Deprivation Economics A term formulated by us, though we may likely have omitted it from somewhere but can't just recall in which context...Obviously, there exist several differing explanations, not necessary in similar vein as our conception for such economic/ sociologic conditions. With deprivation economics, we mean simply: the forms of western (capitalistic) economy where the advances in economical field are acquired without respect for well-being of other groups (of people). Term is applicable in between the Developed World and the Developing countries, where the underdeveloping (the others) is seen as an intentional purpose, often realized by several methods including deprivating the resources, work-force and/or environmental surroundings, mostly in areas of the Developing World. The term can also be applied in circumstances inside the western/Developed world countries economics, where increasements of unfairness and inequality are created socially/geo-economically constructed deprivation inside the existing economic growth. As to complex the definition in question;), the term also includes in its meaning several other aspects such as: the repeating sharp criss-crossings in rates of exchanges, resulting more or less frequently to the downward falls on the (stock) markets; also as well the deprivation of social welfare institutions. We, according to our own formulated view, see these situations more or less a result from previously described unbalanced and intentionally maintained economic uncertainty, briefly said; as consequences from seeking the maxim short-sighted profit-making in the markets that are already fulfilled with the stuff to the level that there's not any real demand for more (not to mention the indifference on what the price in general, fx for the society may be.) Also, deprivation economics as the accepted form of economics, taken for granted as the existing state-of-things in most developed countries by most people (no alternatives exist/ can easily break the rule) and therefore can be seen in parallel with capitalism (=as being its current state).
It can be added, the whole phenomenom (and its results; like the downward trend of socio-economic ”safe-nets” and insecure world markets) has actually been foresighted most profound in the 1990's at the latest, by several sociologists and socio-economic thinkers (we are not to list names spesicifally as there's several theoretically formulated futuristics, think fx as one of the early such theories U. Becks Risksociety1 where(also) such presuppositions on socioeconomic situations in question are discussed). Also, by several thinkers(...Not to mention the many preconceptions of the ecological consequences from much longer time, mainly given by environmentalists, fx.) the current form of consumer economics has been predicted to reach its limit in 20-30 years, but we as always optimistic see no such signs in ongoing trend. Instead, if environmental and human limits are not reached within that time, we predict that overally the deprivation economics will continue in existence as dominating model for economics even for longer period, say at least some 50 years. At the same time, the ultimate fragmentation of society and also apparent climate crisis will prepare the way for the end of current form of consumer capitalism. The resultative economic/politic period is harder to predict, most likely anyway, the developing and technological advancements and (possibly) the urgent environmental threats will cause the unavoidable change in human value-system and as such also (hopefully) affect the resultative form of the past mid-century capitalistic economics.
In continuing (our definitions) of the term, deprivation economics is also rooted on Marxist tradition, mainly the 'Grundgrisse'-theory but shouldn't in nowadays world necessary be limited to socialistic/capitalistic-dichotomies. Similarly to definitions of capitalism in many globalization theories, deprivation economics can be seen as the most advanced, yet not at all unavoidable form of global economics. In short, its main typical characteristics include unfair exchange and unnecessary increases in production(unfortunately as well, the markets devoted to producing and selling unnecessary large amounts of mainly useless and ecologically questionably produced consumerist garbage), and, also similarly unnecessary weighed emphasis on increasements in economic growth and consumer society values.
Past modern (Cybersociety) Also a term propably loaned from somewhere, and as differing from cultural theory of the postmodern, our definitions (for past modern) mark the complete lack of fragments/signs, typical as relics from modern society. In pastmodern the process of change is over, and culture is mostly dominated by postraditionalist and cybertechnologist forms and reference-systems. The aforementined include, but are not limited to, fx microtechnics devices appearing as virtually everywhere, (ao) in peoples pockets. Similarly, datanets availability almost everywhere is one form of such typical technological developments. Culturally, self irony has become just one of the many apparent characteristics in mass-media channels, like TV's change towards even more translucent entertainment media. Also, in 'past modern' the prevailing cultural 'heritage' mainly becomes a natural supply/storehouse for culturally valued references (instead of being intentionally addressed in certain limited contexts such as culturally specified areas / art works). As result, it continues its existence as forms of nostalgy (among ot her forms) in combination with technically advanced areas like wireles communications/cellphones dominated nets. That also means the change of attitude towards the aspects pointed in references, mainly in form the past (history) is viewed in previously mentioned cybersociety platforms. From our point-of-view past modern can be seen as democratizing process (culturally) but also nourishment of some of the values most visible in preceding cultural forms: equally shared belief on certain continuity(of the culture) and as such belief in some expectable conclusive form the culture is developing towards.
Overally typical is also increasing hyperconsumentarism (consuming for consumings sake) in past modern society. As an level of cultural process the fragmentation of welfare society, past modern includes limitless number of available new communication channels and the change towards more diversified level of communicative media production (peoples own produced information, news and media in an incresing amount). Both, self-irony and the emphasis on consumerism are also taken as continuous reality, not as any patterns of on-going change towars certain futuristic model.
As said before, our theoremas (and the term itself) for the past modern are also more or less generated from other similar definitions from (mostly) 1990's cultural theory...
Technological Frontend(s) The term, rarely seen in use elsewhere than by us, naturally means the latest technical advancements(mostly mentioned on the fields of computing/datanets). It therefore includes the latest apparent inventions and creations to make things working more efficient, easier, smoothly, but also/or creating new channels of uses, etc. However, term has also the negative impact, that can most easily be described by words (as said by friend of mine): ”How the automatisation these days is destroying everything.” Thats the downside, mainly apparent in overseeing and neglect on sometimes more traditional and human methods of communication. Technological frontends are often most apparent in matters concerning the revolutionary effect net (fx) has had on peoples lifes, changing life-styles and in the same time abandonment of older or relatively recent things (like traditional, centuries old human communication systems/channels, but also as well recent technical developments of devices, power sources, networks, etc). In short, putting effective systems out of use, not on the basis of newer being better, but to sell such newer inventions on consumer market. Technological frontend can mean any form of machinery/automated process, but we mainly use it in the context of computers and the net, as it is our main topics of concern, mostly.
Websphere Not to be confused with blogosphere, which is a more limited term (blogosphere as defined on Technocrati's State of Blogosphere 2008(link) report is ” is the collective community of all blogs. Since all blogs are on the Internet by definition, they may be seen as interconnected and socially networked. Discussions 'in the Blogosphere' have been used by the media as a gauge of public opinion on various issues.”. Websphere (as defined by us), means the whole complete entity of accessible different and complex systems (networks) generally known as the Information Communication Technology(ICT) in todays society. Characteristic for these is that they can be participated (often/increasingly via wireless nets) and also them content can often be modified by participants (impact often depends on users technical/cultural capabilities and/or available networks capabilities). Shortly defined as 'user's web-experience' this compares to users experience in any certain available 'matrix' , comprising from mainly extra physical elements like fx net as special form of literature/culture participated, GUI2/programming interfaces and various platforms used. Websphere naturally contains (ao) the text, media and various other cultural forms, mostly in context of Internet. It maintains its existence within these communication networks, created on the basis of use of certain technological devices, mainly Personal Computers and nets serving-nodes (comprising among other things the electronic data-storages and programmed, automated functionalities of the web). However as a formulation, similarly to blogsphere, websphere is mainly non-physical and ontological in form and originates more from human actions and communication than the actual forms of software and/or hardware in use. Also, a talk concerning the web-originated technologies/cultural forms, internets typical characteristics, these days most apparently especially the 'web 2.0'-services, can be seen as participating in creation of the 'websphere'.
These were propably the (few) most typical terms we've often used. One at first sight might pay attention to them without exactly aware from our definitions and as such these clarifications are useful to avoid misinterpretations. Also, like said, differing definitions for these do exist...
Notes:
1. Beck, Ulrich, 1992, Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. (orig. Risikogesellschaft, published in 1986).
2. Graphical User Interface (=the OS's main viewed outer appearance on LCD or TFT, fx)
No comments:
Post a Comment