Whale
by Jeremy LucasSummit Books(1981)
(172 pages)
If so, this book obviously seems to break the rule in our series, and so we possibly owe a few explanatory notes here. Book isn't probably any extraordinary example in its kind; However, I've actually read it about 2-3 times since having picked it from library's shelves from recently(at the time) published selections and it still feels worth the effort. And noticing that, I kind of remember it having been placed in youth books (at the library) since most such stories from animals presented as emotional and thinkin', often are. Not necessary to make such limitations here and actually the books as recommendable for adults as well. But also, struggle for survival in nature presented in it quite like it does, this makes me hesitate a little if to recommend this for kids under age of ten years, say (while I know far more falsifying and even abusive stuff presented and to the following much watched by kids younger than that age...And you might think me as an old fashion conservative, but actually we're not talking from video-games here at all.)
Similar to our previous book recommendation, also the Whale may have benefited from being published at correct timing. The long awaited ban of commercial whaling had around the 1980s finally got international acceptance and ruling. Environmental campaigns had raised wider interest for those intelligent and enchanting animals of the seas, that had been hunted close to extinction by man (and many of them still remain endangered). So, probably in 1980s many, I among others were anxious for stories from whales.
Author's forewords mention the Whale being, not just another book of horror fiction where killer Orcas's and Jaws hunt the seas and disperse fears, but an imaginary tale that at least could be possible. Not withstanding, we feel liking to say it being of course quite questionable if story by human can even partially represent something from animals temperaments or describe the kind of intelligence those may have. However, that isn't the main point in the book; It being quite realistic descriptions or merely a particular view created by human isn't that meaningful, books main message is more important. Forewords also underline same theme: from geological perspective man has been tramping on Earth a brief momentum compared to the time life has existed on seas, and shouldn't play too risky on natures endurance. Unfortunately though, presented as fact or fiction, such views are too often just put aside.
For some reason liking to remain critical, perhaps because the story is also quite emotionally loaded and even romantic one, I also remain a bit suspective from its reliability from the lives of whales (Orca's). Anyway, not having any better knowledge from the topic it at least seems to present that truthfully. And then again, in case its main characters were not animals, such question wouldn't even arise. It's a charming story and also often a tragical one. Also worth mention, differing from many animal stories, in this they don't speak the human languages, wear man-made jeans and most of all – they're not presented as separated from their natural living environment(s).
But now I notice having not said much from the books content, which after all the was the main subject. Perhaps thats not needed, its an intensifying story that can be read overnight, fx. So, this may (in our series) appear as some sort of compromise in favour of popular fiction, alternative for all those gotten bored watching/reading the more humanized descriptions from nature and its many inhabitants.
Powered by ScribeFire.
No comments:
Post a Comment