The Frogs Have More Fun...

Flowers



"All the names I know from nurse:
Gardener's garters, Shepherd's purse,
Bachelor's buttons, Lady's smock,
And the Lady Hollyhock.

Fairy places, Fairy things,
Fairy woods where the wild bee wings,
Tiny trees for tiny dames.
- These must all be Fairy names !"

(from Child's Garden of Verses
by R.L. Stevenson)


"Anyone can write a short-story.
A bad one, I mean."

(R.L. Stevenson)
----------------

"Science without conscience is the Soul's perdition."
- Francois Rabelais, Pantagruel
- Acc to/above is citated from: Medical Apartheid. The dark history of Medical Experimentation on Black Americans from Colonial Times to the Present, by Harriet A. Washington (Doubleday ; 2006 ; p. 1.)

----------------
"In the high society of the first half of the century, marriage, despite it's bestowal status upon the wife, was the most absurdity. Marriage, conferring instanteous rank or money, ... lost most of its prestige and moment right after the wedding. ...By the end of the century, spurred by Rousseau's moralistic Nouvelle Hèloíse, a contrary cult, that of virtue, arose. After 1770 conjugal and maternal love became not merely admissible, but, for some, moral imperatives. ...

[...]
...Rousseau, who sought for himself the crown of morality in ostensibly defending marriage, presents in his Nouvelle Hèloíse the most enticing and extended defense of illicit love ever penned. The root of the problem is that as the century progressed sensibility became confused with morality: passionate feeling, if expressed in a highly civilized mode with grace and nuance, makes us forgive the Rousseau of The Confessions, for example, his pettiness, his jealousies, his betrayals. This moral-amoral byplay, present already in the novels of Richardson, was to be more intense as the century unfolded."
-
Madelyn Gutwirth : Madame De Staèl, Novelist. The emergence of the Artist as Woman (10,15.)

;
"...As the social contract seems tame in comparison with war, so fucking and sucking come to seem merely nice, and therefore unexciting. ... To be 'nice', as to be civilized, means being alienated from this savage experience - which is entirely staged. [...] The rituals of domination and enslavement being more and more practiced, the art that is more and more devoted to rendering their themes, are perhaps only a logical extension of an affluent society's tendency to turn every part of people's lives into a taste, a choice; to invite them to regard their very lives as a (life) style." - Susan Sontag , on 'Fascinating Fascism' (-74; p 103;104-5 at Under the sign of Saturn)
; "Anyone who cannot give an account to oneself of the past three thousand years remains in darkness, without experience, living from day to day." (Goethe) - as cited by Sontag (on same compile; p. 137.)

;
"It is widely accepted that we are now living in the 'Anthropocene', a new geological epoch in which the Earth's ecosystems and climate are being fundamentally altered by the activities of humans. I loathe the term, but I can't deny that it's appropriate."
; (Goulson), Silent Earth : Averting the Insect Apocalypse (2021; p 47.)
;
"It is sometimes said that humanity is at war with nature, but the word 'war' implies a two-way conflict. Our chemical onslaught on nature is more akin to genocide. It is small wonder that our wildlife is in decline."
; (Goulson, 2021 ; 118.)
;
----------------
"If we believe absurdities, we shall commit atrocities." (Voltaire)
- Citated from; (Joy, Melanie), Why We Love Dogs, Eat Pigs and Wear Cows : An Introduction to Carnism(2010; p. 95.)
;

"In the presence of the monster, you have eyes and ears for nothing else."
; (Flora Tristan) : London Journal of Flora Tristan: the Aristocracy and the Working Class of England ; 1842-edit. (tr: 1982. ; p. 71.)

;
"Every minority invokes justice, and justice is liberty.
A party can be judged of only by the doctrine which
it professes when it is the strongest."
Mdme de Staêl
(on) 'Consideration sur le Révolution de la Francaise' [1818]


8/15/08

Abbreviative terminology on sustainable production and environmental concerns


As we are of knowledge, along with other things, a need for a list of terms on climate change and sustainable consumption/production topics - and now (since 23.05.09 ->) also includes some terms relating to animal species in need of protection), we have decided to start such. The Abbreviations are collected from various sources, much of result from criss-crossing on our paths in search for the...truth on these things. Mostly them are from the web-articles, reviews on environmental products, product packages, Wikipedia, etc. The list is aimed to serve as supplementary companion and easy dictionary for shortened terms (Like UN= United Nations). It will be fulfilled from time to time, not in any ordered manner, mostly occasionally when feeling like some term might be suitable.

Need for such terminology is actual as there´s continuosly increasing creation of all kinds of systems for fx (environmental) production and environment protection organization/committees. Sometimes these terms are explained on fx. Product reports and in reviews, sometimes not.

There may be and propably is similar lists available elsewhere on web, but that doesn´t matter, instead this list can be used in companion or as alternative for some other(s). Ultimately all such could possibly be most useful if combined under certain headliner like Wikipedia companion and/or some bookmarking entry. For our purposes, the list is created within this blog, although, we understand that an external web-page would perhaps best serve its uses. So far, this will do.

[Notice: Some terms are included with larger alphabets, being (in our opinion) of uttermost important these days, common on discussions or, if we think so, propably becoming increasingly common in time. Thats just for the informative reasons. Any proposed additions or corrections for the terms are warmly welcomed, though I must add that we are not aiming to make most definitive descriptions from any of them here. The terms are included with as brief explanatory sentences as possible. Differing terms with similar abbreviative shortened form are propably separated with coloring. Overally, list should be of use for a quick glance on abbreviation in question.]







Abbreviations and Descriptions:

ACD= Adaptive Collaboravite Management. Participatory approach that links forest stakeholders, empowers local communities and their subgroups, and strenghtens adaptive capacities.

AFP= African Parks Foundation. Transnational conservation organization. A 'Public-Private hybrid', based in Netherlands. (Other acronyms?)

AIAI= See -> EIA

APO= Asian Productivity Organization

AWF= African Wildlife Foundation. Conservation organization focused on mentioned continent. US-based/funded. Established on 1961.

BSCI= Business Social Compliance Initiative. An European common social management system to improve working conditions in supply chains worldwide. BSCI has the Code of Conduct based on fx ILO(International Labour Organization) regulations for protecting workers rights and (ao) prohibition of child labour. ..."The members are requested to adopt and disseminate the BSCI Code of Conduct both internally and in their supply chain to inform employees and suppliers about the company’s dedication to social compliance and the BSCI development approach." Principally, BSCIs standards aren't as strickt as in some labelling systems created for sustainable production, but are developed intended to suit for circumstances and needs of the companies(especially clothing industry) in the developing world.

BEV=Battery Electric Vehicle(s)

BFR= Brominated flame retardants. Major type of chemical flame retardants, often used (ao) to prevent electronics, clothes and furniture from catching fire. One of the main targets of ROHS directive (though these don't strickly said belong among its prohibited containments, (I suppose) is the production of BFR-free products, as these BFR-chemicals are (ao pollutant containts) found to be enviromental hazardous and also possibly could have harmful effects on animals and humans.

CBD= Convention on Biological Diversity. An international agreement (of that).

CCS=Carbon Capture and Sequestriation. A method for reducing and capturing emissions from coal-burning for energy (The problem is (ao) the safe storaging place for the segregated polluting gases.)



CDM= Clean Development Mechanism. (In brief, simplified: An arrangement under Kyoto protocol to improve invests on projects that reduce GHS-emissions.)


CEP= "A report that includes the analysis of the country's environmental situation, current policies, institutional capacities and environmental co-operation experience with clear recommendations for the integration of the environment during CSP preparation." (As defined in EC Development Cooperation". See also: -> REP



CFB= Community Forestry Bill. Created to increase the community participation in sustainable management and utilization of natural resources in Thailand (finally in use after years of negotiations on it, and soon after critizised from certain aspects). The CF Bill makes clear that a legal community forest is one that is located outside of a protected area and that any CF (Community Forestry) organizations must be properly registered with the Royal Forest Department.

CFC=Chlorofluorocarbons. Earlier used fx in refrigerators, etc, more commonly known as freon(s). These were prohibited in use, because having been noticed to cause significant ozone depletion, resulting for and increasing the commonly known Arctic's (more significant) and Antarctic continents ozone holes. So CFCs have been replaced mostly with HFCs.

CIFOR= Center for International Forestry Research.

CITES= Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. Cites is based on an international agreement, with the aim to ensure that international trade in specimens of wild animals and plants does not threaten their survival. To ensure that, species included in Cites are kept in three Appendices, according to the degree of protection they need.


CMS= Convention on Migratory Species (/The Convention on Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals). An intergovernmental treaty (supervised?) by (See ->) UNEP

CSP= Concentrated Solar Power. A system of concentrating sunlight with lenses or mirrors to focus on concentrated small beam. The energy generated is then used as heat source, fx.

CSR=Corporate Social Responsibility, the guideline criteria the companies are to set for themselves to fulfill environmental standers, however all these are voluntarily.


EDGE=Evolutionary Distinct and Globally Endangered. An animal protection and conservation program developed by Zoological Society of London(ZSL), EDGE like the name says focuses especially on threatened species that are unique from the evolutionary basis. Goals intended include raising awareness from these (sometimes unprotected) species, identifying sometimes less known ones and developing strategies for their conservation.


EFTA= European Fair Trade Association. Organization of European Fair Trade importers (see also WFTO).


(EFTA= European Free Trade Association, established 1960.)


EIA=Environmental Impact Assessment. Means briefly an assessment of the possible impact (negative or positive) a project may have on environment considering natural, social and economic aspects. In addition to International Association for Impact Assesments (AIAI) definition, several countries have defined their own criteria for the term, often based on laws/concervation acts.


EPEAT= Electronic Product Environmental Assessment Tool. Ranking of the green attributes of computer equipment. Based on criteria such as the device's power management capabilities, the amount of hazardous material it contains, the amount of recyclable materials used and how easily it can be disassembled when reaches end of life. Bronze, Silver and Gold ratings for certain percentage of optional criteria. Criteria was mainly in use on U.S markets, as on other areas there may similar systems with differing names.


ESI= Endangered Species International


(P)EV= (Pure) Electric Vehicle. (Automobile) using electricity engine as main force.


FCCC= (United Nations) Framework Convention on Climate Change. UN international treaty produced in 1992 UN conference on Environment and Development (UNCD); (convention itself set no regulations on greenhouse gases, limits on those were later signed and are better known as Kyoto Protocol); also means the UN secretariat supporting the operation of convention. Also known as/used naming UNFCCC.


FCPF=Forest Carbon Partnership Facility.


FER= Foundation for Environmental Research. FER is a (US?) non-profit organization dedicated to understanding and improving the Earth’s environment. To support this it has various activities, fx (environmental) research funding.


FERN= Forests and the European Union Resource Network. International NGO (Non-government organization) that keeps track on forest activities at the European level. The scope of this also includes decisions and (climatic) issues that can have direct impact on forests and forests peoples' rights. Established 1991.


FLEGT= Forest Law, Enforcement, Governance and Trade


FIP= Forest Investment Program.


FSC= Forest Stewardship Council is an international non-profit, multi-stakeholder organization established in 1993 to promote responsible management of the world’s forests. Its main tools for achieving this are standard setting, independent certification and labeling of forest products.

FLO=Fairtrade Labelling Organizations International. A well-known non-profit Fair Trade organization. It's tasks include standard setting and operating as certification organization for labeled fair trade products. It unites some 20 labeling initiatives from 21 countries to a combined producer networks. Products carry the renown Fairtrade Certification Mark to guarantee the consumer that original producers in developing countries get better share of the market.

FOEI= Friends of the Earth International. One of the largest grassroot environmental networks in the world. Established 1969 in US, primary pursues focused are on environmental (and human rights) questions. Consists of groups representing each country that coordinate their own efforts and campaigns by themselves.

GFC= Global Forest Coalition, a coalition created by 19 groups in 2000. Consists from NGO's and indigenous peoples' organizations engaged in global policy debate related to forests. Main targets fx to advocate forests dependant-peoples rights.

GHS= Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals. Producers are requested to stipulate the hazard level of a chemical substance clearly using the GHS-specified label. Still a developing system (at most).

GHS= Greenhouse Gas Emissions

GMO= Genetically Modified Organics. Simply food produced or elevated by genetic engineering (GE).

GP= Green Productivity. Strategy for enhancing productivity and protecting the environment. Concept definition by Asian Productivity Organization(APO) for enabling sustainable development on Asia-Pacific region.

GPN= Green Purchasing Network

GSE= General Specification for the Environment, mainly a HP-brands own test conditioned from third party manufacturers produced parts.

HFC=Hydrofluorocarbons, gases used in substitutes for CFCs nowadays (recently, at least?) because these don't cause ozone depletion. However, these do result greenhouse effect, causing global warming even more than carbon dioxides. Therefore, the use of HFCs is also being reduced.

HFCV=Hydro-Electric Vehicle(s)

ICI= International Cocoa Initiative. Regulation and supervision system created for chocolate production (by trading companies internationally), based on protocol created in 2001. Basic aim (as stated in website); “to oversee and sustain efforts to eliminate the worst forms of child labour and forced labour in the growing and processing of cocoa beans and their derivative products.”. The system was still slow to take place in use currently (in 2009), but website states that several (24) pilot projects in communities at Ghana were launched couple years ago. The main intention being to offer best-practise approach, that in time can be adopted by communities in cocoa-producing countries.



ICRI= International Coral Reef Initiative. Co-operative organization founded by UN, various environmental organizations and countries (at least Australia, Philippines, France, Japan, Jamaica, Sweden, USA) for the protection and environmental education about coral reefs.



IDP= Internally Displaced Persons. Practically means refugees that remain within country's geological borders. (IDPs often a result from armed conflicts and generalized violence UN's definition emphasizes on displaced people being forced to flee from their homes/habitual residence. But, since there's not a strickt definition, more generally the term is perhaps used also for internal refugee's from natural disasters as well.)

IEA= International Energy Agency


IFAT= See -> WFTO


IFPRI= International Food Policy Institute. Funded by CGIAR (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research) , on basis of support from foundations, international organisations, etc.


IMO= Institute for Marketecology. One of the most from renowned agencies for certification of eco-friendly products. Has fx. the GOTS (Global Organic Textile Standard)-labeling for organically produced textiles.


IPCC= Intergovernmental panel on Climate Change

IUCN= International Union for the Conservation of Nature

LMMA= Locally Managed Marine Area


MAC= Marginal Abatement Cost. ...So called 'McKinsey Curve', which has 'risen to prominence on REDD+ spheres' and appears influential 'in setting the debate for International carbon reduction regines'; (Term viewed from definition acc. the Greenpeace-report Bad Influence; How McKinsey inspired plans lead to rainforest destruction)


MEA= Multinational Environmental Agreement

MIPS= Material Input per Service Unit. A unit for quantifying devices / human / etc eco-efficiency. Lower the number of MIPS, the better for environment. Can be applied for fx metering the sustainability of production.


MPA= Marine Protected Area(s).

MSC= Marine Stewardship Council. Has created a global environmental standard for sustainable and well-managed fisheries. MSC was founded by World Wide Fund for Nature and Unilever (but has been independent since 1999). The blue MSC eco label given to products should guarantee that a company in question operates environmentally responsible way.

NEAP= National Environment Protection Plan

NEWS!= Network of European World Shops. Has about 2700 world shops around the continent, which sell Fair Trade products.

NGO= Non-governmental organisation.

NSSD= National Strategy for Sustainable Development -> Also: NSESD (National Strategy for Ecologically Sustainable Development)

NTFP= Non Timber Forest Products

PHEV= Plug-in Hybrid Vehicle. Fx combination of electric and other form of engine, most apparently. Also see -> (P)EV

PRTR= Pollutant Release and Transfer Register

PV= (Solar) Photovoltaics. Converting sunlight directly to electricity.

RAN= Rainforest Action Network. An organization based 1985 in San Francisco.

REDD= Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation. UN-REDD program aims to promote kind of 'carbon credits'-system to support sustainable forestry practices, where (developing) countries can gain actual financial benefit from protecting and preserving their remaining (rain)forests. The "...aim is to generate the requisite transfer flow of resources to significantly reduce global emissions from deforestation and forest degradation.", and: "...challenge was to establish a functioning international REDD finance mechanism that can be included in an agreed post-2012 global climate change framework." At least in some developing countries this was in effency/development recently. Criticised in some instances as well, fx from the REDD(money) being limited to certain groups/projects in benefiting countries. Also, a statement for UN climate talks at Bonn signed by large number of activist groups raises concern on that "...Any form of carbon offsetting, including CDM afforestation/reforestation and REDD offset projects will only increase the ecological footprint and carbon debt of developed countries and must thus be avoided." ; And also, they notice: "...Climate change mitigation and sustainable forest management must be based on different mindsets with full respect for Nature, and not on carbon offset mechanisms." and soforth(acc. to them), "...developed countries should provide sufficient financial and technological support to enable developing countries to halt the destruction of forests and other ecosystems."


REP= Regional Environmental Profile. "...focuses on environmental issues common to a group of neighbouring countries (including transboundary issues) such as sharing the management of ecosystems, which can be more effectively addressed at the regional level.". See also -> CEP

RoHS= Removal of Hazardous Substances, removal of the chemicals that companies should get rid of and have substituted for the safer alternatives (if this has taken into practise and how universally propably varies a little more, but the EU legislation fx is from 2006.) Anyway, products that fill the criteria therefore should use this marking on sales packets. ROHS-directive prohibits the use of six specific substances; lead, mercury, cadmium, hexavalent chromium, polybrominated biphenyls and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (as these are "extremely hazardous" for environment and therefore "not to be used as they are difficult to handle" - by environment I interpret that...)

RRI= The Rights and Resources Initiative is a coalition of international, regional and community organizations engaged in conservation, research and development.

RSPO=Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil

SCF= Strategic Climate Fund

SEA= Strategic Environmental Assessment

SFM= Sustainable forest management

SIA= Strategic Impact Assessment. (Not to be confused for Social Impact Assessment)

TEK= Traditional Ecological Knowledge

TOQ= Toxic Equivalent

VOC= Volatile Organic Compounds. There´s not generally uniform policy on definitions for this term, for more information see Wikipedia entry on VOC.

UNFCCC= United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

UNEP= United Nations Environment Programme

WAZA= World Association of Zoos and Aquariums. An association/organisation to join worlds zoo and aquarium communities. Principal aim to support the individual zoos, aquariums and similar in animal care and welfare, as well as in the conservation and other sustainable/environmental efforts.

WCS= Wildlife Conservation Society. Among the oldest conservation societies in the U.S. Originally New York Zoological Society (name was changed 1993)

WDCS= Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society. A charity organization dedicated for whales, dolphins (Cetacean overall) protection. Established 1987.

WEEE= Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment. Any waste consisting of broken electronics or unwanted electronic/electrical device. EU directive on WEEE holds manufacturers responsible for e-waste disposal at products end-of-life. According to WEEE directive (2002/96/EC) responsibility for the disposal of waste electrical and electronic equipment should be on the manufacturer of such equipment. There's similar directives on Asia and also on US the bill on such was recently on preparation (or even yet fulfilled).

WFTO= World Fair Trade Organization. International co-operative Fair Trade organization (earlier known as IFAT)



8/11/08

Newspost#100808

Train train, all though the night...candidates ready ´an willing on freight rails on their way to white house? We were supposed not to give any further comments...and can resist the temptation and decline from any comments. If wish to take the burden and watch the race, see Paris Hilton campaign videos...A quick (beeping) sound effect polls-counter (Bojoing!) tells us that the candidates are (now) even. Exiting times...


If we took one tenth of the state of New Mexico and converted it into algae production we could meet all the energy demands for the entire United States. - Thats pretty statement, but does it have any possibilities to be realized in close future? If one is to reason on grounds of opinion by our news-source, yes most hopefully (consider also, if the New Mexicans would like that scenario to happen) By the way, same source mentions (elsewhere) that "European trains are the real deal." We cannot but agree, happy trains to all travelers...this day could be re-christened the train day...all the same...lets forward...If one trusts on researchers opinions (from algae labs) we find something as shaking as: "...oil companies are in fact afraid that our labs would soon enough put them out of business". Yes...looks like its a 2nd generation biofuel and Algae could possibly be more applicable compared to some other alternatives as that particular vegetation is actually the primary origin of what was to turn into oil pockets while cooking under surface during the hundreds of thousands of years ...and so I see the brighter, greener future, floating on the algae fields from Sierra Madre to the Mongolian deserts in the shiny, shimmering sunlight. Algae can also be used to eat carbon dioxide right out from power plant. The pro(ject) is being piloted by a utility in Arizona and is expected to be able producing "one billion gallons, 10% of current US capacity, by 2012". So good luck...we (hope to) stay in tune.



While waiting the positive cleaner future, one can meanwhile take a look at 1st generation, that is, however, not making as much headlines in the first place. Actually the british governmental as well as citizens knowledge on biofuel production seems to rest on obscure impressions. According to british RFA(Renewable Fuels Agency) study (only) 2.14 percent of UK fuel is biofuel and "Biodiesels are thought by some to have much greater potential for being sustainably sourced - that is, they could perhaps be produced without taking away land and food from hungry people". Also informative is that "For more than 40 per cent of the UK supply, even the country of origin was unknown." But: where the actual source field was known it was mostly cropland, so therefore is found that "RFA felt that it only knew about half what it should." In spite of that conclusive remarks given are "the emerging popular picture of the linkage between current biofuel supplies and rainforest destruction and high food prices seems to be borne out." Is it actually so? Borne out of what? Borne outlandish, foreign origin or borne in outer space, say Alfa Centauri? Again, lack of proof isn´t a proof of no impact. So, on our humble quest for true biofuel economics we now turn on to OECD-FAO Report to find some comparable info, though concerning price hikes on global (world economy) level: "Biofuel demand is the largest source of new demand in decades and strong factor underpinning the upward shift in agricultural commodity prices."1. Remarkable shortage of knowledge or controversial information not considered worth noting? Decide yourself, but all things considered nothing diminishes the fact that biofuels affect, and continues to affect on global food prices.




On the technological frontend... we find a list of relatively new-born consumer aimed inventions, but nothing actually seems to exite us. Yes, the Samsung hybrid camera/MP3 player seems to be of quality but we agree that photographers propably have merely uses for camera. The modified Xvid MPEG-4 file format and a converter software that can convert to other video file formats sounds most useful, though. Why these weren´t available few years ago when I started considering on invest to a new (precious, dear) pocket digiwonder?
Then there´s minilaps with some frustrating 10" screen and 1.6 Ghz proc. As many of competitors on the market also have an insufficient 4 Gb flashmems instead of larger alternatives already possible (16 and 24, hopefully I recalled that correctly...) we find the whole concept of minilaps just.. marketing. Other products mentioned on Wired galleries...limited compability (my grandmother would possibly have favored Emmanuelle to Mad Max, but still couldn´t connect eSATA)...on Soul; no GPS, no Wifi...Sidekick considered; no Wifi and 512 microSD included is(prices considered) just...marketing. Nokias "Blackberry Killer" is more promising including GPS, 3G, Wifi, Bluetooth, but comparing the high price and a promise of battery to live up total of three days we find it just...marketing. But perhaps its all just MuleSkinner World dragging behind the shiny future in these technological frontends...
More of interest are the videos on planned next-gen Mozilla project (to replace Ffox in some close? future) Aurora. We find the "navigational environment" indeed functional and useful for incesting the data and social connections(see the videos yourself, theres also one from mobile Firefox). Yet, I cannot help but think (yes, its still on planning stage, we know...) that the actual view of of floating web-page-icons looks unaesthetical and boring. Besides, yankees seem to frustratingly favor the touch-screen environments on every imaginable device (latest hit, yes...), which I must notice to be also just...boring. I think such UIs feels like being designed for idiots, but maybe thats the prospective future, so also we shall write more from the Idiot (sooner the better, hopefully).






While the consumers are supposed to be under feeling of guilt from torrenting the entertainment market we are given some statistical wisdom from Radiohead "In Rainbows" pay-what-you-wish-dl-experiment (using Big Champagne data, dl the summary Pdf from MCPS-PRS website). The pure nu3bers tell us that album was loaded in three weeks time some 2.3 Million times, though most of the customers favored torrent-sites instead of official one. No remarkable losses, as the CD also sold to something like number one on billboard afterwards(as we noted in earlier posts). Meanwhile, in most active P2P-month december (Rainbows, I guess, was publized at the end of October) french downloaded movies a wealthy number of 16.6 M times, and since then the most favored has been Transformers with 3.7 M dls after the publication. Basic learning from these figures: No more messing with the missionary man, there´s some obscure snowball-effect apparently on the loose...




Wish(?) to check the news(feed), motherlode of all the important information.


Powered by ScribeFire.





Notes:

1. OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2008-2017. , 2008, p. 11-12. (UN Report on global food markets for next ten years). For certain interest on oncoming biofuel markets and, also at least partly on linkage between biofuels and food price hikes, are also (ao) the following lines from p. 22-23. "Production of fuel ethanol tripled between 2000 and 2007, with the US and Brazil accounting for the majority of this growth. However, a large number of other countries either commenced renewable energy programmes or increased fuel ethanol production in this period as well. Biodiesel output witnessed an even more pronounced expansion over the same period, having grown from less than one billion litres to almost 11 billion litres. Initially the EU accounted for more than 90 percent of global diesel production, but with increased biodiesel output in many other countries, in particular in the US, its share has declined to less than 60 percent in 2007.", and (on biodiesel production); "...World trade is, however, projected to remain largely unchanged in following years due to technical constraints in the use of palm-oil based biodiesel in the colder climates and as production in the main consuming countries increases. Most of the trade should originate in Malaysia and Indonesia with the EU as the main destination." (a report pdf should be available at website of FAO)

8/10/08

MuleSkinner Book Recommendations No 3

The Eco-Products Directory 2008
; For sustainable production and consumption (2008)

The Directory published by Asian Productivity Organization comes with paper version and Pdf. According to their website the pdf version (available anywhere, but most originally from their site of course, check under Resources ; e-books on green productivity) is said to contain a selection of more than 700 products and services, so the list seems but overwhelming and respectable.
We are not in knownledge if other such a directories exist, but a quick look on this one shows that it well deserves a place here on our recommendations. Of course, our reviews are based on pdf version.


The directory is propably most valuable for small scale entrepreneurs, though vast list of eco-products (fx from materials and spare parts onto the refrigetors and air-cooling systems) makes it useful for any corporative buyer. Nevertheless, the directory is wellworth getting to know for common consumer also. As the Directory is of Asian origin, so are most of the products listed. So one naturally first notices that certain ecologically renowned producers like Hitachi and Toshiba also participating in editioning the catalogue are well represented in the list of products. Also, if one keeps in mind the area included (everything ”eco-saving”) the vastness of directory becomes merely a matter of taste. In fact considering that there are multitudes of uses and varieties of human generated products the catalogue seems actually quite modest.


The Pdf-version contains 393 page including prewords on climate change and the background of catalogue + the database & indexes(few pages for advertisements not included). As an funny example we can mention that theres as many (three pieces) of eco-friendly rice-boilers as vacuum cleaners. On products on sale at European market we can at least mention the Megaman lamps, advertised (by the company) as worlds first completely ROHS-free energy-saving lamps. Recommendable for everyone (see picture below:)



From practically limitless list of products we also like to give some attention for the auto-insurance system where each contract made benefits the nature by plantation of two trees (thats a good start, why not make it four...).


In catalogue foreword, first of all, theres some pretext on climate change and necessary actions taken by producers on the Asian area. The catalogue itself comprises of Datasheets for each product in it. Each is given continuous ID-number, along within the product in question is linked (by colours)to the category it fits: (eco-) materials, components, products, services. ID-numbers are further divided into subentries, so: ES-4-032 would be: Eco-services -- Management -- related services -- (spesific) single product ; (as usual, a picture here would be more telling than words can come up to...but see for yourself its quite easy to use.) Although, as an electronic catalogue theres limitless amount of space available but books index is managed according to different manufacturers. Therefore, searching products of certain kind is not quite as easy as it could. Better products-index would be of use for both private and company reader, especially if (when) the catalogue in time goes on enlargening.


Continuing, each datasheet contains an icon showing the category of ecologiness and/or certain topics its econess is connected (by which, how, when/where as described in catalogue). On each sheet theres also circular line, showing points in its "life-cycle" (only two points marked on each product considered) concerning when/where products econess fits (scale used: resources - materials - design - production - use/repair - end-of-life). The rest of the of the fields included in each datasheet are textual fields containing information from products econess in details, manufacturers contact information, sales territory (availability: worldwide/ certain areas). Extra details comprise of product-photo and the brief specific description of it (fx. the product model special number) or the short explanation of the precentages/comparisons/charts presented in pictorial tablatures from the products uses.


Conclusively, most apparent interest for consumer reader is naturally the eco-products section. The criteria for selections is based on choices for products that ”help clean and conserve the environment” and ”products with high performance, yet creating a low enviromental effect”. Socalled ”eco-design” is noted in products and the main points taken in consideration are: effective and efficient use of materials, energy saving and toxics. Because the characteristics of eco-products are mostly decided during design stage, more concern is given to that. Increasing in knownledge of environmental labels is hoped to develop an low environmental impact-society (so that manufacturers in response to consumer demand make further efforts in environmental development). Noteworthy goals, and important to notice the range of products included is quite wide: there´s all kinds of stuff from food to hybrid toilets, from natural gas fuelled busses to clothing and furniture. Not everything is available, however, but in time...:)...As last few (additional) remarks we can also just note that perhaps an additional catalogue with a selected list for consumer customers would be useful.

8/3/08

The Muleskinner Clairvoyant Part I

(1.1:) A brief look at the close future Web Development

(By WhAcKo-GeCkO)



”...Now, everybody´s so isolated, a good-looking bunch of ghosts....Now the girls can´t spell, and the boys can´t read”
(Bob Walkenhorst; Rainmaker)


Foreword


In this article (and the following parts, we are to divide this at least in three parts due variety of topics under lens) we are to practise a most exiting task: we (hope to) make propable predictions concerning the future. With the future we mean simply the next 10 to 50 years. The time-scale of our futuristics may sound controversial, but its actually just a developmental formulation. According to our experience from the past 20 years it should not be too complicated to take the role of clairvoyant and give some forethoughts of the next ten (from cybersociety perspectives). Predictions for the longer time are without doubt more or less just guessing. If we knew where the whole planet is at 2058 I wouldn´t be writing this.


Choosing the time-scales just mentioned we are simply using a hypothesis based on increasing fastness of techno-cultural change: One can easily suppose, that during the next 50 years there will be at least as much changes as compared to past 100. Taking a shorter time-scale as a background for the first part of article, say from late 1980´s until 2018 serves as quick snapshot, a brief look at the most apparent aspects. This because the continuing speed of changes is a dominant factor in our common culture, simply defined as ”Cyberculture”.


To give some background to our overall futuristic soothsayings we mention few remarkable inventions from technological area during last 50/100 years. In 1950´s consumer society 'the common people already had the '”luxurious” inventions like fx automobiles, electricity, nuclear powers, television. However, things like computers/internet, genetic engineering(as possibility in uses like cloning) or lets say more unusual luxury like space-crafts were at best on planning level. So, they were not generally imaginable for a typical consumer society member. Widening our time-scale, 100 years past (1908) electricity was invented but not very much common in everyday use, not hints from the use of nuclear power in any close sight (except at, lets say, in Einsteins mind and similar scientists, for the 1st commercially productive reactor started at 1956, automobiles were invented and well on their way, but television, computers, genetics just barely imaginable, at foremost, So, at 2058 most likely there will be at least as many (as aforementioned 3-5) inventions that we are be now able at best sensing in science-fiction stories, but not yet able to see any real uses of them.


The chances are, that the fastness of change will be even more demanding and we are propably not able to predict the future as easily for it will be too much unfamiliar to our common knownledge. Frankly: the changes actually taking place will most likely come from the areas which are not yet much familiar enough (for us) to possibly imagine them properly. In spite of that, like any good soothsayer, we of course wish, in these brief clairvoyances just to make supposable predictions and if actually happened can look back and notice: ”I knew it...” (; First, of course, we have to live that far to see them come true...)


As an area of extreme falsifications and dubious liars, telling the future is of course much appreciated and seems to be the hobby of every other whealer-dealer. There was augurists at the times of Roman empire, not to mention the foreseers of the end-of-the-world through world history (most generally known examples are from 999, 1999 A.D.)1 Most notably, as we have seen, examples of doomsday soothsayers in the last turn of century were as numerous as bank accounts at Cayman islands (as anyone could have foreseen...). However, there´s been also notable number of predictions, based on more factual level; sometimes suitable to us because they give socially interesting views in the future of cybersociety. We take as an examples a couple predictions from decades not so distant past; namely 80/90s.


The Miraculous Machine? PC as (human) transformative device


On foreseers in the recent past, first to notice, would be the over-enthusiastic transhumanistic thoughts on biotechnologies, liberal politics, etc. of Francis Fukuyama from 1980/90s (during their publication times widely used in Neoconcervatism in needs of arguments to raise funds for some ”Brave New World-projects”) as typical example. Though perhaps decorated with falsefully positive futuristic presuppositions, Fukuyamas predictions are much in sync with the actual change taking place in human society and affecting our personnel. The role of human being in relation to developments in certain techno-genetic areas has become to the state where it is in constant interplay with the transhumanitative processes, we believe.

Predictions concerning the close future of computerized humankind have not always been as optimistic; another good example, we might notice, is a book published in the 1980s but very much ahead of its times ; The Cult of Information2 by Theodore Roszak. In spite of that, nowadays reader propably more likely finds out which pessimistic visions actually never happened at least in the manner predicted (or if the Big Brother implications connected to computerization by Roszak were to take place, it has already happened.)


Nevertheless, Roszak´s most crucial theorema is briefly(simplified but here necessary) that because computers doesn´t equate to human thinking, they don´t generate new ideas (like humans). Instead, the ´knownledge´ produced by computerization is merely just information, which in statistical analyses (by government et similar institutional powers uses) finds purposes in limiting and controlling peoples freedom of thought and opinion-making. Nowadays, when internet has created possibilities for people to find ways past the governmental information channels and also to connect (via net) almost anywhere in the world, the PC (personal computer) actually makes every household a possible starting point for a radical questioning of these numb bureaucratic statistical tactics. So Roszaks ´scaring´ point – creation of one dimensional computerized human being who is most concerned to techniques for classifying and cataloging information instead of real concerns of knownledge3 – has proven wrong. The Internet instead more likely has created a lot new ways for people to compare the thruthfulness of information and share that knownledge with others. That said, by no means underestimates the significanse of the most apparent (negative) result of computers in the age of world wide global networks: Information overload (Roszak seems to have predicted that correctly though only first remarks from it were appearent at the time of Cult of Information.)


Funny thing, also that the (most) important single factor in computers march to everybodys homes has been its capability to entertain, which at 1980´s was one its feared characteristics. Computers were feared to lessen peoples capability to think. Another funny thing, the most driving ”Fear Factor” nowadays is not the machines uses as creating statistical nonsense for politics or the machine itself turning against its users like in typical science-fiction written pre 1980. No, more recently the most feared thing has been that the great computer (meaning THE WEB) might some day collapse. Internet has been supposed to fall apart because intentional hacks or the information overload couple of times (not happened so far). However, the coming ending of IP´s seems to be one such a possibily next in the foresight(we predict relatively fast moving to IPV6-world, but how knows...and theres always possibility of the A.I. Somehow, mystically being born from the ever-enlargening parts and differenting areas of imaginative ´websphere´). That mentioned, just to notice that relatively little scifi written about Internets futuristics so far.


Well, all that aforementioned, it seems quite reasonable also mention David Brins 1998 book The Transparent Society. Brins visions first appeared as an article4, which gives us some remarks from the books main themes: the ever-increasing superintendence and unavoidable transparency of human interactions in the social field of society. Taking this as an example most important concerning our predictions on fututistics, we notice a techniques of watching being developed along within the internet and other areas of computer networks.


As the society has become more and more relying on connectivity and Internet, people (as social beings) have found the line between private and public web-persona more significantly blurred (aka borders between private and non-private are continuosly questioned), which pretty much fits in Brins theoremas. As Brin argues, people have choice between one that offers the illusion of privacy by restricting the power of surveillance to authorities, or one that destroys that illusion. According to him it would be beneficial to society if people had the same access to commonly privacy kept areas as the those in power have; the attempts ro limit that for limited groups can be seen as negative development. Also interesting hypothesis for us, credited to origin from Brins book, is a sentence: ”There will be more change in the coming 10 years than has been since 1998”5. In the MuleSkinner perspective that seems perfectly rational. It is also reasonable to note that all the changes will not be for good. As everything affects everything many areas better to be left in peace will be forced to groundbreaking changes.


Nevertheless changes are everywhere apparent as cybersociety has more or less already taken place. Our aim is to try to find some uses for typical uses of scifi-writing (like Brins predictions serve as example) combined with the simple remarks from the actual changes happening. Most wishful result from our methods would be the imaginative, supposable and by no means impossible (if not exactly correct) clairvoyances. A successful marriage from free-form visionaristic prophecies and inspriring remarks based on the factual sources, to express the same in an other words.


From personal experience I can say that most of the technological developments of the recent 10 years have been quite unpredictable (perhaps I´ve just aged or perhaps its the number of computer-related inventions that hides the most supposable new inventions from foresight). In the late 90´ies I had hardly got to notice the music revolution started with the new much obscure packing format named MP3. I did have a slight idea about the file-sharing networks taking a permanent place in home-PC´s in close future, but didn´t have any presupposed idea about speed of coming development or the manner the concept ´digitalization´ would start to affect to the social and economical bases of entertainment media. I had no glimpse of the soon actual fast technological advances of digital cameras, had some idea about cd-roms and hard-disk spesifics but couldn´t have guessed the capasity later available and needed as Blu-Ray/HD-DVD or capasity available nowdays on Harddisks, USB, Memcards. Also, a most telling example has been the increase in wireless networks. The most advertised predictions I remember from those times were possibly the supposed closer inter-connectivity of TV and PC (happened partly, but never as intense as publicly advertised to happen) and the ever so scifi applications mentioning virtuality and ”virtual”-life (actually developed all the time and much hobbyed, but still has yet to become a mainstream habit). And a whole lot more that never happened, or/just recently happening in somehow different levels/manners.


In spite of that I suppose, to predict at least overall trends of next ten years I try in next chapter give a satisfactory explanation from some most actual changes at the moment. In the next chapter, one might suppose we´re favoring some ´key players in the market´ (but we´re not, choices of subjects are mainly just for the current visibility of certain developments in on-going praised web 2.0-revolution) . The main point I´m resting on, is:


G = Web 2.0 [compare to E=mc2]



First of all, one needs to take some notice on defining web 2.0. Is it actually a new area of services and developments as Tim O´Reilly and co. would like us to believe? According to PARTECO-research report Web 2.0 is typically a social media, though there´s been social media in web ever since the beginning of the Internet, yet web 2.0 is claimed to have appeared just after year 20006. Typical examples of web 2.0 developed web-sites are speficially using ”Web as Platform”-thinking where the developer offers users services instead of programs (bittorrent is mentioned as example of the other typical part of service; decentralization). Also, characteristical for web 2.0 can be seen ao. Uses of collective intelligence (tagging, taking benefit from uses customers searches/reviews/favours...), database as a 'primary engine' in web shops, continous (beta-)development of programs/services offered instead of selling new program versions, lighweight programming models (like RSS-feeds, Google-Maps), the services superiority over several devices used (Itunes as an example of program designed to be used in many different computer platforms), and finally, rich user experience (usability/scalability of the service almost anywhere online)7.


Such an list of definitions, one can not but ask if web 2.0 is just a normal continuation in development of historically quite recently born internet, a change that has became obvious more within the capacity of machines raised and also more flexible hardware, phones, comps., available (and in the same time people getting used to web as normal part of their daily life)? I´d be more in favor of that definition; most such slogans as web 2.0 are stuck on the phenomenoms actually taking place in more continous process and as such are to born/die according to marketing logics. Nevertheless, as an overall definition web 2.0 is quite useful and can be seen as ongoing trend, which quite well enlightens us the developments apparent on todays (web)society and as such worth closer study.


According to Tirronen Internet nowadays is ”...webfeeds, blogs, mashups, collective intelligence, sharing, producing, commoness and creating social nets”8 All of the above (and a whole lot more!) can be seen defined as example of the more technologically flexible, more socially oriented user interfaces, and even more typifying as shift towards more decentralized structure in the net. Interestingly, Tirronen also mentions Bittorrent-focused piratism as an example of webs newly created ways as blurring the hierarchical boundaries of media with the (im)material uses of files and/or objects shared. Among the most apparent qualities of the media available at the net (pirated or not) is soforth freedom from physical and spatial bonds. Also, is mentioned the copying/sharing (of files) having been typical in the use of home-PCs ever since the times of Commodore at 1980´s. On more general level is then described the copyright-concerned raidings of the Pirate Bay website9. Concerning the questions most interesting for the uses of this article we can conclude: As an example from typical web 2.0 application Bit-torrent fulfills most characteristics asked, and, as an example from the the uses of (old forms) of media in these web 2.0 platforms, even more apparent is taking into use users increased capabilities (as means of increased computer power) for sharing, connectivity and searching of media.


But to forward in our article we must next ask why mention Google in headline of chapter so important? Simply because the on-linenes has already become so important and as developing ever better, more flexible services are taken in use. From the typical examples of Web 2.0-software relatively recently born many are G-developed (G-mail, Calender, G-Earth... as an examples of typical web 2.0 platform generating interwoven net of user-created extensions). One can notice that concerning the searching, online-databasing as well, Google is in better position to produce something in needed. Flexibility (available everywhere) is one main point, user-friendlines and fastness the other.

Not to mention the ads-system ever so important in the net ever since the early (ideal) days (when there was at least less information overlord...).


The Rainmaker came to town...people got what they wanted?



Cellphones market is the typical example of the everraising importance of searching services, main area of Google. According to relatively recent article, after the publishing of Apples Iphone, significant adding to searches was counted (Iphone resp. For 50% of the total), Google being credited as to have captured 61% of the mobile search market, Yahoo! And MS having a lot lesser searches made10. However, its unlikely that Google will ever gain total market-share in same manner as Microsoft which still had some 91,13 percentage slice of the OS currently11. It will propably govern the information searching and services built around that, but at the times when more ever-available services are affordable to more and more people, there will most likely be more specification on every sector. Nowadays there´s hardware manufacturers (like Nokia) developing products in combination with software developed, in the same time producers like Apple/Google moving to hardware areas (though the strategies may vary, as we learn from Wired-article12).


All that aforementioned is (according) to our opinion not just web 2.0 characteristics, but more a natural consequences of technological spreading of ”WebSphere”. Internets most potential power lies in the power to overcome limits; geographical, cultural, technical, the boundaries type doesn´t really matter. Similarly rapid spreading of the 3G-network possiblities quickly creates needs for the phones softwares to be even more richer and capable of taking use of social networking possibilities (as has a lot already been happening).


Concerning on mobile phones we can mention at least two (relatively) recent developments; the new linuxpowered phone market, mainly the Googles Android as platform in its flag-carrier (Verizons Limo-platform mentioned also even more adjustable to third-party developers). Linux is expected to grab 23% from the smart-phone market until 201313. Second hindsight concerns Nokias decisions to free up Symbian code and re-establish its base as Open-Source during couple coming years14, marking a similar move to more flexible uses of software developed for phones. In the future we can expect more of the similar happening and also more specialized phone builds for certain services/combinations. There will (in fact is...) phones for sports use, music, gaming, etc. This stylishing specializing has good backgrounds so we see no reason why this would not keep on increasing to an even more luxurious market. In the long run, the process means the cellphone transformating to personal usability carrier including for all kinds of specialized needs, including at least larger memory databases, futuristic solutions for LCDs (solving the problem of unusefull small screen), connectability improved in the wireless nets as well as USB/Bluetooth compabilities for external devices and more improvided security features. Just to name a few from the loads and loads of technical/software aspects.


In similar manner as on cellphones one can predict development toward even more flexible products concerning the browsers. From nowadays succes stories Firefox is propably most typical example of the user-flexible platform with its thousands of extensions developed by users (manner copied in later builds of IE ao). In the future (soon, couple more years), one can suppose that there will be possibilities arrange particles and spices according to ones own taste and download a browser built for ones spesified tastes (like cars from factory are nowadays compiled from suitable extra parts chosen by customer), unless that possible development is still halted by security reasons. Whether that is to happen is a possible directional way, at least arguing on the basis of demands for fastness, user-friendliness and scalability. If not on most well-known browsers, perhaps on some more experimental builds. As an early example of similar developmental creations already at the use, one can mention Flock-browser, developed from Firefox-base and added with some extra toolbars for typical new social web 2.0 web-sites like Youtube, Flickr, Facebook15. Even more important to notice, many of the extra usage and/or social webbing apps built are based on efficient usage of most helpful, free work-force, namely the actual customers. Android, as a model for the trend in development of smart-phones serves as an example, where the development of any extra´s (added to actual OS platform) is already at the planning stage left to users and their innovations16.


Again, continuing on the coming generation of smartphones...all the applications originating from linux-platform solutions praised one should not forget that phones basic use is still phones basic use: speaking. So linux-revolution not necessarily overtakes take prevailing market of smartphones(as it did not happen completely on computers OSs either). But as the process is yet started, theres a good reason to suppose that in the long run, it will succeed as fruitful development for phones platforms. In ten years(sooner actually) we are at least supposed to see a real creation of personal carriable identitity card; that is an 3G(or the successors for that standard)-based device, offering efficient uses for onlinenes, access to media and large databases with fast speed as well as geo-locationess. As well as use of multitude of new social sites/apps. According to capitalist logics, in relatively short time, devices are to be available in reasonable prices. Who dares to resist the temptation?


In combination: Information society happened, we can except in the coming 10 years the Cybersociety stepping to the complete wirelessness as with the datanets gaining more potential and also, people ever increasing their uses of that potential. In the next part of this article (1.2) we take a look at some other areas that are most likely to show us some predictable lines in (the close) futuristics of the netfocused parts of society. As an example of the questions most apparent, we might here take a quick look at picture showing the development in storage medias in recent ten years(the picture below).


As can be seen, the (newest) smallest device has the largest capacity of storage space. This is by no means to deny that the objects shown (hard disk, USB-music player/memory + the newer memcards) were developed for somewhat different uses. And the devices are not actually quite comparable, mem cards being more kind of new breed of the (now archaic) high density discs (just for fun, compare the storage capacity of them [1.44 Mb] from some 15 years past) than hard disks. We can also notice that theres an ongoing trend at the beginning: that of flash memory devices coming to markets and strating to replace the tradtional hard disks from now on. Nevertheless, all these devices were relatively efficient at the years of being bought(by me), if not perhaps the most pioneering frontline technology. In spite of that, the mem cards usability being most for just storaging(hd and music player were developed for other purposes as well), the cards yet have most advanced uses in nowadays multi-compability needs(phones, cameras, etc), as well as carryability (small size), as well as being fastest(old USB-standard 1.1 player being perhaps the slowest device, hd most limited in the case of connectivity). At the time of writing, 2 Gb capasity for micro-SD card was somewhat becoming a standard in use as replacing the prevailing 1 Gb cards (reasons propably being the increased demand of music/video files). As has been concluded, theres every reason to suppose that following development will demand even more fastness and capacity. Not to mention compability, carryability and shareability. But...thats of course just slice from the whole cake and our overall predictions should also be enlarged to other areas of development than just internet. (END OF PART 1.1)











NOTES AND SOURCES

(Wikipedia and similar sources are mostly linked directly from the text)

1. Not to mention Nostradame, most well-known foreseer of all times. We hope we can take a closer look at Nostradame on some article later on. In the meantime one can fx. (if not familiar with the person in question) see Roger Christian movie Nostradamus(1994), or if you like music better, theres a Judas Priest album on Nostradamus prophecies.

2. Roszak, Theodore, 1987, Cult of Information. Pantheon Books. My remarks are based on finnish transl. Konetiedon kritiikki. (1992, Art House) from books 1st edition. Concerning Roszaks thinking and its actual correctness one might also like to take a look at books 2nd edition from 1994, reviewed by R.W. Schuler at ”Critical Book Review of The Cult of Information.”; http://www.geocities.com/CollegePark/Library/6460/cbr/cbr.html viewed 16.6.2008

3. Roszak, 1987, most notably: p. 99-104; 124-131; Also, more successful conclusive remarks on computers uses on politics and mass-media field see 173-202. Overally, it can be noted that Roszaks visions seem out-dated merely because the fast development of personal computers has changed their overall usability and capabilities in a way that propably wasn´t in anybodys foresight at the 1980´s.

4. Brin, David, 1996, ”The Transparent Society”, http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/4.12/fftransparent.html ,[article contains several web-pages, Wired Magazine, issue 4.12] viewed 21.07.2008

5. Grossman, Wendy M., 2008, ”The Transparent Society Revisited. Watching the watchers ten years on”, http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/05/26/cfp_transparent_society/ viewed 16.6.2008

6. Melakoski-Sirkesalo-Tirronen, 2007, s 9. ”Himottaa, mutta pelottaa? Suomalaisen sisältötuotantoalan näkemyksiä osallistumistaloudesta ja sosiaalisesta mediasta" / ”Got an itch but are afraid to scratch?”. PARTECO Research Report 29.3.2007. TAMK. Serie B. Reports 19. Tampere Polytechnic University of Applied Sciences Research and Development (R&D). ISSN 1456-0002X. PDF available at [Fin, incl. Eng. Abstract]: http://www.tamk.fi/kirjasto/Parteco_selvitys2007_MelSirTir.pdf viewed 16.6.2008.

7. Melakoski-Sirkesalo-Tirronen, 2007, s 10-12. Also, a brief addition on our definitions for web 2.0: Actually the term seems already out of fashion, nowadays it has (under)evalued into a phrase, mostly stamped on applications and sites taking benefit of the uses of social webbing and the improved user-interfaces. Much of a result from the fast techno-social development of the WWW.

8. Tirronen, Mikko, 2008, s. 105, Web 2.0. Verkon Numerologia. Vaajakoski. (BTJ). Sitation translation by myself. The book itself is not translated in english, I suppose(?)

9. Tirronen, 2008, s. 131-135.

10. Cheng, Jacqui, 2008, ”Google easily extending dominance to mobile search market”, http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080616-google-easily-extending-dominance-to-mobile-search-market.html viewed 22.6.2008

11. According to information available at Market Share, the on-line usage statistics report for operating systems when viewed 30.06.08 [Report generated on Monday, June 30, 2008 1:46:05 AM]. We suppose there are some falses on this kind of metering, but overally it should still be quite close to actual market-share of OS´s.

12. Roth, Daniel, 2008, ”Google´s Open Source Android OS Will Free the Wireless Web ”, http://www.wired.com/techbiz/media/magazine/16-07/ff_android [article contains several web-pages, Wired Magazine ], viewed 27.6.2008

13. Ryan, Paul, 2008, ”23% of Smartphone market to be Linux-powered by 2013”, http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080603-23-of-smartphone-market-to-be-linux-powered-by-2013.html , viewed 16.6.2008

14. Ryan, Paul, 2008, ”Fighting the Android: Nokia buys and open sources Symbian”, http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080624-fighting-the-android-nokia-buys-and-open-sources-symbian.html viewed 25.06.2008

15. Chartier, David, 2008, ”Hands on: Flock 2 steps up the social browsing game”, http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080617-hands-on-flock-2-steps-up-the-social-browser-game.html viewed 22.6.2008

16. Roth, 2008. Android actually is an OS developed for Linux-based Mobile Phone-platform which can be used on several new phones, whose manufacturers have chosen it for their smart-phones as well as its naturally usable in Googles own phones. Nonetheless, the concept is marketed to take benefit from actual user-base a lot in the same manner (leaving beside Googles 10 million prize for Android-extensions developers) as Firefox has been built for years now. That is, according to logic that users most propably create the suitable extra add-ons needed by other users, and so the development itself is at least partly left for them.


Newspost#030808

When the going gets tough...don´t forget to take a look at the opponents most obvious weaknesses. Well, naturally we are as good as anybody in predicting that before the votes are counted, democratic process sealed and cries for peace finally given some notice(?) there is a wealthy list of insults available for use of slamming the other candidate (in addition to latest celebrity-comparisons). Viewing the recent campaigns, we suppose the most used will be(we don´t take sides, not mentioning who´s targeted): Opponents (un)heroic deeds at the foregone famous colonialistic disaster, the Vietnam war or opinions given on that; the alleged (possible) doubtful connections to foreign political/religious supporters; the dangerous opinions given on minority sexual/racial groups...not to forget the accusability of views on foreign military politics and current economical downfall. Meanwhile...a reader can take a look at more important matters like recent Green Products Directory publized by Asian Productivity Organization.

...Also, of no lesser importance is Shiretoko, a forerunner version of forthcoming Firefox 3.1 browser version. As some new improvements to be included are (ao) the visual thumbnails of the tabs opened and also improvements of the miraculous awesome browsing-bar(the html-address bar), where you can use wildcards and 'intelligent searches' combining in word '+' word - manner. Also, there´s advanced effects for html-writing, but what we are most exited is...Ogg Theora support, expected to be supported in next Gecko. Yippee! It means (according to information given) that "Anyone using Firefox will be able stream Ogg Theora video without downloading or installing any extra software" Videos and similar content can be included straight to html and anyone will be able to watch them, no monopolic codecs/players needed as Ogg Theora is "patent and royalty free". Yippee!

On environmental level we learn that Congo-basin, the area containing worlds second largest tropical forests in yet under logging threat also unfair for the local people...Danzer group is best boycotted, though the pressure should be on EU legislators on timber; Also, avoiding plastic one can, so is told, save a lot by not using "take-away coffees, bottles of water or pre-packed sandwiches" and thats just for starters, as not buying the regular 603 plastic items a month could in the long run save the planet from (ao things) "46,000 pieces of plastic litter floating in every square mile of ocean on Earth." Yep, me neither, I didn´t quite realize that such amounts of rubbish get into food chain (read more on that from actual article). Conclusively: 5 M tons of plastic in 1950ies has become 100 M tons these days. Thats an awful lot of rubbish...

Finally, some afterthoughts on popular music field...torrent users preferred to dl the new Radiohead album (given for free) from P2P-channels rather than from bands own site. Reason for that...nobody quite sure why, but "even with legal P2P, we're invited to infer, users will continue to use the unlicensed sites". So the band also informs fans that the experiment, followed by some 2 million sold CDs, is not to be repeated...and theres nothing wrong with that, of course charity is not any qualification for credibility, even in the dawning age of pop industry. For the dawn it is, if one compares the inflation of most self-evident rock cliches´(the originality, the rebellion, the spontaneous). We only like to remind that, originally(yes originally) the pop(ular) music was music made by the people, performed by the people, for the people as meaning the jazz´n´blues decades preceding the rock decades. Afterwards, rock for arts sake, multiple stylish periods, monopoly companies, licensing for extra musical areas and most significant stardom-cults recycled, the resultive state could (possibly) be just the same: back to the roots, music for the people. Nobody really believes that to happen, as the everlasting capability for renewing the (commercial) markets for each generation is the rocks most influential force, proven to be of successive kind. Yet, why not start giving away copies of the back-catalogue for free along with (priced) MP3s as they are around there anyway?

Wish(?) to check the news(feed), the motherlode of all the important information.

7/27/08

Newspost#270708

This weeks a bit more coherent than usually for we´ve not so much concerned on technological frontline (of the net), topics being merely from environmental and foodstuff issues...


The Great White Humpback might have breeded (is speculated), as a new individual albino from is spotted at Great Barrier Reef. It is a common knownledge that whiteness (as lack of pigmentation on skin) is as rare among the animals as human species. However concerning whiteness and large sea habitants(of the Oceans) there seems also to be a some kind of tendency towards fulfilling them with strange requirements of evil and horror... most obvious example being (and perhaps the beginning of this form of horror) Melvilles Moby Dick(p. 1851) , the gigantic white Sperm Whale. Melvilles book carries on with the tension between white whale and whale-hunter captain Ahab, who´s dedicated his remaining three limbs for catching Moby Dick. Book is a symbolical interpretation from struggle of evil and good[as in human and in nature], intensifying to the unavoidable climax(be noted: Spoiler-alert!; if-you-don´t-wish-to-be-told-the-details-skip-over-next-few-sentences :) Most interesting point in Melvilles symbolical tale is that when the Ahabs ship is sunk by the whale, it goes down with its three pagan harpooners in ships mast tops: a caribbean(cannibal), native american and black. So the symbolical horrirying themes in Moby Dick are rising partly from christian - pagan, partly human-nature (mythological) basis. Moby Dick pretty much created the myth of evil and fear connected to the white whale(s), though as the whaling have got banned(for good reason) the book also have got less popular. No reason for that, for also as history fiction it is indeed very worthy reading...And as could be expected, there´s plenty of filmed versions (see IMDB): 1999 flick is best avoided, but 1978, 1956 (Gregory Pecks Ahab) and 1930 versions all seem to be quite appreciated. As a hilarious comparison and in fact a direct loan from Moby Dicks thematics we can take Mickey Mouse comics the Mighty Whale Hunter (1938), though in it whiteness is erranously explained as characteristics typical for female whale. Of course, no mentioning(in the realms of horror) sea animals and whiteness would do without Jaws (1975), deliberously dedicated on Great White sharks. First film in the series it is besides one the most thrilling horror films ever made (the rest are...crap).
The White Humpback has little to fear as to end up in the realm of horrifying stories as Humpbacks are Baleen whales which filter their food from water rather than having any need for frightening tooths. Instead it has more apparently had qualities of becoming a symbol for the preserving of whales. And as such, we can end up this brief glance on whale-fiction and albino whales) - Theres some text about Migaloo, the famous albino Humpback, in Wikipedia under Humpback Whales. Also, the species being most researched of whales, there´s Google maps, statistical data, etc. on OBIS-SEAMAP project, which gathers information ao on humpback whales.


Food...the ever more healthier solutions are found: Beef is acknownledged as most carbon emissions generating manner of food production, energy drinks are a ´risk factor´ for use along with alcoholics, but isn´t it (a bit corny) that Monsanto produced genetically engineered maize (MON 863) contains toxics that are most dangerous for humans - MON 863 was banned by Austria now as well as several other EU-countries earlier. We only wish to remind that when looking back the 1960´s fights against the racism, the New Left and feminists of the 1970s, noted that the biggest mistake was that if they thought they had won, the beast was left alive just to reappear in new more hidden forms later on. Same seems to be true as concerning Monsantos dealings and reappearances on the food production business, which readers can check from the W.Engdahl article in Centre for Research on Globalization.


...transparent society previsited...in close future peole are more and more watched via their phones with bluetooth sensors creating a succesfull net of viewpoints tracking a single phones (and users) movements. But wait! That just already happening according to our newsfeed. And what an individual person can do, surely isn´t impossible for fx governments. While watching the Big Brother watching we lastly have (from external informative sources, not from newsfeed) some key terminology as advisory tips for consumer thinking of obtaining (an environmentally sustainable) new computer: RoHS=(Removal of Hazardous Substances, all the chemicals that companies should remove and substitute to safer alternatives in their production lines in couple years onwards) ; CSR=(Corporate social responsibility, the guideline criteria the companies are to set for themselves to fulfill environmental standars, however all these are voluntarily) ; GSE=(General Specification for the Environment, mainly a HP-brands own test conditioned from third party manufacturers produced parts). Not necessarily the most simple definitions, but at least more understandable than a list of alphabets.


Wish(?) to check the news(feed), the motherlode of all the important information.