The Frogs Have More Fun...

Flowers



"All the names I know from nurse:
Gardener's garters, Shepherd's purse,
Bachelor's buttons, Lady's smock,
And the Lady Hollyhock.

Fairy places, Fairy things,
Fairy woods where the wild bee wings,
Tiny trees for tiny dames.
- These must all be Fairy names !"

(from Child's Garden of Verses
by R.L. Stevenson)


"Anyone can write a short-story.
A bad one, I mean."

(R.L. Stevenson)
----------------

"Science without conscience is the Soul's perdition."
- Francois Rabelais, Pantagruel
- Acc to/above is citated from: Medical Apartheid. The dark history of Medical Experimentation on Black Americans from Colonial Times to the Present, by Harriet A. Washington (Doubleday ; 2006 ; p. 1.)

----------------
"In the high society of the first half of the century, marriage, despite it's bestowal status upon the wife, was the most absurdity. Marriage, conferring instanteous rank or money, ... lost most of its prestige and moment right after the wedding. ...By the end of the century, spurred by Rousseau's moralistic Nouvelle Hèloíse, a contrary cult, that of virtue, arose. After 1770 conjugal and maternal love became not merely admissible, but, for some, moral imperatives. ...

[...]
...Rousseau, who sought for himself the crown of morality in ostensibly defending marriage, presents in his Nouvelle Hèloíse the most enticing and extended defense of illicit love ever penned. The root of the problem is that as the century progressed sensibility became confused with morality: passionate feeling, if expressed in a highly civilized mode with grace and nuance, makes us forgive the Rousseau of The Confessions, for example, his pettiness, his jealousies, his betrayals. This moral-amoral byplay, present already in the novels of Richardson, was to be more intense as the century unfolded."
-
Madelyn Gutwirth : Madame De Staèl, Novelist. The emergence of the Artist as Woman (10,15.)

;
"...As the social contract seems tame in comparison with war, so fucking and sucking come to seem merely nice, and therefore unexciting. ... To be 'nice', as to be civilized, means being alienated from this savage experience - which is entirely staged. [...] The rituals of domination and enslavement being more and more practiced, the art that is more and more devoted to rendering their themes, are perhaps only a logical extension of an affluent society's tendency to turn every part of people's lives into a taste, a choice; to invite them to regard their very lives as a (life) style." - Susan Sontag , on 'Fascinating Fascism' (-74; p 103;104-5 at Under the sign of Saturn)
; "Anyone who cannot give an account to oneself of the past three thousand years remains in darkness, without experience, living from day to day." (Goethe) - as cited by Sontag (on same compile; p. 137.)

;
"It is widely accepted that we are now living in the 'Anthropocene', a new geological epoch in which the Earth's ecosystems and climate are being fundamentally altered by the activities of humans. I loathe the term, but I can't deny that it's appropriate."
; (Goulson), Silent Earth : Averting the Insect Apocalypse (2021; p 47.)
;
"It is sometimes said that humanity is at war with nature, but the word 'war' implies a two-way conflict. Our chemical onslaught on nature is more akin to genocide. It is small wonder that our wildlife is in decline."
; (Goulson, 2021 ; 118.)
;
----------------
"If we believe absurdities, we shall commit atrocities." (Voltaire)
- Citated from; (Joy, Melanie), Why We Love Dogs, Eat Pigs and Wear Cows : An Introduction to Carnism(2010; p. 95.)
;

"In the presence of the monster, you have eyes and ears for nothing else."
; (Flora Tristan) : London Journal of Flora Tristan: the Aristocracy and the Working Class of England ; 1842-edit. (tr: 1982. ; p. 71.)

;
"Every minority invokes justice, and justice is liberty.
A party can be judged of only by the doctrine which
it professes when it is the strongest."
Mdme de Staêl
(on) 'Consideration sur le Révolution de la Francaise' [1818]


1/13/12

The Undesigned Chapter : Part VII

; The S.O.P.


Delacroix's painting (1830).
















Having spend most of my life as follower for practices of this modern and mobilized world (World of cars and fuels, the limitless production, the consumerist life-styles), I've only recently have began to think about it more closely. There's levels on that consumerism, there's levels on ecological disturbance, but all in all there's none a more enslaving product than is the car.



So, nowadays when I see my fellow companions and contemporaries 'damning' the price-lifts on the gas station, I don't much share their annoyance (of that matter). Actually, I more often cheer up and say Hurrah! (...And Yippee!). It's not from the reason that I'd feel any compassion or sympathy for those greedy and monopolistic companies, hoping to squeeze out every penny from the consumer's endless appetites for driving and spending their money on that. No, it's merely from the reason that I've begun to hope that the ever-raising prices would some day push my fellow men for think about how obedient and willing they are for exchange their earnings to nothing ...And, how our societies still are (almost completely) built on base of that oil economy.




One can of course defend one's own driving (and kilometers) under the pretext of how inherent that oil-economy is on our current culture. There's large amounts of it behind each part of modern production; Drops of it spend on most every stuff produced on agricultures and what reaches us (consumers) on markets. Amounts used (fx) on the production of fertilizers, amounts on transport sector, etc. Also, the various 'co-products', the plastics, etc. Most every chain in the production consumes - more or less – oil.




Much of that could have been built otherways, if the modern World (and societies) were been developed differently. But, at the end of it, one cannot either avoid the logical question that almost instantly formulates; How should we relate our own life-styles (notice that the preceding word is in the plural...) to that ? Or, what should I think about this economy myself? And there we are, the Slaves of Petroleum, enslaved by our own appetites for driving and that comfortability on movement.



Of course, it's also so that passing those (large) distances between places would often be difficult, unless we'd have the cars on uses. On some cases going to places without car would turn out unpossible. (Also, and more often, there's not any other option available for carrying larger amount of stuff to any particular place.)


Yet, it all appears so much due the driving economy being so integral part of those individual lifestyles. Nowadays - as I find myself little better understanding the real price of it (the price passed for the environments) - I actually always try first consider whether there's any reason for uses of car. And, inspired by this late emerged environmentalism of mine, I often find myself lots more happy if I succeed evade that habit we're all so accustomed for (ie having to drive). In fact, I find, that I'm lot better capable seeing everything around me when on the move without car (whether it's the trees, other creatures, landmarks, doesn't really matter). Equally true, appears usually more refreshing manner of movement than having to sit enclosed on that (mercifully air-conditioned) gasoline-fuelled maccina, hands tightened at the wheel and keeping watch of traffic signs. And, so much more relieving when one comes to think about not at that moment participating for the current 'Greenhouse cargo' generating (and, mostly just passed for future, or, the further generations to come).


There's nowadays several/various 'smaller scale' choices that permit a consumer to limit one's own enslavement for car (and for comparable transportation means); Start thinking the car just as vehicle, not as the investment; Start thinking changing for those modern hybrids, etc. But in brief, let these words be concised for the (metaphorically spoken) sentence that you become what you drive for. ...And (less metaphorically); The actual Revolution always begins from where begins the revolution of the mind.



 
(Also is noticeable), that by origin the oil reserves - now spend so carelessly by present human cultures – were formed of the plant matter that once grew at the humidious climates of Carboniferous era, during a time-gap of some hundreds millions years. (Carboniferous age was roughly 350 Million year in the past.) So, no wonder the environmentalists and climatologists so often tend to talk about that careless waste of non-renewable energies – in fact it's spend there continuously for the gasolines and stuffs, straight out from Mother Nature's pockets; Resources which took some unimaginable periods of times to accumulate (from view-point of/compared to any human timescales).


--------------

...What comes to our series from Fennoscandian insect and plant, we now only have an example from the latter mentioned under observation at this sequel. However, it's more than proper selection, also considering above words/ paragraphs.


On biological terms this plant in question is mentioned a representative from a (so called) 'living fossil'. Seems it said that a living fossil can either be a singular species that resembles more some foregone plants - ie those only known from fossilized material - than any currently extant group. On the other hand, living fossil(s) can as well be some species (or, usually group of plants) that have survived almost unchanged since from distant past, typically past millions years, and, resultatively there ain't any existent 'closely related species' for them. (Our exemplary species suffices to meet the latter described criteria; It belongs to a group that is ancient family among plants).


As the N.European landscapes only have 're-appeared' for their current state after passing of the latest ice ages, there fx ain't any species of the tree that could have reached our modern era/times from that far. (Neither there's not plants that would be regarded as 'living fossil' by the first described criteria , but several succeed to meet conditions of the latter presented.)

On the warmer latitudes there's also some trees from that ancient origin, I find it said. Fx, Gingko (Gingko biloba), a species of tree whose closest relates are dated to have existed from (around) Late Permian (about over 250 Million years ago), until sometime later (for the Jurassic). The whole group (Gingkoceae) seems been assumed among earliest trees that emerged early on that particular period from their 'flourishment on Earth'. Practically all the oldest tree genera belong for the Gymnosperms - Ie them are conifers generally, sometimes also referred as the Pinopsida, species with (so called) 'naked seed'; Them already existed even before the appearance of flowering plants (so called evolution of the Angiospermsabout 130 Million y. a.)



This tree (Ginkgo) has been known (for science) at least from the 19th century as it is popularly grown on parks and as the roadside tree at China (and probably from since/around that century, or little later, has been planted and cultivated for similar uses on fx Europe and American continents). Yet, not until 1950s seems it been recognized from such anciety by origin. The closest modern relatives of Gingko seem traced for the Cycads (Cycadales), present on various places from subtropic. The Cycads are also rather old lineage from earliest origin and the resembling species, or 'predessors' for their modern genera, flourished during the Trias- and Jurassic periods (roughly 250-150 M. year ago). Nowadays there exists only about 150 separate species. However, the Gingkoceae at least formerly were believed having evolved prior the emergence of modern conifer (-trees) and also from to have preceded the extinct Gnetales. (Modern research seems have re-arranged their supposed evolutionary relations by somewhat). Interesting also, that "needles" (of the Ginkgo) seem considered rather archaic and by looks them seemingly resemble more the leaves of deciduous tree than the conifers (…If wish to make any comparison to modern species of trees. Actually it's 'leafs' are said having quite unique structure among the existent trees). On N. American continent also survives some rather ancient forests, particularly the giant Redwood trees that belong for the Cupressaceae ...And their relates, this group (apparently) contains some very old genera among extant pines [...well, precisely Cupressaceae not belong to the pines, but to a more wider and more archaic group from the conifers (apparently, it's the pinus...supposedly)]

...From other ancient 'oddities' for tree seems it also proper mention the Australian Wollemia (W.nobilis), a tropical conifer related for Araucarias (Araucariaceae), and from which also is said that it's closest actual relates/similar trees existed around the Jurassic period. The few surviving Wollemia are mentioned consist of only few hundred singular trees, but I find also mentioned nowadays grown some exemplaries of it on botanical gardens, and as well there being cultivated species (or breeds from?) grown and sold for uses as household plant. However, the actual natural trees seem also mentioned to having suffered of some diseases, inflicked (apparently) by the unauthorized visitors on their growing site. So them are nowadays only allowed visited by the biologists, etc. Often such 'relic' species appear also vulnerable, even fragile to disturbation, in fact. (Also, seems it being that Wollemia may have 'resurfaced' for popular knowledge just around the time when those Dinosaur-movies were on theaters, 1994. ...But on the light of this, wouldn't it perhaps even be a complete unpossibility if there still would exist at some other places of world similarly exciting representatives of an actual Living fossil from Dinosaurian age (If wish use that term, and, meaning the very ancient trees and not the Dinosaurs, of course...)


After this inspiring (but brief) side-step from the trees, we can finally return for our examplary from the plant. (Namely, this species is Wood Horsetail, Equisetum sylvaticum). During the Carboniferous (-era, about 360-290 M. y. ago) there was actual forests formed by the now extinct families of the Sigillaria and Lepidondrales (the latter also bear as their common name 'the Scaly trees'). To neither from those early groups any surviving relatives exist on present families of the plants (acc. my understanding), but on Carboniferous there also grew several groups from Calamites, tree-like species that a lot resembled the modern Horsetail-plants (Equisetum) by outer look. These modern plants (relatives for those long vanished trees) are typical sight at the ground levels of Fennoscandian woods, ao places, and sometimes appear on various other comparable environments. Their also really nice to watch when on walks at the forest, one wouldn't really wish go tramping over those.

Equisetum Sylvaticum...See the spore on
top of the plant and leafs
(From beetle I don't know if it has
any relation for the plant; Coleopteran are
assumed evolved rather early on times, too...)


Like their long gone "predessors" on Carboniferous, the structure of the Horsetail stem is similarly hollow and it's 'leafs' grow quite resembling manner on cyclical sections. (Only that those ancient trees were lot larger, for about 10-20 meters height. Also, seems it say that - unlike the modern horsetails - the Calamites had "unifacial vascular cambium" allowing them develop wood and grow in excess of ten meters...) ...But, anyway it's said possible acquire quite a good impression from looks of Carboniferous forests from viewing those small 'green-carpets' formed by modern horsetails. Speaks on behalf their anciety also, that this family of plants speads from spores, similarly like the ferns, and not via pollination (like the later evolved plants). So, an actual relic, straight down here from that period when the present energy reserves only were on their formation. And it has survived almost unchanged for the present era, or only little changed. (Although, most part of that black liquid stuff [*], called crude, likely formed from remains of the fast growing Sigillaria-trees...But, large part also from other vegetation that grew on at the time.)


;[*] Well (...for some late addition/correction, on 23.2.2013). I guess...that I'm obliged say now that after from having written this (I've recognized) it been actually the coal-reserves which did form during those days from Carboniferous (-era) ; ...But, that's actually minor difference on what comes to these futuristic aspects (Oils, Coals, Natural gases ; Climatologically seems that this variety of ways for fossil futures differs only on the scales from some few decades, half the century maybe most... ) So, I've so far let that (minor difference) remain uncorrected, until now. However, having recently viewed that popular science book about the species from dawn of evolution (not only the animals; plants, sponges, archaea, ...etc.) by R. Fortey [Survivors. The Animals and Plants that time has left behind., 2011] ... seems a few quotes added on this also give me reason for that above 'correction'.
Few lines quoted of the book, due them make a nice descriptions from environments at Carboniferous (...of p. 212-3) [...These quoted sentences actually discuss Tuatara, the ancient 'reptilous remnants', found on some New Zealand-shoreline places;] 


"The first fossils recognized by palaeologists as reptiles are Carboniferous in age, about 318 million years old. Footprints, made by these remote second cousins of the tuatara, crossed mud flats where early relatives of the horseshoe crabs still scuttles beneath rotting vegetation; where creeks wandered through the hot and humid swamps of coal forests; while far above giant dragonflies skirted tree-sized relatives of Huperzia [some common 'spore'-plants too, like the horsetails - only them seem be even more ancient of origin], or rested briefly on horsetails and seed ferns. The Bay of Fundy in Nova Scotia, Canada, preserves both footstep and fossil in its sea cliffs. When fires raged through the ancient forests, stoked into ferocity by higher levels of atmospheric oxygen than we have today, hollow tree stumps privded the briefest haven from the heat for fleeing vertebrates, before becoming both their tomb and archive. It is a long journey through time and space from such early reptiles to their living relatives..."  

 ; ...And, here's also neat, compact description about that vascular structure the earliest plants needed form, before being able successfully spread on ground-environments (slightly earlier from geological timing);  p. 156-7:

"During the Silurian, about 420 million years ago, plants were well under way with the most important scene change in the history of our planet since the adaptation of oxygenating photosynthesis billions of years earlier. Plants had moved out of the protective and supportive bath of the waters into thin air. It was a move with unprecedented consequences. After that transformation, animals could follow, and the boundless possibilities of terrestrial life could begin to be exploited by organisms small and large. It started with a few species of herbs around muddy flats ...Huperzia and Baragwanathia [some spec. known of the Silurian fossilous remains] are vascular plants, which means that they have stiffened water-conducting tubes (tracheids) within their stams. This is the most important piece of mechanical engineering required to achieve terrestrial status; without it, plant life on land would have been a flop, in the most literal sense. Think of the hopelessly flaccid condition of seaweeds when the tide goes out. Woody, or lignified, tracheids put the backbone (not in the literal sense, this time) into the invasion of the land: they were supply pipes and scaffolding in one."
...Etc, (he) also discusses on that about this definition ('living fossil'), or more particularly from how it's merely some 'paradoxic' and 'oxymoronic' term, but I don't wish to quote too much at this. ; So, let us close these carboniferous-stories with the emphasize on carbonidioxized  speculations, emphasizing the 'unprecented consequences' ...We're possibly on the edge of some 'deeply mysterious'-questions at our times and result might just turn as the birth of 'completely new man' & era on the world-history.  (; ...For now,  returning to the main story at this...)


Finally it is also mentioned that Fennoscandian Nature being enriched from large variety of (Equisetum-) species, actually; I even find it said that almost half of the still remaining little over dozen species are presently existent there. Why so, I've not quite been able to figure out, although feels at least logical that there should appear so many (feels more peculiar, if them aren't more numerous or common on elsewhere places). Anyway, the Carboniferous is described been a period of the moisturic climates and conditions and on present landscapes of Finland (fx) there's quite plentiful small lakes and ponds (Actually, procentually more inland watery areas than at most other areas of the world) ...If that makes any argument/or suffices for good reasons explaining that versatility of Horsetails on Fennoscandias, I don't go guessing. None of them, however, grows for as large as some species on tropics, them seem mentioned to reach even a few meters of height.


And, soforth, that was the chapter about this (actual) Living fossil. Fennoscandian Equisetum (-plants) also are said having mostly benefited from the human effects on woodlands, so I've sometimes picked a few and found it most proper on uses at footbath, (fx). Traditionally, the horsetails – like many plants - also have had a variety of medical uses.
(...Albeit, at least the bogland species (Equisetum palustris) is actually said toxic, so I wouldn't try any of the Equisetum for that purpose without some expertise about them on medicinal use. Often only certain parts from plant - flowers, leafs, etc - appear toxic, while the other parts are not. And also, some plants are only usable when the leaves have just grown, or when they have not yet flowered. And vice versa, etc., ...) (G.U.J.)



-----------------















( The latest posts! - @ Mulskinner Blog @ )


----------
Powered by
ScribeFire.

No comments: