”...Day after day, found us full-stretched upon the moor, looking up at the sky gazing dreamily at the distant horizon. It is not strictly true, of course, to say that we did absolutely nothing, for we smoked, great quantities of tobacco, ate sandwiches and little sticks of chocolate, drank from the cold bubbling streams that spring up from nowhere, gurgle a few score yards, then disappear again. Occasionally we exchanged a remark or two. But we possibly came as close to doing nothing that it is possible for two members of our race. […] Wordsworth, to whom we go when most other poets fail us, knew the value of doing nothing; nobody, you may say, could do it better; and you may discover in his work the best account of the matter. He lived long enough to retract most of his youthful opinions, but I do not think that he ever went back on his youthful notion that a man could have no healthier and more spiritualizing employment than idling about and staring at Nature. (It is true that he very angry in one poem with some gipsies because they had apparently done absolutely nothing from the time he passed then at the beginning of his walk to the time when he passed them again, twelve hours later. But this was prejudiced, tinged, I suspect, with envy, for though he had not done much, they had done even less.)” ; J.B.Priestley (...on that essay below recommended)
;
”The
weather has for me been one of the chief events of Christmas. It
froze hard with a heavy fog, and so we have had displays of Hoarfrost
such as I only remember once in Oxford before...and only twice before
in my life. One of the most lovely events of Northern Nature. We woke
(late) on St Stephen's Day to find all our windows opaque, painted
over with frost-patterns, and outside a dim silent misty world, all
white, but with a light jewelry of rime; […]
The rime was yesterday even thicker and more fantastic. When a gleam
of sun (about 11) got through it was breathtakingly beautiful: trees
like motionless fountains of white branching spray against a golden
light and, high overhead, a paletranslucent blue. It did not melt.
About the 11 p.m. the fog cleared and a high round moon lit the whole
scene with a deadly white light: a vision of some other world or
time. It was so still that I stood in the garden hatless and
uncloaked without a shiver, though there must have been many degrees
of frost....” ;
J.R.R.Tolkien
(1892-1973),
on a letter (28
Dec 1944)
to Christopher
Tolkien.;
The
Letters of J.R.R.Tolkien
(ed. Carpenter-Tolkien), Allen & Unwin, 1981
-----------
Recoms.
:
On
Doing Nothing
by
J.B.Priestley (John
Boynton,1894 -1984)
A
Winter Walk
by
Henry David Thoreau (1817-1852 )
(an
essay, 1843 ; apparently fp. on
Excursions,
1860s
coll. of Thoreau's texts by Emerson.)
;
Recommendation(s) I / 2016.
;
...Series
of
view-points on Commonwealth ; pt VII].
This post mostly compiled of citates from various sources, and not too much anything said on the essays recommended. Not due that I'd consider these shorter pieces of having 'less to say'. ; Actually, original arrangement of this post was from reason I had plentysome else read alongside, so what here presented reflects some impressions I felt araised or what was thought suitable...to this – What follows, then, is actually a 'bunch of thoughts that coincided', and practically not very detailed 'narrative' beyond that. Yet, on this instance (also) it at least seems worth noting that while listening Dylan's 'Masters of War' (song, 1963), I sort from considered, there maybe certain uniting theme between the various aspects on this (...But maybe Jesus knows better from what the exact combining theme on this would/should be... Cons. our recent custom from some 'themes' offered for these writings, it might possibly fit under a theme from 'love for equality'...about.)
About
these essays it said, at least, them from represent rather old pieces,
written around times when people generally, maybe, were
sensible enough to value that virtue from idleness.
Even if we're just at the the dawn from this ongoing century, one can
easily notice/observe, the 'pace of life' ever more having
fastened. People's views and attitudes cons. that usual division from
the 'leisure' time and 'active' time probably changin' quite as
rapidly. But it's perhaps a bit contradictional or rather
selective say so...Guess I'm only noting this 'cause actually I find
certain resemblance between these essays mentioned – by Thoreau
and Priestley - only due because them both been written prior
the most of massive changes from postward the 1900 emerged for so
much of an effect. ; Yet, also there's fx this remark, I think for
(somewhat) worth citing from Priestley, as at (his Wikip-entry)
seems it said that;
”...interest in the problem of time led him to publish an extended
essay in 1964 under the title of Man
and Time...
In this book he explored in depth various theories and beliefs about
time as well as his own research and unique conclusions, including an
analysis of the phenomenon of precognitive dreaming, based in part on
a broad sampling of experiences gathered from the British public...”
(The Time some
central theme on writings by various many 1900s authors too. As well
as the dreaming,
by-the-way.)
;
...This essay selected (Priestley) mainly as I have not too much of
familiarity about his writings in overall. The text itself is very
enchantin'. Not too complicated, not any too lenghty arguments or
topics too theoretically expressed. To an essayist writing an easy
read, briefer text, simple sentences and good view-points. Succeeds
of having much to say on a so little space. It praises idleness
- Not exactly for 'idleness sake', or solely because of it, but for
the actual value and dignity from On doing nothing. In
fact, there appears often/sometimes (not always...) no better advice.
What makes it so good is also that within the few paragraphs text
contains the topic then enlarges to cover all the general 'mess' of a
humanity, in overall. - So I cite a few sentences
more from it;
”All the evil in this world is brought about by persons who are always up and doing, but do not know when they ought to be up nor what they ought to be doing. … If, for example, in July 1914, when there was some capital idling weather, everybody... had been suddenly smitten with an intense desire to do nothing, just to hang about in the sunshine and consume tobacco, then we should all have been much better off than we are now. But no, the doctrine of the strenuous life still went unchallenged; there must be no time wasted; something must be done. And, as we know, something was done.”
-----------------
;
But I also have to mention that this selection of mine –
very much – was based on my own quite similar experience about nature,
peace and idleness. Acc. Priestley there is no better longing place
than moors. But, since we have here not many moors, it possible
consider bogs (/the marshes - described by us here, fx) to quite resembling environment(s). So,
few years ago by now, I was 'passin time' at some little such bogland
place of ours. I was there – perhaps mainly – of the reason I
wanted to see some Sundews
(Drosera Rotundifolia, Broad-leaved Sundew, in the pic...I suppose - Since the
'co-spec.', D. anglica, seems look quite resembling. It's only
said from prefer even more moisturic soils...so I thought this
probably correct identification.) Sundews being some among the
few carnivorous plants which grow at these latitudes - there's
about handful other species, and all from them adapted on even
smaller prey than these diminute flies the Sundews most catch. In
short, all are quite tiny plants. Not any 'flesh-devouring' monstrous
huge horribiles, that the exaggerated imagination on films, (the horror- etc.,
also the drawing arts, stories, comics...) often like to depict.
; Pic - D. Rotundifolia. (Broad-leaved Sundew.) |
; Not to say that I didn't have other plants to look on my walks that day. Some aspect most enchantin' on botanizing is that once you have (some) pre-knowledge you are sure to encounter interesting finds of almost any place – even if it not exactly what you may have been after to. For example, at this instance I also noticed a growth of a bunch from CommonCottongrass (Eriophorum angustifolium), most enchantin plants too.
; But
anyway...Was sunshiny early mid-summer, temperature about some 25 C'
(at height, on mid-noon and not anymore risin'), nothing practically
disturbing my solitary walks there. In some ways it was very much
like you'd imagine of conditions described at that text by Priestley,
peaceful surroundings, the Nature at it's most...harmonizing. Not
that the marshes always would appear so inviting. ...Can even
be a bit dangerous by the overall impression, at least during
nightime when several beast go there hunting (incl. the vipers in
search of a smaller mammals.) Then it is of course usually reminded
of those various irritative insects that habit the moisturous swamps;
gadflies, mosquitos, gnats. (But, but on that time from day or
due the season I was there, I actually saw none from those.) Also,
raresome on anyplace here by now, but possibly exists on places from
bogs those 'sinkin spots' where one, in theory. could find oneself
trapped... ; Further yet, of most important also mention it said the
bogs to represent the most unchanged (natural) environments
there remaining at these corners from the world. Undisturbed
places...Even if you are reminded from these several un-natural
changes only during some past decades time to have taken place.
...I
didn't actually mean stay there very long on any particular spot.
However - the main point-of-view I meant to say – that not all of
my time there was too much resembling for that text (where they say
from spend some days at moors). As I had 'carefully' planned my stay,
I went there by joggin' (ie: hastily), then I followed a route which
I hadn't particularly planned but kept my eyes (constantly) on 'seek'
of those said plants. (They're pretty common species of
course.)...Though, did spend some time pickin' berries too, not
letting particular haste from disturb my being. Enjoyed my being
there, of the harmony and quietness. I did sense something of
the atmosphere one couldn't by any manner reach at the
speeded-up and traffic-burdened modern environments, that our modern
city-life mostly consists from. But, seemed that of my original
purposes from going there, it had to have it's justifications,
by certain reasons, had to serve some other means than just the value
of laziness itself.
;
...Guess'll that this concept about an idleness often seem (now) have
become very instrumental. It not is even so much due because from all
the obvious changes brought on the human value-system, or from due
because our adapted concepts towards the way of life
itself. ; Related for this, we could here neatly cite a few definitions used, on fiction-text, by Orwell. (Such as '...clerks with a
hurry to eight-fifteen with the fear of the boss eating at their
vitals'; 'pink-faced masters of the world'; 'the sleeky young
rabbits'). ...As he uses the words for a bit resembling
description/topics, while it not nearly from similar topic or theme than at this, exactly taken. But, 'suppose you may see the main point from this, even without any (this) pointed
argument...It mainly concerns the manner about fillin' the obvious
void in between those unavoidable taskless moments and
some more usual periods of an operational functionality on our
daily lives.
(B-t-w,
this then reminded me for mention that on prior posts we probably
didn't pay attention on how popular Orwell's books seem remained
postafter that 1950s. Fx, the relative little renown Clergyman's
Daughter (from the y. 1935), seems seen steady reprinting after
every couple of years between about 1960 to -82. This of course not
very much to do w. the aspects here discussed either, just for
mention...)
----------------
;
...Concerning Priestley himself, one
wouldn't probably say man for had very consistently to have followed
his sound advices. I noted him from published (smght like) 20 novels,
solely - plus the plays, essaist-, cultural historical, and other
writing - during his lifetimes. Aside from that, also seems made most
active, perhaps cherished cultural figure. (...Acc. that Wikip.
entry on Priestley, fx he
”...in 1942 was the co-founder of the socialist Common Wealth
Party.”, ...ao, etc.)
; Inspired by this essay (here recommended), I then went on to read a bit more of the Priestley's writing, incl. his memoirs
written on an old age, by the 1970s. At some early part from that,
'uncle' Priestley (Or if you prefer, seems him maybe at his days been
termed as 'papa Priestley'), along the other things discussed,
expresses some yearn about the old 'empirial times/era'.
Priestley's observations or opinions on that make only few pages at
that memoir, so you are not urged from to interpret it too
one-sidedly (Besides I've quite limited, casually read him, can't say
for too absolute...) But I emphasize, a little, on that, as he writes
also from to feel not very convinced from whether those 'masses now
set free' are any better governed – ie, on that he
refers/discusses of the independencing of various former colonies,
mainly after the 2nd World War-era, then still recent
past. As well, ao, he says those peoples (having heard, or to have
found so) now (the 1970s or priorly) being 'poorly governed' and
'heavily taxed'. And, as well also accompanies (that view) writing
from not to lament the disapperance of Empire 'from
British standpoint'. ...Must say, I wasn't too surprised
from find those kind of hindsight- and 'postward wisdoms'
expressed and cultivated.
; Yet I care not, at this, from (too) much emphasize on Priestley's (assumably) sometimes open conservative admonitions, or 'his care for'. - As it seems merely opinioning, not from a political guidances offered. Also, I've not any particular detailed view about the historical incidents he makes some references at it. As well, I think his view only quite distantly echoing the prevailed attitudes of politics by then. (The 'hidden' post-colonialist thought, which fx on the said 1970s permitted, or supported openly/secretly, on some cases even aided and created, the various dictators, those military coup d'etats... And other barriers 'quietly' established for prevent any actual democratisation and guarantee the cheap supply of various resources from those regions.) ; ...To some side-mention, made me also wonder, having noticed his repeated wooin' of readers w. references from the high taxation rate by the time (at his country, Britain), whether he felt very much at home on his final years on that Thatcherist 1980s...
; But fx, I suppose, could (whole-heartedly) agree w. his followed remark – quote of that memoir too – about things:
”... Never in the history of our species have more things been produced. Almost everything from the planet's future to a decent peace of mind is being sacrified to more and more and more things things things. It is as if we were turning ourselves into a bigger sort of insect fixed into an idiotic pattern of manufacture and distribution.” (...acc. the juxtaposition used, insects operate as some 'idiotic' or automated creatures – On that I don't, of course, agree from. As I think, that even for just an expression, it to reflect the typical common human (/or, maybe the western...) antropomorphism.) [Anthropomorphism; 'Attribution of human characteristics to that which is not human.', acc. the Dictionary defn.]
;
Alongside, (not accompanying but for some
contrast) my various readings recently then also happened featured a
book by Franz Fanon (1925-61), namely 'The Wretched of the
Earth' (p. 1961. as 1969 repr.). And as I think it makes some use
to cite from it as well (but again only little) concerning the
relations btw Europe and it's various 'post-colonies', here a few
sentence:
”...Europe is literally the creation of the Third World. The wealth which smothers her is that which was stolen from the underdeveloped peoples. … It is a fact that young nations don't attract much private capital. There are many reason which explain and render legitimate this reserve on the part of the monopolies. As soon as the capitalist know – and of course they are the first to know – that their government is gettin ready to decolonize, they hasten to withdraw all their capital from the colony in question. The spectacular flight of capital is one of the most constant phenomena of decolonization. […]It happens that few countries fulfill the conditions demanded by the trusts and monopolies. Thus capital, failing to find a safe outlet, remains blocked in Europe, and is frozen. It is all the more frozen because the capitalists refuse to invest in their own countries. ” (; Wretched of the Earth, p. 81, 82.)
;
...Elsewhere from that Fanon also, fx, defines the former
settlers (European countries formerly having held colonies) to a
Manichaean world (Apparently, the reference on that for the
manichaeism.) - i-o-w, 'a
world divided into compartments'. Also notes at the same
- Fanon's writing mainly times to the 1950s – often it taken for
granted that there shan't be any acknowledging from the existence
from variety, cultures and peoples, in those colonies. ...Ie, that
case reference on the 'perverted logic' shared by
colonialists/settlers from 'classifyin' peoples at those former
colonies to a single whole division (,and that cultivated/inherited
from an imperial period for the referred closer post-colonial era).
Resultatively also considered possible from treat them as such –
While obviously the settler-countries themselves never
consisted any such 'unity'. ; I don't claim that
(any/most) from Fanon's arguments to appear any manner adjustable to
this modern world – the book itself was recognized, by it's times,
to an open call for resistance against the colonial reign, as it then
still existed on several larger regions. (Mostly at Africa, some at
Asia, apparently. French colonies, plus maybe some other. Anycase,
many countries independenced no sooner that from 1970s. Btw, the same
decade when Priestley was writing those memoirs of his.) Fx, Fanon's
open 'demand' on necessity from an armed resistance (against
colonists) makes his tone considerably violent. – At least gives
that impression, and if thinking the conditions at this more recent
era/world, where in cases the past years lenghtier wars, carried by
the modern destructive weaponry having, some cases, ruined many
country's internal structure or the existed societies. Resulted civil
wars on the worst cases. (Not to mention that often also those
long-lasting or most persistent wars, seem had origins around that
1970s/-80s, and their different parties been, during the time or
after, supported invariably both by communist and capitalist 'blocks'
of the developed North. Vietnam war maybe the most renown of
the said past colonial wars...unless you consider the more
recent oil-wars to the same).
; As
well, Fanon's adopted marxist theory (/and, thematics about
the 'seen' on-coming unavoidable class-struggle) gives mostly an
impression from been based at that time existant views/marxian
theorema. I mean, from reading it now, feels bit out of date.
; But I also think Fanon offers sometimes good reference-points to certain aspect, there's fx this (often cited, no doubt) observation on a few sentences, goes like: ”...They are ninety-eight per cent illiterate, but they are the subject of huge body of literature. They travel a great deal: the governing class and students of under-developed countries are gold mines for airline companies.” (; p. 65) – That about the so called undeveloped countries during the years from the post-colonial era, Africa of course mainly. ...That description on that then follows fx by noting how the officials from some Third world country could in the same Month 'follow courses from socialist planning in Moscow' and some on 'advantages of liberal economy in London or Colombia univ.' (; emphaz. added. ) ; ...Well, not anymore quite so illiterate. Possibly the world also is not simply 'pocketable' from to fit under similarly 'universal' categories or by any too oppositional definitions. There's fx these modern changes; mobile phones, networks, even the TV has emerged to an influensive medium only after the gap of time since that written (And not every manner for the negative effect.)
; ...I
only mention these aspects, not the least, 'cause
actually seems it for time to time often stills from surface on postwar(s) European-American thinking, that very misguided an
attitude about the Northern (developed) countries and (their) former
settlements/colonies of to having an existence as some separate
worlds. (The basic idea of colonialism was to underdevelop the
colonies and grow rich by resources stolen from those elsewhere
places. Out of sight, but not out from control and supervision.) Some
that had no common histories, and even less from considered for to
have any any common futures to face. (Btw, some compilation of
Fanon's theoretical writing seems named for 'Black skins, White
masks', p. 1967) ….I-o-w, it a plain
falsification that the said former colonial histories wouldn't have
to do with the condition of many of those countries, resultatively.
It a plain falsification that these aspects wouldn't have much to do
with this present world
condition (The Climate
change, as the
nicest presented or most often
used a term about it.)
...There
may also be some comparative p-o-w from noting that these
observations (of mine) are mostly of that 1970s - same decade which,
occasionally, by now seems at climate talks recognized for an era when
the level
of the general life-standards - in the developed countries - still
was at it's 'safe' limits. And, should the emissions now succeeded of
to effectively retrograde – ie those climatic targets acquired –
would demand those modern luxuries and joys 'reduced' for that levels
(something most would not agree to, in practice not every manner
probably not even possible). But, I only made these few glimpses
about that past 1970s here, even if it more often noted for a decade
having preceded the break-through from a more resource-wasteful, more
over-commercized economics from during 1980s. Of course, world was
very different by then, and more oppositional
(East – West). (Fx, it seems noted that by now a multinational
company, exhaustive on wasting and capitalising on some mineral and
resource rich poorer region, can quite as possibly appear owned by
Chinese,
fx, than exclusively by 'origin' from the U.S., European, etc.)
;
Couldn't possibly say that I'd feel very optimistic about this human
condition, all in all. People often are surprisingly capable from
deteriote their very own living environments/surroundings
(and of others). On the other hand, people appear, and have often
been capable to do remarkable embettering of their condition, once
they happen take some time to be sensible and stop for a while. Or,
to follow their 'natural instinct', as I think about that. (And once
those actions are not carried by any ill-will, naturally.) ;
...Not claiming from had expressed here anything very
argumentative, or any especials on these past histories – As it
compacted on these few paragraphs. Yeah...that global mess of a
humanity in overall...don't forget from mind about that, every once
in a while.
---------------------
;
Then I also
considered devote a few words on another 'old chap'. Cited at begins
from this, ie Tolkien.[John Ronald Reuel] ...Seems that
actually, them were born on same decade - On, or at least close for
that Victorian era, Priestley having been born only 2 years
after Tolkien.
That
former quoted selected just due because those impressions from local climatic
conditions, on due from those expressed enchantments on winter season.
But actually does quite as well also from cite a few words of another
war-time letter written for his son during the 2nd world
war-era:
”...No great fun, no amusements; no bright new idea; not even a small joke. Nothing to read – and even the papers with nothing but Teheran Ballyhoo. [...means that conference held by allied leaders around closer the end of World War] … Humph, well! I wonder (if we survive this war) if there will be any niche, even of sufferance, left for the reactionary back numbers like me (and you). The bigger things get the smaller and duller or flatter the globe gets. It is getting to be all one blasted little provincial suburb. When they have introduced American sanitation, morale-pep, feminism, and mass production throughout the Near East, Middle East, Far East, U.S.S.R., the Pampas, el Gran Chaco, the Danubian Basin, Equatorial Africa, Hither Further and Inner Munbo-land, Gondhwanaland, Lhasa, and the villages of darkest Berkshire, how happy we shall be. At any rate it ought to cut down travel. There will be nowhere to go. So people will (I opine) go all the faster. ...” (; Letter seems time on Dec 9 1943, on that 'The Letters of J.R.R.Tolkien...')
...I
chose
from quote this (slight bitter, ironic commentary) too, 'cause in
some ways – or many, depending on what the attitude one adapt
about all that modern phenomena, sometimes called for 'the global
village' - it seemed to a quite well confirmed foresee. (Or,
'cause it rather close for some of referred aspects;
'...so the people will go all the faster, I opine...'
That's mostly how they seem to do, year after year.) ; ...Even if
'uncle Tolkien' would bear some similar burdens of an
'reactionary back number'
(like he there jokingly himself expresses...), you can't certainly
opinion him to just some old 'fairy-teller', say.... ; Actually,
occasional parts (like this selected) of the letters seem show to a
more strickt and clear expressed suspicion
about the changes happening and seen during (then) actuelt post-war
years politic, etc. (Fx; in the omitted sentences from that above
quoted, Stalin, fx is termed for
'that
bloodthirsty old murderer',
and, also writes
'our little cherub'[Churchill]...looked
the biggest ruffian present',
...Of course it's a letter, not anything written originally as
published, and bit less concerned from the use of words/terms on it.)
Seems it quite often referred sentences too, from since the
publication of those letters by Tolkien. Could possibly, of course,
made more of remarks about that too, but I guess it not elseways
similarly in the 'centre' of the aspects relevant to these
thoughts...
----------------------
;
Perhaps, would've been proper say something on Thoreau's
essay at this, since it alongside recommended. ...But in fact, we've
quoted him ever so often here already before, that I only selected
the essay to refer via it to my own winter experiences. – As I
happen to be fond of winter-season. (It not even among
Thoreau's most renown or appreciated writing, although belongs to my
own favorites. Written around some 160 years ago, b-t-w. )
;
...But, instead of discussin it, and taking look for my past
skiing-calender (Cross-country, I favor not any seemingly
'sportified', but acc. to my finding merely fashionable traits as
slalom), I noticed had been on skis this winter to some 285 km distances
worth. Let's see...yes, about a ten years past I used make from ca
600-700 km's at skis during those winter Months (from Nov-early
April). Now, when writing this (13.3.), by some fool's
luck, 'suppose we can expect a maximum few additional weeks of
winter. - But that's about it then, season over. (The last year it
was even worse, I think I was able from make about some 200 km's
worth only.) The lessened distances by calculation, wasn't even only
from the actual winter-period shortened (The snowy-season fx lately
has begun only from around the January, the skiing being far more
climate-dependent sport than most.) Actually this was mostly from
reason that much of the Winter months/season seems
spoiled, temperatures generally remaining closer the zero-level
more of the time.(Unlike ever before to my memory.) So, I was able
make only a few lenghtier tracks this winter, while in that recent
past I used to ski sometimes 30-40 km's distances, couple times a
week at some weeks from those coldest Months, early year. ...Even
that my fit is perhaps not quite same as before, it seems obvious
that prediction '...faster, sooner, more unexpectable'
(Headline on that climate-report by some ten years ago) from having
confirmed itself. (...maybe not so unexpectable, but I care not
for imagine what the situation may be ten years after from now.) But
as I'm quite aware that in the world there is (lot) people to whose
lives these aspects may affect more directly, for example via the
affected harvests or the supporting livehoods (such as fishin', or
smght), I limit my own embittered curses to these few
mentions.
-----------------
”Conclusion”
; ...Anyway, reading (somewhat) these 'reactionary back numbers'
of mine, of course, showed them to quite variable characters too.
Tolkien probably (I only assume), must've merely
'scorned' any journalist and newspap-writing in general, while
in contrast that seems been noted from where Priestley's career
began/or was built from onwards. Personally I think at least not from
wasted my time reading a bit these old reactionaries...Even that, and
say especially, because I didn't notice from catching them of
any apparent intellect untrustability (Not even in the case from
Priestley's often quite self-reflective argumentation and perhaps
patriarchaist tone.). Put for plain words, I didn't notice them of
intentionally lying. ...I never read fx politicians pamplets,
memoirs, whatsoever, but by that I don't mean you necessary
shouldn't. ; At least this now should offer any reader of this (a limited)
introduction on these few past tombstones.
(;
...And, writing this, brought on my mind also that 'Tolkianish troll' (,or that natural 'walking stick', a Tree-warden it named, perhaps) - here represented few years ago. Kindly please
return us that figure...'cause in the meanwhile we seem only from to
have this to any of it's 'replacement'. And I feel, despite it being quite as green,
perhaps quite as young and 'barky' too, obviously seems from quite reckless – And it yet not nearly quite as authentic. ...But that maybe also depending from
what kind of relation you happen to hold concerning those creatures, the trees
by the common name.) (; W-G.)
( The latest posts! - @ Mulskinner Blog @ )
----------
Powered by ScribeFire.
No comments:
Post a Comment