”...It's
a doubtful promise thus I would unite
With thy beloved name, thou Child of love and light.”
With thy beloved name, thou Child of love and light.”
;...from
poem Revolt of Islam by Percy
Bysshe Shelley (1792-1822)
”MOST HONORABLE, MAGNIFICIENT AND
SOVEREIGN LORDS...”
; ...the
words on begins from Rousseau's Discourse
on Inequality
”Nature
abhors repetition.”
;
...from Thoreau's, ”Chasticity and Sensuality”
Tea leafs... |
The Confessions
[Les Confessions ; written ca 1770, p. 1782]
By Jean-Jacques Rousseau
; Accomp. / Complementary reads (All Rousseau's works):
Discourse
on the Origin and Basis of Inequality Among Men [Discours
sur l’origine et les fondements de l’inégalite parmi les hommes,
p. 1754]
Julie,
or the New Heloise [Julie,
ou la Nouvelle Héloisê, p. 1761]
Reveries
of a Solitary Walker
[Les réveries du promencur solitaire,
p. 1782]
[Book Recommendation II / 2014]
...Considering that we have at this several accompanying reads (also) recommended, I think it sufficient not say much on any of these book(s) by Rousseau (Jean-Jacques, 1712-78 – I guess, for the simpleness sake we can refer here to the author briefly JJcQ). He is of course so famous figure in the history, that anything said on Rousseau almost automatically evokes an amount of 'historical ballast'. Also, probably, was best known via his fame as the 'nature philosopher', or the 'romanticist philosopher' of the Enlightenment-era (say, from early 1700s until...ca 1780s). I actually think it quite misleading to consider Rousseau solely for a philosopher (/'thinker', whatsoever term one might prefer...), or for some social thinker/reformator.
Aforesaid
mainly due because his various writings and written 'studies' did
range on for such a wide field of interests; There's, in addition for the above
mentioned, fx some nowadays less-better known drama-works
(popular at his times, mostly written during his early
career), some studies on music (...incl. fx the Dictionnaire
de musique, completed prior 1767, and about the musical terms.
Music also is often described as his other main 'pursuit',
along w. the Natures), ...not to mention the world renown novel Emile
(p 1762). It appears, however, his most widely renown text
containing his views on the education. Also was very much expected
and awaited book on it's times, the sensation it aroused – at least
superficially due because of the passages or opinions expressed from
religion (etc.) – were the principal cause that lead him been
obliged to go for exile (around early 1760s). But I thought it better
read the novel above listed (Which was at least equally popular book,
having appeared about year before. It also probably established his
fame also as the novelist.) ; ...Likewise, left out of this also was
JJcQ's perhaps second best known work, the Social
contract (Principes du droit Politique, 1762),
mostly due from because I personally wasn't so interested of his
views concerning the society, but merely from of how those might've
originated.)
Also, I
discovered JJcQ every manner more 'approachable' read compared for
most other from his comtemporary 18th centurian
'philosophers' (...or whatever term feels proper...). Fx, it's said
that Voltaire (Francois-Marie Arouet, 1694-1788) was
very productive author, having written on his days numerous volumes
of books (pamplets, theory and criticism, whatsoever, etc.), but most
of that remains perhaps less-well known or read nowadays. The notable
exception appears the novel Candide, (p. 1759). (Also don't
prevent us from recommending that earlier here presented brief story
of Voltaire's, which was insidiously abolished from here...)
; ...The
'great schism' btw the separate progressive 'tendencies' having
become apparent during the pre-revolution era is sometimes described
most evident of the completely differing views that "actualized" at the Rousseau and Voltaire. The former ('philosopher'),
via his romantic naturalism, can/has often been interpreted of to
have represented the rural countryside, latter the
recent 'emerged modernity' - ie the city. But, of course
that's somehow, very much, just a simplification, relating
various things and historical developments to a few personnel, also
excludes several other (aspects), so no more words about that
(view-point). (Voltaire, it's mentioned, like Rousseau also
had to flee from France during the time. He also returned only during
his latter years, as I recall it stated.)
...Also, we can at this instance refer briefly for the societal circle of the France court, during JJcQ's era. During the era deeply rooted for autocracy and hierarchised social order (despite some changes concerning the middle-classes, political institutions, and the major influence from the new Rationalist ideas) in the court there appeared also some kinds of oddities for characters; fx the charlatans and impostors, typical for the period. Sometimes seems it asserted that the mentioned new ideas, sort of, were also counterbalanced by 'sentimental and romantic, even reactionary tendencies' (...like I read from it, some place. However, I only think that comparable for some typical entertainments always been favored by the abundantly rich and idle classes - meaning w. that, so to say, that 'hocus pocus' and 'sponger-mongers' et similar exiting and little odd...) Some among most famous of those, at least in the postward memory, seems been the count St. Germain (Died on 1784. His year of birth appears a bit uncertain, :)…For, St. Germain, stated for having lived 2000 years.) He even said from having met the Jesus of Nazarethian, acc. his own claim, and from to possess alchemist knowledge incl. the secret recipe for an 'eternal youth'. And the legend even says that the King and Madame Pompadour, among others, were his devoted listeners. - ...I also then read it of elsewhere places that all counts' secrets didn't go buried with him on that year 1784: Perhaps not quite his 'secret recipe', but the renown St.Germain-tea he's said from having sold, to a considerable price, for the Danish government. Postward from that, for about a century's time, this 'elixir' then remained as the most popular universal remedy on those countries. Somehow sounds rather very usual, or even similar to our times? But this, for the most part, of course completely off the main topic at this...
;
Rousseau's Discourse on Equality
was written earliest from these books on our recom. (It's kind of a
scientific essay, written for the contest, and feels perhaps also
most out-dated from the texts here discussed. That mainly due because
the anthropologic (or human prehistoric theory) of the 18th-century,
by now feels rather distant in the light of any current knowledges.
But there's on it much what seems remained for essential part
on JJcQ's later, better known works: The roots for his later
natural-romantic thinking and theories about the political system
appear already traceable from that.
Text
largely discusses the origins of the society and it's institutions,
etc, ao. (The main topic, inequality, of course was very much
central for the political discussions on late 18th-century
monarchist France.). Seems to me that his writing on it appears based
on good argumentation, makes it also quite fascinating to read still,
albeit not (always) that convincing from the modern perspective
(...at least what comes for it's views about the early history part).
But, develops its theme logically, well-readably.
Notwitstanding the
previously said, I also think the text, only in-directly says
anything concerning the later much flourished 'Rousseauisms', or from
that popular view usually interpreted for view from 'Back to the
Natures'. (...Also, its sometimes erranously stated as the words
invented by JJcQ from the term noble savage, but term predates
the discussed era, as it first appeared on 17th-century on
the drama-play by John Dryden (1631-1700).
Soforth, term had originated in the literary imagination lot priorly,
and actually in the context from European expansionism.). I think
(JJcQ's) text mostly expresses as his view that on the 'pristine
conditions' (within the nature) men lived for more free, and
more honorable lives. Or, he seems think that at begins it was
better, as there were no complex sociel organizations/hierarchies,
also not the inherent capital, that
alienate the naturally born feeling(s) in the lives of any
civilized human(s).
...That very shortly said of course, text appears quite wordysome,
some sentences almost paragraphs lenght (Typical French, actually.
Although, Rousseau was Swiss-born.) – But, I think he also
makes it not for any exuberant Natures admiration
(...Not even when the text seems reach such
'epical heights' as on the following sentences):
”What then is to be done? Must societies be totally abolished? …O you, [who] ...can resign in the midst of populous cities your fatal acquisations, your restless spirits, your corrupt hearts and endless desires; resume, since it depends entirely on ourselves, your ancient and primitive innocense; retire to the woods, there to lose the sight and remembrance of the crimes of your contemporaries; and be not apprehensive of degrading your species, by renouncing its advances in order to renounce its vices.”
...However,
in during the followed decade(s), at the pre-revolution days from
late 1700ies, there were all kinds criticism towards the colonial
politics of the Royal monarchial France. Fx, the claim from
acquisation of foreign oversea-lands aroused for a controversy in the
homeground. Questioning the nature of colonial politics emerged for
an 'ideological battle over the Nature of humanity', and ao; ”Diderot
challenged capt. Bougainville's right to claim Tahiti for France,
causing the destruction of a free people within their own cultures
achievements, whose social felicity and sexual freedom gave the lie
to Europes civilizing mission.” ; ...as I noticed
referred for that on that book by Walls, p. 27. (earlier here
presented as the recom. no 36.) – Diderot (Denis
1713-84), famously edited the Encyclopedia [Encyclopedie au
dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers, it
was published btw 1751-72. Book had great influence at it's times,
esp. concerning the question whether religion and science should
appear as the separate realms. Acc. the ideas on Enlightenment(-era), Bible
no longer was automatically considered to any absolute authority over
the scientific knowledge.] ; ...from Bougainville-expedition 1766-9, 'the first expedition circumnavigating the Globe w.
professional naturalist and geographers aboard.' ...Or, see for
more profoundly from the Wikip. (...of where I picked that.)
In the
light of the previous said, and like often seem been the view, was
only unavoidable Rousseau's views (esp. those from the civilization's
corruptive effect on peoples morals), came for to play part
on that debate as well. It's also justified
(shortly) assuming that major part from the Rousseauist
'followers' possibly not paid so much attention on his
nature-romanticism & -'philosophy', and what he was saying about
their own life(s). Merely, or at least quite usually, that
interpreted to some 'naturalistic imaginations' allowed them for to
constitute illusory views about yet 'uncivilized races'. (Or how it
was perhaps commonly understood. You know that old stereotypic
view; the slight odd-looking 'prehistoric' men, w. the stone axes
and little of a so called property.)
; About the
last mentioned book (Reveries...) we only find space say that
it been usually considered to some continuation for the
biography/memoirs (Reason why I happened select it for read too).
Some chapters show of Rousseau's increased mental paranoia (Because
of the various reasons, not discussed on this.) But, as well it has
some very enchanting description devoted on plants, for the natural
surroundings, ao. Actually is written for several brief contemplative
chapters, in form of those 'walks'. It was published only
posthumouly.)
The main
recommended text at this (JJcQ's Confessions) also belongs to most
renown works of Rousseau. Often the memoir (his bio) seems praised
from it's straighforwardness, also usually described from not so
exact by detail. I only notice that every one should read smtgh
by Rousseau, his way of thinking and opinions appear still - after
that 250 y. having passed - very...unconventional. And the biography,
while being very fragmentarist indeed, contains much of interesting
chapters. I only selected for this few quoted paragraphs below, the
(told) story he writes should time for JJcQ's early days, of his
walk-a-bouts around the French countryside. A reader might suspect
the authentity of the story (at least I do, but only slightly, he fx
mentions to relate these events from memory, mainly). But, it doesn't
really matter that much, for it offers some good view-point about the
society on that time. (But I emphasize it being only few paragraphs,
any imaginable similarity to our present days must appear only
circumstancial and incidental...mostly.) (;W-G.).
(Quote): ”...weary, fainting with hunger and thirst, I entered the peasant's hut, which had not indeed a very promising appearance, but was the only one I could discover near me. I thought it was here, as at Geneva, or in Switzerland, where the inhabitants, living at ease, have it in theirpower to exercise hospitality. I entreated the countryman to give me some dinner, offering to pay for it: on which he presented me with some skimmed milk and coarse barley-bread, saying it was all he had. I drank the milk with pleasure, and ate the bread, chaff and all; but it was not very restorative to a man sinkinhg with fatigue. The countryman , who watched me narrowly, judged the truth of my story by my appetite, and presently (after having said that he plainly saw I was an honest, good-natured young man, and did not come to betray him) opened a little trap door by the side of his kitchen, went down, and returned a moment after with a good brown loaf of pure wheat, the remains of a well-flavored ham, and a bottle of wine, the sight of which rejoiced my heart more than all the rest: he then prepared a good thick omelet, and I made such a dinner as none but a walking traveller ever enjoyed.
When I again offered to pay, his inquisitude and fears returned; he not only would have no money, but refused it with the most evident emotion; and what made this scene more amusing, I could not imagine the motive of his fear. At length, he pronounced tremblingly those terrible words, 'Commissioners,' and 'Cellar-rats,' which he explained by giving me to understand that he concealed his wine because of the excise, and his bread on account of the tax imposed on it; adding, he should be an undone man, if it was suspected he was not almost perishing with want. What he said to me on this subject (of which I had not the smallest idea) made an impression on my mind that can never be effaced, sowing seedsof that inextinguishable hatred which has since grow up in my heart against the vexations these unhappy people suffer, and against their oppressors. This man, though in easy circumstances, dare not eat the bread gained by the sweat of his brow, and could only escape the destruction by exhibiting an outward appearance of misery!- I left his cottage with as much indignation as concern, deploring the fate of those beautiful countries, where nature has been prodigal to her gifts, only that they may become the prey of barbarous extractors.”
(...From
the cited words at begins of this recom., well, let's just say them –
from not any particular reasons, but somehow - felt suitable and
proper here...)
; The following post (tag: Rousseau) also contains a few words devoted for Rousseau (and from the 'Discourse'.)
------------; The following post (tag: Rousseau) also contains a few words devoted for Rousseau (and from the 'Discourse'.)
( The latest posts! - @ Mulskinner Blog @ )
----------
Powered by ScribeFire.
No comments:
Post a Comment