The Frogs Have More Fun...

Flowers



"All the names I know from nurse:
Gardener's garters, Shepherd's purse,
Bachelor's buttons, Lady's smock,
And the Lady Hollyhock.

Fairy places, Fairy things,
Fairy woods where the wild bee wings,
Tiny trees for tiny dames.
- These must all be Fairy names !"

(from Child's Garden of Verses
by R.L. Stevenson)


"Anyone can write a short-story.
A bad one, I mean."

(R.L. Stevenson)
----------------

"Science without conscience is the Soul's perdition."
- Francois Rabelais, Pantagruel
- Acc to/above is citated from: Medical Apartheid. The dark history of Medical Experimentation on Black Americans from Colonial Times to the Present, by Harriet A. Washington (Doubleday ; 2006 ; p. 1.)

----------------
"In the high society of the first half of the century, marriage, despite it's bestowal status upon the wife, was the most absurdity. Marriage, conferring instanteous rank or money, ... lost most of its prestige and moment right after the wedding. ...By the end of the century, spurred by Rousseau's moralistic Nouvelle Hèloíse, a contrary cult, that of virtue, arose. After 1770 conjugal and maternal love became not merely admissible, but, for some, moral imperatives. ...

[...]
...Rousseau, who sought for himself the crown of morality in ostensibly defending marriage, presents in his Nouvelle Hèloíse the most enticing and extended defense of illicit love ever penned. The root of the problem is that as the century progressed sensibility became confused with morality: passionate feeling, if expressed in a highly civilized mode with grace and nuance, makes us forgive the Rousseau of The Confessions, for example, his pettiness, his jealousies, his betrayals. This moral-amoral byplay, present already in the novels of Richardson, was to be more intense as the century unfolded."
-
Madelyn Gutwirth : Madame De Staèl, Novelist. The emergence of the Artist as Woman (10,15.)

;
"...As the social contract seems tame in comparison with war, so fucking and sucking come to seem merely nice, and therefore unexciting. ... To be 'nice', as to be civilized, means being alienated from this savage experience - which is entirely staged. [...] The rituals of domination and enslavement being more and more practiced, the art that is more and more devoted to rendering their themes, are perhaps only a logical extension of an affluent society's tendency to turn every part of people's lives into a taste, a choice; to invite them to regard their very lives as a (life) style." - Susan Sontag , on 'Fascinating Fascism' (-74; p 103;104-5 at Under the sign of Saturn)
; "Anyone who cannot give an account to oneself of the past three thousand years remains in darkness, without experience, living from day to day." (Goethe) - as cited by Sontag (on same compile; p. 137.)

;
"It is widely accepted that we are now living in the 'Anthropocene', a new geological epoch in which the Earth's ecosystems and climate are being fundamentally altered by the activities of humans. I loathe the term, but I can't deny that it's appropriate."
; (Goulson), Silent Earth : Averting the Insect Apocalypse (2021; p 47.)
;
"It is sometimes said that humanity is at war with nature, but the word 'war' implies a two-way conflict. Our chemical onslaught on nature is more akin to genocide. It is small wonder that our wildlife is in decline."
; (Goulson, 2021 ; 118.)
;
----------------
"If we believe absurdities, we shall commit atrocities." (Voltaire)
- Citated from; (Joy, Melanie), Why We Love Dogs, Eat Pigs and Wear Cows : An Introduction to Carnism(2010; p. 95.)
;

"In the presence of the monster, you have eyes and ears for nothing else."
; (Flora Tristan) : London Journal of Flora Tristan: the Aristocracy and the Working Class of England ; 1842-edit. (tr: 1982. ; p. 71.)

;
"Every minority invokes justice, and justice is liberty.
A party can be judged of only by the doctrine which
it professes when it is the strongest."
Mdme de Staêl
(on) 'Consideration sur le Révolution de la Francaise' [1818]


8/22/08

MuleSkinner book recommendations #4:

Fyodor Dostoevsky:

The Idiot





It´s hard to imagine a more serious novel than Fyodor Dostoevsky's The Idiot on questions of true christianity and principal purposes for humanity. Dostoevsky is often renowned as the creator of modern psychological roman, but The Idiot also targets on questions arising from human belief-systems, the search (of human kind) for religious, existential and ethical ideals. In fact, The Idiot was the first of his lenghty works, focusing on under surface depths of human mind as well as uncertainties in the given social order. At the time of publication (1869) it wasn´t accepted generally well, when compared to Tolstoys War and Peace, but afterwards the book has gained in respect. All this naturally makes it one of Dostoevskys most remarkable works, well-deserving its place among the other such ambitious novels like The Possessed (1872) and The Brothers Karamazov (1880).


The Idiot could also be described, at least to certain level, as an experimental laboratory on themes later fulfilled in Dostoevskys magnum opus, Brothers Karamazov. In spite of that, this is mainly a novel from prince Myshkin. The main character is presented as good-willing, illusionary example of human person. As consequence, the ever-idealistic Myshkin soon finds himself often as laughed but pitied, more or less a curiosity in upper class social life circles he's entering to. He also suffers from epilepsy which is also strongly connected to princes character (the novel contains a passage describing him suffering an epileptic seizure). Myshkin, the eternal walker in sunshine, the passenger on lighter side of one way street (of humanity), also has his counterpart. Thats Rogozhin, introduced and described in somewhat darker tones. Rogozhin presents princes total opposite: He is capable to evil deeds and frightening violent acts. In this manner, his presence balances the human ideals presented in Myshkins persona. Naturally there´s also a woman, Nastasya Filippovvna, much in sight of both men.


Books have been written from the reasons for birth of that spesific form of narration; russian 19th century realistic novel, which in content and form is far superior to the contemporary english and american efforts. After all, Russia had just years before moved on from feaudal serf bondage society (lasted as late as 1861) in towards the more modern state. Therefore it is, of course striking, that Idiot is mainly a novel from upper-class people. Dostojevsky's writing omits the poor peasants and the former serfs to the level that one could sometimes errate to think there weren´t any in russian society at the time (a point sometimes mentioned when comparing Dostoevskys realism to Tolstoys). However, the word Dostojevsky had most keen interest was not realistic, but fantastic. As firm believer in tzarist order, he propably never even considered class society questions as of importance, and besides, spent and wrote large parts of his life in foreign European nations. As a result, one finds that in Dostoevskys religious views the christianity is presented within the duality in human. Dualism being an important area also in psychology, Dostoevsky is often counted among its forefathers. But, his dualism is somewhat different in nature as its based on Christian faith and simultaneously in interest for demonic depths of human mind. Dualism, of course is much older in origin, even as a technique of characterization used in modern literature fiction.


The Idiot, in itself, is typical social drama, a serie of acts culminating to the unavoidable result. As mentioned, in more deeper level its a continued questioning in search of good humanity, and as such, propably more credible to christian ideals than the christianity itself. Thats basically so, because Dostoyevskys prose acknownledges the capability for pure evil in human personal (thats the question most common in his works, continuosly repeating in his novels, as is often reminded too). The illusions from ideals of humanity, and also Christ as such ideal, are reflected in the Prince Myshkins characters, the idiot. But Myshkins idealistic character would not truly exist without Rogozhins shadow on him, kind of a mirror-like contrast to his. By the way, similar characteristic interplay, created between Corto Maltese(though, he can not be depicted quite as idiot, but idealist) and Rasputin in Hugo Pratts comics could be a straight loan from The Idiot.


Taking books themes in deeper examination would be of frustrating and unnecessary. So I'll just mention that any person under age of 25 years would benefit significantly from reading it. Older ones...shouldn´t miss it either, though its plain idealistic tone can sometimes be a bit harder to cope with in case of someone with more (life-)experience. Anyway, we recommend this for anybody interested in world literature history classics and/or the emotional and psychological roots of russian 19th century society. In fact, according to my experience it might the best book to get acquainted with Dostoevkys ingenious art-of-words.



Powered by ScribeFire.

No comments: