The Frogs Have More Fun...

Flowers



"All the names I know from nurse:
Gardener's garters, Shepherd's purse,
Bachelor's buttons, Lady's smock,
And the Lady Hollyhock.

Fairy places, Fairy things,
Fairy woods where the wild bee wings,
Tiny trees for tiny dames.
- These must all be Fairy names !"

(from Child's Garden of Verses
by R.L. Stevenson)


"Anyone can write a short-story.
A bad one, I mean."

(R.L. Stevenson)
----------------

"Science without conscience is the Soul's perdition."
- Francois Rabelais, Pantagruel
- Acc to/above is citated from: Medical Apartheid. The dark history of Medical Experimentation on Black Americans from Colonial Times to the Present, by Harriet A. Washington (Doubleday ; 2006 ; p. 1.)

----------------
"In the high society of the first half of the century, marriage, despite it's bestowal status upon the wife, was the most absurdity. Marriage, conferring instanteous rank or money, ... lost most of its prestige and moment right after the wedding. ...By the end of the century, spurred by Rousseau's moralistic Nouvelle Hèloíse, a contrary cult, that of virtue, arose. After 1770 conjugal and maternal love became not merely admissible, but, for some, moral imperatives. ...

[...]
...Rousseau, who sought for himself the crown of morality in ostensibly defending marriage, presents in his Nouvelle Hèloíse the most enticing and extended defense of illicit love ever penned. The root of the problem is that as the century progressed sensibility became confused with morality: passionate feeling, if expressed in a highly civilized mode with grace and nuance, makes us forgive the Rousseau of The Confessions, for example, his pettiness, his jealousies, his betrayals. This moral-amoral byplay, present already in the novels of Richardson, was to be more intense as the century unfolded."
-
Madelyn Gutwirth : Madame De Staèl, Novelist. The emergence of the Artist as Woman (10,15.)

;
"...As the social contract seems tame in comparison with war, so fucking and sucking come to seem merely nice, and therefore unexciting. ... To be 'nice', as to be civilized, means being alienated from this savage experience - which is entirely staged. [...] The rituals of domination and enslavement being more and more practiced, the art that is more and more devoted to rendering their themes, are perhaps only a logical extension of an affluent society's tendency to turn every part of people's lives into a taste, a choice; to invite them to regard their very lives as a (life) style." - Susan Sontag , on 'Fascinating Fascism' (-74; p 103;104-5 at Under the sign of Saturn)
; "Anyone who cannot give an account to oneself of the past three thousand years remains in darkness, without experience, living from day to day." (Goethe) - as cited by Sontag (on same compile; p. 137.)

;
"It is widely accepted that we are now living in the 'Anthropocene', a new geological epoch in which the Earth's ecosystems and climate are being fundamentally altered by the activities of humans. I loathe the term, but I can't deny that it's appropriate."
; (Goulson), Silent Earth : Averting the Insect Apocalypse (2021; p 47.)
;
"It is sometimes said that humanity is at war with nature, but the word 'war' implies a two-way conflict. Our chemical onslaught on nature is more akin to genocide. It is small wonder that our wildlife is in decline."
; (Goulson, 2021 ; 118.)
;
----------------
"If we believe absurdities, we shall commit atrocities." (Voltaire)
- Citated from; (Joy, Melanie), Why We Love Dogs, Eat Pigs and Wear Cows : An Introduction to Carnism(2010; p. 95.)
;

"In the presence of the monster, you have eyes and ears for nothing else."
; (Flora Tristan) : London Journal of Flora Tristan: the Aristocracy and the Working Class of England ; 1842-edit. (tr: 1982. ; p. 71.)

;
"Every minority invokes justice, and justice is liberty.
A party can be judged of only by the doctrine which
it professes when it is the strongest."
Mdme de Staêl
(on) 'Consideration sur le Révolution de la Francaise' [1818]


8/22/15

Common Knowledge, '...irrecoverable and inconsolable'




This set the tramps talking about history, and a very old man declared that the 'one bite law' was a survival from days when the nobles hunted men instead of deer. Some of the others laughed at him, but he had the idea in his head. He had heard, too, of Corn Laws, and the jus primae noctis (he belived it had really existed), also of the Great Rebellion, which he thought was a rebellion of poor against rich – perhaps he had got it mixed up with the peasant rebellions. I doubt whether the old man could read, and certainly he was not repeating newspaper articles. His scraps of history had been passed from generation to generation of tramps, perhaps for centuries in some cases. It was oral tradition lingering on, like a faint echo from the Middle Ages.” 
 ; ...from Orwell's Down and out in Paris and London. , novel, p. 1933. (;...on Penguin pp, p 204.)

He abhorred violence, yet served as a soldier.”  ; ...T.R.Fyvel on Orwell, at George Orwell. A personal memoir. (f.p. 1982), p 209.

--------------------------------------------------  
"... - like love, the words know no boundaries. But of words you know how to treat'em right...they like as much cheatin', beatin' and twistin' as any good fib. (On Stevenson's [,R.L.] terms: 'Anyone can write a short-story. A bad one, I mean.') In case of love, no way. Your on own – loves purely stuck on emotion. You can't cut it off from that connection. ..."
----------------------------------------------------- 

"... In fact, I think I've referred for some past histories of related interest, on several prior posts, briefly but continously on this blog – on 'closeby' topics, if not directly comparable for the main subject at this. ...Fx; here, here and – I suppose – at some forthcoming post also, we can surely suppose to discuss resembling things..." --------------------------------------------------  


 " ... the basics is very simple: the whole global nuclear s**t-hold appears represent the unpleasant remainder of those decades of fear, oppression and dominance - generally known in history w. term cold war. (You are allowed, even invited to interpret this text as a plea for disarmament of the nuclear weaponry, but personally I think that s**t-hold consisting as much also the so called peaceful uses of nuclear energy. And guess'll I'm not a sole person who thinks so...)"
 
-----------------------------------------------------


; And, that:" - Like I'd ask alterations but blue sky on our circumstances...", ...like was or could've would've been the some 'visionary words' shortly quoted at the original written words devoted these viewpoints. ...But, I find you probably not/did not adequately consider/make clear for yourself the said commitments/view-points addressed at the words I was using - fx the short quots on above - of dat  former presented 'version'.  ; ...So I don't here care from citing 'Unca Burroughs' (, W.S. 1914-2004) much elsemore on this instance (...the y. 1968 was probably more considerable turning point in history than today is, yet the same questions unanswered - of global humanity's viewpoint - remain practically stabile and disadvantagious to development of free democratic societies, ...ao.)

; ...To take a very cool attitude on these things I could perhaps state that the truly independent 'beings' (...humans, read that term) wouldn't actually possess any enemies. No, some obstacles or some adversories, maybe, but the true species of the Nature can't actually allow themselves such luxury as to considering others for it's 'enemies' (...Of course there are seemingly opposite examples from the Nature, for example the Ants generally are known from species that continuously war and enslave their 'co-species' and colonies, ...but only seemingly so, no living being - except the humans - has ever been too stupid to endanger the existence of its kind by warring against it's own race. Many predative species also fx hunt by packs, and even occasionally seem to kill for no practical reasonability, but even so - them doesn't either behave due because of the pure 'cruelty' that way. It's more kind of an instinct. Besides, from many such cases it been shown traceable to some practical reasons too, winter-stocks, fx, etc...) ; By the same logic you are soon to conclude that any state possessing nuclears ever isn't and can't be an independent nation - for it doesn't allow it's citizens any form of independence about that ugly 'past heritage', the cold war supervision, surveillance and mass-control over an individual - And, of course I care also to point out that what said priorly about weaponry quite practically is relevant and identifiable to the burden from nuclear power production (...'-units and facilities', '-plants', or whatever by term mostly used.) ; Actually, ethically considering, 'the power' and 'independence' as values, or for aims disequate each other... 

[...The pic below - ...on a second thought I decided it better use this less emotionally loaded and less sentimental, more usually seen Orwell-pic instead. (But notice, the text here not any manner altered - except perhaps, possibly w. some footnote we might a bit later add for this - my intention here not to entertain, as I've formely mentioned. Lewis' book pic taken from, seems also contain, actually begins, w. a noteworthy 'Orwellian' phrase, often quoted: 'If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell the people what they do not want to hear.' Exactly. [...since from writing that I, fx, did discover that it'd, perhaps, be somewhat informative to little discuss on these few Orwell-bio's of the 1980s (some that I'd time to read on)  - in the light from what Orwell himself said at his wartime, and post WW II-writings (...for example, I find a mention about him, sort of, 'inventing' (british) 'left-wing patriotism' quite misleading an interpretation - or at least shortcoming, considering the various aspects/meaning of the topics addressed on that book there appears referred, ie Orwell's The Lion and the Unicorn, p.1941,...but naturally I can't devote so much time on all of these things worth consideration. And, like noted elsewhere/priorly my better familiarity on most of these around 1940s writings by Orwell is rather recent gained. But, guess we'll later devote a few words on that, when a time/chance allows...] ; From this pic below, it is also interesting observe how much it resembles, much indeed, the typical politcal advertisement and poster depictions (seen esp. often prior the electorials),  ...Or, the heroic and dramatical, 'gaze towards the future', etc. type-tradition on painting, on the photography, etc. (...In short, I think it neither not accident just this particular photo been selected on that 1981 short-bio from Orwell, published ca around/closely the time from Orwell's 'rediscovery' at Briton press and literature, I just suppose... Actually, I'd preferred the pic where he's typing his typewriter...but I didn't bother for the trouble of checking that out.) ]

; But, telling ya smtgh additional aspects too: While considering these things (nucleus of the nuclear weapons, armaments and 'production'), I actually - for a while - felt that overwhelming frustration over my whole being. It felt as some apatizing and overpossessive exhaust and weakness. (Mostly usually always I have, of some mind-of-state, merely the 'high spirits', I've not often falling on victim of depression, and probably that's also why I noticed it for so emotionally strong a frustration.) And so I considered how it must've felt pretty much the similar emotionally - but far more desperating and overwhelming - by people on begins of the so called 'atomic era', the period of times when the first bombs were created and used, against the people. The mass-supervision weapons in question from nuclears - and that's also why one should take some caution for one's reaction on those global cruelties (their production and arms race) - People may think themselves nowadays on more free from those past fobias and mass-dominance systems ('the Big Brother'), but renownly fx Orwell (G., 1906-1950) at his times already warned countries any foreign wars of been always fought only for the interests of money-oriented arms producers and weaponry manufacture companies. (...As was seen and often been acknownledged, during the some past decade(s), most recently, historically thinking). In the 'nuclear age' also any defensive war actually ceases exist as a 'justified cause' to a war (Any potential destruction, any resulted causes would always be global - and there's not any preventative defense or excuses. Not that there ever would be any defensible violence, in case used by the stronger.)

; ...But I've not just to mention inpassing of the (so called) 'Orwellian precautions' (...meaning those tools of dominance, the potential urge by the state over it's individuel citizens, most effectually immortalized on his famous 1984-novel.). That's due because I'm merely thinking one shouldn't have to feel just that level of desperation, by presently. People generally, Orwell often noted as some exception (that's why he's been so appreciated from historical view-point shared by many), couldn't assume or know just what kind of futures the recent global war-stricken world was going to see by 1950s. The World War just had ended and most probably generally felt more of a relief...at least those whom had time or ways to think about these aspects. Only - like I've earlier referred for - the global hatred generated by the time of that era of history was probably smtgh that we feel it difficult imagine by now. (So, in the middle from your global 'consumerist doping', you should take precautions too.) , ...And like any good archeologist could remind you, there's not any guarantee from our 'present form of civilization' of to remain for as such any permanent, lasting 'achievement'. That's probably the greatest and most disgusting burden brought by the age of nuclear generation - there is not any permanent guarantee from the arms, wastes, pollution to remain 'safely storaged' - if one cares to think about it for a period from few centuries, even few decades postward the moment. We don't how the oncoming times will turn out, yet something can be done: Let's get rid of all those dominative, atrocious, mendacious forms of 'production' (energies or armaments, not so much a difference, actually). In short - One of the greatest benefits the humanity could arrange for itself would've the continous dissolution of these systems addressed. (Or, think it for the planet's benefit, by-the-way...). Nowadays, the wastes are just entombed - and that ain't any real solution like everyone knows, instintively or by knowledge of facts.

; ...Actually I was reading quite a lot by Orwell most recent, at least partly inspired by the thoughts here shortly considered (...as I had not so much familiarized w. the man or his 'other works' - generally people just know the 1984 (p. 1948) and the Animal farm (p. on 1940, I suppose). Recently, I suppose, must've read about half, or at least some one third from Orwell's better known writing, fiction and non-fiction (some only casually paging, though). And I was slight surprised to find how versatile and productive a writer Owell really was. Most successfull author's of course are...But did you know, fx, that the man - 'practically', if not perhaps 'literally' - worked himself to death when putting on papers that famous last novel of his' ? (Like most of the people on those times, in the midst or after the crises from any war, Orwell's life had a lot grief too - fx his first wife died closely prior the ending of the second word war.) 

So, the circumstances during when that great book - written about the tyranny by state/nations/officially sanctioned supervisory-systems over it's individual(s) came to being were many ways rather quite unique too. Those 'Orwellian precautions' remain, whether or not you'd care to consider them. And, even that the times of ours are quite distant from those and the disguises by this 'era of ours', luckily or unluckily, however the view-point adapted, contain rather different cautions (and likely more fruithfull seeds too) - At least partly that shadow of nuclear threat is less felt as having any dominance over...the 'citizen'. Generally speaking, and  finally saying, I'm only mentioning Orwell's renown essay on nationalism, written shortly post 1945...aged by now as such, but worth consideration  too. (As I think the concept itself as well for only a remainder of those moulded pasts, the 1800s. I mean, naturally you can have a national pride and faith in some 'unity' or combination of peoples forming a so called 'country'. But as long as there's not any guarantee that your government serves the interests of the global better, not its own - or, by the riches - you can throw the whole lot from that nationalism into the dustbin. So did Orwell, and so do I.) At  least, if I consider that global future of ours shall have any better chances. 


So... [Footnote:] 
;...At first I actually considered this footnote from to further discuss on that term/concept nationalism, on basis from Orwell's observations (...closely after and around the war years, ie about 1940-46, ca). But first thing to admit would be that Orwell's contemplations are very much tied for his own times and, besides, like said my own familiarity on them not too overwhelmingly comprihensive so...I actually considered it wiser advice anybody to check of that by themselves - from fx his Collected Essays, Journalism and Letters, publ. from btw 1920-1950 (ed. by Orwell - Angus, on 1960s). [...Of my own thinking on this, shall it suffice here if I shortly notice from to think for, so called, an ethnic identity in every sense far more sensible and understandable as term as the - more popular term by almost any state, a - so called - citizenship, or even worse, a national identity. ...And, if one then considers the various ethnic minorities of the world, often mistreated or deprived of their natural rights, (by the - so called - ethnic 'majorities') - one finds soon a lot enough reasons from to despise any overt boasting about the - so called- state nationality. But that just for a mention on this. After all, nobody ever asked me from to offer any views of mine on nationalism, or merely from those (various) ugly-sides of it, historically and presently...] 
; ...Then I also considered whether I'd say on this smtgh else on nuclears, or, about the nuclear - so called -powers, -states, or, '-arms-race'. ...But, yet I again considered that anyone wishing to find about what the knowledge/information they are (likely) deprived from by their own governments, there's a lot of peace-organisations and information on the nuclears, available fx in the net.  - So, shall it suffice if I notice from think that the greatest threat on world peace - probably as much nowadays than on Orwell's times - is the conbination from (any state) possessing nuclears and the totalitarian systems of governance, or the maintained general suppression from right for the free speech (...believe me, I have quite some familiarity about that (latter mentioned), concerning our presence here on the MSW - otherways I wouldn't perhaps recent often had noted that greatest danger on your own freedom of thought is the negation of my words, here presently expressed (or, anyone else's speaking/writing against the suppression of free speech) -  in the light of (a falsifyin view) that any opinion by singular, or, a few peoples wouldn't matter.  But, in fact, each - so called nation (esp. of course concerning it's government) is just as bad in case it chooses to neglect the freedom of thought, of any person. ...Doesn't of course mean that I'd think it allowed for declaring - religious fanatism a good example -  all kind of speech, or opinions, views, even in my own family. But any suppression (from the freedom for speech, speak out one's thoughts) leads automatically for an increase of discrimination. I suppose your able to imagine the difference...world history is full from examples, just think about the stalinism or, the historical communism in general..., or, on 'Unca' Thoreau's terms,fx, 'better the government, the less it governs', so to say...)  - ...However, notice, that (according my view, or opinion) Orwell probably slight underestimated the emergence and effect of our age of the 'pleasure-worlds' (...tv, all-over consumerism, ao, etc...), so to say...i-o-w: the said totalitarism is as much an aspect of any capital-, or consumerism-driven present societies, than of the (so called) 'totalitarian socialist'-states, countries that he - merely - imagined or 'fictionalized'. (In the afterwar years, the fear of communism was probably at the time equally large on the - so called - West European countries, that fx the book 1984 almost without consideration read for a description on it's future. On the other hand, apparently book's larger fame and reception only took place somwhat decades later, likewise as the case from Orwell's writing in general - so I suppose the whole from that is a bit too long a story to discuss/check out just for this purpose...) 
; ...Finally, I considered that there's of course lot more worth reading from many various texts by Orwell (on the said Collected Essays, Journalism, and letters - in 4 parts, from btw y. 1920-1950, and considering the aspects of this post). ...But, like said, not having read too much of the Orwell's prior/after-war writings formerly, so for this case I only decided - also considering the actual 'theme' of this post, love - that his contemplations on the post WW I-politics might make the most interesting/useful of little refering here, at least a few paragraphs that is possible...here. Likely some 'picks' of elsewhere a bit later on. (...precisely this chapter of the said particular column, of his famous wartime 'As I please'-writings, and seems it written circa at Spring from 1944, discusses from the executions carried at those latewar years.),:

"Hatred is an impossible basis for policy, and curiously enough it can lead to over-softness as well as to over-toughness. In the war of 1914-18 the British people were whipped up into hideous frenzy of hatred, they were fed on preposterous lies about crucified Belgian babies and German factories where corpses were made into margarine: and then as soon as the war stopped they suffered the natural revulsion, which was all the stronger because the troops came home, as British troops usually do, with a warm admiration for the enemy. The result was an exaggerated pro-German reaction which set in about 1920 and lasted until Hitler was well in the saddle. [...] Treitschke, Bernhardi [...can't say that I'd actually formerly ever even read about these personnel(?) mentioned... ; W-G. - ...but now that we have these 'modern' communication networks, like the internet, it's of course usually relative easy to find out (so I added the Wikipedian-entries on that). And, I guess Orwell - along w. the many other historical thinkers/'contemplators' for questions from politics and democracy  of the pasts -  would've warmly welcomed the networks.  Due because of their value from increasing the individual's freedom/communication, internationally - but in the same sentences would've probably reminded of the value of the education, reading widely (classics, ao, but also of so called underappreciated, or 'forgotten' books, and popular literature),ao. ; And (even better reminder):  That so, because you can't actually know a Frog unless you've seen a Frog. ...Inspired by our former (some years past) posts on frogs (here, fx) I've actually watched frogs quite sometimes lately, whenever encountering some. They're beautiful, 'cause it's the way their quite unique in comparison w. most other animal 'genera' (Or, them differ quite much from fx the animal order of birds and mammals). ...Here in the Northern corners we have quite little frogs in overall, but, once I encountered a great specimen of frog, recent apparently 'awakened' from it's over-winter sleep, still frozy snow and Springtime cold still in the air...quite (somewhat) resembling like Orwell discusses on one of his writings...but that much about that 'frogly stuff', this time... ] , the Pan-Germans, the 'nordic' myth, the open boasts about 'Der Tag' which the Germans had been making from 1900 onwards- all this went for nothing. The Versailles Treaty was the greatest infamy world has ever seen: [...this text referred, btw, was written on the year 1944, before the so called Atomic Age, ao aspects worth thinking on this...] few people had ever heard of Brest-Litovsk. All this was the price of that four years' orgy of lying and hatred. 
Anyone who tried to awaken public opinion during the years of Fascist aggression from 1933 onwards knows what the aftereffects of that hate propaganda were like. 'Atrocities' had come to be looked on as synonymous with 'lies'. But the stories about the German concentration camps were atrocity stories: therefore they were lies - so reasoned the average man. The leftwingers who tried to make the public see that Fascism was an unspeakable horror were fighting against their own propaganda of the past fifteen years. 
[...] If you think now in terms of 'making Germany pay', you will likely find yourself praising Hitler in 1950. Results are what matter, and one of the results we want from this war is to be quite sure that Germany will not make war again. Whether this is best achieved by ruthlessness or generosity I am not certain: but I am quite certain that either of these will be more difficult if we allow ourselves to be influenced by hatred." - ...in combined (if you allow), nothing positive ever emerged from hate, revenge, et sim...but while the more usual story goes that the "Allied" didn't make a same mistake after the WW II - notice, the second World war, Orwell refers on that for the first World war - It's a less renown fact, that nowadays the 'unspoken horror' of a 'nuclear world' was created just around the same time...w. the stately-dominated, totalitaristic emergence of the world of nuclears, '-weapons and powers'. Hatred and suspicion never created anything good, indeed, and even less has them any capacity to make an improvement, any betterment, or 'results'...from a citizens view-point. Any state possessing nuclear weapons plainly and openly lies to its citizens. Arms-race and the atomic world of the postwar era were at least as much based on a negation of the citizens - by their own states,countries - than on a suspicion btw so called 'superpowers' (ie that meaning the preceded Soviet Union and United States.)   


; ...then I'd fx advice anyone to read on Orwell's (postwar) characterizations on and from Hitler and Gandhi  - quite a combination, I know, and on separate places from his writings. His contemplations are interesting, ao, because he makes quite much postward-estimating from his own earlier attitudes on both from those renown characters ...ao other from Orwell's essays/war-years texts. 
[; W-G.]

[...the addit. depictions on this post:
 1st and 2nd...of classic Doctor Who-series, ca from 1968, sequel 'The Tomb of the Cybermen'. ; ...the Orwell-pic - of Lewis' Road to 1984, a short biography. ; 'La vagabonde'  - of Mitchell's Colette-bio. ]



  ( The latest posts! - @ Mulskinner Blog @ )

----------
Powered by
ScribeFire.

No comments: