Fyodor Dostoevsky:
The Idiot
It´s hard to imagine a more serious novel than Fyodor Dostoevsky's The Idiot on questions of true christianity and principal purposes for humanity. Dostoevsky is often renowned as the creator of modern psychological roman, but The Idiot also targets on questions arising from human belief-systems, the search (of human kind) for religious, existential and ethical ideals. In fact, The Idiot was the first of his lenghty works, focusing on under surface depths of human mind as well as uncertainties in the given social order. At the time of publication (1869) it wasn´t accepted generally well, when compared to Tolstoys War and Peace, but afterwards the book has gained in respect. All this naturally makes it one of Dostoevskys most remarkable works, well-deserving its place among the other such ambitious novels like The Possessed (1872) and The Brothers Karamazov (1880).
The Idiot could also be described, at least to certain level, as an experimental laboratory on themes later fulfilled in Dostoevskys magnum opus, Brothers Karamazov. In spite of that, this is mainly a novel from prince Myshkin. The main character is presented as good-willing, illusionary example of human person. As consequence, the ever-idealistic Myshkin soon finds himself often as laughed but pitied, more or less a curiosity in upper class social life circles he's entering to. He also suffers from epilepsy which is also strongly connected to princes character (the novel contains a passage describing him suffering an epileptic seizure). Myshkin, the eternal walker in sunshine, the passenger on lighter side of one way street (of humanity), also has his counterpart. Thats Rogozhin, introduced and described in somewhat darker tones. Rogozhin presents princes total opposite: He is capable to evil deeds and frightening violent acts. In this manner, his presence balances the human ideals presented in Myshkins persona. Naturally there´s also a woman, Nastasya Filippovvna, much in sight of both men.
Books have been written from the reasons for birth of that spesific form of narration; russian 19th century realistic novel, which in content and form is far superior to the contemporary english and american efforts. After all, Russia had just years before moved on from feaudal serf bondage society (lasted as late as 1861) in towards the more modern state. Therefore it is, of course striking, that Idiot is mainly a novel from upper-class people. Dostojevsky's writing omits the poor peasants and the former serfs to the level that one could sometimes errate to think there weren´t any in russian society at the time (a point sometimes mentioned when comparing Dostoevskys realism to Tolstoys). However, the word Dostojevsky had most keen interest was not realistic, but fantastic. As firm believer in tzarist order, he propably never even considered class society questions as of importance, and besides, spent and wrote large parts of his life in foreign European nations. As a result, one finds that in Dostoevskys religious views the christianity is presented within the duality in human. Dualism being an important area also in psychology, Dostoevsky is often counted among its forefathers. But, his dualism is somewhat different in nature as its based on Christian faith and simultaneously in interest for demonic depths of human mind. Dualism, of course is much older in origin, even as a technique of characterization used in modern literature fiction.
The Idiot, in itself, is typical social drama, a serie of acts culminating to the unavoidable result. As mentioned, in more deeper level its a continued questioning in search of good humanity, and as such, propably more credible to christian ideals than the christianity itself. Thats basically so, because Dostoyevskys prose acknownledges the capability for pure evil in human personal (thats the question most common in his works, continuosly repeating in his novels, as is often reminded too). The illusions from ideals of humanity, and also Christ as such ideal, are reflected in the Prince Myshkins characters, the idiot. But Myshkins idealistic character would not truly exist without Rogozhins shadow on him, kind of a mirror-like contrast to his. By the way, similar characteristic interplay, created between Corto Maltese(though, he can not be depicted quite as idiot, but idealist) and Rasputin in Hugo Pratts comics could be a straight loan from The Idiot.
Taking books themes in deeper examination would be of frustrating and unnecessary. So I'll just mention that any person under age of 25 years would benefit significantly from reading it. Older ones...shouldn´t miss it either, though its plain idealistic tone can sometimes be a bit harder to cope with in case of someone with more (life-)experience. Anyway, we recommend this for anybody interested in world literature history classics and/or the emotional and psychological roots of russian 19th century society. In fact, according to my experience it might the best book to get acquainted with Dostoevkys ingenious art-of-words.
Powered by ScribeFire.
No comments:
Post a Comment