 'story'. ('Also', and such as we already by priorly, oftenmost noted for), or how we on earlier these writing had for the remarked: Any militaristic use always tends to from considerably increase a risk from some majors accident happening. Or of worse.; [Addit:] ...And, such as we to these reads for the 'case histories' find rather quite 'confirmed - Only of the examples such as the Windscale (Britain); Or, from the Japan. (Where the early reactor-models I now seem notice said for the 'copied' of the US-military-based ones.) Or, along discussed renown 'case histories', the numerous accidents in the Sovjets (In those infamous RBMK-reactors, prob. mostly). And if you'd then think that finding to some 'relief for', in some reasons, from some/any overt 'optimistical estimate based only on these fewsomes in the nuclear-energy historics...
(Addit.) ; ...In fact, from now reading that, I notice that Brown seems provide on that an even more compact decscript., some that leaves not a place for any 'partial view'. (Or say, little room to any misinterpretating.) ...The paragraph begins w. noticing that in Chernobyl, post-accident, the Ukrainian 'liquidators' in area discovered that soon arriving 'specialists' had 'uncannily knowledgeable' to consequent actions in the cases from the radioactive accidents. And so (those specialists) ; "...They recommended burying cottages in pits, shaving away the top layers of soil, spreading fertilizer to stave off radioactive mimics of essential minerals, cutting down forests turned red from exposure, and rinsing streets with special chemicals devised for radioactive spills. How did they know so much? Most liquidators in Ukraine had no idea that Chernobyl was not the nation's first nuclear disaster or that, from a scientific perspective, there was little that was new in the Chernobyl cleanup. The emergency actions in Ukraine had all played out before in 1951, 1953, 1955, 1957, and 1967 in the Urals.
In other ways, too, Chernobyl repeated the experience of its progenitors in the military nuclear industry. The Chernobyl RBMK reactors were designed to produce both electric power and plutonium. The Chernobyl plant exploded because of problems that had plagued the Maiak plant for decades: irresponsible management, poorly trained workers, rushed and faulty designs, and procedures that emphasized the economy over safety. As in Ozersk, the sole whistle-blowers at the Chernobyl plant were KGB agents, who had wide powers to access classified records... [but, whose warnings of, ao, an 'alarming accident records' were 'largely ignored'] ... The compartmentalisation of information, the secrecy, the failure to inform the public of radiation dangers, the evacuations that occurred with critical delays, the deployment of expendable prisoners and soldiers on the most dangerous jobs, the failure to inform these 'jumpers' and other employees of ways to protect themselves, the unpredictability of radioactive fallout in concentrated hot spots outside the neat zones of concentric circles - all were eerie repetitions of the plutonium disasters of the previous four decades. The only new feature in 1986 was that the catastrophe occurred while the cameras were running." (Plutopia; p. 284-5)
So, pretty much that traces the 'story'. ('Also', and such as we already by priorly, oftenmost noted for), or how we on earlier these writing had for the remarked: Any militaristic use always tends to from considerably increase a risk from some majors accident happening. Or of worse.; [Addit:] ...And, such as we to these reads for the 'case histories' find rather quite 'confirmed - Only of the examples such as the Windscale (Britain); Or, from the Japan. (Where the early reactor-models I now seem notice said for the 'copied' of the US-military-based ones.) Or, along discussed renown 'case histories', the numerous accidents in the Sovjets (In those infamous RBMK-reactors, prob. mostly). And if you'd then think that finding to some 'relief for', in some reasons, from some/any overt 'optimistical estimate based only on these fewsomes in the nuclear-energy historics...
...That
noted, yet, having to also notice: Despite that the Three Mile
Island-accident (the reactor meltdown, U.S. Harrisburg, in the 1970s), apparently,
ain't said to had caused any human deaths (At least not 'directly' such as is said.) – American citizens then probably,
consequently, nowadays would think themselves to only had some luck
in that during the 'Reaganesque' 1980s, the similarly war-devoted,
nuclear arms-race investing government(s) didn't realise some
disasters of just as similar scope in an american soils. (...In some
resulted 'once and for all' polluting of the crop-fields, the human
healths, ...plus then that always guarded nuclear public-'facade'
gotten for permanent 'contaminated'. If the latter mentioned even
then possible, given all of a public distrust from 'engathered' with
the years)
(...Ao,
as it being also readable only on that little what at above
quotatations – on above quoted from that Brown (,on the 2015-book) also seems it
contain a mention that during Reagan's administration it was from ordered the '...long-mothballed
Hanford Plutonium Plant' of to restart it's
production again. During those same 'warring' years, by the same
1980s. (...Of these later reads learned that about it's 'dismanting', it was 'announced' already by during the Johnson years, late 1960s) ; Or, it seems said of began in some more 'minor level' already by
the latter years from Carter's presidency (Such as I now also seem to
read about.)
;
...Smght more close to our present timing, perhaps - (Diamond) then
as well remarks that 'since 1945' there having been (only)
'...two known events...[where] accidents at nuclear power
stations did kill people
[...from directly, that should read. ...'plus',] 'the
large but uncertain' numbers those who died
'subsequently of the
radiation' released in those two accidents. (;p.
403, italics added by
me.)'; The two
mentioned cases that Chernobyl-accident, by 1986 as we would know. And the
Fukushima-reactor accident(s) in Japan (For which the
year 2011 is given.)
And maybe so.
...Although, that latter one also leaves me little uncertain of the year, or 'specifics' for the some sayings in that remark. ; Reading anything to the nuclear (industry's) histories, you soon, fx, learn to recognize that usually the given figure to any reactor-accident's victims tends hide the larger numbers aspects that are left devoid the mentioned. - ...Since I also kind of recall for read, by formerly, when I first did slight observe these 'histories', that the Tokaimura-accident said lead for deaths of at least two from plant's employees. (In the facility constructed for the nuclear waste 'post-processing' purposes. That one also in Japan, by the y. -99) ; ...And that even without going for anything to more specific on the mentions of the potential 'less direct' consequences; The increases, often discussed many cases cons the noted cancers subsequent some radiation-related accident/'leaks', plus the other similarly connected diseases, and plus then still even more of a variety cases where it could've resulted to, is (maybe, often) left to only speculative issue for whether the released contaminations might've increased any possibilities from the long term illnesses, since them usual are noted for become discovered only by the 'after-years'. Etc...
And maybe so.
...Although, that latter one also leaves me little uncertain of the year, or 'specifics' for the some sayings in that remark. ; Reading anything to the nuclear (industry's) histories, you soon, fx, learn to recognize that usually the given figure to any reactor-accident's victims tends hide the larger numbers aspects that are left devoid the mentioned. - ...Since I also kind of recall for read, by formerly, when I first did slight observe these 'histories', that the Tokaimura-accident said lead for deaths of at least two from plant's employees. (In the facility constructed for the nuclear waste 'post-processing' purposes. That one also in Japan, by the y. -99) ; ...And that even without going for anything to more specific on the mentions of the potential 'less direct' consequences; The increases, often discussed many cases cons the noted cancers subsequent some radiation-related accident/'leaks', plus the other similarly connected diseases, and plus then still even more of a variety cases where it could've resulted to, is (maybe, often) left to only speculative issue for whether the released contaminations might've increased any possibilities from the long term illnesses, since them usual are noted for become discovered only by the 'after-years'. Etc...
;
The whole from that (often downscaled) figure of the ('direct') victims from
nuclear pollution, which so often is for 'drawn' aforth. (...for a side-mention: on that 'count', one learns some plenty, also fx reading from that Brown (2013), btw p. 178-188. Or, cons the more lots at that on about those Sovjet-pasts, esp the polluting from that Techa-river, in Ural, etc... ; Or, also cons that Lake Karachay) ; ( From cons the victims to the nuclear accidents, the fewsome counted in that long lived 'official figure' from - it being a bit like...If
I'd to say that because to the remains of a vulcano-explosion in the
Pompey (79? A.D.) only so-and-so many victims have been to present
ages of discovered - in form from those famous 'ash-moulds', under
rained vulcanic 'layers' having covered them and left the empty
'spaces' in the midst, in place victims bodies – Then, apparently
(?) that volcano erupting did kill only from 'so-and-so many'.)
And
there's other obvious reasons why the Chernobyl-accident
became, and remains, the crucial 'turning point' in the global alarm
about the nuclear safety. (Hence those many 'cover-ups' and efforts
for hiding it's 'left-after', made by the nuclear industry.) ; ...Of
that view-point, for reminded, one needs only fx cite to thise the
few followed (briefer) passages of that Plokhy (of pages
210; 224). For, ao, fromafter then in the soon 'after-days' of
the accident it was fx 'found necessary' that:
“...Legasov was allowed to install his water filters, while Velikhov could go ahead with freezing the ground under the reactors and constructing a concrete platform there. The latter was an enormous undertaking. They began drilling around the reactor and pumping liquid nitrogen at a temperature of 100 degrees Celsius below zero into the tunnels. It was calculated that 25 tonnes of liquid nitrogen per day would be required to keep the earth around the reactor frozen and the reactor cool. It was anybody's guess whether that would work. The reactor kept heating up and erupting with clouds of radioactive dust, releasing close to 7 million curies into the atmosphere on May 4. Those clouds carried the radiation all over Europe.” ;
“The scientists were worried that the use of heavy machinery could make the reactor building's foundation shift and possibly crack, releasing radioactive substances from the reactor's core into the earth and affecting groundwaters. The miners were therefore forbidden to use any heavy equipment. They had to dig virtually with their bare hands and push carts full of soil out of the tunnel, also by hand. And dig and push they did. ...”
(Also,
like nowadays better known, the amount of the people estimated gotten
exposed to radiation, w. the resultant damages of health and various
health concern resultant is usually estimated w. the varying figure
from the 'several thousands' to a several hundred thousands.)
“...
Yet in the five years immediately following the 1986 accident,
Ukrainian officials and scientists confirmed the national cancer rate
increase of well over 5 percent in adults and 90 percent in the
regions children.“ ;
“...For their part, the United Nations and
some prominent Chernobyl disaster scholars continue to discount as
mistaken or Radiophobic ...claims of additional, short-term, direct
deaths due to accident-attributable trauma or radiation sickness not
counted in the official tallies of the accident's death toll.”
; From some web-source (Not wrote down on which – Might have been
on a Wikipedian-entry for the accident's health consequences...)
;
...From (somewhat) contrastively for our former remarks, p-o-w's -
One would also think it at least a level quite reliable an 'argument'
that the several countries have now, to some times, used their
nuclear energy-plants without similar (devastating) fails. (Or at
least not of any similar major accidents suffered.) So on that book
(Upheaval, p. 404) Diamond seems quite correct write that: 'France
has generated most of its national electricity requirements from
nuclear reactors for many decades without an accident. ... South
Korea, Taiwan, Finland, and many other countries also generated much
electricity...without significant accidents.' ; (But,
also then remember some remarks to our former most previous few
posts. ...Fx that one w. the reference on that French 'near' nuclear
disaster/accident taken places, by the year 1999.)
;
Yet, also, like as well we've noted earlier before, the 'clean up'
always was the biggest issue that the nuclear industry never wanted
for taken on it's energy-calculation. (...The costs, the unnerving
possibility of those negative health effects, plus all the social
concerns – Or, cons the people's felt distrust whether there's any
reliability on a (said) safetyness of formerly polluted sites – As
the possibility about the contaminating particles w. radioactive
'remains' always would 'remain'. ; Subsequently, constantly some of
former nuclear bomb test-sites seem, fx, often seen their renewed
de-contamination operations during the decades following. – Not
either much anything that'd arise any 'trust' on about what often
made the 'officially' told “truth”.)
...And
basically the same concerning the often debated figures, stats and
claims by level from severity in any accidents, or the major 'faults'
in reactors (During the nuclear reactors past uses suffered.) A few
areas in the modern technology, histories, that'd would contain
so much a disputed claim and – for apparent – intentioned
'uncertainties' around, about.
------
Yet
to mention that I don't exactly, in a straight-forward manner reject
any techs and, well, some “progressive” views about it's any 'benefits'.
(While I don't believe it for, anyhow from 'benefitting' on the human kind, in general - Not as such...) - So, Here,
fx the entry I lately glanced, from on (some) newssing for perhaps
latest(?) at the fusion-research. (On a built 'experimental'-reactor,
fusion plant named Tokamak.) - But oh! (?), ...that article wouldn't now seem to be 'around and easily discoverable' to us. So, then after a brief look did notice this, ('Uk hatches plan to build world's first fusion power plant') Which probably, would from have the 'most', the basic essential cons the issue. (Of the present plan and the 'situation' from, by now.
;
...I recall of had by earlier wrote, now to some years ago, that if a
fusion-(energy reactor) were possible for 'invented', it would've
basically solve all the vast numbers problem w. the nuclear power.
(But also that it for being a possibility from more 'unlikelier'
still.) ...Whether or not it (fusion-energy) would've be by someday
actually become an 'operational' a solution (ie, actually practical
and functional in the more wider uses) – By now looking the issue;
The vast amounts that fx this seems to costed so far, onto it's
present 'stage' from - One tends to have an impression that any
actually functional fusion-plants wouldn't arrive in a time from to make some meaningful
solution on the climatic 'problems'. ; ...In that above the planned years for a mentioned countries invested to the building from first usable (smaller) fusion-reactors to be completed would seem giving the timings of years 2040 (UK), and for 2035 (France).
(; ...Given the usual 'case histories', and the observed care of neglect in the former nuclear 'pasts' - plus the fact about it's usual habit to turn out for surprising 'costy' (,expensive) for the taxpayers, of course - Which at our writing on at this and elsewhere before so much from covered - the following 'side-mention' noted of an above link then don't so very much...from assure us, either; "Scientists hope that the smaller facility ...will prove cheaper. But it's reduced size could also bring problems, ...
...for spherical tokamaks there are many unknowns, she says. 'That means there is more risk, but on the flip side, it could also mean there is more to discover and perhaps more to optimize.") - 'Perhaps', whose to say, I therefore choose to leave any conclusions of the lastest to anyone's own making, by this case... (Indeed, it's now usual, of all that former 'experience' 'till present day, that a mention on that 'flip side', the one about the risk in connected w. the nuclear energies, 'any form' - Often it sufficient to horrifies people enough for them to most quickly from turning their attention elsewhere, for the 'next page'.)
And even...if it somehow did/would (the fusion, energy-plants turn out for the 'realizable', an alternative) : You then have the other obvious questions, the same ones than which usually are found to relating for most uses from almost any modern 'high-tech'. (When it to had arrived, or from gotten for 'commercialised'.) - Does that ever seem to result, or realising from to actually to benefit the 'poor and the deprived' (,of the world) ? In other words; even any recognition for the invents, these modern technological “wonders”, tends in the climatic issues to always returns for that same question of the global inequality. And to that (basis), one concludes that the actual modern clean energy-revolution, if for meaningful climatically, it's always more likely from to happen in the form of solutions and changes away off the former existant – that what from it's 'manifestations' was the centralised, and nowadays the multinational-owned, costly 'solutions'. (The past suppressive and mostly non-renewable sectors, in that meaning. Not of to excluding a mention of the millions and billions for that 'overhaul', and in the decontamination costs.) ; Some 're-emergence' of the actual energy-revolution being, besides, already for happening.
(; ...Given the usual 'case histories', and the observed care of neglect in the former nuclear 'pasts' - plus the fact about it's usual habit to turn out for surprising 'costy' (,expensive) for the taxpayers, of course - Which at our writing on at this and elsewhere before so much from covered - the following 'side-mention' noted of an above link then don't so very much...from assure us, either; "Scientists hope that the smaller facility ...will prove cheaper. But it's reduced size could also bring problems, ...
...for spherical tokamaks there are many unknowns, she says. 'That means there is more risk, but on the flip side, it could also mean there is more to discover and perhaps more to optimize.") - 'Perhaps', whose to say, I therefore choose to leave any conclusions of the lastest to anyone's own making, by this case... (Indeed, it's now usual, of all that former 'experience' 'till present day, that a mention on that 'flip side', the one about the risk in connected w. the nuclear energies, 'any form' - Often it sufficient to horrifies people enough for them to most quickly from turning their attention elsewhere, for the 'next page'.)
And even...if it somehow did/would (the fusion, energy-plants turn out for the 'realizable', an alternative) : You then have the other obvious questions, the same ones than which usually are found to relating for most uses from almost any modern 'high-tech'. (When it to had arrived, or from gotten for 'commercialised'.) - Does that ever seem to result, or realising from to actually to benefit the 'poor and the deprived' (,of the world) ? In other words; even any recognition for the invents, these modern technological “wonders”, tends in the climatic issues to always returns for that same question of the global inequality. And to that (basis), one concludes that the actual modern clean energy-revolution, if for meaningful climatically, it's always more likely from to happen in the form of solutions and changes away off the former existant – that what from it's 'manifestations' was the centralised, and nowadays the multinational-owned, costly 'solutions'. (The past suppressive and mostly non-renewable sectors, in that meaning. Not of to excluding a mention of the millions and billions for that 'overhaul', and in the decontamination costs.) ; Some 're-emergence' of the actual energy-revolution being, besides, already for happening.
Additionally,
there also then presently number human energy uses that fusion, if
actually invented and practical wouldn't so neatly solve. At least in
the transports. Besides, the preceded few selective looks on the
horrifying and neglecting histories in beyond the present
'fission'-plants really don't exactly strenghten the assurances the 'fusion'
would've to emerge of its (possible) 'begins' to some manner a more
universal and less discriminating an energy-form.
But,
cons this, I also eagerly admit not of having the very latest
familiarity on anything 'bout, the fusions 'potentials' – or, say
for it's 'current promise'. (Whatever it's actual 'worth'...)
I also mean, it's actually not the less astonishing nowadays to notice for what all else lot in a modern innovation there seems - during only few recent decades - for shown capable to 'reveal'. Such as fx on this. (...Another article on Nature. On about the atoms and techniques to their 'microscopic' observation.)
I also mean, it's actually not the less astonishing nowadays to notice for what all else lot in a modern innovation there seems - during only few recent decades - for shown capable to 'reveal'. Such as fx on this. (...Another article on Nature. On about the atoms and techniques to their 'microscopic' observation.)
So let us then only say that the effectual uses, in any soon time, seem rather...unlikely.
Pic (right beside...) : ...from Valentina...'s adventures' (Crepax). Of a story by name "Anthropology", published by the y. -77. More precisely - such as I noted of that compilation to Crepax's works - of the fewsome pages to an 'after-story' the story, published only on some mag, to an additional separate closing for the story... ; Perhaps some of the Crepax's cleverast singular details, at his comic stories...
---------------
;
...Such as we from formerly often been noting, the present problems,
emerged from relating on the humanity's (global) energy-uses, it's
exceeding any realistic 'limit', those don't seem to any manner
'solved' w. the further increasage of an energy produced. – Acc the
former experience such seems only, merely, before functioned for to
realising the more in emissions generated, the more 'piled up' at our
already prevailent vast consumeristic GHS-'footprint'. Yearly and
daily.
Below (Pic) : ...Also of the Lee-(Ditko's) Dr Strange. From mag Feb 33/1978, 'Through a Glass, Strangely' (A dream weaver-story. 'Adapted' in the phantasy comics 'dimensions', sort from... (But I wonder from whether that, the drawing, was based on - suppose' it - Rod Stewart-album ? Or, vice versa, ? Whichever the 'original source' - or, whatever else then was...)
Below (Pic) : ...Also of the Lee-(Ditko's) Dr Strange. From mag Feb 33/1978, 'Through a Glass, Strangely' (A dream weaver-story. 'Adapted' in the phantasy comics 'dimensions', sort from... (But I wonder from whether that, the drawing, was based on - suppose' it - Rod Stewart-album ? Or, vice versa, ? Whichever the 'original source' - or, whatever else then was...)
--------------------
'Beyond fictions' – This present age.
; “Case
histories and novels are 'fabulations' which translate or gesture
towards the unspeakable in terms of human experience. In the
post-Aushchwitz, post-Hiroshima age, the fabulators have kept the
faith with remarkable resilience.
The
career of H.G. Wells most vividly illustrates the twentieth century's
abandoning faith in God and science and finally art. From the utopian
vision of The World Set Free we may move to the
coalescing of private fears and public chaos in The Shape
of Things to Come (1933), where the 'sibylline' dreams of
Dr Raven are at odds with his public confidence; or more personally
to The Mind at the End of it's Tether (1945),
written before Hiroshima but suffused with post-nuclear paralysis. To
Wells it seemed that the human mind was now pursuing and contriving
only 'endings and death' (30). He recognized, like so many other
writers of the nuclear age, the lust for apocalypse:
We
want to be in at the death of Man and to have a voice in his final
replacement by the next Lord of Creation, even if, Oedipus-like, that
successor's first act be parricide. (19)
Like
the critics of Holocaust writing, Wells now felt that the fate of the
Earth was beyond fiction. ...” (Dowling, -87) : Fictions
of Nuclear Disaster (; p. 149.)
(It - the quote above - then continues w. the notice that he [Wells, ended from pessimistical, of the fictions possibilities for a...realistic descript, on it's capacity to "see", 'or say 'reveal' (smght) past the 20 century horrifications to the 'nuclear ends'], ...while of priorly [he]
'...had shown...an
ability to imagine a waste land of haunting power, ... ') ...Etc. (, the sentences continue.)
; But briefly - if
I lastly think from the Climate-issue only – And I don't,
“anymore”, so much view anything of these aspect that much in
the view-point from some amount energies generated. (Or how them best
generated by non-pollutive productions from.) Or, even of view how
those emissions would get the best way for down-scaled. (While the
both things having their utmost necessity, by obviously.)
Pic : Frog, seen amongst the several at their Springly swims on a flowing water (creek), this year. About...maybe it was April (/May, around by the 'labour-day' celebrations, possibly.) ...Likely the depicted a Common Frog, one from those only fewsome native amphibian species that do appear at here environments.
; It being actually from as well, or even more, a question about from the amount for the environments that are being for reserved. Not necessary all can be 'conserved' in their 'pristine' level. (Little exists that way even, anymore.) But in a state from what would benefit the actually health-supporting and 'tolerable', in times by these advancing future climates. It's about how those environments, their remains kept as much as possible still nearer to their 'natural balance'. Unlike from any other factors in the 'climatic calculation', the environments you simply can't replace from w. some other (man-made) 'variable' with. (Can't change the 'figures', as the environments actually change acc their own rate, logic.) ; Simply, for the humanity, it's most about finally recognizing what danger lies in exceeding those 'safe limits' – smght that is far nearer than used to be, previously was. Having considerable neared only by during a few latest decades. (And the needed actual change for certainly isn't achievable w. a more 'installed' nuclear plants.)
; It being actually from as well, or even more, a question about from the amount for the environments that are being for reserved. Not necessary all can be 'conserved' in their 'pristine' level. (Little exists that way even, anymore.) But in a state from what would benefit the actually health-supporting and 'tolerable', in times by these advancing future climates. It's about how those environments, their remains kept as much as possible still nearer to their 'natural balance'. Unlike from any other factors in the 'climatic calculation', the environments you simply can't replace from w. some other (man-made) 'variable' with. (Can't change the 'figures', as the environments actually change acc their own rate, logic.) ; Simply, for the humanity, it's most about finally recognizing what danger lies in exceeding those 'safe limits' – smght that is far nearer than used to be, previously was. Having considerable neared only by during a few latest decades. (And the needed actual change for certainly isn't achievable w. a more 'installed' nuclear plants.)
It's
about taking notices of the present warning-signs. Also of the birds,
beetles, frogs. (And of the increased 'battering heats', some that
tell of the fastening climatic 'shift', during this nowadays rather
well-renown 'sixth extinctions-age'.)
; And foremost it's about being open for an actual change.
-----------------
; And foremost it's about being open for an actual change.
-----------------
“...To drop a metaphor: history informs us that such things have been done or have occurred; but when we come to inquire into motives and characters, it is the most false and partial and unsatisfactory authority we refer to. Women are illustrious in history, not from what they have been in themselves, but generally in proportion to the mischief they have done or caused.” (Jameson, Anna), from Characteristics of Women, p. 1832 (;Vol I.)
Pic (beside) : ...Of that Meziéres-Christin early space comics-album, 'Bad Dreams'. ...The most classic one to the Laureline (-Valerian) story-plots. (Actually) the earliest one of those, from the y. -67.
(...So what comes for the general characteristics on about that nuclear-energy 'form'. ; Seems to me, that only these, few, observances shown from of the rather similar discovery than what we've noted by before. – Much in that, much the same way about, for how it appears to 'always' been. That looks...a lot like 'playing games w the God', and on the very edges of his/her own field. For/of how 'serious' you think the game, that depends solely of how long, you choose for to think, the luck by “your” very own can last...And that not from a very good foreboding as any calculation, obviously.)
-------------------
;
“The
analysis, ...says intensive agriculture is the main driver of the
declines, particularly the heavy use of pesticides.” ;
“The 2.5 per cent rate of annual loss over the last 25-30 years is
'shocking' ...in 100 years you will have none.” ; Guardian - on 10.2.2020
;
“Water
is an integral part of bioplanning. Not only is essential for plant
life, but it is also necessary for the animal kingdom within a
garden. Without it the gardener assumes the aspect of desert for many
species. Water can take the form of a series of artisticially
arranged shallow bowls with pebbless placed as small islands in the
bowls, a birdbath, an artificial bog garden, a small water garden, or
a running water feature of some kind. The latter is water in its
ideal form. The sound of running water, splashing and gurgling with
its amplified resonance, has a magical, pleasing, and relaxing
quality to the human ear.
Ponds
large and small in a north temperate climate add a dimension to
gardening that is as filled with pleasure as it is astonishing. The
numbers of common skimmers, most usually dragon flies, seen flying
over the smallest surface of water is a visual treat taken for
granted in North America but noticeably absent in an English garden
due to the demise of so many species. Many birds flop down for
private bathing, and many garter and various snakes take an elegant
swim. ...Frogs of all kinds are attracted by the call of water.
A
bird bath, however, is the most commin water feature in the garden.
It should be placed near shrubbery... In times of drought or water
restriction, a floater (a small piece of softwood) should be placed
in the birdbath. The small insects, honey bees, wasps, butterflies,
and many other beneficial insects will use this as a drinking
fountain. If honey bees are closely watched drinking, their pumping
mechanism can be observed. Bees, while pumping water, are intent on
their business and completely ignore human inspection of their work
habits. Bird baths should be kept clean and topped up with fresh
water as needed.“
;
“A bat house should be erected in an out-of-the-way place to entice
bats into the garden, as these much maligned beneficial creatures may
eat many times their own weight in mosquitoes and other predacious
insects in an evening's hunt.
My
friends don't even know this, but I wear the same jacket every day
feeding the birds during cold winter months. I always use the same
feeding call. Now the birds follow me when I cross country ski during
the winter or work in the garden during the summer. One day my
husband threw on his old jacket and was so impressed that the birds
were so friendly around him. ...Some things are better unsaid.”
(Beresford-Kroeger): Bioplanning a North Temperate
Garden (Orig.
p.1999 ; 2004 ed, p. 24-5; 27.)
'Hii-hiii...there
ain't no other like me...' ; Well, not quite. Now
we actually even have - Two plants of that species Anchusa
officinalis, (ie Alkanet, or by other name, the Common
Bugloss).
Reason
for it's mention – and of that pic here – just from that in the
latest season's post did present this species and praised for it's
nice, blueish flowering in the garden. Can't now recall if mentioned
about that it's 'base leafs' grow for the looks to like those of the
thistles. (Them being rather large and even look
little...'spiky', say.)
Photo(s): (above) - Hepatica - the photo, from some previous years (, ...'supposedly'.) The fewsome to those at garden were in flowering by the March-April...quite the similar as before. Almost like that lack from the snows during our latest winter wouldn't for so much prevented, or hindered them from that...Well, I have them in the quite good places. ; Now actually in plans for to have planted - of grown first, obviously - the more 'early Spring' natural native flowers... ; (below) pic - Alkanet (anchusa off.) - The seedling, that is about 3-4 weeks old in the pic. (Such as it was around by then mid-April, of so supposing of that timing...)
Such
as is usual from native plants, it is not necessary add
fertilizer on the seedlings during the pregrowing period. (That from, since it's a 'semi-native' species, such as to the Alkanet we might find...quite 'fitting' a descript.) ; Already by now (, by the late April, I notice it was...)
that seems from fill it's container, almost - While there still (was...) at
least a 1.5 Months until it can be planted out. ('Suppose I made the
mistake to add some for it, during the last year– Yet, as you see, even without any fertilize the growth seems appear from just as effective.)
;
...But, as a matter a fact, now it being the June – And
I then already planted that on the garden-bench. (About the late by
May.)
And
then; of that has to be mentioned also, the (surprising !) finding
that also to this season...I only succeeded of grow only one
plant of these. ; Seems that was just like during the previous
summery season/Spring from my effort on them. - I carefully planted
there a fewsome of the seeds (3-6 maybe), some I had left in the
bag. But again: Only one plant actually emerged (!!, ?).
Anyhow
– whatever the main reason to their 'scarcity' for germinating,
indoors - from originally did select the species w. a purpose to
add some more from native plant, on the 'midst' by my any
others. Shall then see if I'm actually having from later of weed off
some, perhaps resultant 'offspring' proves the more 'multiplying' in garden. (In case they
then happen for turn to more frequent increases in the garden.) The plant
emerged from quite large, takes quite much space and 'resources' of
the area it covering. (Like any other larger perennial would.)
;
Otherwise – like maybe was former prior said - it seems not need
much any particular care in the garden The only necessities are some
amounts the sunshine (ie, not on any very 'shady' place.) And
(perhaps) a little, some 'standard' amount addit fertilizing. ; So
only on the germination those seems presented some amount difficulty.
But actually the ones that then emerged didn't take for very long –
Maybe a few weeks from the seeds planted, and then pregrowing, indoors, from some couple Months. It could've been planted earlier, very well,
but the growth is apparently better only when the Summer-warms
arriving. (Onwards from June...)
...If
on indoors planted; ...A fewsome to it's
early leafs may 'dry out' in the room temperatures – But: It's
quite quick for grow some new ones in replace those. And that growth
'developed' the more effective, the longer the days do emerge.
; In short, small plants tolerate easily some Springtime-heat
(battery-heat), and also aren' very vulnerable for resulted drying. Of
course, during that time it needs an occasional watering – Planting
outdoors is best then 'timed' for around/after the begins by that
June. (Can be planted earlier even, like noted.)
So,
'semi-native', they're also quite cold-tolerant. Quite old, long-ago
'arrived' plants on here, actually. Might've been 'carried' itself,
seeds spread along the early nomads, 'farmers' by the late Iron-age.
Or, by during an early 'middle-age'. (...'Supposin', :)
; The previous year sowed plant looks very impressive now, w. the several stems growing, all have numbers for it's loveliest small blue flowers.
Also it is said to a favored plant to the bees too, etc.
The
one planted by the last year is now almost in flowers (actually, like said, now flowers...), being among earliest to my Summery perennials.
(Might've been, due of that I quite plentyful watered the whole bench during a few latter weeks by May, when it was drier and any Spring-rains were in lacking. The plants at the lower level that bench, then, might've received the little less of water - But that might've actually been for just a sufficient, correct 'amount'... )
(Might've been, due of that I quite plentyful watered the whole bench during a few latter weeks by May, when it was drier and any Spring-rains were in lacking. The plants at the lower level that bench, then, might've received the little less of water - But that might've actually been for just a sufficient, correct 'amount'... )
(Pic) : ...Some wood-borer decorations, that felt nice to photograph. (Sometimes often discoverable for under the bark at any piece for log of wood. These on the birch.)
-----------
'Bloody
Hot...' ;
...Not formerly described on my early writes this one for the season's new
species (...suppose i not,) This large impressive specim belongs to clovers (it's Melilotus officinalis, Yellow
Sweet Clover) – Noted for a perennial and not the biennial. Or
at least making a one whose specim should be expectable to last a
several years in the garden, in the spot them from planted.
Pic : Yellow Sweet Clovers. Some located at the garden greenhouse, at the 'sand-warmed' pregrowth-base such as can be seen. They're lookin' much smaller by that early (early May...?), of course - By now the one plant has a number separate stems (or the 'twigs' from) and supposin' it might start for blooms by any..weeks from now. Or perhaps closer for the July... (However, some reason to experiment planting them this way, was, originally of the aspect that on indoors - early sowed, already by Feb - the quick growth by some plants seemed to develop the stems rather thin. ...Thought that perhaps then it would've had led for to too 'weak' stems, when brought on outdoors by May/June. ; Anycase, from ultimately - After this 'process'; of the indoors to the garden greenhouse, and, then lastly removed on their 'final' spots - Some placed in gardens thenafter (early on June) seemed at first a bit suffered from that continuous removing - didn't take on the same 'pace' of growth to so very soon - but from the favorable weathers we've been having (20 to 25 C, max) them seem now from well 'recovering'. So of this 'method', said that it seemed quite practical in uses.
Although, obviously, to most flowers - at least from the more demanding seasonal some - to the more effective would probably been from if them sowed directly for the greenhouse 'spot' and that way saved the trouble to their continuous 'shifting'. ; However, fx the Sweet Clovers seem to need somewhat longer pregrowing period. So it perhaps don't turn out very succesfull planting them 'out' by, say, at May. But like noted, as clovers, they're a relative 'gregarious' growers...and easily adapted. (Did I mentioned in the 'mains' them should appear perennials ? - Can therefore now enjoy for those 'bee-tempters' to several Summer-times onwards from now...)
(Some other) specifics given that, it not tolerates the standing water for very long. And then; Preferably the 'calcareous or clay soils'. ; In the Full sunlight, if possible. - Or, in an 'ideal Summer' (on a 'good spot') the partial sunlight could do.
It's then also suggestive add some sand in the base, if a soil happens appear be any too 'thick'. Advice that I then followed...And for a place to the temporarily 'pregrowth', it seemed a good idea try the growing on greenhouse-base – An 'experiment' this picture now then shows. Inside the greenhouse, in a thinned soil it indeed seemed to grow very...gregariously. ; But I already also resultant discovered that from 'replanting' them don't continue in quite similar straightforward way for growths. – Due because that in the greenery the stems also seem get quite 'overgrown'. (Ie, they then need still now little 'adjusting-time' on a bit chillier and more demanding weatheric condition outside.) ...Nevertheless I think the 'effort' might actually aided their growth. In a few specim I planted in greenery, the roots simply grew faster in that warm. – So my these plants are, indeed, to quite well developed already by now. ...Suppose I'll keep one from those in the greenery, just to see of how soon that to develop flowers then.
; Matter-a-fact, did plant on their 'final spots' a fewsome these too, by now. The rest of (some not in greenhouse 'pregrown') I'll probably plant by until the mid-Summer. So, next that we'll see them – Should be on the flowering, then.
(Photo), beside left - Not of the Sweet Clovers (flowering) - But of Lathyrus Vernus flowers - Another nice 'cloverine' species in our natural flowers. (I've actually, a few occasions, tried to sowing those at the garden - but, in vain. All seeds failed germinate. From reason why - I haven't discovered.) ; L.Vernus - by it's common name Spring Pea or Spring Vetch, is the enchanting blooming flower on a boreal forest/mixed forest where the ground is suitable (and from relative 'low-fertile') ; ...Increasing only (or, mostly?) via their quite large seeds, them usually seen as 'scattered' singular specimens, here and there - But this year I also actually spotted 'a growth' where there was larger bunch. (At least...it contained, maybe about 6 to 8 flowers on the same spot. Perhaps some bird (or a squirrel?) had collected those and 'hidden' on the ground to a winter reserve, but left them un-touched. Or however, what for the best explanation...?)
------------
Then
- for some good, practical advices: The below seen mini-greenhouse to
the perennials pregrowth can turn out to the most useful
acquisement.
Notesworth,
it actually a necessity as a garden 'tool' for growing perennials. ;
When germinated, or even directly in the sowing, the seedlings are
kept there of 'protected' from (overt) colds, winds, and 'heavy rains'.
Ie, from until they should be 'ready' for planted out. Plus, that it like
any larger 'greenhouse', effectively maximises the available warmth,
received sunlight. Box has the space for 8 pieces from standard
8x8 containers. (Maybe appears worth reminder that it wasn't very
expensive. Sold for about ten or twenty euro, 'a piece'.) ; But, the
quality on any mini-greenhouse available seems to vary considerable
much. – If you acquire a cheaper one that sometimes sold in the
regular markets, during Springs, the plastics tend appear of usually made of the lot worse material. Resultant, at least the cover of box
then in a few years starts for fall in parts (Of the sunshine
'toasting' that material.) Also it leaves for consequent the
unnecessary plastic waste-piece, and fragments scattered for around a
garden... ; In a more quality one - like this – the base and cover
are being from more hardened plastics. So it remains practically
usable for decades. These boxes now also have the closeable
'ventilating'-hole.
Pic : ...Oenotheras (O.biennis), in their 'very earliest'. At this are, maybe, of just couple weeks after planting, midst April. ; On that mini-greenhouse for seedlings (, one on surrounding paragraphs described.) The lid/cover on it is actually not very well visible to see - on a pic it's placed below the base of that 'box'.
;
...Matter a fact, grew numbers to my last years Bee balm
(Monardas) in this box too.
(...Don't know if to those it was from any particular benefit - The
Monarda's aren't from too cold-vulnerable. At least the ones I did
grow separately seemed by ends of the Summers of had developed almost
as well.) But the main easiness comes fx then in the aspect that one
can now more practically move those small seedlings indoors/outdoors
w. these greenhouse-'boxes', during when it's still too cold to keep
'em constant out. (March – April -'May', sometimes). Every manner
practical an aid in these tasks. – Though I now actually decided
not to need any more of these. As I've often before noted, I've only
limited amount space on these gardens of mine, anymore. – W. a few
boxes one easily takes care growing an amount seedlings - If one thinks, then
somehow, from able find an adequate large spaces for...
-------
...Though',
from my this years plants: The ones seen in that 'box' (photo, on above) actually
appear to be the Biennials too – At least on here
Fennoscandian seasonal conditions. (Or so it's said.) Them appear
Oenothera biennis
(ie; the Evening Primroses,
or 'Evening Stars', by their other common name.) ; In the separate box(es) having this year a few Oxeyes
too...
By
now I actually have about 18 small of those too. But some of those I
(again,) actually already planted in garden. (Since the weather been to
relative warm.) ; In that (now older) picture, there's a one I
actually replaced for the pic (one in the first 'row', down corner).
Since it was from somewhat earlier planted – As you see it's leafs
are already to more grown. In general their growth is...relative
slow, takes still indoors to some time.
From
cons it's ecology, the Wikip.-entry fx simply seems to recommend it
'Habitat, dry and sunny'. So guess'll try to find suitable place(s) like that – If I should find
any such 'spots' left for planting in the garden ! Or, whether I then to this season can
arrange any proper 'spot' from the sort, to their to 'strive and flourish'...
Primroses too are actually 'quite large', can reach to a height of as much as 80 cm. (And noticeable, on the above pic, from that the one in rounder container, some closest for the view...That actually was grown separately w. the sort small 'cover-vase' - So, it being recognizable how that, even in such small plants, can improve their early growth, on indoors too. Such as was in the prev post from little adverted.) ; Also, in case/possibility from weatheric conditions worsening, this season, finding them suitable protective places would appear of the majorest important. (I kind of recall, having noted those not very effective grow in cases the sunshines aren't for enough...So, to their seasonal flowering, first year, we're probably only having to rely on 'some luck'.)
Primroses too are actually 'quite large', can reach to a height of as much as 80 cm. (And noticeable, on the above pic, from that the one in rounder container, some closest for the view...That actually was grown separately w. the sort small 'cover-vase' - So, it being recognizable how that, even in such small plants, can improve their early growth, on indoors too. Such as was in the prev post from little adverted.) ; Also, in case/possibility from weatheric conditions worsening, this season, finding them suitable protective places would appear of the majorest important. (I kind of recall, having noted those not very effective grow in cases the sunshines aren't for enough...So, to their seasonal flowering, first year, we're probably only having to rely on 'some luck'.)
...The
plant, along many others, seems said brought for cultivation in the
Europes as early as from 17th century – Of the
N.America. Such as many/several to my former presented “easily”
sowed garden plants, too. Though', for the 'kitchen and medicinal
herbs', and of some beneficial qualities in 'essential oil' (cont.
'fatty acid') at them, weren't recognized but only by later. Some 100
y. after from when it to earliest was brought in European gardens as
an ornamental plant, it said from. (However, such as also usual is,
seems it said that fx Cherokees, Iroquis and 'other native
tribes' had used it for a 'food and
medicinal crop', past the 'hundreds
of years'.) ; Furthermore, acc the BNG; the Primrose
(O.biennis)
“...supplements are
a popular herbal remedy taken to ease premenstrual tension. The
leaves have been used as a remedy for diarhoea.”
Also, the basal leaves only grow at the first year on
plants.
'Cultivation',
for briefest: (Apparently?) the small plant need some amount
fertilizing, or by 'weekly' maybe is necessary. – Just like the
cases for the most perennials is. ; The germination wasn't much any
problem, in around March - I don't recall whether I used the 'warm-up
base' to those – But some, I think, emerged even without that, on
their own in some time. (10 to 20 days.) ; Like remarked, the
primroses' have certain medicinal qualities, as a number of diseases
have been recognized relieved by that 'essential oil' manufactured
from.
;
The flower also has most characteristic fragnance,
recognizable 'in the air' at the evenings. (Obviously, from it's name
- Or so it would seem to...) Another nice aspect that the blooms are
said to tempt moths and other
night-time butterflies. (Acc the local 'plant-database', the plant's
'corolla' only opens by evening and closes in the mornings –
opposite to that, in the 'many
other primroses' the flower is open only in bright
sunshine. ; Corolla is that visible, 'principal' part on a
flower, about that uppermost part.) It then also attracts
'...different kinds of night
butterflies such as hawk moths and bees too. Finches readily eat its
and other primroses seeds too.' Well, what would be from the more
nicer findings.
And
by the way, didn't actually think for those potential insect
night-time 'visitants' when chose from grow these.
;
And well, we now shall see how they'll to do, from grow,
actually...Whenever them then should/would to developed the
flowers. - This season, or only by the year next. (But hope by the
earlier.) The over-wintering might also emerge to little more
'tricky' than how it is w. the more usual perennial ones. Or maybe
not, actually read that them in some (warmer) conditions, 'spots', at these localities here seem of found quite succeedingly to
naturalize. At least for the fews years time, w. larger temporarily
surviving groups from. So, maybe their overwintering in the garden
then not near that much an un-likehood, not at all 'uncertain'...not
anymore.
Photo, beside - Also of the bark for a log of wood - Photographed that due the small 'pecking holes' on it. - Or, so I at least thought them for be, made by the woodpecker. ; ...My supposing was, it had maybe 'tested' for whether the trunk from tree was adequate rottened for to make a nest on it. Or maybe from some other purpose from - Nevertheless the test proved probably unsuccesfull - the wood was actually tough and firm as any...hardwood? But like notable, this log too was of a birch. ; ...And if those then even appear represented the woodpecker's pecks.
--------
'Holly-hockneying'...
; ...And then I'm to this year also having some Holly-Hocks grown. They're from some 'standard' variety, 'The Watchman'. Belongs to, latin name of the 'genera', Alcea. This one to that commonest 'variety', Alcea rosae (ie, 'Common Hollyhock').
; ...Their precise relation, 'kinship' to the family of the Roses (rosaceae) isn't exactly too clear to me – But I have some (vague) premonition that them do belong at the same 'main', as the 'sub-family', than what are more known for those 'garden roses'. Yet, acc the Wikip., it seem said (that, Alcea) belong for the larger family of Malvaceae (,or 'mallows') 'family of flowering plants estimated to contain [so and so many...] ...species' (Many of those also by some economic importance, or, are known to contain many ornamental garden plants – such as are 'okra, cotton, cacao and durian', Or, in the malvaceae appear belong orders by 'Alcae, Malvas, Tilea'.) So I guess that 'relation' is then about the 'distant cousins', about same as of the horse and the zebra, or from the Common Finch and the Great Tit....At least both latter mentioned appear birds, such as these appear to belong on groups of plants at a same 'tribe'. – Acc to my understanding. But how complicated that by specifics to seems be! (Well not actually any real botanist...)
; ...And then I'm to this year also having some Holly-Hocks grown. They're from some 'standard' variety, 'The Watchman'. Belongs to, latin name of the 'genera', Alcea. This one to that commonest 'variety', Alcea rosae (ie, 'Common Hollyhock').
; ...Their precise relation, 'kinship' to the family of the Roses (rosaceae) isn't exactly too clear to me – But I have some (vague) premonition that them do belong at the same 'main', as the 'sub-family', than what are more known for those 'garden roses'. Yet, acc the Wikip., it seem said (that, Alcea) belong for the larger family of Malvaceae (,or 'mallows') 'family of flowering plants estimated to contain [so and so many...] ...species' (Many of those also by some economic importance, or, are known to contain many ornamental garden plants – such as are 'okra, cotton, cacao and durian', Or, in the malvaceae appear belong orders by 'Alcae, Malvas, Tilea'.) So I guess that 'relation' is then about the 'distant cousins', about same as of the horse and the zebra, or from the Common Finch and the Great Tit....At least both latter mentioned appear birds, such as these appear to belong on groups of plants at a same 'tribe'. – Acc to my understanding. But how complicated that by specifics to seems be! (Well not actually any real botanist...)
Of
course, their flowers seem somewhat to resemble the actual roses,
hence the common name.
Pic (on above) : The one mentioned specimen (A.rosae) sometime on...maybe early of May. (As I recall, of this year's plants I sowed those by almost to the earliest - acc from the good advices in the bag - could've been, about, on the early from March.) ; ...What, maybe, becomes noticeable of that photo too, is that to this particular (one) plant I added the slight too much fertilizers during the pregrowth Months. ; While it was the one to the best developed during that time this pic is taken - it's apparent of the leafs having resultant gotten to slight 'overgrown'. (So that actually was still left for unplanted by now. For, the overgrown leafs seemed to grow paler, possibly due of some conseqeunt followed 'imbalance' to the plant in it's smaller vase. - Or was it that got too early subjected cold, kept past overnight(s) on outdoors ? - Despite it, now having the several to those from planted in the garden already.)
Seems
that my Holly-hocks do generate their flowers for black –
Which maybe rather unique, exceptional feature in my any garden
plant. Not from remembering if I had for planted anything w. black
flowers of formerly. Although, had one or two black tomato-plants at
some from the previous Summers. Unfortunately, those didn't quite
prove to grow from very 'harvestable', I think of recall. - For, I
probably miscalculated smtgh in the amount by fertilizers then too – Or
maybe it was just of that the seasons weren't so good in that year.
Another
p-o-w; the old groups from Hollyhock seem said of recognized to
survive here w. the steadily reappearing plants - On the very same
places where them were, now well long ago, planted. So, sometimes,
their growing in the disbanded, long ago 'forgotten' old housing
places seems led to the assumption that 'certain' species from
Holly-Hock might've exhibit a perennialism (Even at these latitudes.)
Whether or not that the case I can't say, 'cause only trying to learn
some things to their growing w. these specimens of mine. ; For an
explanation, it seems then assumed that in very favorable
conditions, the constant emergence by yearly new specimens growing of
the new seeds having given a false assumption that some would show
perennialiam. Apparently. Or, so it's assumed. But, maybe,
they're only from very...demanding? (Of the 'particulars'...etc.)
However,
w. a little effort one then only recognizes that their flowering in the
first year not would appear
any manner unlike. Esp. of the recent warmed Summers we tend have
had, by the latest. ; In the Britain (Isles) them seem, of course,
to have had some rather standard and traditional use - at least by
formerly, acc the older house-gardening practices. Or however about the more
ancient histories there...Only reminded me 'bout that there's that
'Lady Holly-hock' in few
verses cited on the begins for this blog.
Child's 'Garden of verses from Stevenson's children's
poem.
;
...Given from that what on above observed, then assuming that the
out-planting by some first weeks of June might not actually
prove any too early. But whether them should be also well fertilized, for
the soils not so (very) good or at least not from 'ideal' – Or,
should I then not ? Not of quite sure. ...Maybe they'll manage better from
without such 'extras', at first. ; But from cons the lenghtier growing time, indoors, w. the stems there weren't any similar problems than w. those Sweet Clovers. You just add some sticks to the pots from Holly-hock, as some aid - them can then quite unproblematical to (slight) 'lean on' those.
My
planted Hollyhocks seemed also grow very effectively on
indoors. Which should've been, of course, only rather expectable. The
plants are said to reach about that 1.5 meters in height. Of their
estimated 'maxim', maybe grow even larger.
-
...And so, like said, actually planted a fewsome best developed from these to
their place already, too.
It
is said that them can also be sown directly to outdoors from the May onwards.
(Only reason I didn't plant the rest of those, being, that I've so far actually found them little places that'd felt from the 'proper' protective. W. the 'more' of a sunlight than of shade. However, I'll have to invent to rest from some additional good places soon enough – And like noted, basis the numbers photos one tends see of the Holly-hock(s) - those seem for grown/growing most successively in some warm and fertile soils, often right next for some house-walls.)
...In
that gardening book/guide by the Beresford-Kroger there is the recommend about Hollyhocks to add for them some ash. In the base, during Spring,
somewhat lot before the timing them are to be planted. Perhaps,
preferably(?), it was already in during a previous Autumn... From the
reason that then a PH for those should've not emerge from strictly to
too 'acid' from. Anyway, not of having any former knowledges on their
growing, so decided for add some lime while establishing the 'bench'
for those. (A small amount only – 'Cause I couldn't actually
estimate from how them likely respond on to that.)
...So,
if lucky, we'll probably seeing those too for the next time around by
the midst(?) from July, when them could be already from flowering.
Hope that the base (and places) then proves adequate protected and
fertile – Like said them can said reach the 150 cm, or more, of
height.
...So
far, it seems (maybe still is) slight too cold, in during the nights, to their better
'emergence'. But the weathers are getting
warmer now each day. And if not, then we'll to wait from slight bit
longer, guess...
;
I fx also already relocated the tomatos out in the garden greenhouse. So it would, by anycase soon be quite adequate warm for those
planted too. (The Hollyhocks, meaning). Such as them said for the biennials,
don't know what for expectable of them, precisely. But can for well
to recommend, anyone to try those. – Not very complicated by
any aspect; the sowing, pregrowth, their 'adjustment' (May-June) in
the greenhouse – All the said went from (relative)
unproblematically.
(Photo), beside right : Some Chervil (Anthriscus carefolium ssp carefolium). ; ...I also tend grow at greenhouse some of herbs (maybe mentioned). Quite often sowed the Chervils - For they grow there, in some shaded 'corner spot', even more quick than at outdoors - perhaps, needing less than a Month of time. ...Can be consumed fx, w. the fish. Or eaten as 'raw' (tasty bits, from cheved while gardening, doing smght else...) Also pretty well serviceable ingredient at the bortsch too, I've noted. ; ...Might've perhaps quoted that of before - but at the BNG wrote on Chervil also, that '...the ancient Egyptians must have thought highly of herb, as it was found in the tomb of Pharaoh Tutankhamen.' ; Well...sounds that not to the worst sort of recommendation on behalf this delicacy, so I'd think...
At least, those not having of showed anyhow difficult - Not so far...
---------------------
But the species then being very easy to cultivate, not much anything is needed at their care; part sunlight, part shade; does much better in the 'sievened' light. (Like the most plants, perhaps).
(Photo) : ...the earliest hesperis matronalis flowers, by this season.
And indeed acc the information on bag the Dame's Violet's would in the evening 'twilight' release their 'orchidea-like' scent in the garden. So far I've noted nothing of that...but the pics also seem provide the view that once full-grown there is in the stems for several 'clusters' of the flowers. (And my plants now only just from emerging to their blooms.) ; ...From a further 'confirmation' for, the site for local plants offers ao the following sentences on it: "...the Greek word hesperia which means 'evening', ...the fragnance is very pleasing to people too, so it is worth planting near a window to be enjoyed to the full on warm summer evenings. [well, didn't happen take notice of that advice...] ...especially favoured by moths e.g. owlet-moths and hawkmoths, which can be heard humming around the stands after the twilight has fallen."
(Photo), beside: ...A small moth, photographed some morning (June). ...Was found 'stuck' on a wall-side, and as that was in the fullest daylight, thought it best from located hidden under-leafs by some vegetation. Seems for back-up the claim that Dame Violet's tempt the various moths to visit the garden. (This one even 'stayed for the night'.)
--------------------
(Photo), below. : Rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis), brought for the garden by these June-'heats'.
Photo (beside) ; Biting Stonecrops (Sedum Acre) - Another good example of the previous year sowed native flowers in my garden, finally by now for the flowers. ...The 'starry' flowerings are impressive lookin', and I have those planted on the 'edges' by my herbs-garden, adjacent some spots where I placed from to increase some warmth by plants (/improve the roots for grow). ; Good aspect at the Stonecrops, also is, that them tolerate the amount stepping on - So while picking from the herbs, or moving those, the Stonecrop '...does not mind being trampled'. ; ...Another good aspect is that them don't need for be watered at all and can grow on the thinnest surface. For the plant is described also w. these qualities: "...thrive in unbelievable thin soils and can survive up to half a year without water. ...Biting stonecrop's follicles open only in the rain and the seeds spread with raindrops and running water far from the parent plant - a surprising adaptation for a plant that grows on dry, rocky places." ; The pregrowing - as I decided not to plant those out directly, having my herb-garden's 're-arranging' less than 'complete' - was a little time-taking (It grows slowly, in the early Months). But after from planted it needs not any care. And the flowering, if from good weathers, lasts relative long - in the June-July. ; ...In the proper soil, them develop the nice 'flowery mat' that remain a joy of sight on repeating Summers.
------------------
; On that (present) 'Overhaul' - Or, mainly from it's origin(s) and consequences to the...
; And yet another nice garden 'perennial' in the beside pic. (Or, again - to be specific in terms - this one actually seems said for the biennial too.) But, these Dame's Violet's (Hesperis matronalis) appear mentioned often to survive and regrow in the garden from their seeds.
Soforth, as these were also said from the 'traditional' flowers and (very) undemanding as garden plants, without particular consideration on an above said (,for it's praises), I already sowed these plants by last year. ; Actually, them got for quite 'erraneously' sowed on a bench that was "enriched" w. the plentyful summer-flower dirt. I therefore, resultant in that previus year was discovering the first year 'leaflets' on the plants w. quite worn-out and of 'vermin-eaten' by looks. (I didn't expect to 'strive well' in that soil, and the reason from to sow them on that was just of the reasons I acquired their seeds for quite late. - And so, until this timing I'd actually almost forgotten that I even had those from sowed...!)
But the species then being very easy to cultivate, not much anything is needed at their care; part sunlight, part shade; does much better in the 'sievened' light. (Like the most plants, perhaps).
(Photo) : ...the earliest hesperis matronalis flowers, by this season.
And indeed acc the information on bag the Dame's Violet's would in the evening 'twilight' release their 'orchidea-like' scent in the garden. So far I've noted nothing of that...but the pics also seem provide the view that once full-grown there is in the stems for several 'clusters' of the flowers. (And my plants now only just from emerging to their blooms.) ; ...From a further 'confirmation' for, the site for local plants offers ao the following sentences on it: "...the Greek word hesperia which means 'evening', ...the fragnance is very pleasing to people too, so it is worth planting near a window to be enjoyed to the full on warm summer evenings. [well, didn't happen take notice of that advice...] ...especially favoured by moths e.g. owlet-moths and hawkmoths, which can be heard humming around the stands after the twilight has fallen."
; Soforth, basis that 'reasoning' I'm to conlude that if there happens from live a bat in the attic, it must've been pretty pleased to this sowing of mine, as well...
Traditional and 'old-time' species. Easy grow. Flowers uneffortlessly, no fertilizers needed - And thefore a good choice as a garden plant on spots where you not very often tend have time devote any 'efforts'. Watered occasionally, from after a week or two, maybe - In periods when the weather turns for appear very dry. ; Like said, once the seeds are ripen them can also keep it to remaining a 'returning inhabitant' at garden, years after it's sowing.
(Photo), beside: ...A small moth, photographed some morning (June). ...Was found 'stuck' on a wall-side, and as that was in the fullest daylight, thought it best from located hidden under-leafs by some vegetation. Seems for back-up the claim that Dame Violet's tempt the various moths to visit the garden. (This one even 'stayed for the night'.)
--------------------
(Photo), below. : Rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis), brought for the garden by these June-'heats'.
; Finally and lastest to these 'garden looks', but not of forgotten from this: A few words on my now "years gathered" experience on keeping Rosemaries for overwinter here - At the indoors, on a 'house-hold storage'. ; A word of caution - No miracles to be expected, cons any plants to last 'beyond' the few years. Such as I must've said, priorly, none of my plants having survived longer than that - Not one from the several I've now yearly at Spring sowed by myself, or from the fewsome I'd before bought of the shops.
...Main reason having been (that) by during the latest winters, in the midst of Feb.,Jan. there been abrupt 'warmed-up periods': Ie a week or weeks when the winter temperatures 'jumped' for over zero to several weeks. - As I've not any well lighted cold-storage, only a room in the household w. the reduced battery-temperature, the result (usually) was that on indoors the temperatures happens of exceed some 'critical limit', the plants started from to grow too early ('awakened' by the very earliest warm sunrays) - And resultantly, if you water them even little a too much, the whole plants tends soon 'dry up' in the lack for proper growing conditions in during the followed weeks (Cause there's still of relative little light in early Months of year, etc...)
; However, I've made considerable progress in my learnings of how best to keep the still (relative, that 1-2 y. old) young plants to last. The one in the photo was sowed, if I recall from correct, by the previous year only. ; ...And interesting p-o-w, also, that it's said that - such as the case to some other plants too - of the sowed and germinated (usually several) smaller Rosemary-seedlings only the best developing ones are worth keeping for further growth. Don't know from which reason. Might've biological reason (genetics), or, it might be just that in earliest 'begins' some gain in the (here) limited winter-light some 'competitive edge' and get therefore a 'better start' - Ones that don't, then either won't for later near so well develop. Or, it from due to smght else. ; Soforth, it somewhat pays worth to select the specimen(s) you mean to grow further, on their begins of the sowed ones.
More to the aspects, of the Rosemary's overwintering, in the house-hold 'conditions': One tends fx also read that the plants won't last past the darker Months, unless the temperatures aren't kept to the nearer the +5 Celsius degrees, at least preferably constant for under 10 Celsius degree. Not quite: At least from these 'shrubs', some that I've sowed by myself, I've past repeated winters been able keep them in the conditions where the 'average' temperatures were about 15 C, say up to 5 degrees over/less. (Depending, like noted, for how cold it got on outdoors.) ; Significantly, such as I noted, for the crucial aspect, turned out the watering. Practically, the Rosemaries shouldn't be watered from much at all during overwintering, past those colder and darker Months (...from Dec to earliest March, if you can keep that on room from "cold enough". ; If grown by after latter parts the Summer, the overwatering isn't much a problem - then from during a first year the smaller seedlings still do relative well even if from little 'over-wetted'. But not on second year, or if them appear grown large enough, fromafter planted already early in Spring. Which is the more usual practice.)
; Given the circumstances described, I've had to 'get by' w. some watering on my plants in winter period too. - But the timings proved quite crucial (and the amounts). Generally, one finds, it proved practical to once, or twice relative well water the plants when them taken to indoors, for cold room. Usually that was, by the late of Oct., now later than by around the midst from Nov. Then, I noticed, while them were 'adjusted' in the light by window-sill (plus, 'afters' also the regular articial light), one needed from give them slight less of watering, again, by the midst that Dec., and, on begins from Jan. (When it is, generally rather dark, too early 'start' for growth-season turns yet not any problem.) - After that, I've practically given them the diminutest amounts water past the Jan., and Feb. (just enough to keep the soils not for to complete dry). And, prayed that the 'cold spell' remains on a relative steady level, no sudden 'sunshines'. Then, during the March, w. the growth-season w. first 'real' sun-rays arriving, I'd begin for very carefully add them the slight bit more constantly the water. Maybe, after every couple weeks. - And so it goes, until about the early by May.
; Thenafter, one only keeps watch of the temperatures outdoors...Only by the timing to a turn of the Month, for the June, one feels it 'pretty safe bet' to change the plant(s) for a larger vase, the new soils from. Once that successfull, usually the arriving Summer heats keep care of the rest. And - if not subjected to any too colds, winds and heat too soon, Rosemary kept at the vase emerges, in a good Summer season, to it's better growths.
...Ie, during the dimmer winter Months not to overwater is the important issue, at the Spring-time that one not changes it for new vase too early, keeps that indoors when cold nights or 'hardy' weathers.
Of course, affects 'most' (,or second most, after watering) how well-lighted over-wintering room you can have. ; From having had to 'get by' w. a slight more compromised conditions to that - I 'developed' these particular, practical "methods" for...
...Ie, during the dimmer winter Months not to overwater is the important issue, at the Spring-time that one not changes it for new vase too early, keeps that indoors when cold nights or 'hardy' weathers.
Of course, affects 'most' (,or second most, after watering) how well-lighted over-wintering room you can have. ; From having had to 'get by' w. a slight more compromised conditions to that - I 'developed' these particular, practical "methods" for...
Demands quite plenty effort...given the aspect that after Summer seasons the overwintering it here, by 'standardly' again proves for be somewhat a demanding task. (; Also, noted that when keeping that at indoors, overwintering at a clay-vase proved impossible. A combination of an outer vase, and the plastic container inside the only manner I've succeeded in overwintering those. It a bit 'problematic' too - Some kept on a clay-container tend to grow notably better during a Summery growth-period.)
; ...But all that ('trouble') somewhat descriptive from what to the main issues in the plant(s) keepin. - It takes some time to learn the 'tricks' to keep any particular species from. Goes pretty much like the words by that common saying, 'One lives, one learns'. ; ...Much the case from about plants too. Actually, they're all different...
Photo (beside) ; Biting Stonecrops (Sedum Acre) - Another good example of the previous year sowed native flowers in my garden, finally by now for the flowers. ...The 'starry' flowerings are impressive lookin', and I have those planted on the 'edges' by my herbs-garden, adjacent some spots where I placed from to increase some warmth by plants (/improve the roots for grow). ; Good aspect at the Stonecrops, also is, that them tolerate the amount stepping on - So while picking from the herbs, or moving those, the Stonecrop '...does not mind being trampled'. ; ...Another good aspect is that them don't need for be watered at all and can grow on the thinnest surface. For the plant is described also w. these qualities: "...thrive in unbelievable thin soils and can survive up to half a year without water. ...Biting stonecrop's follicles open only in the rain and the seeds spread with raindrops and running water far from the parent plant - a surprising adaptation for a plant that grows on dry, rocky places." ; The pregrowing - as I decided not to plant those out directly, having my herb-garden's 're-arranging' less than 'complete' - was a little time-taking (It grows slowly, in the early Months). But after from planted it needs not any care. And the flowering, if from good weathers, lasts relative long - in the June-July. ; ...In the proper soil, them develop the nice 'flowery mat' that remain a joy of sight on repeating Summers.
------------------
; On that (present) 'Overhaul' - Or, mainly from it's origin(s) and consequences to the...
Pic - beside left: ...From Mignola - Roberts Hellboy-stories, of a story named 'Beyond the Fences'. (On a 2016 'compile', Hellboy and the BPRD.) ; Thought at first a few other alternatives of pics from that Hellboy-"saga" - But given what this post mostly discussed, it actually being the most obvious selection. ; - For the story, like Hellboy-stories usually, situates/begins on 1950s - And, I know not of a more appropriate comics-picture that'd so completely from capturing (that) decade's disastrous, oppressive, anti-democraticizing calamities. ...Some that got for created along w. the invention from nuclear weapons, followed by the arms-race begins, and continued to the periods postward - merely, as it's now representing itself - in some ridiculous 'faith' for the dawning new 'prosperous' atomic futures. (...some unforeseen 'blessings' to humanity by then emergin', within from the 'nuclear age' having begun.)
; ...Or, if you'd ask me, thinkin' it quite as conveniently could be seen as an image about the whole lot what wrong gone in all the followed years nuclear industrial businesses. It's histories of an astonishing neglect of the environments, and from people's healths concerning.
-------------------------
"Here you have a group of sane men in the middle of lunatics... - in short, people whose interests were not, in the current sense of the word, purely scientific." (Orwell)
...from referring, w. that fewsome 'sane men', to the physics amongst some participating at the first atom bomb-project, whom for the begins of it, refused for to do any research behalf it. (The fewsome, that there were.)
...from referring, w. that fewsome 'sane men', to the physics amongst some participating at the first atom bomb-project, whom for the begins of it, refused for to do any research behalf it. (The fewsome, that there were.)
;
(Photo, beside right) ; ...a bee, visiting my geraniums that were flowering, about, closer to middle from June. ; The species, likely, being Bombus hypnorum. - and the flower, G.pratense (ie, the Meadow Crane's-bill.)
" Another important way to neutralize the plutonium disasters has been to naturalize them. In the last decade, the officials have repurposed the Hanford, Maiak, and Chernobyl territories as wildlife preserves. ... Tim Mousseau, an evolutionary biologist, however, tracked birds in the Chernobyl zone and found a zone of ecological calamity. Even in the areas of moderate contamination, 18 per cent of birds he followed had deformities, 40 percent of male barn swallows were sterile, and the total number of swallows was depressed by 66 percent. Mousseau could not find in the hot spots bumblebees, butterflies, spiders, or grasshoppers. Whole zones of the Zone are dead. ...
Wine production is the Columbia River region's latest diversification project. Tourists are encouraged to tour tasting rooms located in a large arc around the Hanford Nuclear Reservation, which figures as an unnamed area on the vineyard to tour map. As I tasted a few vines, I mentioned to a vintner that a lot of Wanapam Indians down the road are sick with cancers and that a Centers for Disease Control study found local Indians had a one in fifty chance of gettin cancer, in part because of their traditional diet of Columbia River fish. ...
...It is difficult to face the problem of nuclear waste because it is so outsized. ... Russian officials promoting the 'nuclear renaissance' are competing with a Hitachi-GE partnership to export nuclear reactors to developing countries in Asia and the Middle East. A big part of Russia's sales pitch is the promise to reprocess spent fuel, using its existing, already overtaxed Maiak processing plant as the dumping ground. Geographer Shiloh Krupar describes the nuclear wastes as among the living dead. Like zombies in a 1950s films - there is no way to kill them, no way to keep them from returning.
Plutonium production required undemocratic and unsafe decisions and policies that Americans and Soviets found politically palatable because the world's first plutonium plants germinated distinct communities - of affluent permanent employees separate from temporary, migrant laborers - on zoned-off landscapes that effectually rendered invisible not only the massive nuclear installations but also the environmental and health problems they produced. ...
Plutopia was locally popular also because it served up an ever-expanding economy delivering a continually increasing volume of consumer goods for an endlessly rising standard of living made possible by government subsidies for select workers. Residents of plutopia displayed a fantastic faith in scientific progress and economic efficiency. Many understood their city's universal, classless affluence as the materialization of the American dream or Communist utopia, an affirmation that their national ideology was correct. Self-assurance and confidence bred patriotism, loyalty, submission and silence." ; Brown, Plutopia (; of p. 333-5.)
;
(Photo), beside: And yet another nice one for the last season sowed native flowering plants in garden, the Valeria (Valeriana officinalis) - The plant can reach even a height by 1.5 meters it said (But, of 'consequently', the ones I planted at my selfmade garden 'bench' might already grown to larger - For the fertilizers on more 'regular' perennials might've affected...) As the cultivation was pretty commonplace, much like any perennial, nothing said on to that. (It prefers relative much the shaded fertile places, and, them by naturally grow on 'riversides', ditches, wet spots...So adequote watering also important.) - Not quite so much shading needed as for a closely similar 'sister-species', Common Valeria (V.sambucifolia). ; And, well, I afterwards the planting recognized the reason why V.officinalis appears more preferable as the garden plant - For it spreads only by under-surface 'runners', and therefore the root-growths mainly increase just adjacent the original plant. (Not so far aside, as on the case of Common Valeria.) ...However, as these plants too grow for pretty large, can in time take much of the soils, it might seem advisable to relocate these plants on some more restricted 'spot' by their own.
...In some time it's (lot Angelica(s) lookin', resembling) flowers shall turn from the more 'pinkish' by their color. Of the insects visiting, for those 'blooms', I've formerly spotted only some bee, flies and (, earlier in the woods) beetles. (But likely there are quite plenty.) Along those, along w. some number other plants, the Valerianas also provide the food plants to larvae of an endangered species of day-time butterfly here, namely that a False Heath Fritillary (Melitaea diamina)
; The plants uses in traditional medicinal histories are for quite 'honorable some' - In fact, I noticed that it's common names also include, the 'All Heal'. In the uses by a more modern "Apothecacry"', seems (.officinalis) also sourced for a number remedies too - ao, the dried root is been used in an extract to cures for imsomnia. ; ...However, as the BNG even remarks that along w. other believed properties' ('wards off evil spirits', curing 'even on plague'), in the pasts it was also believed for proper attract of the '...opposite sex - and as an aphrodisiac.'
Since I'm not at all too sure whether any internal digestion of that plant, would appear too healhysome (at least without any/possible side-effects, more or less), I only mention in addit that the 'Health tip' featured at the BNG offers to it's usabilities the advice for the preparement to a 'soothing bath'. (By any case...there are, all kinds of heals, obviously.)
; In some contrast, I also read that the large 'clusters' from the flowering Valeriana also mentioned to emit a rather strong, perhaps 'repelling' scents - '...gives off a dreadful pong (especially when it's dried).' - Can even lead for some ills (,nausea to some). ; So if very sensitive to that, the cultivation maybe then not ain't from so good an idea (Or, however about, whatever anyone then likes...)
-------------------------
(Photo), beside: And yet another nice one for the last season sowed native flowering plants in garden, the Valeria (Valeriana officinalis) - The plant can reach even a height by 1.5 meters it said (But, of 'consequently', the ones I planted at my selfmade garden 'bench' might already grown to larger - For the fertilizers on more 'regular' perennials might've affected...) As the cultivation was pretty commonplace, much like any perennial, nothing said on to that. (It prefers relative much the shaded fertile places, and, them by naturally grow on 'riversides', ditches, wet spots...So adequote watering also important.) - Not quite so much shading needed as for a closely similar 'sister-species', Common Valeria (V.sambucifolia). ; And, well, I afterwards the planting recognized the reason why V.officinalis appears more preferable as the garden plant - For it spreads only by under-surface 'runners', and therefore the root-growths mainly increase just adjacent the original plant. (Not so far aside, as on the case of Common Valeria.) ...However, as these plants too grow for pretty large, can in time take much of the soils, it might seem advisable to relocate these plants on some more restricted 'spot' by their own.
...In some time it's (lot Angelica(s) lookin', resembling) flowers shall turn from the more 'pinkish' by their color. Of the insects visiting, for those 'blooms', I've formerly spotted only some bee, flies and (, earlier in the woods) beetles. (But likely there are quite plenty.) Along those, along w. some number other plants, the Valerianas also provide the food plants to larvae of an endangered species of day-time butterfly here, namely that a False Heath Fritillary (Melitaea diamina)
; The plants uses in traditional medicinal histories are for quite 'honorable some' - In fact, I noticed that it's common names also include, the 'All Heal'. In the uses by a more modern "Apothecacry"', seems (.officinalis) also sourced for a number remedies too - ao, the dried root is been used in an extract to cures for imsomnia. ; ...However, as the BNG even remarks that along w. other believed properties' ('wards off evil spirits', curing 'even on plague'), in the pasts it was also believed for proper attract of the '...opposite sex - and as an aphrodisiac.'
Since I'm not at all too sure whether any internal digestion of that plant, would appear too healhysome (at least without any/possible side-effects, more or less), I only mention in addit that the 'Health tip' featured at the BNG offers to it's usabilities the advice for the preparement to a 'soothing bath'. (By any case...there are, all kinds of heals, obviously.)
; In some contrast, I also read that the large 'clusters' from the flowering Valeriana also mentioned to emit a rather strong, perhaps 'repelling' scents - '...gives off a dreadful pong (especially when it's dried).' - Can even lead for some ills (,nausea to some). ; So if very sensitive to that, the cultivation maybe then not ain't from so good an idea (Or, however about, whatever anyone then likes...)
-------------------------
(Photo) ; A bee, barely recognizable of feeding of my Martegon Llilies at garden. Martegon Lily (Lilium martagon), a traditional species that grows best in 'semi-shade', does tempt numbers of various insect. It flowers late of June, at least by that timing here does. Just yesterday I spotted on those a fewsome bumbles, a honey-bee - and, think, formerly of had seen to it several other species too. (So, no wonder that Wikip. seems mentions this plant having "...gained the Royal Horticultural Society's Award of Garden Merit.")
So it's highly recommendable have some in the garden (They also quite effortless increase, if the favorable conditions are met) ; ...A "funny detail" was that when I tried to identify the bee on it, couldn't be from quite sure - All the bees visiting it's 'top-side down hanging' blooms tend get covered by a reddish coloration (ie, that from pollinations gathering in their furs.) ; ...As I'm not much any 'hobbyist' for bulbs, I mostly leave the Martegon Lilies forgotten, in their shady corner - But when flowering they also offer an enjoyable sight.
“This is a story of scientific progress as well, and particularly the relatively new science of nuclear physics. Many of the main protagonists in the Maralinga tale were physicists. Some were well inside the Maralinga tent, such as the head of the series, William Penney, and the scientist often said to have been 'planted on Menzies', Ernest Titterton. Titterton was famously characterised as a Dr Strangelove figure, and his reputation was trashed during the McLelland Royal Commission. Penney's reputation came out the other side rather better, though still damaged by the cloak and dagger. Other scientists, particularly the Australians Mark Oliphant and Hedley Marston, were on the outer. They had grave doubts about the nuclear tests in Australia and paid a professional price for raising them.”
So it's highly recommendable have some in the garden (They also quite effortless increase, if the favorable conditions are met) ; ...A "funny detail" was that when I tried to identify the bee on it, couldn't be from quite sure - All the bees visiting it's 'top-side down hanging' blooms tend get covered by a reddish coloration (ie, that from pollinations gathering in their furs.) ; ...As I'm not much any 'hobbyist' for bulbs, I mostly leave the Martegon Lilies forgotten, in their shady corner - But when flowering they also offer an enjoyable sight.
“This is a story of scientific progress as well, and particularly the relatively new science of nuclear physics. Many of the main protagonists in the Maralinga tale were physicists. Some were well inside the Maralinga tent, such as the head of the series, William Penney, and the scientist often said to have been 'planted on Menzies', Ernest Titterton. Titterton was famously characterised as a Dr Strangelove figure, and his reputation was trashed during the McLelland Royal Commission. Penney's reputation came out the other side rather better, though still damaged by the cloak and dagger. Other scientists, particularly the Australians Mark Oliphant and Hedley Marston, were on the outer. They had grave doubts about the nuclear tests in Australia and paid a professional price for raising them.”
;
“...Plutonium, a most
unnatural and dangerous material, is one of the most important things
to understand about Maralinga, because when plutonium fell to earth
there it changed the landscape forever.
Australia's
media underwent a profound transition during the decades of this
story. The articles published in the Australian media at the time of
the nuclear tests, and particularly in the early years, were often
deferential to Great Britain, overtly patriotic, uncritical of atomic
weaponry or actively in favour of it, focused almost exclusively on
storylines provided by official information, and lacking scientific
detail or analysis. Almost always, statements from test personnel and
from the Australian Government immediately allayed any safety
concerns raised in these stories. Many of these assurances were shown
later to be unfounded. A few contemporary stories were critical of
delays to scheduled tests or raised questions about the safety of
indigenous people in the area and the cost-effectiveness of the
Maralinga facility. ... The high-profile
scientists involved, such
as Penney and Titterton, were not subjected to scrutiny.
This began to change
in the mid-1970s with a series of stories characterised by a
productive scepticism...” (Tynan)
: Atomic Thunder.
British
Nuclear Testing in Australia, 2016
(; p. 7, 8.) italics
to the preced were added by us.
(...All
foll. quotes, also are of Tynan's
book.)
(Photo) : My Arnica's (.angustifolia)
were also flowering by the June. ...However, that was by, maybe, a
week or more later than they usually tend for do. Perhaps that was from the other plants, in numbers and height for now increased. (And the Arnicas in their place have been left, a bit, more enshaded.) ; ...But I was also obliged to wonder if that might've from 'resulted' of the lime added to the bench by last year. (Even that I carefully avoided
pouring that on where my Arnicas grow.) ...Or, maybe it just from due the snows
were for so much lackin', during previous winter. Or, alongside w. that, of the drier Spring-period.
Whichever then the more 'trustworthy' of number possible reason, 'explanations' on this...
“The
Pearce Report has created considerable confusion over the decades
because it is totally wrong about some centrally important things,
most notably of the level of plutonium contamination. More than 22
kilograms of plutonium was exploded in the Vixen B tests at
Maralinga. Pearce said that 20 kilograms of this was safely buried in
21 concrete-topped pits dotted around the perimeter of a firing site
called Taranaki, about 40 kilometers north of Maralinga village. On
the basis of this information, Australia allowed the UK to sign away
it's responsibilities for the site in 1968. The Atomic Weapons Tests
Safety Committee (AWTSC) was the Australian body responsible for
monitoring the British testing program to ensure the safety of the
Austalian environment and its population. John Moroney, its long-time
secretary, will later tell the scientists that it would have been
'ungentlemanly' for Australia to question the edicts of the British
atomic scientists at the time.”
(; p. 16)
“Noah
Pearce, the author of the report, looms large in this part of the
story. Pearce had an honours degree in physics and had worked during
the latter years of World War II on measuring the effects of bomb
blasts for the UK Ministry of Supply. [Atomic
Weapons Research Establishement (UK)] He lived a long life,
dying in 2009 at the age of 91. He worked for the AWRE in various
capacities, particularly in the early days measuring the explosive
yield of Hurricane and Totem. In the 1950s he was responsible for
health aspects of the minor trials and, later, for the clean-up
operations: Operation Hercules in 1964 and Operation Brumby in 1967.
Both these operations made the contamination problem worse, and both
seem to have been conducted largely for the sake of appearances,
rather than to actually clean up the appalling mess in the site.
'Operation Brumby', said the Royal Commission, ' was based on wrong
assumptions. It was planned in haste to meet political deadlines and,
in some cases, the tasks undertaken made the ultimate clean-up of the
Range more difficult'. Later, a report by the Maralinga
Rehabilitation Technical Advisory Committee (MARTAC) on the
rehabilitation of the Maralinga site stated that Hercules and Brumby
'did not rehabilitate the site to the standard later recognized to be
necessary for the protection of the people and the environment '. How
could something so important be so wrong? ...”
(;p. 228-9)
;
“At its heart, this tale turns on a power imbalance between the British test authorities and the country that provided the expansive territory they needed to set up a permanent nuclear test facility.” ; “...permanent site was in active service for only seven years. It has lain idle more or less idle since 1963, other than some clean-up operations. ...
“At its heart, this tale turns on a power imbalance between the British test authorities and the country that provided the expansive territory they needed to set up a permanent nuclear test facility.” ; “...permanent site was in active service for only seven years. It has lain idle more or less idle since 1963, other than some clean-up operations. ...
[...]
...In
1977, political pressure forced another survey, carried out by ARL
[Australian
Radiation Laboratory]
and the Australian Atomic Energy Commission, which perpetuated the
conclusions of the Pearce Report. So, too, did the 1983 report AIRAC
(Australian Ionising Radiation Advisory Council)... None of these
reports has come close to the truth. Instead they have clouded the
issue both politically and scientifically. ...after a major public
outcry sparked by Brian Tooney's stories in the Financial Review in
October 1978, the British were forced to send military personnel to
remove drums full of salt imbued with plutonium buried at the
Maralinga airfield. They did so reluctantly and only after prolonged
negotiations. Pearce himself visited Maralinga for 48 hours in 1978
during those negotiations and reaffirmed his 1968 report. ...”
(; p. 18,19:)
;
“Anderson's
article was not the only source of pressure on the UK Government,
however. In 1993, a delegation of Aborigines from the Maralinga lands
(including the prominent indigenous activist Archie Barton) had
arrived bearing sand from the region – not actually contaminated
sand - which they planted on the steps of the British Houses of
Parliament. British parliamentarians, notably the outspoken minister
of state for the Armed Forces Archie Hamilton, had been asserting
that the 1967 clean-up had been effective. Their message was
undermined, though, when the government called in people wearing full
contamination suits to remove the sand from the steps. As Peter Burns
remarked, ... '...Talk about a PR disaster'. ” (;
289)
(Photo) ; Nematocera ('Thread-horns') are a 'suborder of elongated flies', containing ao, then as well fx the groups (/families from the) mosquitoes, crane flies, gnats... ; The sort of the species (, in the adjacent photo - it's crane fly) belongs for the more 'harmless' families of that Nematocera - harmless of any human view-point, not having sting(s), not known for have any role in the spread by
any known infecting diseases, etc... ; Here merely presented, only for
the remainder that in a healthy garden there often 'dwells' the numbers
insect one not of so much tends even usually from pay any attentions. ; As
them aren't necessary so significant impressive lookin'. Or, not always
to the flowers visiting, fx. But the most from, all from, of course, do
have their (very) own important tasks in the Natures. And that actually the foremost reason for me of to add the native plants in this flora of mine, in my gardening 'hobbies'. - Those plants support the wider numbers insect that appear to my locality. ; Besides, they also occasional tend from attract around also some less usual seen ones, some to the more impressively decorated too...
;
“Plutonium.
The material is not found in nature. It is created in a nuclear
reactor by bombarding uranium with fundamental atomic particles
called neutrons. In the words of nuclear chemist Glenn Seaborg, one
of the team who created this dense, silvery substance in February
1941, plutonium 'is unique among all of the chemical elements. And it
is fiendishly toxic, even in small amounts.'
[...]
All
the plutonium isotopes are radioactive and undergo a process of
'decay', releasing radioactivity in several different forms and
eventually turning into other elements over time. The radioactive
half-life (the time required for half of the nuclei of a radioactive
isotope to undergo radioactive decay) of plutonium-239 is more than
24 000 years, much longer than the other plutonium isotopes. This
long half-life means that plutonium-239 will be present in the
environment so far into the future that it might as well be called
forever.
...To
make it worse, much of the Maralinga plutonium was turned by the
Vixen B test into a fine form that could be inhaled. This made it
potentially hazardous for anyone who encountered the dust of the
area. The risks are well known: if you inhale 20 milligrams you will
probably die of pulmonary fibrosis within a month. Inhaling a
milligram will lead to lung cancer. The strange thing about plutonium
is that it is relatively safe outside the body, and in fact you can
touch a lump of it... But once it's inside the body, it turns deadly.
It can be inhaled into the lungs, ingested through the mouth or
absorbed through a wound, and if it enters the body through these
pathways, there is strong statistical probability that it will cause
various kinds of cancers.
The
Pearce Report does not mention any fragments contaminated by
plutonium. ....” (; 24-5.)
;
“The
media blackout that descended over Maralinga was extremely
successful. Given both the level of previous coverage of British
nuclear tests and the rise of anti-nuclear movements throughout the
world, the lack of media activity is conspicuous. Vixen B, a test
series that ran for three years and involved hundreds of personnel on
site, does not appear to have been covered at all. ...
Arnold
[...Lorna
Arnold,
app. on a 2006-book]
claimed that the British authorities were 'particularly anxious' not
to attract any publicity during international negotiations to limit
nuclear weapons testing. Vixen B was the major reason for this
anxiety, since it produced nuclear fission, albeit in small amounts,
and tested an apparatus that came close to many of the
characteristics of an actual nuclear warhead. Vixen B was right on
the borderline of international law and may have crossed into
illegality. The behavious of the AWRE [Atomic
Weapons Research Establishment (UK)]
authorities at the time suggests they knew Vixen B was in a grey area
and political reasons dictated secrecy.”
(; 125-6.)
;
“The
dangers were grave, although there is considerable dispute about
their extent. Lorna Arnold took the view that the people exposed to
the tests were not seriously affected by radiation, doses of which
she said were well within the guidelines laid down by the
International Commission on Radiological Protection: 'The people
most affected ... were the Aboriginals, because of damage to their
way of life rather than directly to their health. They had no rights
and their interest in the land was not realized or respected; but
this was, and had been, their general situation and was neither new
nor peculiar to the weapon trials'.
[...]
...Vixen
A caused major disruptions to the test program. In fact, these
problems turned out to be a foretaste of more serious balloon
incidents in September 1960 connected with Vixen B.“
(; p. 127.)
[Addit...] ; ...While I mean not to make any commentaries cons anything (much) to these described Maralinga-'tests' and their level of the realised environmental pollution (Along /w. the nuclear weaponry destroyed landscapes, some that were contaminated, 'forever') - And, that of the reasons for having only quite recently in any manner even become more aware of these histories. Yet, it may be also in place to cite little of that other book I recent read on it. (Some that in the preceding post also was referred to, from briefly.) ; For, at it Cross (2001) writes 'bout that (apparently) from later quite similarly 'much disputed' extension from created radioactive fallout, and then from the actual directions it traveled across Australia. (Ao, having 'passed by' - or over - the city of Adelaide. Resultant of the test carried under unfavorable weatheric conditions, by the time, from the 1956 'Operation Buffalo'-test serie.) ; Alongside that (description), Cross (on p. 164.) as well remarks that:
"A published whitewash of these events exists. Its author Lorna Arnold, appears to have some official backing - having received 'every possible help from the British Ministry of Defense'. Her book, A Very Special Relationship: British Atomic Weapons Trials in Australia, published by her Majesty's Stationery Office in 1987, deals with the atomic weapon tests from a British point of view. ..." (,italics on above, at first sentence added by me); ...But such as above noted, no further commentaries to be expected w. this familiarity on anything from more ('particulars') about. ; ...Yet, I can't avoid of say at this also that the Cross's book would've been more helpful had the book's presented list from atomic tests (on the Appendix) also encontaied those that were carried postafter the y. 1957. Even that those, apparently, not then of so relevant cons the books main topic of interest (Marston). (Or, to be fair, by this recollection - Might be it even had those listed from. In that case, then I've just appeared been bit 'slovenly' and not just happened made the note of those some...)
- See, to these circumstances one more rarely tend find oneself often even of decently informed, appears become (a bit) over-suspecious from 'bout...the anything most. ; ...For a cautious reader it might also appear somewhat a shortcoming that on that Tynan (2016) there weren't any notes for the sources in the text itself. (But, of exceptionally, I didn't find that to so much a 'defect' that I'd otherways thought for. - Cons any book to my any reads. Of the non-fiction books w. that obviously meant.)
;
“Beale
took a sanguine approach to the Indigenous issue when planning for
the British atomic weapons testing project to descend in the
Australian desert. The government was perfectly happy with William
Penney's advice that X300, now named Maralinga, was the place to
establish a permanent test site. In a top-secret Cabinet briefing
document, Beale falsely claimed that if Maralinga was chosen they
could revoke the existing Aboriginal reserve at Ooldea without
difficulty as Aborigines had not used the area for some years.”
(; p. 187-8.)
;
“One of the most perplexing episodes in this history is the so-called black mist. This little understood phenomenom occurred after Totem 1 [...which was, 'a 9.1-kilotonne atomic device detonated from a 30-metre-high steel tower at 7 am on 15 Oct 1953'] at Emu Field in October 1953. ...When the Royal Commission investigated the Emu Field tests, it concluded that weather conditions for the first Totem blast had been unsuitable and the test should not have proceeded.
...The
allegiation is that after the first bomb in the Totem series was
detonated on 15 October 1953, an unpleasant greasy black cloud
enveloped the land around Wallatinna and Mintabie and deposited
material on the people in the vicinity. Uniformly, they reported
vomiting, diarrhoea and skin conditions, as well as blindness (in the
case of Yami Lester, who was a child at the time) and a number of
deaths. Ernest Titterton called the allegation 'a scare campaign' and
denied the possibility of a black mist. ...
[...]
British
scientists WT Roach and DG Ballis in evidence to the Royal Commission
supported the possibility of a black mist from the Totem test, saying
that all reports 'had a measure of internal consistency about them'.
Both scientists asserted that the conditions of firing at Totem could
conceivably have delivered to the Indigenous people of Wallatinna a
fallout cloud that had raced along near ground level. 'It would have
been a strange and awesome sight to anyone beneath it. A fine
'drizzle' of black particles would also have been noticed.' However,
they did not think that the cloud would have caused health problems
for anyone standing awestruck beneath it.
And
that is the problem. While most people who have looked at this issue
in any depth agree that the black mist occurred, disagreements about
the harm it caused have never been resolved. But the compelling
evidence of the Aboriginal people in the area is hard to ignore. The
most famous of those affected, Yami Lester, said, 'Almost everyone at
Wallatinna had something wrong with their eyes. And they still do
...I was one of those people, and later on I lost my sight and life
was changed forever'. One of the Aboriginal people who was the
spokesperson for Aboriginal witnesses to the Royal Commission,
Kanytji (also known as Kantji), said the cloud was 'very black', but
reddish towards to the top, and it dimmed the sun. It produced a
strange shadowing effect, seeming to give people multiple shadows.
... Whatever it was, it was not healthy.
Despite Titterton's
scepticism, the Royal Commission officially recognized the
credibility of the black mist allegiations but found insufficient
evidence to say whether the phenomenom caused injury or illness. This
finding still causes considerable distress to the Indigenous peoples
who were present when the black mist rolled in.” (;
196-8.)
(Photo, on below, beside) ; ...Lately, it was (slight) surprise to being able for observe a some larger moth for visiting my Loniceras in the garden. Precisely, the plant in the pic is L.Periclenumum. (Ie; from it's common name, the Common Honeysuckle. Already described that, sometime. by earlier here.) ...The Moth must've belonged to the Hawk-moths, or by other name, 'Sphinx-moths'. (In a greater superfamily of Bombycoidea,) Although, I also wonder whether this then was only little too 'coincidential' - As I had just recently mentioned from those.(The hawk-moths).
; ...But it was after a warm late June evening, when I only 'by chance' happened to be around to see that 'around'. Such as may be noticeable on the photo...I didn't even have a chance for any better picture to it's more specific identification - Like must be typical to those, my garden 'visitor' didn't ever stop, any place, during it's short stay.
; ...And, oh yes, by the way - Actually, did for a first sighting spot that too from the Martegon Lilies, by earliest. (But of the sudden 'discovery', by my arrival didn't have the camera around. Luckily it stayed, a while.)
Of what the species I've no particular guesses...But must've belonged on some of the more common species. Nevertheless, an enchantin' sight, not too usual seeing those here, in my gardens. So, actually I subsequently also planted few more garden-vine - also another Lonicera - in the hope they invite more of those, more to these 'discoveries'...
; “...When the tests were over and the British were gone, the picture of what they had left behind was alarmingly incomplete. The Pearce report was no help. ...
...The
British authorities have still not given up all the missing pieces.
No-one outside a small circle knows why the UK Ministry of Defense
still retains some files relating to Vixen B and other issues
(including information recently released by WikiLeaks). Whether those
files will ever be released is currently unknown. ... The truth is
unpalatable but must be faced: Australia in the 1950s and early 1960s
was essentially an atomic banana republic, useful only for its
resources, especially uranium and land.
...Tellingly
the legendary official British historian Margaret Gowing rarely
mentioned Australia throughout her magisterial accounts of the
British nuclear enterprise. Austalians were not a partner in any
sense of the word, just lackeys and useful idiots for the most part.
...The 1990s remediation plan was devised using guidelines provided
by the IAEA and the International Commission of Radiological
Protection. It was monitored by ARPANSA [Australian
Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency] and agreed
to by the Maralinga Tjarutja traditional owners. This plan involved
securing 500 000 cubic metres of contaminated waste from the tests in
27 pits at the site. When it was completed in 2000, Austalian prime
minister John Howard called it the 'worlds best practice clean up'.
But nuclear engineer Alan Parkinson, who worked on the clean up and
later became a whistleblower, and Jim Green, an anti-nuclear
activist, among others, continue to criticize its inadequasies.
...
Recently some media reports have claimed that the Maralinga pits are
subsiding and eroding, creating fears that the contamination is not
permanently secure. ...
Alan Parkinson (...who
'vociferously disagreed' on the official announcing from successful
clean-up of the site,) ...saying that 'of the hundreds of
kilometers contaminated, only 2.1 kilometers have been cleaned to the
clean-up criterion, and, of that, only 0.5 kilometers permits
unlimited access. The only people who claim the [clean-up] project a
success are paid by the government.' ...”
(; 300-1)
[Addit...] ; (Significantly,) ... It seems informative to add on these 'summaries', have still a few more lines cited (,or for 'recolleted') of that Tynan, 2016. - Afterwards, I also noted, she seems mentioning that already by at time from those most infamous Vixen-test series (years btw 1959-63), there already was people who '...suspected that Vixen B was more than just a safety test series'. (...For, as some background explanation, all the carried overground nuclear 'tests' in Australia weren't producing the 'iconic'-sort mushroom-cloud explosions, but there were executed in more of 'guarded secrery' several - so called - "minor trials". Of which then as results there has been recognized even more endangering contaminations, ao that plutonium 'left-after', etc...) ; Following that sentence, Tynan cites Parkinson (more recently) of commented that: "... 'While they were said to be to test the safety of nuclear weapons in storage or transit, there was also an element of weapons development in these trials'. [and, thenafter continues the cited paragraph...] The data from Vixen B are still retained by the UK MInistry of Defense, long after the 30-year rule, meaning no-one is entirely sure exactly what they found or how it was used for weapons development." (; on p 119.)
; “The
Maralinga-story is filled with outrages. A story that began to appear
in the Australian media in September 2001 described one particularly
disasteful aspect of the saga, namely the analyses of (mostly)
babies' bones to detect radioactive fallout. At a meeting in Harwell
on 24 May 1957 attended by Ernest Titterton, along with his confreres
from the AERE [Atomic Energy
Research Establishment (UK)] and the AWRE, a variety of
sampling tests was ordered, including soil, vegetation, milk and
sheep bones. And babies' bones.
As many samples as possible are to be obtained (the number available is expected to be small). The bones should be femurs. The required weight is 20-50 g. Wet bone, subsequently ashed to provided samples of weight not less than 2 gm. The date of birth, age at death, and locality of origin are to be reported. [...changed font on this, for reasons of the better visibility. ; W-G.]
Every
cliche of the mad, obsessed scientist is entangled to that quote from
the report presented to the AWTSC
[Atomic Weapons Tests Safety Committee] on 11 June 1957.
This fact about the British tests ignites the public sentiment like
few others. ...The meeting minutes recorded that 'Prof. Titterton
will ensure that arrangements are made by the Australian Safety
Committee for collection of all of the above samples and despatch
them to the UK, along with all relevant information, addressed to Dr.
Dawson, A.W.R.E., who will pass them to A.E.R.E.'
The
bones were scattered far and wide, from Australian laboratories in
Adelaide and Melbourne to British ones in Aberdeen, Liverpool and
London. The parents of the babies never knew. In all, bones from
nearly 22 000 bodies – the majority of them babies – from both
Australia and Papua New Guinea formed part of the experiments.
Collection of samples in Australia was part of a bigger international
program perhaps ironically titled Project Sunshine. The bones were
tested for strontium-90. ...While a rational argument can be made
that testing bone for traces of radioactivity during the early days
of the atomic age has valid scientific justification, no amount of
reasoning is likely to reassure the families of the 22 000 babies and
others whose bones were tested. Stealing the bones of the babies can
never be seen in purely scientific terms.”
(; 302-3.)
(Photo, beside right) ; Chamomille-flower (Matriculata chamomile, ie the German Chamomilla). ; ...Had some those too planted by this season (It's an annual plant, like most apparent is.) The most obvious reason - like most cases, anyone growing that - was for to be able gather some it's flowers gathered and dried to a self-made Chamonille-tea. ; I have those now only at 'semi-favorable' spot, enshadowed by the adjacent perennials - Despite it, them seem emerged in during a warm early Summer very well.
Anyone growing those, notices that not much is needed: A low-fertile soil (preferably), as much sunshiny as possible. ; The flowers are surprisingly small (!) - Always thought of the tea-packets covering that them would appear to somewhat larger...
“... Most of the decisions about the atomic tests taken by the Australian Government were not discussed and debated in public. The secrecy put in place at the Atomic test sited, shored up by the imposition of information controls such as D-notices that deliberately fostered media self-cencorship, enabled experiments of unprecendented risk to be conducted without public consent and their aftermath to be left unaddressed for many years. ...
[...]
...these
intrisically dangerous experiments...not available for public
assessment largely because the media, in line with the official
British and Australian government policy, did not report them to the
public, The fact that their dangers and damage were not part of
Australian public conversation had dire ramifications. A deadly
substance was scattered across the Maralinga lands, and an equally
toxic legacy of cover-up and deceit was left behind. To this day, we
do not know the full extent of the human toll. ...”(;
310, 311.)
(Photo; beside right) ; ...By the time from writing these latest paragraphs it was nearing the 2nd weeks of July. ; The weather having had taken now (apparently) the 'usual' change away of the early Summer season 'heated period' to the decline in temperatures, and, the almost daily rains from. (Until the warmer conditions to 'return', from recent years so observed, the 'usual' by late weeks July) ; However, quite precisely in their 'normal' timings from, the Greater Knapweeds (Centaurea scabiosa) were just emergin' in blooms. And, similarly as usual - though not near so many in numbers - the bees to be observed noticeable were increasin' to the sighting. ...For, after a few years following those - I've discovered that in June the typical amount, variety separate species discovered, on the garden's offerings tend limit to, perhaps, 6 or 8. 'about'. But when the more general warms are 'established', here that 'awakes' the larger numbers. (And, like said, I've perhaps former years been able to 'spot' from about '15 plus' more, at least.) Usually that also times quite around the time my Knapweeds are emergin.
(Another good 'catch' for those is the Thyme (Thymus vulgaris) - It begins from flower already bit earlier, is quite favored by many bees, and also, it's flowering lasts from rather long. However, the actual timing from, what species flowering 'drawing the line' for the bees - in my garden - to get really multiplied in amounts, is from the timing by Hyssop's, actually. Not far after this, and thenafter there usually also starts to emerge several more of the 'mid-Summer' flowering plants.)
------------------
...And that said, should suffice for the 'most about it', from now.
(I'll add a few words more, once having some little gap from time...)
-----------------
(Photo; below) ;...However, this one on the leaves of Valeriana officinalis (,paragraphs above described), the bee must then appear also belong (also) to the above mentioned species, B.hypnorum.
(Interestingly, the English name of it seems appear, the Tree Bumble-bee.) ; Easily identifiable, for the brownish fur on overside(s), it may well be the most common-place species from 'bumble' here latitudes. - Ecologically they're also said typically to form nests that appear far larger in numbers than of many others. Estimates seems varyingly give the nest to contain numbers from 30 to even 100 individuals - In contrast most others bumble-bees can produce to smtgh like 6 to 14 for 'offspring', in one nesting/generation. (B.hypnorum also tend appear rather early 'on move', both seasonally and by any 'average' day. First individuals one tends see by a late March, even. Not on this year, though... ; And, I've a few occasions in July observed those, in the nearby meadow, active still closer the midnight-hours - ie when it already scarce of light.. ; ...these 'reminds' just of to emphasize that one could describe the species to, sort of, as the "shovel" in amongst our local bumble-bees. (The range is also pretty large, from across the Europe, and then reaching far as until '...Kamchatka in the East'.)
'Could
harm of this kind happen again? The answer must be yes. Without
independent scrutiny of their activies, governments are capable of
anything.'
(; Tynan,
p.
311.)
'Time
will tell...' ...Indeed.
Or, from then: the Furthermore(s)...
...What comes on these
preceding sections, (,'chapters'), at least it can be said that much on it to shown traced itself from those
typically earlier 20th-centurian often authoritaristic,
totalitarian 'mindings'. View about what constituting a 'humanity', or related to that from the peoples 'worth'. And the science's many misdemeanours - and how it to long decades helped for to keep those bad chapters 'canned', still effective to remain on their keepin'. (That keep of to prevent the most of it ever to the 'public eye', obviously. At least from 'til the statues and monuments built would in 'necessary' time lasted all too long, in their unavoidable but not admitted disvafor. 'Til the most 'dust' having fallen on the 'tracks'.)
; For that one thing that these stories
histories, in overall, 'suppose...From to their most revealing seemed of
tell us. That what - I suppose - from it 'begging' to be recognized.
(Could've it then also be said for shown us, perhaps, also in many
levels that to similarly an all the more usual lesson. Some familiar for lot to these 20th
century pasts ? (That) it for being far too easy, all too easy (often) if just asiding
the much into those pasts, possible even when one is for maintaining any
'uncritical eye' for. And there is - can be - the unconscious taken 'self-evident' attitudes that render the finding less complete. ; By which meaning that then (,if so, not recognising) the so called 'authentic reality' then less usual to the 'resurfacing', as one tends avoid anything for not as
pleasing. Or, then that not 'sees the day' - As it less favorable than how all for often still appears wished remain seen. Less usual and more common a 'fail' is of not for give it's necessary space - anything - that'd not to confirm for what was the expected 'result'.)
Difficult from avoiding that, though. We all tend from 'stretch' the truth. And resultant, sometimes that then...cracks.
Or, maybe it reflects from smght of the
same than what can be said of the actual finding for most any to
these ('sort', similarly, typically) “forgotten” histories. The
crucial question, obviously would be: What(?) that means for the
today. And then, the conclusion following also is; The established
'conclusions' always should receive some re-estimat on it's any
current finding.
Basically I think, the more nearer the
historical 'process', the details to it's present finding – The
more difficult is of see some division, the difference between the
'fictional' and historical fact. (For, whatever then by now achieved
historical 'out-lining', about this recent 'periods', the fiction and
fact of unavoidably tend for to coincide. Anytime the more time
passing the fiction and fact - 'in fact' – the difference only
becomes to more obscure to see. But it becomes to seem clearer
– for those divides, 'gaps' are more in visible for see.) Sometimes
they describe that (process) to how myth is created.
...Cons then from the above
cited plentiest citates (Tynan) one, no doubt, does get to the
most part, a more clear idea 'bout it all that (contaminations,
destruction, neglect....) from how that being covered in the book. ;
...But, cons all that (, and from all else to these above 'sections')
'suppose it not very possible for being covered anyhow else manner
than for these 'selections', by this writing. Soforth, my few
references here would only be the supplementaries on what at above
quoted passages, or, so from the most part. (Besides that, I'd not
too likely for have any to too comprihensive, any long-term
knowledges from most to this. Most of my current understanding being
based on...these few reads only.)
; Tynan at the ends
her book (p. 306-7), mentions, ao, the Maralinga Tours,
'...tourist venture wholly owned by
the traditional owners, began in 2014'. It said become
possible, fromafter the 'unrestricted
access to the final part of Maralinga land was finally granted to the
Maralinga Tjarutja people.' (;p.
306) ; In the accomp. text (,'sentences') is then also said;
“The injury upon the
indigenous people cannot be propertly measured. Robbing people of
their ancestral homelands, subjecting them to forced removal and,
later, exposure to the plutonium-laden dust and debris is not
something that can be forgiven. ...of all the people harmed by
Maralinga, the Indigenous people were the most powerless.”
...Along the preceding(s),
w. the brief glancing of the web, noted as well this, for some read to
these aspect. (From some to it's scope, from the 'main parts', it
telling some main details for the 'Maralinga-story', short. Albeit
not of so 'extensively', of course.)
Perhaps also is for
interests, this Guardian-column. ; ...Noted there were mentions in the ends from an online source providing materials from the old Australian newspaps,
perhaps also of other 'archivals'. ('Trove' – such as that said by name at the article.) If interested, for more, by oneself can then fx
dig some other 'data' of it all. From backgrounds or otherways from a media reaction in during that time – Of the public 'visibility' (,and
unvisibility) of those atomic tests. It might be of use to someone (For
anyone...)
...Some parts from those
links, web-pages might've add the more to these views, of course. ;
There as well the article from the exhibition named Black Mist Burnt Country, which said continued
'...until 2019 [and from did] ,commemorate
the 60th
anniversary of the Maralinga atomic tests through painting,
sculpture, printmaking and installations.' (Ao, in
the latter mentioned relating/there been, of the wider recognition in
those modern 'installations' also the modern 'virtual reality art'
from an atomic tests as subject – In the article to it's
“adverter”, or that just for the mentions too, but it seemed for
remarking rather descriptive from to retell; ...That the
installations maker (Nyarri Nyarri Morgan) is cited saying
(that) 'His first
encounter with western culture (in the 1950s) occurred when he
witnessed an atomic test.' (; ...I mean, that
sentence from quite tellingly captures the many characteristic parts
from that above emphasized 1950s. And of course for the then 'till
later followed decades continued secrecy, the scope of exclusion by
peoples most harmed – the natives, 'viewers'/hired personnels - at
those “operations” realised btw 1951-63.)
I guess one could imagine for some comparable examples...But I choose now rather to only suppose that you (/anyone) finds, can recall some comparisons. Or if not – Well it'd anycase appear of to quite as 'oblique' a finding cons all what of these historical chapters is the most...descriptive for(?)
; One having to, of course,
also from to add at this place, while it might possibly now being the
most renown case example from that disastrous radioactive left-after
of the -40s to -60s nuclear bomb-tests (Or, for the 2nd
most renown, after those some on the Bikini-isles, Pacific, 1946-):
That Maralinga still remains a relative little known histories, all
in all.
Or at least so I'm having an
impression, from by myself formerly been to only 'little aware' on
the most parts for it. ; It a bit like finding some barrels of a
toxic nuclear waste at your suburban backyard. Shouldn't be there,
yet can't change the fact: Somebody did smght very wrong. The
'offialdom' (government) denies there an evidence.
--------
"... Jonah on the Shoalhaven - Outside the City (1976) shows Jonah as a half-human, half-animal carcass sprawled under a lone tree.His stomach is ripped open violently, revealing gold coins stored in his guts, and a mushroom explodes in the distance..." ; ...of one those linked articles. (On few paragraphs above. ; Describing some among most renown paintings on the exhibition. The painting is depicted at the article:)
; ...Generally it'd also
perhaps made the most logical if to my these – prior and following
- scattered 'findings' there would'd been some parts on the (many)
noted victims stories that go back to these histories only of a
pastly nuclear pollution. Of the many places and different regions –
the related harms and caused ills, estimable or sometimes
'uncertain', yet very existent obviously. Foremost would've been in
place as examples here - Unless I'd then only though that any level
possible. (For any individual stories by name, read on pages from
these book referred to this – Mostly they'd made this from yet some
lot more expanded a writing.)
Among those, of course,
there were (“always was”) also the many from a (so called)
indigenous groups of peoples, in the world. Not just from the
Australian parts these lastly examples, but fx among those 'farmers
and natives' – On the most any that'd by the mention feature in the
above selected plentitudes of quotations; Like the tatar-people
from those Russian villages (in the Ural), or the desert-'dwelling'
american indians any 'nearbies' for that Nevada and on elsewhere
country. (Such as that from N.E. Region/plain form US, of that
Hanford-plant.) ; And then there could've been, fx, encontained the
more lots (examples) of what mentioned 'bout that exposure by
'workers' and 'veterans' - the histories from, often long-time
hidden, on from their exposure and endangerement to the unsafe
amounts radioactivity. It's accumulating in the body, and affecting
the physical well-being in/from during the later years. All those whom denied of their justice.
---------
; ...Interestingly, albeit not quite without some annoyance, I was one day also offered a sight of this kind specimen that was attacking on the bumbles (!, ?), and perhaps, some other insects too, which were visiting the flowers (of that former mentioned Alkanet, it's flowers do tempt quite many bees...) Apparently, it was for reason to repel them away of the nectars, and to secure to itself the vaster amounts that. With shortwhile what that was to observable (/that this said specimen was around), I noticed that bumbles attacked didn't show being particularly harmed. They just seemed for to flee for other directions, and flowers. However, I'm not sure if the species was from this one that on a pic beside.
; By anycase, it seemed from to fly, "just like only a fly can" - With the quick, rapid changes on it's course. (And from whatever were, if any for the 'benefits' by that tactique, it from showed, can't say.) ..Curiously, watching that, it felt (somewhat) to the exhilarating and from repulsive, at the same time...
'Suspectably
'safe' ; -
Or, and, from 'Still Furthermore...'.
; To some noting, a source for
thought – and of to cite in following some terming by Brown's
using – In much cases those scientist's by early nuclear 'era', by
the 1950s (and later), of having subjected the peoples for their
carried radiological studies can, 'postwardly', from fit for criteria
form the 'crimes of opportunity'. ('Opportunistic' as in the
created – accidentally or from cases by purposefully, such as fx at
that Maralinga – contamined environments, the note high levels
radioactive pollution can be noted from offered the possibilities of
to follow how endandering any forms radioactive particle, and how
those affected and functioned at their victims physical bodies.) ;
However – of the glancing fx the few above referred web-links, on
those Australian bomb-tests, made me then also to think that one not
quite errs if for to think that in ('most cases') there must've had
been in effect also a soimewhat more than just the 'opportunities'
for. ; ...So, the quoted is only of the words, cited sayings by some
researcher interviewed on that, “You
can't help but wonder the extent to which there was a deliberate
interest in the medical results of radioactive materials entering the
body.”
; ...I think, also in the
many 'less clear' cases from (than of the bomb tests, their careless
fulfil from) that thin line between an intentioned – the medical,
radiological - crimes and of the opportunate some, might
perhaps appear from less apparent. In the first 'discovery'. (The
social and of historical developments, sort, 'permitting'. Given the
level from a staggering atomic faith in that 1950s.) ; However, from
those formerly reading that Washington (2005), seemed fx from
noting how much to that history too. – of the US's part, but
likewise prob. It from it of recognized on elsewhere too - also often
did follow the same racial 'mindings' of the time (Or, from it's
'perverted logic'.) ; That Washington providing the examples that
black people in for more procentual averages were subjected in the
various medical radiologic 'experimentations'. There in the described
aspect, then (fx, also) that existed the medical context - ie
that remarkably important and meaningful other “thin line” from –
That thin line between some from between some subjects for the
'volunteers' and some whom 'subjected' unknowingly, without their any
given consent. ; But fx that procentual average (Yet, I won't go on
that part from more either, not on to this writing at least... )
The US or Russian practices,
from at the time, in the researches of (their caused) victims to
radioactivity possibly might've realised in cases of 'opportunately'.
But the cultural and medical development that'd permitted it, that
must then also having the lot more in connected w. the seen
eugenistic devotinism and progressive scientific 'faiths' the
(Began the somewhat earlier by century.) Some, many thinkers say
that the same is still from even to more enstrenghtened in the
effect, remains a part of the biology's and the 'physical' sciences
most cherished principles. - For the more recent seen in the
criticism from what 'principes' may lie under surface of the
acceptable scientific ethic and consequent to the advances by fx,
say, from the molecular sciences, and genetics. (I care not to even
refer for anything from medical 'sector'.) But the p-o-w, possibly,
it's most significant in the values and what becomes from 'taken for
granted'. And, what's seen from of constituting what was seen/made
for a 'reality' accepted. (Guinea pigs and victims become a whole
less visible in a created totalism where, indeed, the separate
experiences don't even penetrate as the sting and cracks in the
'grand story'.)
Whether or not the
opportunities more typically preceded the crime(s), or contrastively
from followed them – It to the more apparent that the neglect was a
first step taken leading to how it now appears.
That not probably makes any
justice for the several objections, the several peoples involved
who'd felt what there was, terribly, wrong. But seems to the more
fitting as any 'conclusive finding' of mine on this. Not just the
opportunistic wrong-doing, but that 'ugly corruption' (in the minds)
that'd swam to blurring any independent scientific conceptions,
moralitet.
All still don't believe
there is any much part of that, 'moralities', in the “hard
sciences”. One way to often see, interpreting from that, is that it
would've become prevalent in parallel for the war-time anxieties and
'depression'. (That view then excludes the longer histories from the
said racistic histories and more widely look of any it's 'social
setting'. The social 'divisions' sharpening in a world all too
rapidly in modernization. Some for what that book by Brown offers a
particularly interesting views to. That 1950s reality behind the
'coca-cola smiles'. What a folly. What a foolery.)
; That for said, from the
most part, on that decade whose 'mind-set' from any present finding
show itself to so completely (and disturbing) incomprehensible. Yet,
even so: Were them really so out of their minds, or from just so
well-educated to the 'out-minding'? (I suppose the latter to the more
correct a defining.)
But, by anycase, at least if
following those Orwellian conclusion(s), that citation on the
above pars, lots to that same affected to a major influential reasons
for why the first atomic bomb even got from created. Not a very
'admiring' finding – But necessary if one wishes of view those
'opportunisms' in their complete contexts.
And, of course, of the
generations in concerning, on these views of ours a fewsome
more of a word could've been added for. ; Anything addressed about
the effects – the discovered and perhaps all that might still
remain not from yet recognized of – to the unborn here would've
probably had done good been them bit more 'comprised' at this
writing. (Had that seemed proved...somehow practical, possible?) The
parents and children (and also the fetuses) whom were been then left
for to be exposured of suffer an unestimable effects from any amounts
the released radioactivity. Sometimes 'accidentally' and sometimes
for knowingly, since there was the now renown lack of care about
anything like individual human lives, health, in those professional
attitudes of the scientists involved to radiologic 'experimenting',
along w. nuclear tests. Or, in the 'production' sector, ao.
And, then into that of
course also 'coincides' that above reference, mention on about what
only later been revealed of the then existed knowledge there was, to
what comes for any long-term consequences, effects. (Also of
culturally. And medically.) Meaning, on an above cites that
what presented on the few remarks on that Titterton. ...Or the
project in more generally, the one from collecting those babies'
bones, or samples of for the 'detecting' any level of an accumulated
radioactive amounts in them. Etc...
------------------------
(Photo, beside) ; ...This was the beetle I also lifted of that pool. Not very colouric, or decorated one - But it was also for relative large, for a 'temperate' (or, 'subarctic') insect. They're quite usual, this time of year - though', not in this 'suburbia' near so numerous seen than on some other ranges, 'supposin... It doesn't (,apparently) go for the flowers - Actually I've no particulars from this species. But the photo succeeded quite well to capture it's fine details, while it was for 'warming up', subsequent, in the mild, welcomed sunlight.
; Yet, fx, from to offer still just a
bit more in form (these) brief citings, or just as smght in concerning the preceded, via that
Brown - I also find in place (that 2013, p. 300, 301.) these at the following:
“In
fact, having a population with successive generations exposed to
radioactive isotopes in a natural setting came to have great monetary
value. Hoping to attract foreign money, a 2001 Russian Ministry of
Health brochure promoted the 'Muslumovo cohort' as a data set with
'worldwide significance for the evaluation of the risk of the
carcinogenic and genetic impact of chronic radiation in humans.' The
U.S. Department of Energy invested heavily in this data set from the
Urals, Japanese researchers, however, found the dosimetric records
too unreliable to be of use.
It
reminds me of The Truman Show, a 1998 film about an insurance
adjuster who discovers his entire life has been staged for a reality
TV show. ...
[...]
...
in 1999, 95 percent of infants born that year had genetic disorders.
Meanwhile, 90 percent of Muslomovo's children suffered anemia,
fatigue and immune disorders. ...
[...]
Both
positions – that the villagers are sick from radiation or that they
are sick because of other sociocultural factors – can fit into one
schema. Radiation illness is not specific, stand-alone illness. Its
indications relate to other illnesses. ...”
; (Like often, these are
heavily enshortened quotates btw...) But one would seem of find them
from tell, btw, lot from cons anything what nowadays more renown
become from to still (relative) recent histories for those places in
question. (Here 'enbriefed' the sentences omitted discuss fx the
more specifical of the health records; plus from other 'histories'
etc... ; Yet thought, esp., that the last remarked in place from to
these views.) - Can't much help the aspect; These views ultimately
remain from...sorts of, quite selective notes.
Only too much having had to
been left outside from what for the presented.
The children and infants
always the most vulnerable some in cases of an exposure to the
radioactive isotopes and, '-material'. Plus similarly, also the
carrying mothers too, not for from excluded of this mentioning. ;
Along, like perhaps quite as renown, then there are some of peoples
most usual left for exposured from the radioactivity's enharming
effects. Sometimes due their, more or less, striking levels got for
asided of the societies most interest in the toxic circumstances,
environments that having got from created. (Or, of the other reasons
into their exclusion from these concerns.) Typically the 'natives',
or the other peoples who don't/did not inhabit the modern
'city'-landscapes but appeared live more or less in the traditional
way.
; Fx, (Tynan) mentions also
perhaps that more renown example of the failed protecting of the
native peoples in those atomic tests in Australian 1950s. (From the
aboriginal Milpudde-family, people having for accidentally happened
set camp by the crater created in a recent bomb-test.) ; Some among
of the many victims. Also their treatment fromafter following that
discovery from there, perhaps, might shown smght (lot) what for the
most characteristical to those attitudes by British 'operatives' in
test, and the military personnels supervising them. The thorough
racism to the prevalent values, valuings in all that.
; Or, one could then also
then go for those numerous cases described where the 'contamination'
released, the wastes left in natures from originated of the
uranium-fuelled 'plants', production.
(Photo, left-side) ; ...And then: Yet another pict from with the above descibed B.hypnorum (the 'bumble'). The main depiction, although, is for the presenting that of the July arriving my Crimson Clover (Trifolium incarnatum) were also emergin for the flowers. (Actually...as the annual species - When ready they make those characteristic spikes in a matter from few days. (And the bees noticeable favor. 'Though, not that I'd noted them to so much visited as fx some other clovers are. Some that w. longer cultivation history, 'traditionals' here.) ; Like said before I use the Crimson Clover mainly from it's very good capacity as a soil-improving plant. Random years cultivated it can make "miracles" to the poor, 'nutrient-scarce' flower-bench. ...This year I didn't cultivate so many, but them planted w. the spefici purposes, in few places of garden. (By which manner...That shall be left for the following garden-post..)
-----------------
“All my life I've been late, but I always arrive in time.”- Talleyrand(-Périgord),Charles Maurice de) ,1754-1838.
- 'About' the words on
one to his compact expressions, the often cited phrase. ;
...Interestingly (while I'd perhaps bit less convinced to this one...),
a somewhat more renown of common 'phrases' is
as well 'credited' to originate from Talleyrand. Namely that 'It
is the beginning of the end'. The phrase (,if
it really so, was for his saying by earliest), first used to
refer on Napoleon's soon expected downfall. Ie that then was said (,if so was) in the1814. (; Apparently, far less suspectably of Talleyrands inventing, and an intressant detail - being that the phrase above first cited, was also his 'preferred' expression of his strategy for dealing with and trying to influence on decisions made by emperor, that Napoleon Bonaparte.) ; These references are via Harris's bio (2007) of that Charles Maurice. (The 'Prince' as was the common 'nickname' used by his contemporaries.)
'Règime
Change'
;
Talleyrand – the famous 19th
centurian diplomat – famously was acknowledged from to be
not just 'very corrupted', but also from about his 'overt' self-esteem. To
the level that fx his written memoirs seems said to contain the plentiest
divergences and 'fancifyings' from the truth. From him having in them, without any 'scruples',
of 'painted w. rosy colours' much that'd actually would appeared for
his part, or 'role' at anything to the more disfavourable.
That noted, my concern here only on the practical impossibility on that first mentioned 'phrase' to this sayings. – Cause', from ultimately no-one actually can't ever appear from be for 'always in time'.
That noted, my concern here only on the practical impossibility on that first mentioned 'phrase' to this sayings. – Cause', from ultimately no-one actually can't ever appear from be for 'always in time'.
(More often, and particularly so, the humans tend for appear to be from 'late in wisdom'. Contrastively, somewhat, that's what much how any for the 'wisdom' then ever got for 'inaugurated'. We can prepare for the forthcoming – and some say, to the pasts from 'returning' too, sort of - at least in occasions – but ultimately all about future does remain the more or less for obscured. More often are then also sudden happened, realized 'cracks' at our established expectation, the less parts from the past wisdom(s) are for to 'enreach' our present.)
However, (of that last said, and from 'ultimately') cons then for
anything to our further notes here, on from the chapters to nuclear pasts and from the
industry's histories on militaristic, or, on it's “peaceful” uses –
Mostly these read(s), them of course only did convince me in the view
that it to a 'high time' from these said business, the (continuing)
so-called 'nuclear age', if them were to pass amongst the other
unfortunate 'chapters' at humanity's past history.
(Photo, beside) ; ...This adjacent one (butterfly) would then appear the more interesting encounter to see, in the garden. (Even without it having been the one I - somewhat for a first estimate - assumed to be. ; Such as mentioned, the day-time butterflies a rare by number species I tend see in garden (No doubt, mostly of the reasons this area being, most part, 'the suburbia'.) Like also mentioned, of the Lycaenidae butterflies the number maybe is, can be counted w. the one-hand fingers. From the species by formerly seen. However...when trying to identify the characteristics and 'colouration' of this one I came for the rather unusual assumption that it might've been at this Fennoscandia's rather 'rare' species, namely Silvery Argus (Aricia nicias), (...?)
; The guess is not very certain, for didn't have pics from undersides, but them were almost devoid from the typical lycaenid 'markings', or those decorative colorourful 'spots' in edges of wings, underside. Also it was just a bit larger than some others to the 'resembling' comparables. - But actually not at all too sure, maybe it still was 'just' a specimen of the Cranberry Blue. (Or, perhaps some late-flyer from the Holly Blue.) Can't say from it for too surely. - At least it then feels also in place of to mention that (that) Silvery Argus seem have a quite large range here, despite it's scarcity. (but, that range doesn't quite reach this far South.) ; Whatever the correct identification - A nice sighting, even for those few moments it stayed around...
One might find some relevant comparisons in from the histories of where (and there is many examples) some similarly conflicting, infamous, practice or 'beliefs' after it's times, then subsequently becoming for obsolete and declining. Often the more critical overall 're-estimates' then also followed the more widely accepted disfavor. For instance ; The slavery in during that 1800s. (Continued on some cases, places, regions from long after.)
(Photo, beside) ; ...This adjacent one (butterfly) would then appear the more interesting encounter to see, in the garden. (Even without it having been the one I - somewhat for a first estimate - assumed to be. ; Such as mentioned, the day-time butterflies a rare by number species I tend see in garden (No doubt, mostly of the reasons this area being, most part, 'the suburbia'.) Like also mentioned, of the Lycaenidae butterflies the number maybe is, can be counted w. the one-hand fingers. From the species by formerly seen. However...when trying to identify the characteristics and 'colouration' of this one I came for the rather unusual assumption that it might've been at this Fennoscandia's rather 'rare' species, namely Silvery Argus (Aricia nicias), (...?)
; The guess is not very certain, for didn't have pics from undersides, but them were almost devoid from the typical lycaenid 'markings', or those decorative colorourful 'spots' in edges of wings, underside. Also it was just a bit larger than some others to the 'resembling' comparables. - But actually not at all too sure, maybe it still was 'just' a specimen of the Cranberry Blue. (Or, perhaps some late-flyer from the Holly Blue.) Can't say from it for too surely. - At least it then feels also in place of to mention that (that) Silvery Argus seem have a quite large range here, despite it's scarcity. (but, that range doesn't quite reach this far South.) ; Whatever the correct identification - A nice sighting, even for those few moments it stayed around...
One might find some relevant comparisons in from the histories of where (and there is many examples) some similarly conflicting, infamous, practice or 'beliefs' after it's times, then subsequently becoming for obsolete and declining. Often the more critical overall 're-estimates' then also followed the more widely accepted disfavor. For instance ; The slavery in during that 1800s. (Continued on some cases, places, regions from long after.)
('Though - To this estimate, in to it's
any 'comparison' for this – The history don't exactly make
that in all manners from so encouraging in it's possible
'prospects'.)
The selection from what meant for
specifically also affects the timing given for the slavery's actual
duration, in modern times. Or, in particular of how you see what
would've actually meant for it's complete ending (Mainly,
particularly at the sphere from a “developed”, northern
countries', parts from the world) ; So, if I'd, say, choose to those
the years for that lasting from 1789 to about 1850, to it's 'ending',
as a process might be from estimated had taken at least the well over
a 50 years.
Yet, fx the slave trade, could
also be noted for had from ended some decades - w. an international
treaty by the 1820s. (Was the year 1826, can't recall.) But it
nevertheless continued, somewhat illegalized but not effectively
controlled in the 'Spanish colonies' and on the US South for 'till
for the subsequent decade(s). Which from just for the more 'standard'
general outlines, shortly for about that becoming a penalised
activity. And the resistance for the change. ; The reached
“international ban” proved generally largely ineffective. Fx the
Napoleon's downfall, and from prior that successfull independencin'
from the St Domingo's 'slave colony probably had more impact in the
'process'. – Yet, one wouldn't say from that the 'treaty' wouldn't
been a meaningful decision. On what then was seen for/comprised as
'the world'.
And then, there were(/by some places
there might still exist) also fx the land slavery. (Or the
serfdom, like that by formerly was called for.) Also in the
'developed North', some places it actually also did exist 'till for
the quite later timing. And, alternatively in forms of that “human
bondage”, by it's various forms to that is also possible count
smght what more usual known, described for a 'debt bondage'.
(Continued still in, perhaps, several places of world.)
...And if one then counts in the
calculation also the racistic and apartheidists policies and politics
continued, for the segregation and discrimination maintained on it's
place, (well long most part the 1900s, fx in the US, S.Africa's, from
examples), then we might come to the conclusion that'd add for
another 100 years to that 'time-line'. ; It's of course quite
inadequate 'from compares' – But if you develop a similar
'out-lining', then that all nuclear production could be imagined
ended by (...the 2080? fx.) And the clean-up, and decontamination
from the only so far existant wastes, perhaps it expectable,
assumable from becoming (the 'most part') finalized – by 2100?
(Excluding the more permanent, 'more or less', compromised (?)
left-afters – Perhaps most disturbing, renown being those described
'radiation zones' whose actual generations-level effects holds still
much of the uncertainty, and the former nuclear blast-sites, plus
from all during the sometimes formerly lot released radiation,
directly for natures (the rivers, ao) – of the 'facilities'; from
nuclear submarines; in the lost amounts of a radioactive material;
plus what else? – All form the long-term effects, it's not even
well from possible estimate, not known from it's complete 'scope'.)
(Pic) ; (adjacent right,), 'close-up' on Centaurea Scabiosa. (Knapweed-flower). ...Not quite sure from whether I'd maybe had this already on some from the last year's posts. Anyway, the bee just hardly is recognizable but identifiable as some to the slight less common ones from see, here. Can't say of the species, too certain. A p-o-w, that now w. the more 'unstable' weathers by this year - during the last Winter and the early Summer - the less usual bumble-species found in the garden seem also been to (slight) less from any sightings.
; Hoping that them (,due that awful winter-period particularly) haven't 'taken the hit'.
...Favor your own minding, to the
sensible estimate 'bout these aspect. But perhaps the nuclear
'business' – and it's vast risks – are only expectable to
last just as long as the 'bondage' from permitting it. Any human,
'social' and – say, in lack of the any better word – cultural
dependencies permitting that. It could – in theory – end
on tomorrow. Or it can last until the next major cultural 'transform'
renders the continuence a practical impossibility, in a final
disfavor. (So far the world “accidental record”, in some for the
modern energy-forms, hasn't lead for it's complete fall to disfavor.)
So, there is every possibility that the environmental and climatic disturbances by presently the more likeliest to emerge for the last 'brick' that'd “sink the boat”.
So, there is every possibility that the environmental and climatic disturbances by presently the more likeliest to emerge for the last 'brick' that'd “sink the boat”.
(; For I don't think it solely
coincidential, if the known 'atmosphere-tearing', Earthly
radiologic-levels affecting, nuclear (bomb-)tests and the subsidised,
governmentally supported emergence of an 'atomic ages' just came for
existence – Simultaneously from the decade for where global
carbon-dioxide 'scale' is set to become a more concerned noticed.
(Although the latter 'spike' somewhat explains from a modern
measuring only began of that timing too.) ; Of course, this argument
to develop for anything more specifically would need the some
more...'examples' on it's evidencing. Basically, in their
industrially permitted 'energy-enthusiasm' by that 1950s the people
felt their ages for some period from an ultimate lasting. But not
quite so for anymore.)
Yet, suppose we'll rather move on at this. Not meant here of some lenghtier, specific look, but of to some recognition.
Fossil fuel emission's continued impacts
for the (global) climates obviously, by presently, the more usual
of concerns. Whether my envisaged end of the 'atomic age' then would
happen from ultimately arrive only bit too late – Can't say for of that not being any too
sure. Anyway, sooner the better when it's ending.
No more for the Godzilla's repeated 'returns', anymore. – Obviously.
No more for the Godzilla's repeated 'returns', anymore. – Obviously.
; Question, in the plainest, is then
quite the similar of how it of those climatic threats now
increasingly more common often appears become recognized. – Will
that happen in time? ; ...'Time', what an easily astrayin' word.
'High time', 'soon time', ...(in) 'no time'.
But there's of course every reason why
that said wider change should take place.
For now, w. these 'historical mindings'
viewed by, I only prefer offering the idea to what the described
production actually is/always having been: the bondage. (Or even more
precisely said bondage for the stolen time...)
Anything from it's emerging of such an
questionable basis and discrimante origins can't remain 'on effect'
from 'permanent'. It's smght written for to it's context. The solar,
the other renewables actually in developing constantly – for just
some alternative examples, development. A view on the newssing - from
(apparently) nearby these timings – seems give an estimate that
while in the Northern Europe countries ('Fennoscandian')
regions the wind is expected for in a 10 years increased for
to cover for the 30 percent from all energy-need. (While at the
moment, in Finland fx, that only covers some '10 percent'.) Good
prospect in that too, therefore. (In case those figures really from
the amounts of all energy-uses actually, not for just the peoples
house-hold.) Of course, not at every country, regions, the procentual
average by any single renewable energy-form isn't quite same levels.
Fx, probably of that wind the largest average would've likeliest
originating for the Denmark's part. Where the wind is perhaps the
most effectively available usable. In some other countries it then
combined of the slight different 'mix'. But by any manner; that's
promising.
Photo (beside, left) : Yet another nice flowerin' plant for early July, which also seems been visited by...'many a bee'.
; Borage (ie, from it's lat name: Borago officinalis). ...It's also said that Borage's nice 'starlet'-flowers can be gathered and used as a decorative addition to salads. (And so I've followed the advice.) The page on Wikip. seems even mention for the leafs used on same purpose from parts it's wider range through the midst- and eastern Europes. (The origin-region of this very 'traditional' herbs plant seems assumed existed around the eastern Mediterranean.) ...However, the (slightly) contradicting information (on that wikip. too,) then seems as well say that due it's containing amounts toxicity, the leaves or stems aren't recommended palatable. And so I've followed that advice, only flowery parts usable.
; ...(I think,) did plant the Borage about 6 to 8 years ago at garden. And like was said 'common wisdom' for it - this seasonal herb steadily, of repeatedly grows every year, in a very same places. (W. even more of the plant, each year.)
...It sort of 'hides under' other growths for until, about, the midst/late June - And then it's flowers actually emerge, in maybe to less than a week (or within two weeks.)
; Then, despite it, I also find myself bit less optimistic from the prospects, an actual scope from a similar positive change in the environmental levels from to it's place, in levels necessary. Or, at least for what comes to these prevalent 'consumeristic' priorities, the constant growth in market for the 'stuffs', how it tends affect and 'orientate' the peoples principal way-from-life, astill. What to the most characteristic parts, what the en-contained priorities and oftenmost, unquestioned value-systems that helps keep. And sometimes even feel, having somewhat the resemblant impressions on what comes for the actual extent, how it comprisiming the actual potential in 'change for the better' to all that lot now become the more favored and known as the sustainable production.
; Borage (ie, from it's lat name: Borago officinalis). ...It's also said that Borage's nice 'starlet'-flowers can be gathered and used as a decorative addition to salads. (And so I've followed the advice.) The page on Wikip. seems even mention for the leafs used on same purpose from parts it's wider range through the midst- and eastern Europes. (The origin-region of this very 'traditional' herbs plant seems assumed existed around the eastern Mediterranean.) ...However, the (slightly) contradicting information (on that wikip. too,) then seems as well say that due it's containing amounts toxicity, the leaves or stems aren't recommended palatable. And so I've followed that advice, only flowery parts usable.
; ...(I think,) did plant the Borage about 6 to 8 years ago at garden. And like was said 'common wisdom' for it - this seasonal herb steadily, of repeatedly grows every year, in a very same places. (W. even more of the plant, each year.)
...It sort of 'hides under' other growths for until, about, the midst/late June - And then it's flowers actually emerge, in maybe to less than a week (or within two weeks.)
; Then, despite it, I also find myself bit less optimistic from the prospects, an actual scope from a similar positive change in the environmental levels from to it's place, in levels necessary. Or, at least for what comes to these prevalent 'consumeristic' priorities, the constant growth in market for the 'stuffs', how it tends affect and 'orientate' the peoples principal way-from-life, astill. What to the most characteristic parts, what the en-contained priorities and oftenmost, unquestioned value-systems that helps keep. And sometimes even feel, having somewhat the resemblant impressions on what comes for the actual extent, how it comprisiming the actual potential in 'change for the better' to all that lot now become the more favored and known as the sustainable production.
But at least that social 'transform' is
under it's way; More of a concern to the more of the peoples by
nowadays, than still by the few decade ago. (There's no reason say,
it wouldn't hold the promise that'd that change to still come in
time.) ; Only the question of the already realised climatic
'disturbance' and what that means for the nearest futures, seems to
the present appear in the most urgent 'public' concern.
Plus, the recent noted findings from the extinction-levels in connected w. that...ao things of (an increasing) present concern. (; W-G.)
Plus, the recent noted findings from the extinction-levels in connected w. that...ao things of (an increasing) present concern. (; W-G.)
---------------
(Photo) ; ...And finally, the picture from my Yellow Sweet Clovers (Mel. officinalis) - Also already in the flowerings. ; ...Of that specim that I left to grow inside of the garden greenhouse - Only the few first 'spikes' having had for developed until this timing, or as yet.
Perhaps in the forthcoming posts some plant would be featured on it's full florescesense. - Although, that would not be of so easy to photograph, the one in this picture already is (about) some 160 cm in height. ; But anyway - them were of quite effortless to cultivate and appear rapid from the growing, even on outdoors. (Just compare this to that pic on an above paragraphs, where the still small saplings are only recent planted, by around sometime that early May.)
; As those are being perennials, and would last in garden at least to a few years time, I'm then likely having to seek to this some suitable 'spot' from there, too. (; ...Albeit, in the packet it seems said to appear plants of the 'two-year'. Maybe then my impression/recollection was of that these too said tend in the good conditions to resow themselves in garden. Well, like noted the one plant pictured - grown in "optimal conditions", of course - having already reached for double a height-estimate given in the seed packet. Maybe their longer lasting then wouldn't either proven of be so unlike...)
The weathers having remained last weeks quite cold and from 'showering' rainy - So, for the ones already planted outside that greenhouse we'll have to wait some time more still, 'suppose. It would be also interesting for observe to what kinds insects these to most would tempt...
The weathers having remained last weeks quite cold and from 'showering' rainy - So, for the ones already planted outside that greenhouse we'll have to wait some time more still, 'suppose. It would be also interesting for observe to what kinds insects these to most would tempt...
/ ; ...'Assuredly' and from 'assuming..', by Dok Doc-to-Power.
/ ;"approved by" , "And there's more to it..."
Pic (Nemi) : ...The Laureline from 'buzied' by her marital problems, we're then having here yet another distinctive heroine...'of the blade'. To some subsequent followin' posts, that meaning.
; This modern Goth-heiress - Nemi - seems it, of created and drawn by Lise Myhre. Didn't check from whether she a Swedish or Norwegian artists, but Nemi seems of been goin'strong from at least since the 2003.
...But beware; it's the double-sided weapon, that sword. And the blade, oh, it cuts so deep, if from well sharpened...Yet remember, also for avoid from any too hasty 'levelling'. ; And every garden, those only do grow better fromafter their 'trimming' - Still, such as we would know, all from the roses have the thorns too. And who knows, for it is not revealed for us of beforehand - Whatever one then happens to find from any - the bee, caterpillar, spider,...a collecting bug?
...So, w. that 'gobblery-bublery' - now also introducin' her for our on-coming (un-)merciful adventurous 'quests' here.
- ; '...the hour grows late, the Darkness takes it's toll, the Shadow grows taller. The age of a Man is over, the time of the...'
- ; '...the hour grows late, the Darkness takes it's toll, the Shadow grows taller. The age of a Man is over, the time of the...'
( The latest posts! - @ Mulskinner Blog @ )
----------
Powered by ScribeFire.
No comments:
Post a Comment