The Frogs Have More Fun...

Flowers



"All the names I know from nurse:
Gardener's garters, Shepherd's purse,
Bachelor's buttons, Lady's smock,
And the Lady Hollyhock.

Fairy places, Fairy things,
Fairy woods where the wild bee wings,
Tiny trees for tiny dames.
- These must all be Fairy names !"

(from Child's Garden of Verses
by R.L. Stevenson)


"Anyone can write a short-story.
A bad one, I mean."

(R.L. Stevenson)
----------------

"Science without conscience is the Soul's perdition."
- Francois Rabelais, Pantagruel
- Acc to/above is citated from: Medical Apartheid. The dark history of Medical Experimentation on Black Americans from Colonial Times to the Present, by Harriet A. Washington (Doubleday ; 2006 ; p. 1.)

----------------
"In the high society of the first half of the century, marriage, despite it's bestowal status upon the wife, was the most absurdity. Marriage, conferring instanteous rank or money, ... lost most of its prestige and moment right after the wedding. ...By the end of the century, spurred by Rousseau's moralistic Nouvelle Hèloíse, a contrary cult, that of virtue, arose. After 1770 conjugal and maternal love became not merely admissible, but, for some, moral imperatives. ...

[...]
...Rousseau, who sought for himself the crown of morality in ostensibly defending marriage, presents in his Nouvelle Hèloíse the most enticing and extended defense of illicit love ever penned. The root of the problem is that as the century progressed sensibility became confused with morality: passionate feeling, if expressed in a highly civilized mode with grace and nuance, makes us forgive the Rousseau of The Confessions, for example, his pettiness, his jealousies, his betrayals. This moral-amoral byplay, present already in the novels of Richardson, was to be more intense as the century unfolded."
-
Madelyn Gutwirth : Madame De Staèl, Novelist. The emergence of the Artist as Woman (10,15.)

;
"...As the social contract seems tame in comparison with war, so fucking and sucking come to seem merely nice, and therefore unexciting. ... To be 'nice', as to be civilized, means being alienated from this savage experience - which is entirely staged. [...] The rituals of domination and enslavement being more and more practiced, the art that is more and more devoted to rendering their themes, are perhaps only a logical extension of an affluent society's tendency to turn every part of people's lives into a taste, a choice; to invite them to regard their very lives as a (life) style." - Susan Sontag , on 'Fascinating Fascism' (-74; p 103;104-5 at Under the sign of Saturn)
; "Anyone who cannot give an account to oneself of the past three thousand years remains in darkness, without experience, living from day to day." (Goethe) - as cited by Sontag (on same compile; p. 137.)

;
"It is widely accepted that we are now living in the 'Anthropocene', a new geological epoch in which the Earth's ecosystems and climate are being fundamentally altered by the activities of humans. I loathe the term, but I can't deny that it's appropriate."
; (Goulson), Silent Earth : Averting the Insect Apocalypse (2021; p 47.)
;
"It is sometimes said that humanity is at war with nature, but the word 'war' implies a two-way conflict. Our chemical onslaught on nature is more akin to genocide. It is small wonder that our wildlife is in decline."
; (Goulson, 2021 ; 118.)
;
----------------
"If we believe absurdities, we shall commit atrocities." (Voltaire)
- Citated from; (Joy, Melanie), Why We Love Dogs, Eat Pigs and Wear Cows : An Introduction to Carnism(2010; p. 95.)
;

"In the presence of the monster, you have eyes and ears for nothing else."
; (Flora Tristan) : London Journal of Flora Tristan: the Aristocracy and the Working Class of England ; 1842-edit. (tr: 1982. ; p. 71.)

;
"Every minority invokes justice, and justice is liberty.
A party can be judged of only by the doctrine which
it professes when it is the strongest."
Mdme de Staêl
(on) 'Consideration sur le Révolution de la Francaise' [1818]


9/6/15

'After-Dark-Amorous',or, Lady chatterbox...


 ; Has to be said that, as usual here, we're likely devote our main attention on the subsequent posts for quite various topic. Yet, I suppose, main part from them would be on the books, plants (/herbs, trees) - and, what happens then from feel like suitable. ...Seems that our 'Unca Don'-series closing to it's end, and probably the plants-posts also on some sort pause - temporarily at least - leaves us to wonder what else we'd concentrate our attention on. But, resultatively, decided that at least on some of followed sequels their main focus would be on - the Love.
Has to be said then, quite as well, that there's all kinds of love in the world. I mean, there's most various conceptions and varieties of human life you think might have something to do w. (that). There's - fx - sensuelt love, there's love of gardening, love for the money, love for the fame, religious love ('love of God' in practical sense - we discuss that not here - for it's quite unlikely we'd have anything much to say on that), love for the philosophy, sisterly/brotherly love, parental love, love of the flowers...Almost anything you could think about, humans have the habit from finding (that) having smtgh to do w. (-so called-) Luuv. (A most humanly emotion, that is, obviously. And why not, it's often considered worth all kinds of sacrifices and suffering, quite as well noticeable...in short; There's possibly not much anything new or original, we could invent concerning love, but the focus on that, at least on (some) from followed posts.)
 ------------ 

Oxhearts...in the 'love-bowl.'
; ...Then of completely different aspects mentioned, that during this summery season cultivated some tomatoes (...as my beloved hobby has been for some time now.) The Summer wasn't precisely too supportive (Here having it rained most from the July, sun occasionally shined. Luckily, the August was yet much better...) - but yet I had at least some harvest, finally. I cultivated these beside 'Love apples' (Like goes the Italian saying, or was it by some other foreign folks, I've no idea...but anyway, indeed, the tomatoes look, a little, like apples - ever wondered where that originating? They say that potatoes appear known as 'pommes de terra' (on French),  the 'earth apples' - so maybe the tomato then quite similarly has to carry the name of the 'love apple'. A most usual colour on the love-symbols, et sim, I suppose...along that  pink, but it's a more modern creations, likely... Whatever the origins to those namings, they're generally just terms... - Btw, I also regularly farm potatoes as they're most easy to grow w. a minimum from any additional fertilizing - if the soils from any good. I usually use mainly same fertilizing to them as for onions, only generally them need less by amount. Organically farmed easily and quite effortless unless you want grow any larger fields...which they say is bit more troublesome due because of their vulnerability for pest.) ; ...But, I cultivated this year an old (at least here), traditional species of tomato, 'Oxheart'. And indeed, some of my (unfortunate few, but plenty enough) ripened fruits resemble, a little, for hearts. Like that beside in the pic (Actually it's plum-tomato, by definition, yet funnily some of the first harvested grew for such large - in lack of the good ripening warmy sunshine days during that July - that I first supposed maybe I actually had bought seeds of the beef-tomatoes...But, the colder autumn Months advancing that must've enslowed growth and the rest of them grew to about this regular-sized, or for slight larger tomato.) Tasty...and the best thing is from grow them by your own. Few things make one happier than the first tomatos of the season. Of course they need lots love and care prior that...
 ------------
Abutillon x hybridium (flowers)

; Then - just mentioning here, in passing - that for these plants-series I also considered some additional post on the house-hold plants. ...As I actually have plenty, only problem would actually be of which particular species to choose for it. So far, not anything else on that forethought, here just mentioned to some of the subsequent topics... ; However, as some foretaste-of-the-future, here then presented these lovely flowerings by one of my household/indoor plants - Abutillon (x hybridium, by latin/scientific name - I don't know whether them are known, generally, w. some name on English.) Like many old indoor plant, they're hybrids of the various origin-species, which were brough for Europe around the (late) renaissance-period - that said...w. reservation from that my findings should happen hold a precise/most recent  information. ; Anyway, seems that the plant(s) originated of the S.Americas and were brought for decoratives rather early soon after the 'first' over-seas/-Atlantic voyages (So all the species known as indoor plants are hybrids, bred to each other early by that timing. So, their actual origin species - as the usual in case on these things, at least prior there were those dna-techniques - (maybe) is somewhat disputed/difficult trace. There's about some hundreds close spec.  in the Nature, most likely.. 
;...Having grown this flower of the seed I've learned bunch of things during cultivating it: For example the seeds are rather easy to make grow, but then the young 'saplings' are rather delicate from direct sunlight (...Them easily begin loosing leafs, if kept too long under direct shine). Also, it has to be permanent kept on suitable moisture (not overmuch, though) while bit later on growth.  I also noticed it rather easy them to 'overgrow', ie grows too fast, and therefore it seems adviced 'cutting the tops', from time to time, during the early growth (...Of course, only when they're grown for adequate high. That also increases the leafs groth - I didn't, of course, at first notice to do the cutting, and resultatively my plants then actually did grow for quite some overheight...which made look little like 'ragamuffins', so to say... :) ; As could be guessed of their S.American origins, (the Abutillons) are in summer periods best kept well-moistured and -fertilized. But, generally, once they've grown for large enough - or at least from the 2nd summer onwards - it can flower very luxuberantly and continously through most of the summer. (That, w. reminder from one remembering to keep them properly moistured - I read, some place, that during hot summer day a singular large plant can evaporate about 2 l water...) ; Here North them also need be kept in a bit colder, during darker winter months, of course. ...But such a lovely flower - and once it having grown larger (the pot needs to be changed a few times on summer, it grows so quick), is relative easy to keep flourishing. 

 ; ...Funny thing I've also noticed, as is the case from plants usually, that the growth can be quite quick, or goes on some rapid cycles. Namely, sometimes when you in the Summer Months have added the waters and fertilizing, it seems from to grow the extensions (/'twigs'), by almost overnight. Then, in the morning, sometimes, one can discover the said huge growths emerged almost during the same night and already several buds of the flowers starting to form (...them emerge almost equally fast, at least when it's continuosly good sunshine weather) ...Household gardening a good hobby, once you learn it's tricks - 'cause each plant has it's very own particular characteristics. ; G-U-J.
; ...B-t-w, I also experimented w. growing some other lovely Solanum-family plants, namely these Phys. Peruviana ('Cape Gooseberry', by some of the more usual from it's regular names). It's apparently almost as easy to grow as tomatoes (...In fact easier, as the berries are somewhat smaller - if there happens to be enough of the sunshine/warmth during summer. But it grows slower, in overall.). Don't seem I can expect it to make much harvest this year...since the circumstances above described. But the berries are pretty good, they sell them also on shops nowadays quite some times. Of course, it can't be grown here w. shorter summer season, except at the greenhouse. But how lovely the flowers on this cultivable delicacy too... (Seems it also that the main family, Solanum, is named after the Sun - Quite proper, they only grow fast when it shines brighly, temperatures ca over 20 C average minimum.) Good cultivables, I only used the same fertilizing (Bb) than w. the tomatoes, ...plus a little addit. nitrogen-containing fertilizer, few times on season.
Cape Gooseberry Flower.
---------- 

  ( The latest posts! - @ Mulskinner Blog @ )

----------
Powered by
ScribeFire.

8/22/15

Common Knowledge, '...irrecoverable and inconsolable'




“This set the tramps talking about history, and a very old man declared that the 'one bite law' was a survival from days when the nobles hunted men instead of deer. Some of the others laughed at him, but he had the idea in his head. He had heard, too, of Corn Laws, and the jus primae noctis (he belived it had really existed), also of the Great Rebellion, which he thought was a rebellion of poor against rich – perhaps he had got it mixed up with the peasant rebellions. I doubt whether the old man could read, and certainly he was not repeating newspaper articles. His scraps of history had been passed from generation to generation of tramps, perhaps for centuries in some cases. It was oral tradition lingering on, like a faint echo from the Middle Ages.” 
 ; ...from Orwell's Down and out in Paris and London. , novel, p. 1933. (;...on Penguin pp, p 204.)

”He abhorred violence, yet served as a soldier.”  ; ...T.R.Fyvel on Orwell, at George Orwell. A personal memoir. (f.p. 1982), p 209.

--------------------------------------------------  
"... - like love, the words know no boundaries. But of words you know how to treat'em right...they like as much cheatin', beatin' and twistin' as any good fib. (On Stevenson's [,R.L.] terms: 'Anyone can write a short-story. A bad one, I mean.') In case of love, no way. Your on own – loves purely stuck on emotion. You can't cut it off from that connection. ..."
----------------------------------------------------- 

"... In fact, I think I've referred for some past histories of related interest, on several prior posts, briefly but continously on this blog – on 'closeby' topics, if not directly comparable for the main subject at this. ...Fx; here, here and – I suppose – at some forthcoming post also, we can surely suppose to discuss resembling things..." --------------------------------------------------  


 " ... the basics is very simple: the whole global nuclear s**t-hold appears represent the unpleasant remainder of those decades of fear, oppression and dominance - generally known in history w. term cold war. (You are allowed, even invited to interpret this text as a plea for disarmament of the nuclear weaponry, but personally I think that s**t-hold consisting as much also the so called peaceful uses of nuclear energy. And guess'll I'm not a sole person who thinks so...)"
 
-----------------------------------------------------


; And, that:" - Like I'd ask alterations but blue sky on our circumstances...", ...like was or could've would've been the some 'visionary words' shortly quoted at the original written words devoted these viewpoints. ...But, I find you probably not/did not adequately consider/make clear for yourself the said commitments/view-points addressed at the words I was using - fx the short quots on above - of dat  former presented 'version'.  ; ...So I don't here care from citing 'Unca Burroughs' (, W.S. 1914-2004) much elsemore on this instance (...the y. 1968 was probably more considerable turning point in history than today is, yet the same questions unanswered - of global humanity's viewpoint - remain practically stabile and disadvantagious to development of free democratic societies, ...ao.)

; ...To take a very cool attitude on these things I could perhaps state that the truly independent 'beings' (...humans, read that term) wouldn't actually possess any enemies. No, some obstacles or some adversories, maybe, but the true species of the Nature can't actually allow themselves such luxury as to considering others for it's 'enemies' (...Of course there are seemingly opposite examples from the Nature, for example the Ants generally are known from species that continuously war and enslave their 'co-species' and colonies, ...but only seemingly so, no living being - except the humans - has ever been too stupid to endanger the existence of its kind by warring against it's own race. Many predative species also fx hunt by packs, and even occasionally seem to kill for no practical reasonability, but even so - them doesn't either behave due because of the pure 'cruelty' that way. It's more kind of an instinct. Besides, from many such cases it been shown traceable to some practical reasons too, winter-stocks, fx, etc...) ; By the same logic you are soon to conclude that any state possessing nuclears ever isn't and can't be an independent nation - for it doesn't allow it's citizens any form of independence about that ugly 'past heritage', the cold war supervision, surveillance and mass-control over an individual - And, of course I care also to point out that what said priorly about weaponry quite practically is relevant and identifiable to the burden from nuclear power production (...'-units and facilities', '-plants', or whatever by term mostly used.) ; Actually, ethically considering, 'the power' and 'independence' as values, or for aims disequate each other... 

[...The pic below - ...on a second thought I decided it better use this less emotionally loaded and less sentimental, more usually seen Orwell-pic instead. (But notice, the text here not any manner altered - except perhaps, possibly w. some footnote we might a bit later add for this - my intention here not to entertain, as I've formely mentioned. Lewis' book pic taken from, seems also contain, actually begins, w. a noteworthy 'Orwellian' phrase, often quoted: 'If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell the people what they do not want to hear.' Exactly. [...since from writing that I, fx, did discover that it'd, perhaps, be somewhat informative to little discuss on these few Orwell-bio's of the 1980s (some that I'd time to read on)  - in the light from what Orwell himself said at his wartime, and post WW II-writings (...for example, I find a mention about him, sort of, 'inventing' (british) 'left-wing patriotism' quite misleading an interpretation - or at least shortcoming, considering the various aspects/meaning of the topics addressed on that book there appears referred, ie Orwell's The Lion and the Unicorn, p.1941,...but naturally I can't devote so much time on all of these things worth consideration. And, like noted elsewhere/priorly my better familiarity on most of these around 1940s writings by Orwell is rather recent gained. But, guess we'll later devote a few words on that, when a time/chance allows...] ; From this pic below, it is also interesting observe how much it resembles, much indeed, the typical politcal advertisement and poster depictions (seen esp. often prior the electorials),  ...Or, the heroic and dramatical, 'gaze towards the future', etc. type-tradition on painting, on the photography, etc. (...In short, I think it neither not accident just this particular photo been selected on that 1981 short-bio from Orwell, published ca around/closely the time from Orwell's 'rediscovery' at Briton press and literature, I just suppose... Actually, I'd preferred the pic where he's typing his typewriter...but I didn't bother for the trouble of checking that out.) ]

; But, telling ya smtgh additional aspects too: While considering these things (nucleus of the nuclear weapons, armaments and 'production'), I actually - for a while - felt that overwhelming frustration over my whole being. It felt as some apatizing and overpossessive exhaust and weakness. (Mostly usually always I have, of some mind-of-state, merely the 'high spirits', I've not often falling on victim of depression, and probably that's also why I noticed it for so emotionally strong a frustration.) And so I considered how it must've felt pretty much the similar emotionally - but far more desperating and overwhelming - by people on begins of the so called 'atomic era', the period of times when the first bombs were created and used, against the people. The mass-supervision weapons in question from nuclears - and that's also why one should take some caution for one's reaction on those global cruelties (their production and arms race) - People may think themselves nowadays on more free from those past fobias and mass-dominance systems ('the Big Brother'), but renownly fx Orwell (G., 1906-1950) at his times already warned countries any foreign wars of been always fought only for the interests of money-oriented arms producers and weaponry manufacture companies. (...As was seen and often been acknownledged, during the some past decade(s), most recently, historically thinking). In the 'nuclear age' also any defensive war actually ceases exist as a 'justified cause' to a war (Any potential destruction, any resulted causes would always be global - and there's not any preventative defense or excuses. Not that there ever would be any defensible violence, in case used by the stronger.)

; ...But I've not just to mention inpassing of the (so called) 'Orwellian precautions' (...meaning those tools of dominance, the potential urge by the state over it's individuel citizens, most effectually immortalized on his famous 1984-novel.). That's due because I'm merely thinking one shouldn't have to feel just that level of desperation, by presently. People generally, Orwell often noted as some exception (that's why he's been so appreciated from historical view-point shared by many), couldn't assume or know just what kind of futures the recent global war-stricken world was going to see by 1950s. The World War just had ended and most probably generally felt more of a relief...at least those whom had time or ways to think about these aspects. Only - like I've earlier referred for - the global hatred generated by the time of that era of history was probably smtgh that we feel it difficult imagine by now. (So, in the middle from your global 'consumerist doping', you should take precautions too.) , ...And like any good archeologist could remind you, there's not any guarantee from our 'present form of civilization' of to remain for as such any permanent, lasting 'achievement'. That's probably the greatest and most disgusting burden brought by the age of nuclear generation - there is not any permanent guarantee from the arms, wastes, pollution to remain 'safely storaged' - if one cares to think about it for a period from few centuries, even few decades postward the moment. We don't how the oncoming times will turn out, yet something can be done: Let's get rid of all those dominative, atrocious, mendacious forms of 'production' (energies or armaments, not so much a difference, actually). In short - One of the greatest benefits the humanity could arrange for itself would've the continous dissolution of these systems addressed. (Or, think it for the planet's benefit, by-the-way...). Nowadays, the wastes are just entombed - and that ain't any real solution like everyone knows, instintively or by knowledge of facts.

; ...Actually I was reading quite a lot by Orwell most recent, at least partly inspired by the thoughts here shortly considered (...as I had not so much familiarized w. the man or his 'other works' - generally people just know the 1984 (p. 1948) and the Animal farm (p. on 1940, I suppose). Recently, I suppose, must've read about half, or at least some one third from Orwell's better known writing, fiction and non-fiction (some only casually paging, though). And I was slight surprised to find how versatile and productive a writer Owell really was. Most successfull author's of course are...But did you know, fx, that the man - 'practically', if not perhaps 'literally' - worked himself to death when putting on papers that famous last novel of his' ? (Like most of the people on those times, in the midst or after the crises from any war, Orwell's life had a lot grief too - fx his first wife died closely prior the ending of the second word war.) 

So, the circumstances during when that great book - written about the tyranny by state/nations/officially sanctioned supervisory-systems over it's individual(s) came to being were many ways rather quite unique too. Those 'Orwellian precautions' remain, whether or not you'd care to consider them. And, even that the times of ours are quite distant from those and the disguises by this 'era of ours', luckily or unluckily, however the view-point adapted, contain rather different cautions (and likely more fruithfull seeds too) - At least partly that shadow of nuclear threat is less felt as having any dominance over...the 'citizen'. Generally speaking, and  finally saying, I'm only mentioning Orwell's renown essay on nationalism, written shortly post 1945...aged by now as such, but worth consideration  too. (As I think the concept itself as well for only a remainder of those moulded pasts, the 1800s. I mean, naturally you can have a national pride and faith in some 'unity' or combination of peoples forming a so called 'country'. But as long as there's not any guarantee that your government serves the interests of the global better, not its own - or, by the riches - you can throw the whole lot from that nationalism into the dustbin. So did Orwell, and so do I.) At  least, if I consider that global future of ours shall have any better chances. 


So... [Footnote:] 
;...At first I actually considered this footnote from to further discuss on that term/concept nationalism, on basis from Orwell's observations (...closely after and around the war years, ie about 1940-46, ca). But first thing to admit would be that Orwell's contemplations are very much tied for his own times and, besides, like said my own familiarity on them not too overwhelmingly comprihensive so...I actually considered it wiser advice anybody to check of that by themselves - from fx his Collected Essays, Journalism and Letters, publ. from btw 1920-1950 (ed. by Orwell - Angus, on 1960s). [...Of my own thinking on this, shall it suffice here if I shortly notice from to think for, so called, an ethnic identity in every sense far more sensible and understandable as term as the - more popular term by almost any state, a - so called - citizenship, or even worse, a national identity. ...And, if one then considers the various ethnic minorities of the world, often mistreated or deprived of their natural rights, (by the - so called - ethnic 'majorities') - one finds soon a lot enough reasons from to despise any overt boasting about the - so called- state nationality. But that just for a mention on this. After all, nobody ever asked me from to offer any views of mine on nationalism, or merely from those (various) ugly-sides of it, historically and presently...] 
; ...Then I also considered whether I'd say on this smtgh else on nuclears, or, about the nuclear - so called -powers, -states, or, '-arms-race'. ...But, yet I again considered that anyone wishing to find about what the knowledge/information they are (likely) deprived from by their own governments, there's a lot of peace-organisations and information on the nuclears, available fx in the net.  - So, shall it suffice if I notice from think that the greatest threat on world peace - probably as much nowadays than on Orwell's times - is the conbination from (any state) possessing nuclears and the totalitarian systems of governance, or the maintained general suppression from right for the free speech (...believe me, I have quite some familiarity about that (latter mentioned), concerning our presence here on the MSW - otherways I wouldn't perhaps recent often had noted that greatest danger on your own freedom of thought is the negation of my words, here presently expressed (or, anyone else's speaking/writing against the suppression of free speech) -  in the light of (a falsifyin view) that any opinion by singular, or, a few peoples wouldn't matter.  But, in fact, each - so called nation (esp. of course concerning it's government) is just as bad in case it chooses to neglect the freedom of thought, of any person. ...Doesn't of course mean that I'd think it allowed for declaring - religious fanatism a good example -  all kind of speech, or opinions, views, even in my own family. But any suppression (from the freedom for speech, speak out one's thoughts) leads automatically for an increase of discrimination. I suppose your able to imagine the difference...world history is full from examples, just think about the stalinism or, the historical communism in general..., or, on 'Unca' Thoreau's terms,fx, 'better the government, the less it governs', so to say...)  - ...However, notice, that (according my view, or opinion) Orwell probably slight underestimated the emergence and effect of our age of the 'pleasure-worlds' (...tv, all-over consumerism, ao, etc...), so to say...i-o-w: the said totalitarism is as much an aspect of any capital-, or consumerism-driven present societies, than of the (so called) 'totalitarian socialist'-states, countries that he - merely - imagined or 'fictionalized'. (In the afterwar years, the fear of communism was probably at the time equally large on the - so called - West European countries, that fx the book 1984 almost without consideration read for a description on it's future. On the other hand, apparently book's larger fame and reception only took place somwhat decades later, likewise as the case from Orwell's writing in general - so I suppose the whole from that is a bit too long a story to discuss/check out just for this purpose...) 
; ...Finally, I considered that there's of course lot more worth reading from many various texts by Orwell (on the said Collected Essays, Journalism, and letters - in 4 parts, from btw y. 1920-1950, and considering the aspects of this post). ...But, like said, not having read too much of the Orwell's prior/after-war writings formerly, so for this case I only decided - also considering the actual 'theme' of this post, love - that his contemplations on the post WW I-politics might make the most interesting/useful of little refering here, at least a few paragraphs that is possible...here. Likely some 'picks' of elsewhere a bit later on. (...precisely this chapter of the said particular column, of his famous wartime 'As I please'-writings, and seems it written circa at Spring from 1944, discusses from the executions carried at those latewar years.),:

"Hatred is an impossible basis for policy, and curiously enough it can lead to over-softness as well as to over-toughness. In the war of 1914-18 the British people were whipped up into hideous frenzy of hatred, they were fed on preposterous lies about crucified Belgian babies and German factories where corpses were made into margarine: and then as soon as the war stopped they suffered the natural revulsion, which was all the stronger because the troops came home, as British troops usually do, with a warm admiration for the enemy. The result was an exaggerated pro-German reaction which set in about 1920 and lasted until Hitler was well in the saddle. [...] Treitschke, Bernhardi [...can't say that I'd actually formerly ever even read about these personnel(?) mentioned... ; W-G. - ...but now that we have these 'modern' communication networks, like the internet, it's of course usually relative easy to find out (so I added the Wikipedian-entries on that). And, I guess Orwell - along w. the many other historical thinkers/'contemplators' for questions from politics and democracy  of the pasts -  would've warmly welcomed the networks.  Due because of their value from increasing the individual's freedom/communication, internationally - but in the same sentences would've probably reminded of the value of the education, reading widely (classics, ao, but also of so called underappreciated, or 'forgotten' books, and popular literature),ao. ; And (even better reminder):  That so, because you can't actually know a Frog unless you've seen a Frog. ...Inspired by our former (some years past) posts on frogs (here, fx) I've actually watched frogs quite sometimes lately, whenever encountering some. They're beautiful, 'cause it's the way their quite unique in comparison w. most other animal 'genera' (Or, them differ quite much from fx the animal order of birds and mammals). ...Here in the Northern corners we have quite little frogs in overall, but, once I encountered a great specimen of frog, recent apparently 'awakened' from it's over-winter sleep, still frozy snow and Springtime cold still in the air...quite (somewhat) resembling like Orwell discusses on one of his writings...but that much about that 'frogly stuff', this time... ] , the Pan-Germans, the 'nordic' myth, the open boasts about 'Der Tag' which the Germans had been making from 1900 onwards- all this went for nothing. The Versailles Treaty was the greatest infamy world has ever seen: [...this text referred, btw, was written on the year 1944, before the so called Atomic Age, ao aspects worth thinking on this...] few people had ever heard of Brest-Litovsk. All this was the price of that four years' orgy of lying and hatred. 
Anyone who tried to awaken public opinion during the years of Fascist aggression from 1933 onwards knows what the aftereffects of that hate propaganda were like. 'Atrocities' had come to be looked on as synonymous with 'lies'. But the stories about the German concentration camps were atrocity stories: therefore they were lies - so reasoned the average man. The leftwingers who tried to make the public see that Fascism was an unspeakable horror were fighting against their own propaganda of the past fifteen years. 
[...] If you think now in terms of 'making Germany pay', you will likely find yourself praising Hitler in 1950. Results are what matter, and one of the results we want from this war is to be quite sure that Germany will not make war again. Whether this is best achieved by ruthlessness or generosity I am not certain: but I am quite certain that either of these will be more difficult if we allow ourselves to be influenced by hatred." - ...in combined (if you allow), nothing positive ever emerged from hate, revenge, et sim...but while the more usual story goes that the "Allied" didn't make a same mistake after the WW II - notice, the second World war, Orwell refers on that for the first World war - It's a less renown fact, that nowadays the 'unspoken horror' of a 'nuclear world' was created just around the same time...w. the stately-dominated, totalitaristic emergence of the world of nuclears, '-weapons and powers'. Hatred and suspicion never created anything good, indeed, and even less has them any capacity to make an improvement, any betterment, or 'results'...from a citizens view-point. Any state possessing nuclear weapons plainly and openly lies to its citizens. Arms-race and the atomic world of the postwar era were at least as much based on a negation of the citizens - by their own states,countries - than on a suspicion btw so called 'superpowers' (ie that meaning the preceded Soviet Union and United States.)   


; ...then I'd fx advice anyone to read on Orwell's (postwar) characterizations on and from Hitler and Gandhi  - quite a combination, I know, and on separate places from his writings. His contemplations are interesting, ao, because he makes quite much postward-estimating from his own earlier attitudes on both from those renown characters ...ao other from Orwell's essays/war-years texts. 
[; W-G.]

[...the addit. depictions on this post:
 1st and 2nd...of classic Doctor Who-series, ca from 1968, sequel 'The Tomb of the Cybermen'. ; ...the Orwell-pic - of Lewis' Road to 1984, a short biography. ; 'La vagabonde'  - of Mitchell's Colette-bio. ]



  ( The latest posts! - @ Mulskinner Blog @ )

----------
Powered by
ScribeFire.

7/17/15

'Unca Hitch' jawbone', Or, an interdisciplinary intermission from some (old) cinematics...


”The goose-step began. Left, right. Left, right. Forward, march! 
The automatons moved. The squares disintegrated into fours. Into twos. 
… At twelve those children who by some accident had been a little minute 
or two late would have their first meal after five hours of work and so-called education. 
Discipline, it was called. ”
; of Quicksand, p. 12. (a novel by Nella Larsen, p1928)


; While I had some time lately, I watched quite a lot old movies. ...Don't know how those are actually described these days. (I think) some hobbyist, or, 'professionals' refer to them as the old cinema. (Or, just as the old flicks, meaning anything much dating back to that era prior-/post-war years, ie that means almost exclusively bw-films, etc.) ...Doesn't have any importance concerning my few observations at this instance. Also, of not having any especial hobbyism to film(s), I just call them for the old movies.


[ To the Right - Sylvia Sidney (on Fritz Lang's You Only LIve Once, 1932-film) ...(A bit) like Donald Duck she looks on that, don't ya think...? ]

Anyway, along w. the other "projects" of mine, I recently watched quite several old Hitchcock-movies. ...Occurred then that I came for to think rather differently than is – or, in contrast for – (maybe) the prevailed conception(s) about Unca Hitch's (Sir Alfred, 1899-1979, of course) old creations, or the classics of his career. (Notice: I'm not here discussing from all his films, obviously, there's a great number from those...filmed during the several decades, at least of 1930s, -40s, -50s, and even on 60s and 70s, I think. I've only watched some minor number of them, mostly the earliest.) 

; Usually the Hithcock after-war stuff appears recognized as the period when his most renown classic films were made and his cretivity was at best (Psyko, Vertigo, Rear window and Byrds the most appreciated some...perhaps.) Maybe it's quite justified to say so. However, I also noticed that Hitchcock's early times, rather surprisingly, seems (often) considered to consist period of early realism on his directions. (...And maybe that too is quite correct said, but..)

; ...Along the viewing I then came also from recognize that actually there is quite much variety on Hitchcock's early films, (probably) more than on the later some (ie: 'the classics') – For example, the films like the Secret Agent (-35), or even 39 steps (-36) are indeed quite typically some 'mystery-plot'-thrillers...Meaning, the murder- and a chase-type films, superficially (relative) conventional by structure, and from the main themes presented. But, fx the Lady Vanishes (-37) is itself completely surreal and different for the preceding mentioned (It's plot for example is 'stripped off' for to a minimum necessary needed.) It's probably 'classed' as some experimentation on the limits of the medium (film/cinema). Usually that (aspect) also, I guess, is considered from reflect the approached political instability and the closeness for a war-time atmosphere and anxiety. - To the level, that (apparently) the y. -38 filmed Sabotage seems mentioned in the GB's press of the time  blamed from an intention of stirring up peoples anxiety and public hysteria. ; ..Seems also said that all his films go on relative limited cinematic 'scope', almost each and every can be classified to the category from thriller. And that's why they've been so much imitated on the much from the later (popular) movies and tv. Not the least, because them often contained (again, superficially) quite easily reworkable basic theme and plots. (But I don't claim from having any especial familiarity from Hitchcock's whole career, or most his films, of course...)

; However, also seems - as  many of the Hithcock-films have been much psychologically and 'filmographically' studied - of many his creations after studies 'resurfaced', or found out certain (so called) 'signifier-objects'. (Term, means – probably, or so I understood – smtgh like, seemingly meaningles objects, which have a particular role on a story-plot, creating - again, probably - certain 'chain', associations btw the formerly presented pics-in-the-story and the moment it presented again. And while they're not any manner directly necessary, or not inexchangeable - considering the actual meaning, story told - them 'sort of' serve from to active viewers imagination..or smght like that [Check from the filmographies in particular if wish...] ...The key on Notorius (film from y. -45...?) seems perhaps the most 'cherished' example from. And, looking almost any Hitchcock-film one possibly/usually finds some such object.)

...But (as my own impressions, of shortly), while watching those old films I naturally came to think not so deeply for that kind (psychologizations) of that 'magical realism' from older Hitchcock-films.  Merely them felt (to me) not so much traceable to any that kind cinematic-tricks (Even if it really of some meaningfulness, I don't know...). But, what I can say the old "realism-period" Hithcock-films well from to show, is that a 'real trick' on movies is how to hide the 'message' within the lenght of the whole story itself – as result it resurfaces almost by itself, w. the little aid of the viewers imagination. (...Hitchcock famously imagined films of the future for smtgh like 'injected emotional narcotics' and (I think) it's actually not so far ahead by nowadays...(Unfortunately), most modern popular films are made using more simple technique - I-O-W it's forgotten, probably intentionally, that those 'signifiers' should have some basic meaning on the social and not just on the emotional level too.) 

; ...Just came for to think about these things 'cause - after all - cinema is an emotional medium. It's of course important what kind of emotions are presented, but even more important how them serve the story itself – just for to tear down (smtgh), or for tieing up some 'knots together'. And that's how you get some real meaning on the story presented.

-------------- 

[ To the right: Sylvia Sidney w. a 'sailor suit' (screen is from 1930s film Sabotage).
Popular fashion at the time....but how well it fits her, don't ya think? ] 
However, reason to that I actually watched quite a bunch from those old films, possibly was, mostly, because of the old bw-era actresses. For some explanation (very briefly): Putting aside all the (possible) disrespects and conventionalisms typical to the old movies (...A'la the 1930s MGM-productions, the Big Money entering movie-industry, melodrama and overacting for some regular standards, not to mention the usual overt heroisms and -emotionalism likewise) - Still remains that on those old classics the acting (often) was so much better. (Besides, often the irony and certain 'grin behind tears' also was far better constructed...) ; ...Guess it's also, from some part, due of the nostalgics we now feel watching those old pictures. But the films, generally, were lot better too. And people goin' to movies – at least during 1920s, 30s - really expected the viewed from to contrast (/reflect) smtgh of their own lives. (No matter how imaginous and unrealistic adventurous were the stories presented. And even all the above listed cliches-of-the-era, conventionalism and the 'mass-brainwashing' considering...)

; ...So within this is we also picked a few screens of Sylvia Sidney's. (An actress Baldwin seems noted for his most favorite star from old Hollywood cinema. ...I guess that was on 'The Devil finds work' – if I happen recall correctly the name of that essay...) ; ...B-t-w; quite surprisingly I didn't find from her bio on Imdb any mention of the role on that You Only Live Once (-32, early gangster/crime-film). Of course, she perhaps played on that mainly as supportant to (Henry) Fonda - the usual standard for women on movies still at the time. (Fonda on the main role as a falsely accused and chased convict.) ; But let us now leave that for the mention (...Hitchcock seems also said to have possessed some eye for the particular characteristics of any actresses he used – quite so, at least on basis of our few selections...:)

; G-U-J.

---------- 

  ( The latest posts! - @ Mulskinner Blog @ )

----------
Powered by
ScribeFire.

6/19/15

The MSW Book Recommendation #45 ; Or 'Good Gawd, said little miss Molly...'





The Long Dream
By Richard Wright
f.p. 1958 ; 384 p.(Chatman repr., p.1969)

; Alternate/ Accomp.:
lawd today ! 
Unexpurgated edition (;Northeastern Un. Press 1991 ; 219 p.)
;...also by R.W. (f.p. on 1963, but, as said on books preword,
this 1991 edition '...differs in important ways from the version of the novel
established by Walker and Company in 1963.´

[Recommendation(s) III / 2015]
 ------------------------ 
”...  Fishbelly would count out the change and Miss Hanson would watch with horror-struck eyes.
'Lord, how can you do that?' Miss Hanson would whisper in terror.
'Why you so scared of money, Miss Hanson?', he would ask her.
'Because it's dirty!' Miss Hanson would cry. 'That money's been in the hand of every nigger in town! It's full of germs. Keep on handling that money, and you'll catch a disease.'
'You just think that'. Smiling, Fishbelly would give her the receipt.
Miss Hanson would trap the coins with her tweezers and drop them into the disinfectant. 'That's one thing I don't understand about people', Miss Hanson would wail. 'They bathe, brushe their teeth, wear nice clothes, want clean food, and then they touch money all day long, money that's been in the hands of even those nigger whores on Bowman street, with all their venereal diseases.
Think of it! Mr. Tucker, money carries germs! Doesn't your common sense tell you that?
'Guess so,' he would mumble, a trifle intimitated.
'Look at you, standing there smoking that cigarette. You're putting it in your mouth with the same fingers you used to give me my change. Why, you're eating germs, Mr. Tucker!'
'They ain't killed me yit,' he would say defensively.
'But they will, if you're not careful,' Miss Hanson would warn.

Funny woman, Fishbelly would tell himself as he went out. But, the moment he was upon the street he would nervously and unconsciously toss away hiss just-begun cigarette and then elaborately wipe his hands hard upon his handkerchief, murmuring: 'Gee, but it's hot today...'” 
;The Long Dream (;p. 194-5.)
------------------------

”... ´Woman, what makes you so dumb? Don't you never try using your brains sometimes? Don't you never think of nothing that's serious?'
'I don't know Jake.'
'How come you don't know?'
'I wasn't listening to your reading.'
'You could learn something if you didn't keep that empty head of yours stuck into them Gaddamn Unity books all the time.'
Lil' eyes widened.
'Jake, this is Gawds word!'
'Gawd's hooey! It's a gyp game, that's all!'
'You blaspheming Gawd!'
'So what?'
'Don't you know that Gawd can slap you dead right where you is?'
'Aw, woman, don't be dumb!' he said, glaring as though she had threatened him. 'This is the last time you're going to read that stuff in my house, get me? Don't send no more of my money off for that damn trash, you hear?'
Lil swallowed. Jake turned disdainfully to the paper.
HITLER CALLS ON WORLD TO SMASH JEWS
'Now, that's something for everybody to think about. It shows that people's waking up. That's what's wrong with this country, too many Jews, Dagos, Hunkies and Mexicans. We colored people would be much better off if they had kept them rascals out. Naw, the American white man went to sleep; he didn't have sense enough to let us black people have a break. He had to let them Jews and all in. Now they got the country sewed up; every store you see is run by Jew, and the foreigners. And they don't think about somebody but themselves. They ought to send 'em all back where they come from. That's what I say.'
Jake paused and drained his cup.
'You want some more coffee?'
'Yeah, fill it up.'
[…]
Jake turned the page.
COMMUNIST RIOT IN STREETS OF NEW YORK
'Gaddamn! Wonder how come the police let them guys go on like that? Now them goys, them Commoonists and Bolshehicks, is the craziest guys going! They don't know what they want. They done come 'way over here and wants to tell us how to run our country when their own country ain't run right. Can you beat that for the nerve of a brass monkey? I'm asking you? Why don't they stay in their own country if they don't like the good old USA? That's what I want to know! And they go around fooling folks, telling 'em they going to divide up everything. And some folks ain't got no better sense than to believe it, neither. Just weakminded, that's all! Now look here, if I got two suits and another guy ain't got none, they want to take one of mine and let him have it! A fool can see that that's wrong! And how are they going to do all this? With bombs and dynamite” What can be wrong with some folks' brains? I wonder! And over is Roosia where they in power folks is starving to death. And now they want to get us the same fix. What's wrong with folks when they act like that? If they get in power and tell you to do something and you don't do it, then they lines you up against a wall and shoots you down! That's no lie, I was reading it just the other day in the Tribune...'
'But Jake!'
'Hunh?'
'Folks is starving here, too.'
'Aw, you talk like a fool!'
'The papers said so.'
'Nobody but lazy folks can starve in this country!'
'But they can't get no work.'
'They don't want no work!'
'And they burned a colored man alive the other day.'
'Who?'
'The white people in this country.'
'Shut up” You don't know what you talking about”'
'Well, they did!'
'How you know?'
'It was in the papers.'
'Aw, that was down South, anyhow.'
'But the South's a part of this country.'
Jake stopped chewing and glared at her.
'Woman, is you a Red?'
Lil blinked. Jake turned back to the paper.”
; Lawd today! Unexpurgated edition (; p. 31-3.)
------------------------

”Behind the phenomenom of female parasitism has always lain another and yet larger social phenomenon; it has invariably been preceded, as we have seen, by the subjugation of large bodies of other human creatures, either as slaves, subject races, or classes; and as the result of the excessive labours of those classes there has always been an accumulation of unearned wealth in the hands of the dominant class or race. It has invariably been by feeding on this wealth, the result of forced or ill-paid labour, that the female of the dominant race or class has in the past lost her activity and has come to exists purely through the passive performance of her sexual functions. Without slaves or subject classes to perform the crude physical labours of life and produce superfluous wealth, the parasitism of the female would, in the past, have been an impossibility.” ; Olive Schreiner (1855 - 1920), on Woman and Labour (cite from essay's chpt II), fp. 1911.

; ...Depending of one's preferences, this alternate recommended novel (Lawd today!, by Richard Wright, 1908-1960) could've been presented as the main selection here. By many ways it's actually more descriptive concerning those times (Situated on the fictional present by the time it written, on 1930s. The Long Dream for the 1940's.) His other fictional writing, ie novels mainly, seem count around some 8 or ten whole-lentgh books, all in all. Only that I most recently read these few – so them felt like most proper recoms from this sitting.

; On the other hand, I've not any comprihensive familiarity on 'Unca Richard''s writings...Instead my few words (here presented), more informative (maybe) are those (relative) lenghty paragraphs quoted on begins. Also, I'm not offering too much my own views and if having a better knowing about backgrounds (etc.), you're of course free to form your own opinioning...

; About the details (Bio/etc...) insufficiently and shortly as possible...Seems it usually remarked Wright (of course, a leftist author) having at first advocated communist party (/participated actively, by activity, spoken and written word, ao). But later on - like many among his contemporaries, fx Sinclair and Orwell (G., 1903-50) along the others – having got disappointed for the idea. Probably, more presicely, it was due of some issues or controversies from, or a clash between his ideals about artistic freedom and the 'officielt doctrines' of the communist's literature policy (...During the 1940s/50s.) Perhaps an interesting p-o-w, that he later emigrated/had to relocate (during the 1950s) for the Paris. Also around that era had an argument w. (James) Baldwin (1924-87)[X1] concerning reliability of the some characters on his fiction (...Precisely that concerned the novel Native Son, p. 1940). ; ...All from that actually falls outside the scope of mys interests/observations. Many years ago, I recall from having read also Black Boy (p. 1945, a novel?) – said for mainly an autobiographical story, based to his youthful years. But read about all that elsewhere. On this, I've only placed attention for his very first novel (...unpublished on the 1930s, it appeared only posthumously), and, for his very last one.

; Actually, at this case, more interesting than my random thoughts and impressions is the manner how I actually happened from first read Richard Wright (at all). Namely, it wasn't from any recommendation by a friend, neither via his general fame. Neither was that via any school classes or other educative 'intellectuelt' source. No, actually I did select his novel purely randomly (...Of course, it was that Native Son, at the 1950s a 'scandalous book' which around the time seems been categorized unproper enough to been included on some banned book lists, delivered on several public libraries around Americas, probably also was kept oout from several sale-shops, ...etc. or smgth like.). ; But, just like that, while glancing around in the library, and quite inconspiciously, I happened to pick the said particular book for my read during my youth (long time ago). ...Not anymanner particularly attention-catching book tied to the gray cloth. And I recall it hadn't any backcover texts or similar either. So that what I meant by an accidental choice.
I also remember that around the time, my english wasn't too good, so it took me quite some time reading it. (And, I guess) the experience then inspired me afterwards paging through also The Outsider (1953) and his autobiographical book, Black Boy (already mentioned).

; ...And now these selected novels. All this is only important, due because from (a view-point) that wasn't it from that purely random selection, perhaps, I might've probably never even having read this afroamerican author. ; Further yet - sounds of course very accidental and insignificant, and there's of course numerous appreciated writers I've never ever heard from, even less read – I think, it must've been from some particular reason. ...Actually, by now it feels like almost like been of some guidance. - If you understand the particulars I mean: Some people call it for the premonition. Some prefer the term sixth sense. Though, nothing extrahuman on it, nothing larger than life either. Just...some good vibes, if one thinks that better expression. (If being supersitious, I'd probably state the book must've haunted me from those library shelves, but naturally it would be much an exaggeration...)
; But, maybe, what I mean by this, is that Richard Wright – it sounds very commonplace; smght like...David Stevens, Elisabeth Duncan, or Mary Stewart, fx. Not anything like, say, Isaih Berlin or Moses Malone, fx. (...Or, by the way, not like any Hillbunster Shockbuckster...) So, maybe it actually could been that it was my own subconscious conceptions which were haunting there. But; Richard Wright, that sounds far more like the not fill-in-forms, shareable food coupon signatures, or alternatively, say, for the horse-race gambling participant lists. Not for any real author-name. (…Nowadays, having read my Humboldt's, I am of course somewhat better aware about this (aspect) and I understand that maybe that not an actual name at all. Maybe should've/could've been fx smght like Obea- kanah-ke-wah-kenah-wah-keh. Or smgth...goes to as good guess as any other. )

...Anyhow, I only think it a pity him still remained quite little a read author. (But around the time, 1950s or about so, became generally quite acknowledged a writer.) Certainly far more readable in comparisons to a bunch of other authors who nowadays are, probably, better renown and lot more read (Or, at least so I'd suppose...not made any polls and stats about that). ; But, in short, if you want fx to know about 'modern' America at the 1930-50s - ie prior that 'great divide', the 1960s and the emergence of popular cultures, the 'break-through' of the more liberal views on life and attitudes for it (/end of the openly accepted apartheidist attitudes/discriminating 'moralities'), among other things related, etc., ... – I think it's quite recommendable reading Richard Wright. Far more useful than reading fx the Hemingway...Certainly. (Hemingway having his own uses, of course.) I only mean that nowadays all we read and view of the years/decades prior the World wars very much consisting of an artistically and/or nostalgically reworked material – and often that (as interpretation) gives impression from even less a realism than what shown on the old soaps, or melodrama.

; ...Seems it then also (at the foreword for Lawd today! by Arnold Rampersad), written that Wright's early book has some 'sense of kinship' w. the other major american early 1900s realists - The mentioned examples/presented comparison contain Stephen Crane's Maggie: A girl of the Streets and Frank Norris's McTeague. ; As well James Farrell, Theodore Dreiser and John Dos Passos mentioned (...ao). ; And as well, Rampersad, seems fx mention that the working-title to said book originally was 'Cesspool'. Also it having relied lot for author's own experience. Manuscript was at the time offered for several publishers (...around eight publishing houses, if I happen recall that correctly...) during the late from 1930s. But; ”...novel made the rounds of the major commercial publishers without success or encouragement, until at last it disappeared into Wright's files not to surface publicly until after his death.” Obviously, the actual reason for turndowns, was the stark realism ('naturalistic' manner) from the racial and sexual issues depicted on novel. ...Indeed, but unlike sometimes offered categorization I don't consider Wright by style from his writing had much any resemblance for Zola (Emile, 1840-1902), or naturalism itself. (I think his style too modern to that comparison.)


; ...The selected novel The Long Dream could, possibly, be described as a book combining most central themes of Wright's writing (both on the individuelt, psychological and social levels) - So it made the main recom here. Due from that same reason, those somewhat plentysome quotes of Lawd today ! at begins of this chpt. (...Also, despite it survived basically 'only' in form of a manuscript, latter mentioned book appears a bit more compact a story, also perhaps is more uniform.) ; ...Actually meant to say more on The Long Dream at this - After all, was his last novel, so could perhaps safely be assumed for Wright's most cafefully prepared work. (Even seems aimed some continuation to it, also was planned for a stage play at the time.) ; But shall it now suffice that notice from had found the book's plot-turns (but not it's characters) occasionally perhaps bit unlikely, not so drawn from 'real-life'. Or about that way... ; The above quoted parts from one of the books most convincing chapters. It's from a place that makes - intentionally or untintentionally - rather surprising intermission for the actual story told. Incident tells about that Fishbelly, novel's black 'anti-hero', collecting rents from those obscure and peculiar residents of his father's maintained housings. At the poorest corners, or slums. It also leaves an impression from that (possibly) might've been drawn on basis of some actual incidents/experiences. 
 
; However, (and like noted priorly), my familiarity to this solely based for reading some from Wright's novels (or, Obea- kanah-ke-wah-kenah-wah-keh's, as named acc. my 'guess-work'). And even less I'm familiar to his contemporary writers. ; Actually in comparison for better 'renown' american realists – Faulkner, Steinbeck, Sinclair – all those feel lot more traditional from form, even Faulkner. (As the other main difference those, except Sinclair, are best known from had depicted the rural life. But Wright's books from city-life.). Also, while all the said generally wrote (somewhat plenty) about the poor/the discriminated, and occasionally, happen provide equally 'gloomy depictions' (...generally the prevailing 'atmosphere', at least on the novel Lawd today ! is quite desperate), Wright appears yet quite different author if compared to those. Of course, was from of a bit younger generation too...But at least seems also had a slight better sense from women too (on his fiction, of course) in comparison for most from those 'canonized', or officially accepted 'white' realists of the 1930s – even though, not on his fiction either not any exceptionally succesfull/striking-realistic 'female-portraits'.

; ...But good gawd, wasn't meant (/any my purpose) at this from refer by any words to wimmen, or for a feminine fiction already quite much here discussed...But read carefully also above that quote on parasitism too (Schreiner), offers some a good viewpoint(s) on this too. (...I mean, historically it's quite an interesting an essay, while of course not nearly is of the same period than these novels above discussed.) (;W-G. :)

----------

Note:
[X1];  added 01.07/2015;
 ...To 'civilize' myself on these aspects, a bit further, I then also read Baldwin's novel  Another Country (-68), and, then also glanced here and there of his collected essays (...publ. 98, ...ie almost exactly thirty years later, w. an imaginous name Collected essays. The library copy I loaned looked almost as fresh and unworn as the new book. ...I suppose Baldwin would've considered that quite proper, book tied w. bible-thin sheets, etc., soforth... But, apparently, I was the very 1st or 2nd loaner for that particular copy, and perhaps he then wouldn't appreciated the relative slight interest for his writings on these northern corners, this seemed to tell from...) ; Of some part them (essays) felt quite much tied on their times of appearance - but on the other hand, while writing sometimes pages lenghty paragraphs, he seems also possessed capability to state things w. very direct and frank sentences (...not exactly like my expressions here, that aren't (always) so coherent from grammar or everything else...perhaps, :) -  ...But, for some examples, there written fx: 'The american ideal, after all, is that everyone should be as much alike as possible.' [on 'The Harlem ghetto'], or, ...fx on another place ['Everybody's protest novel']:  '... The aim has now become to reduce all Americans to the compulsive, bloodless dimensions of a guy named Joe.' Exactly. (...But, of course, picked that latter said - of that about 1940s appeared text - only from due that it felt, somehow, so familiar.  ; I mean, w. all our words here written against the McDonaldsation of the world, the disappearance of 'natures gifts' to under that ever-advanced artificialisation (of life) and from that view-point that I really don't (at all) appreciate the over-sized Wal-marts and hamburgers, and neither the clean and sterile consuming-environments - our 'outside living-rooms' on these over-expanded, 'monstrous consumerist' times of our own - So that felt (to me) somehow very actuelt, even that the said essay(s) not anyhow, or directly discusses the consumerism...but merely are from other issues.) ;...However, think about those aspects by yourself, I only related this much on the essays as I discovered Baldwin to a well readable author too. (...And, at least had the chance of grasping a few thoughts 'immortalized' on them of his writing, from those very plentysome pages, tied on on those bible-thin sheets, and, of course this neither meant not to any comprihensive reading from or about that...) 

( The latest posts! - @ Mulskinner Blog @ )

----------
Powered by
ScribeFire.