The Frogs Have More Fun...

Flowers



"All the names I know from nurse:
Gardener's garters, Shepherd's purse,
Bachelor's buttons, Lady's smock,
And the Lady Hollyhock.

Fairy places, Fairy things,
Fairy woods where the wild bee wings,
Tiny trees for tiny dames.
- These must all be Fairy names !"

(from Child's Garden of Verses
by R.L. Stevenson)


"Anyone can write a short-story.
A bad one, I mean."

(R.L. Stevenson)
----------------

"Science without conscience is the Soul's perdition."
- Francois Rabelais, Pantagruel
- Acc to/above is citated from: Medical Apartheid. The dark history of Medical Experimentation on Black Americans from Colonial Times to the Present, by Harriet A. Washington (Doubleday ; 2006 ; p. 1.)

----------------
"In the high society of the first half of the century, marriage, despite it's bestowal status upon the wife, was the most absurdity. Marriage, conferring instanteous rank or money, ... lost most of its prestige and moment right after the wedding. ...By the end of the century, spurred by Rousseau's moralistic Nouvelle Hèloíse, a contrary cult, that of virtue, arose. After 1770 conjugal and maternal love became not merely admissible, but, for some, moral imperatives. ...

[...]
...Rousseau, who sought for himself the crown of morality in ostensibly defending marriage, presents in his Nouvelle Hèloíse the most enticing and extended defense of illicit love ever penned. The root of the problem is that as the century progressed sensibility became confused with morality: passionate feeling, if expressed in a highly civilized mode with grace and nuance, makes us forgive the Rousseau of The Confessions, for example, his pettiness, his jealousies, his betrayals. This moral-amoral byplay, present already in the novels of Richardson, was to be more intense as the century unfolded."
-
Madelyn Gutwirth : Madame De Staèl, Novelist. The emergence of the Artist as Woman (10,15.)

;
"...As the social contract seems tame in comparison with war, so fucking and sucking come to seem merely nice, and therefore unexciting. ... To be 'nice', as to be civilized, means being alienated from this savage experience - which is entirely staged. [...] The rituals of domination and enslavement being more and more practiced, the art that is more and more devoted to rendering their themes, are perhaps only a logical extension of an affluent society's tendency to turn every part of people's lives into a taste, a choice; to invite them to regard their very lives as a (life) style." - Susan Sontag , on 'Fascinating Fascism' (-74; p 103;104-5 at Under the sign of Saturn)
; "Anyone who cannot give an account to oneself of the past three thousand years remains in darkness, without experience, living from day to day." (Goethe) - as cited by Sontag (on same compile; p. 137.)

;
"It is widely accepted that we are now living in the 'Anthropocene', a new geological epoch in which the Earth's ecosystems and climate are being fundamentally altered by the activities of humans. I loathe the term, but I can't deny that it's appropriate."
; (Goulson), Silent Earth : Averting the Insect Apocalypse (2021; p 47.)
;
"It is sometimes said that humanity is at war with nature, but the word 'war' implies a two-way conflict. Our chemical onslaught on nature is more akin to genocide. It is small wonder that our wildlife is in decline."
; (Goulson, 2021 ; 118.)
;
----------------
"If we believe absurdities, we shall commit atrocities." (Voltaire)
- Citated from; (Joy, Melanie), Why We Love Dogs, Eat Pigs and Wear Cows : An Introduction to Carnism(2010; p. 95.)
;

"In the presence of the monster, you have eyes and ears for nothing else."
; (Flora Tristan) : London Journal of Flora Tristan: the Aristocracy and the Working Class of England ; 1842-edit. (tr: 1982. ; p. 71.)

;
"Every minority invokes justice, and justice is liberty.
A party can be judged of only by the doctrine which
it professes when it is the strongest."
Mdme de Staêl
(on) 'Consideration sur le Révolution de la Francaise' [1818]


10/17/12

From diary-pages of the Part-time Vegetarian (Seq. III)


I remember how, with pride from his originality,an Evangelical preacher, who was attacking monastic ascetism, once said to me, 'Ours is not a Christianity of fasting and privations, but of beefsteaks.'  Christianity, or virtue in general - and beefsteaks!" - Tolstoy; The First Step (Preface to the Russian transl. from the The Ethics of Diet, book by Howard Williams,1883)

”In a way all living things must be contentious. Reproductive capacities are such that any species, reproducing freely, can in short order outrun it's food supply, however plentiful.” - Asimov (Extraterrestrial civilizations, 1980)


Often the best choices are made accidentally. This ”vegetarian” diet-experiment (of mine), lasted from 15.3 until 15.9. I now consider it some of the most advantageous life-style choice I've maintained, lately or recently. 
 

This final part mostly discusses the ethical arguments favoring the vegetarian diet. Naturally it little touches the issues from and about meat production system/animal farming. But, mainly aims consist from thoughts having arised or provoked by this practical experiment (of mine) and also contemplates the various benefits of the vegetarian diet. (Some afterthoughts et similar, but I also try say smtgh on a more general level.)

 ...Along these 'part-vegerian' thoughts here's some examplary plant for pics. Many garden and wild plant are known of their great many uses as healing aids, improving health and on various other purposes throughout human history. Yet, we nowadays surprisingly little find use of them on anything like that. On the other hand there's nowadays variety from imported (so called) super-seeds, -berries, et other stuffs lots advertised and resultatively, often expensive.  - What comes for the plant - wild plants especially, but as well various of the cultivated - one should very well know their properties and looks (at medicinal uses in particular), because renownly some are very poisonic, etc. ...As for some "rule of the thumb", when using any plant one should never take very large amounts, or use some plant for too any extended periods at once. (Also, in short at any slightest uncertainty, always appears preferable consult some medicinalist or other source first.) 
The few exemplary plants here selected are generally known of no harmful side-effects, but noticeable fx some people can be allergic to pollen of flowers, or even for other substances of any particular plant(s). ...Also matters from where the usable plants/herbs are collected, for the ground can contain various toxic, or chemicals, that can end up at the plant. So, know your plants and the places where those picked from. All these - of course - are rather common, easily recognizable species growing/cultivated most anyplace from N.Europes. 
 

 (Pic left) - Mint (Menthe) - There's also wild species of mint, but garden varieties have the stronger aroma (also, there's nowadays hybrids in the natural environment). Commonly used as herb tea due it's good properties (and mentol-oils as soothing aid to coughs, ao) However, the fresh leaves should only be used before the plant blooms. - Also, by chance caterpillars from Rusty Tussock Moth (Antiqua orgyia), can be found from mint leafs...and the other butterfly-species, too.

 
(Pic below) - Calendula appears some of most often recommended garden plants for it's wide variety of uses (Plant originates perhaps from Mid East/Near Asia; Anyway, it was widely cultivated on Europe already on antique.)...The ray florets can be made for some gargling water, but I've few times infused that for tea too; Seems have some effect for preventing colds (When used seldom, not continuosly.) Fresh ray florets are also usable treating skin conditions...and, in the pasts the plant even was believed from magical powers due it's many healthy properties. (As some additional benefit, at garden it also helps repel off pests.)

Garden Marigold (Calendula Officinalis)

Since what presented on recent part at this serie, my few exceptions of the formerly described 'part-vegetarian diet', were only the following: On 15.7, ate half an oven sausage (w. the excuse from avoiding w-o-f), 2.8 ate a couple Frankfurter sausages (of no particular reason), 7.8 ate couple meatballs (Of my own cooking, and just for tastes; Must say them were pretty good), 15.8 ate a one slice of bacon, from no particular reasons, whatsoever.) ...After this half a year-experiment (of mine) I've occasionally eaten meat; Not daily, if fish included probably about every other day (Chicken mostly.) Pieces of cold cuts on bread (ham, liver sausages) perhaps more often. Since that mid-September I've also practically eaten not soya, eggs also somewhat less often.


Of the citates on begins of this, first is via pages from International Vegetarian Society (there's also other authoritative/historical personnels having favored the diets against animal eating, view their pages if wish.) The cited words (by Tolstoy) are from a piece of classic vegetarian texts, it contains the main essence of the vegetarian ethics. The abstainment from eating meat also appears abstainment from the killing; Production of the animal foods, whether or not one cares to think about that, always has involved performance of that mentioned act. (The book from which the cite, is sort of a vegarian 'bible', at least acc. some.) ...The other cite (Asimov) is here only due because it serves for me to enlargen this topic a little. I've often read a parables (from various books) about how some alien visitor, having stopped to observe our planet and human societies, would perhaps mainly recognize characteristic to us our uses of any resources at Earth for our own benefits (includes various animal species). That 'visitor' would then soon find us for an immoral race, also morally inferior, and probably just head for the better planet. (An imaginous comparison, but the question from human population numbers exceeding planets capacity well beyond it's limits, appears some amongst largest problems usually assumed overshadow/grow along with other development during the 21st century.)


Plantago major

(To the right) - Common Plantain (Plantago major) ...it's leafs are renown as efficient first aid for small wounds. One can also prepare herb tea from those; Usable at flu's (and also coughs, throat infections, etc.) ...The Ribwort Plantain seems actually a more commonly used plant at herbal medicines. But the regular Plantain is far more common and it grows on most every place where there's damped grounds. ...The reason why the indigenous americans even used call Plantain by name the 'Englishman's foot'.


...Along his contemplations, or discussion from the vegetarian ethics, Tolstoy fx makes a visit for slaughterhouses, pays attention to how cruel is the treatment of animals and recommends fasting as the path for any virtous life. To summarize his views (very briefly) what's uniform or typical to all men – fx you and me, means the women as well, of course - is gluttony. Acc. Tolstoy immorality of the meat-eating is tied for our usual habits and attitudes about eating (...he refers at that for the rich classes behaviours of his own times and also relates the question by some part for the inequalities at society. But actually, read the referred text by yourself to have a better understanding.) He also makes a point about how hypocrite all those described behaviours appear in the light of any Christian belief. 
 
...Myself I don't fx consider fasting of any similar importance, even if one wishes think for the development of a moral feeling on humans. Feels to me - probably is more easy think so - that maintaining mostly vegetarian diet can practically take care of the same. However, I fx find quite much truth on his words about those usual hypocricies of the eating and how we often pretend being so virtuous, while in the same enjoying dinners purely because from pleasure of eating (and all that maintained at the cost of animal life). Basically, like Tolstoy, I find (the habitual meat-eating, without necessity) a practice that actually flourishes, more or less, against all the dominating principles of the basic Christian beliefs. 
 

On that sense - seems to me - the modern Christendom is in many ways quite a contradictive religion of it's moral and values; Or, probably better said, from that view-point it's among most ambigious belief-systems I know about (There's many religions that fx limit the uses of animal by some varying regulations, ao...But, with this I don't mean to say that I'd find other religious beliefs – or anything else, by the way - necessary more virtuous when compared for Christianity. Acc. my opinion, there's lot of good in the Christianity. Also, all people must have freedom from decide about their own beliefs and you can't judge any opinion basing to some single aspect like this. There's also quite many values that most credible beliefs share; Like fx abstainment from the use of violence.) However, any saying/arguing that there would be any moral grounds permitting us (the humans), as some higher or morally advanced species taking benefit of the sufferings of other species (ie animals) for to provide us some 'luxurious' dinners, is indeed just some crap of the same. There's a place for relative ethics on many aspects at life, but not on this. Naturally (probably needles say), I don't mean by this (sentence) that there wouldn't be a lots of difference if the animal is slaughtered for foods to feed many, than if the same happens just for benefit of a few. In short, it's actually quite educative little thinking that question concerning our (prevailing) human behaviours, that aspect about gluttony in particular.


(Right below -) The White Dead-Nettles (Lamium Album)
...A lot resembles the Nettles (but it's leaves don't stinge). Dead-Nettles, however, has white flowerings (those not visible in the pic, for the plant wasn't yet flowering). Tea made of flowers is recommended fx on stomach and digestive complaints. (Seems it also said help as some natural sedative and sleep aid too.)

Lamium Album
...Then, on the other hand, must say that physically I'm just not quite so convinced than on basis of these weighty ethical arguments. From this experiment of mine I noticed that one can well get along with a multi-sided diet containing fx eggs and milk and no meat (Not to make any falsifications, I also ate regularly some fish or similar.) Certainly does require somewhat more discipline sustaining w. the vegetable-oriented food - Probably the main reason why that 'First step' (on moral progress) of humanity, so finely imagined by Tolstoy, is yet quite far from realization in practice. As I also liking from keep myself in some condition (relative much jogging, biking, etc), I think it's probably fair to say that if not eating meat at all, acquiring all the necessary nutrients requires likely more carefully balanced diet. (I also noticed that it's perhaps more complicated trying maintain some 'middle-ground' diet. Probably there's also lots variation between different people, or at least somewhat, we are generally quite varying of the physical structure. 
This is some relationism, as you might correctly point out, but anyway I also don't consider that any healthy adult would have practical necessity for eating meats more often than perhaps on 1-2 days per week. If doing much physical work perhaps a bit more often. And I even say – contrary to my some former words – that for the older peoples as well it might appear useful to eat meat, sometimes. But I'm also not saying that anyone, if they wish and find that preferable, couldn't do just as well without.


If one then wishes compare human biology/diets for some favored by our close relates, there's actually much interesting aspects. Chimps, the most closely related from primates to us, mostly eat plant and fruit, but some meat too (...likely contains mostly of larvae and termites, but occasionally smaller animals). Gorilla, the largest living primate (-species), and one that has largest body-mass, practically eats just the plant matter (roots and leafs, acc. my understanding). Anatomically nearest human-like species of apes, Orangutan (or better said proportionally; It has average weight almost the same as humans, from males 60-90 kg) maintains a varied diet largely consisting of the fruits...and fx leaf. (Also it's mentioned to eat fx bird eggs, casually. Yet, significantly most part from what it feeds is fruit.). Then, from the species relative close to human lineage, fx Baboons - socially quite human resembling species - are most carnivorous from primates. To the contrary, Gibbons - most flexible climbers from all apes, and, also species quite close to humans - eat only fruit, leaf, flowers. What comes for the smaller existent primates/monkeys, diets probably vary lot, actually them are (probably) even more diverse. On any case, the larger part from the animal species on their 'natural' condition and environment(s) maintain rather strictly ordered diets. Fx,  there's species from monkeys (and other animals) that almost solely feed on trees leaves. And, there's some that eat (mostly) the insects and small invertebrates. Also, of all the (primates) their dietary practices likely aren't too precisely known, fx about the Chimps (social) practice of hunting smaller prey animals it wasn't known before about 1960s (For them weren't observed at their natural environments prior Jane Goodall's studies).
...Humans, quite clearly, are some from the most omnivorous of mammalians (personally I can only think of the squirrel for a good comparison...). Sometimes described been a factor having guaranteed our great success in the pasts. Yet, nothing from the above said (at this paragraph) tells much about the human dietary needs presently, for almost exclusively (we) humans live today on artificially built societies. So, I don't think vegetarism similarly argumentable on the evolutionary basis than it (clearly) is on ethical basis, but as we live on modern civilizations there isn't much real grounds for actual comparisons for our related primates either. Saying that humans (probably) wouldn't have evolved at least some biological dependency towards meat-eating would be incorrect; But, would appear equally false saying that we'd have any biological necessity to that.

...And that's basically most of it, or whatsoever I learned of my experiment. Or what level my 'moral progress' towards a vegarian diet was at this particular time from my life. I don't consider it too likely I'd completely quit eating meats in the future, but wouldn't appear unthinkable to me either; Seems at least proven that for a regular consumer (average paid, living on developed societies) maintaining a healthier and environmentally significant less stressing diet appears not any difficulty. And, there's also a point-of-view that when I go for the shops and grab a packet of minced meats, I usually tend glance at the other varieties of meat available to customers w. more 'carnivorous' diets... And I just can't avoid from now feeling some inherent dislike. 

 (Below) Rowan (Sorbus aucuparia) - Rowan-berries make most helthysome accompanient to diet (acc. my finding; fx them contain lot C-vitamin.) As they also are quite acidic the berries have to be precooked for juice, or marmalade (of the latter, see fx from our recipe-posts.) ...Rowan grows, possibly, more sparsely/only at higher altitudes on Mid-Europe, but at Fennoscandia it's very common and there's copses of Rowan often on mixed forests.
 
Sorbus aucuparia (Berries)
But, as I'm only talking from a relative brief period of experience, I'm only saying that people shouldn't too easily pass the ethical argument presented; Tolstoyan view for this. In particular considering how much actual waste - resources, lives, time – contains that 'modern' meat-production system. (...And, of waters - fx, seems that globally most water-consuming agricultural trade-product is - the beef.). So, my suggestion is that absolutism is not the word, but eating better – less of the meats – certainly is. ; [W-G.]


------------

( The latest posts! - @ Mulskinner Blog @ )


----------
Powered by ScribeFire.

No comments: