The Frogs Have More Fun...

Flowers



"All the names I know from nurse:
Gardener's garters, Shepherd's purse,
Bachelor's buttons, Lady's smock,
And the Lady Hollyhock.

Fairy places, Fairy things,
Fairy woods where the wild bee wings,
Tiny trees for tiny dames.
- These must all be Fairy names !"

(from Child's Garden of Verses
by R.L. Stevenson)


"Anyone can write a short-story.
A bad one, I mean."

(R.L. Stevenson)
----------------

"Science without conscience is the Soul's perdition."
- Francois Rabelais, Pantagruel
- Acc to/above is citated from: Medical Apartheid. The dark history of Medical Experimentation on Black Americans from Colonial Times to the Present, by Harriet A. Washington (Doubleday ; 2006 ; p. 1.)

----------------
"In the high society of the first half of the century, marriage, despite it's bestowal status upon the wife, was the most absurdity. Marriage, conferring instanteous rank or money, ... lost most of its prestige and moment right after the wedding. ...By the end of the century, spurred by Rousseau's moralistic Nouvelle Hèloíse, a contrary cult, that of virtue, arose. After 1770 conjugal and maternal love became not merely admissible, but, for some, moral imperatives. ...

[...]
...Rousseau, who sought for himself the crown of morality in ostensibly defending marriage, presents in his Nouvelle Hèloíse the most enticing and extended defense of illicit love ever penned. The root of the problem is that as the century progressed sensibility became confused with morality: passionate feeling, if expressed in a highly civilized mode with grace and nuance, makes us forgive the Rousseau of The Confessions, for example, his pettiness, his jealousies, his betrayals. This moral-amoral byplay, present already in the novels of Richardson, was to be more intense as the century unfolded."
-
Madelyn Gutwirth : Madame De Staèl, Novelist. The emergence of the Artist as Woman (10,15.)

;
"...As the social contract seems tame in comparison with war, so fucking and sucking come to seem merely nice, and therefore unexciting. ... To be 'nice', as to be civilized, means being alienated from this savage experience - which is entirely staged. [...] The rituals of domination and enslavement being more and more practiced, the art that is more and more devoted to rendering their themes, are perhaps only a logical extension of an affluent society's tendency to turn every part of people's lives into a taste, a choice; to invite them to regard their very lives as a (life) style." - Susan Sontag , on 'Fascinating Fascism' (-74; p 103;104-5 at Under the sign of Saturn)
; "Anyone who cannot give an account to oneself of the past three thousand years remains in darkness, without experience, living from day to day." (Goethe) - as cited by Sontag (on same compile; p. 137.)

;
"It is widely accepted that we are now living in the 'Anthropocene', a new geological epoch in which the Earth's ecosystems and climate are being fundamentally altered by the activities of humans. I loathe the term, but I can't deny that it's appropriate."
; (Goulson), Silent Earth : Averting the Insect Apocalypse (2021; p 47.)
;
"It is sometimes said that humanity is at war with nature, but the word 'war' implies a two-way conflict. Our chemical onslaught on nature is more akin to genocide. It is small wonder that our wildlife is in decline."
; (Goulson, 2021 ; 118.)
;
----------------
"If we believe absurdities, we shall commit atrocities." (Voltaire)
- Citated from; (Joy, Melanie), Why We Love Dogs, Eat Pigs and Wear Cows : An Introduction to Carnism(2010; p. 95.)
;

"In the presence of the monster, you have eyes and ears for nothing else."
; (Flora Tristan) : London Journal of Flora Tristan: the Aristocracy and the Working Class of England ; 1842-edit. (tr: 1982. ; p. 71.)

;
"Every minority invokes justice, and justice is liberty.
A party can be judged of only by the doctrine which
it professes when it is the strongest."
Mdme de Staêl
(on) 'Consideration sur le Révolution de la Francaise' [1818]


10/22/08

Newspost#241008

Returning to maintain the infrequent order of our posts, we now select weeks main topics from completely other areas than the phone-, cloud-, road- or home-computing. So, in opposite to our customary practices, we focus on regular world news, mainly the ones we've picked from BBC (recent months/weeks). However, being keen followers of Mozilla's products, we can't let ourselves pass by just without noticing a few quite recent creations: 1st comes the betas from the awaited Firefox 3.1 version; As well as TraceMonkey script engine, it is now publicly announced to also contain Geode, an extension for use as easy (geo)locationer, supported already on many websites. As well as that, there's now also Ubiquety (Guess I spelled the name/project correct...), another relatively recent extension to help any regular users to create simple web-apps for their pages decoration, etc, even without any extra skills. Hey ho, let's go!


Challenging the archeological theories of human origins..Perhaps surprisingly, but quite convincingly(maybe) the scientist have confirmed that modern humans must be of relatively recent (some 100 000 years past, at most) Out-of-Africa-in-origin (genetics also 'can prove' that inhabitants of other areas of world have quite unique genetic inheritance lacking some multiple forms in DNA found on Africans.) Briefly simplified the alternative theory, multiregional model claims that people today evolved directly- and/or less-directly in separate areas around the Globe from descendants of Homo Erectus (who inhabited the Earth some 1.2 M years ago). Whatever the explanations, anyway most suppose that Homo Sapiens migrated from Africa to Near East someabout 70 000 years ago, and, now they even believe they've discovered the route and placings for that migration past Saharan deserts(they also suppose that the first group of people, containing the 'modern man' genes might have been as small as some 150 people). We don't necessary disagree with either theory (most likely answer between competing scientists often lies in-between) but cannot help but noticing that making some conclusions from 1 Millenia (100000) ago is almost as difficult as from some 1 Million years past. Small group of people, led by that revolutionary man who first decided to leave 'the homeground' might have traveled to Levant by the routes said (the newly discovered rivers that existed at the time), but who says how quickly they then might have traveled? Couldn't they actually have gone around everywhere similarly, much quicker speed than seems to be the 'prevailing belief'? The natural conclusion that follows is that who says the Australian aboriginals(ancestors) got to continent some 40 000 year ago? To prove that hypothesis, it has been confirmed (at least on archeological basis) that ancient Man/Lady found from Lake Mungo have lived there around 40 000 years past, as these are the oldest human remains found there. Since the Australia was among first areas to be inhabited by 'modern humans' (pre Cro Magnon man never got there, they seem to think), we just suppose, that almost as likely they must have gone there by boat, via islands (known as Indonesian archipelago or something like that...) Who say they didn't? But as the archeology is our favorite field of guessing and making puzzling theories we're just as happy to add that the main reason for such belief, the loss of pre human remains, doesn't anyway prove the theory of 'late-comers'. Even less that it should have taken some 20 to 30 000 years for them just to get there (even considering changes in climatic circumstances like icy periods, the hunter-gather anthropologist theories, etc). There should be some archeological evidence but hasn't been found? Has been found? We don't know, but simply think that people practically moved to many parts of the world a lot faster than seems to be common belief. Didn't they? Do they actually believe so?


On more recent founds theres that old here-we-go-round-the-table song...world oil prices have fallen to almost 'normal'-state of some 70-90 $ barrel from recent summer 140 $ all time high... but nobody actually knows why. Many argue that Peak oil has likely been reached, being most obvious the reason? As well as connected to uncertainties about supply, oil prices are traditionally dependant on numerous speculative factors. In theory, they say even things like rocket testing in North Korea might include as speculative cause (for price hikes)...So, there comes the ambiguos conclusion: "In a market with such a serious shortage of reliable information, as long as enough people believe that a factor will affect the oil price, it will. " Uncertainty about the adequacy of oil, seems to also have been main cause for recent price hikes. Yet, they still can (have for some 20 years so far) promise that there's still plenty for driving economics and consumption to some 40 years onwards. But, also as is generally known, actually over 60 per cent from reserves is from Middle-East, as European and North American production can't even fullfill their own demand, expectable to remain equally high in the future. So...if the price rallye (on fuel) was a sign of changing economics there's actually only of the same to be expected. How soon? Well, we are given these quite comforting sentences: "While the forecast is controversial and extremely bullish, even allowing for some increase in capacity over the next few years, a supply crunch appears likely around 2013," Speculations are that at the time the price heights might reach something like 200 $ barrel, but also that this might even quickly be shifted to selling prices causing new hikes as well (the reality is, luckily, as much speculative as anything on this field of market economics). But, if there's something to be certain of, its: "world demand for oil will grow by 50 per cent between now and 2030 as people in developing countries drive more cars. " As all this seems quite expectable, any suggestions we (ourselves always willing to share good ideas for free...), might give? Simple. Better start walking Joe. And don't forget to cut off that PS3 and Ipod-carriable Sound Speaker with SuperBass too, as there's going to be increasing demand for electricity and biofuels as well...


...On other areas of (relatively) recent crisis in news, we focus on report about food prices at the same time. One sometimes learns a bit from reports given on situations elsewhere. So, it feels that a litre of milk doesn't actually cost that much, as its about the same as ”two thirds of India's population are forced to get by " [on daily basis] , that being ”...less than two dollars (£1.15; 1.47 euros) a day”. And the money now ”buys less than it used to”... In Egypt, food prices (as country is worlds largest importer of wheat) have also hit the poor hardest, but they say it looks better as what used to be 480 $ a tonne has now fallen under 200 $ a tonne...In UK meat and fish prices rose some 22.9 per cent from January to August, as a result (of overall rising prices);”41 per cent of shoppers have switched to cheaper brands, with two-thirds searching for promotions and deals more often than a year ago.” ...in China they are optimistic as the inflation ”would slow to 3% in 2009 from a high of 8.7 per cent earlier this year.” ...In Ethiopia, prices ”have more than doubled in the past year here.”, and of a sack of wheat sells by double price on road, reason for that?: ”...likely there is just not enough food in the country. ” ...In Thailand rice ” is still double what was being paid last year. ”, surprisingly the farmers weren't getting any richer. ...Lastly, in Argentina prices were also on rise but ”...to get an idea of just how much will depend on who you talk to.” On the contrary to official opinion common guess given was ”more than 20 per cent annually. ” The droughts and increases on export taxes weren't welcomed with cheers either. ...Ending our citations here, there seems to be plenty of various alterations on differenr food economics as well as there must be various reasons for high prices. We just mention, in case we didn't mention this earlier... some 15 years ago they promised that biogenetics would solve the food problems, especially the ones at developing world...Who did? Go and find out... (Actually there´s plenty, of course).


No comments: