The Frogs Have More Fun...

Flowers



"All the names I know from nurse:
Gardener's garters, Shepherd's purse,
Bachelor's buttons, Lady's smock,
And the Lady Hollyhock.

Fairy places, Fairy things,
Fairy woods where the wild bee wings,
Tiny trees for tiny dames.
- These must all be Fairy names !"

(from Child's Garden of Verses
by R.L. Stevenson)


"Anyone can write a short-story.
A bad one, I mean."

(R.L. Stevenson)
----------------

"Science without conscience is the Soul's perdition."
- Francois Rabelais, Pantagruel
- Acc to/above is citated from: Medical Apartheid. The dark history of Medical Experimentation on Black Americans from Colonial Times to the Present, by Harriet A. Washington (Doubleday ; 2006 ; p. 1.)

----------------
"In the high society of the first half of the century, marriage, despite it's bestowal status upon the wife, was the most absurdity. Marriage, conferring instanteous rank or money, ... lost most of its prestige and moment right after the wedding. ...By the end of the century, spurred by Rousseau's moralistic Nouvelle Hèloíse, a contrary cult, that of virtue, arose. After 1770 conjugal and maternal love became not merely admissible, but, for some, moral imperatives. ...

[...]
...Rousseau, who sought for himself the crown of morality in ostensibly defending marriage, presents in his Nouvelle Hèloíse the most enticing and extended defense of illicit love ever penned. The root of the problem is that as the century progressed sensibility became confused with morality: passionate feeling, if expressed in a highly civilized mode with grace and nuance, makes us forgive the Rousseau of The Confessions, for example, his pettiness, his jealousies, his betrayals. This moral-amoral byplay, present already in the novels of Richardson, was to be more intense as the century unfolded."
-
Madelyn Gutwirth : Madame De Staèl, Novelist. The emergence of the Artist as Woman (10,15.)

;
"...As the social contract seems tame in comparison with war, so fucking and sucking come to seem merely nice, and therefore unexciting. ... To be 'nice', as to be civilized, means being alienated from this savage experience - which is entirely staged. [...] The rituals of domination and enslavement being more and more practiced, the art that is more and more devoted to rendering their themes, are perhaps only a logical extension of an affluent society's tendency to turn every part of people's lives into a taste, a choice; to invite them to regard their very lives as a (life) style." - Susan Sontag , on 'Fascinating Fascism' (-74; p 103;104-5 at Under the sign of Saturn)
; "Anyone who cannot give an account to oneself of the past three thousand years remains in darkness, without experience, living from day to day." (Goethe) - as cited by Sontag (on same compile; p. 137.)

;
"It is widely accepted that we are now living in the 'Anthropocene', a new geological epoch in which the Earth's ecosystems and climate are being fundamentally altered by the activities of humans. I loathe the term, but I can't deny that it's appropriate."
; (Goulson), Silent Earth : Averting the Insect Apocalypse (2021; p 47.)
;
"It is sometimes said that humanity is at war with nature, but the word 'war' implies a two-way conflict. Our chemical onslaught on nature is more akin to genocide. It is small wonder that our wildlife is in decline."
; (Goulson, 2021 ; 118.)
;
----------------
"If we believe absurdities, we shall commit atrocities." (Voltaire)
- Citated from; (Joy, Melanie), Why We Love Dogs, Eat Pigs and Wear Cows : An Introduction to Carnism(2010; p. 95.)
;

"In the presence of the monster, you have eyes and ears for nothing else."
; (Flora Tristan) : London Journal of Flora Tristan: the Aristocracy and the Working Class of England ; 1842-edit. (tr: 1982. ; p. 71.)

;
"Every minority invokes justice, and justice is liberty.
A party can be judged of only by the doctrine which
it professes when it is the strongest."
Mdme de Staêl
(on) 'Consideration sur le Révolution de la Francaise' [1818]


12/28/09

2010



---------------------------------------------
--*******-----*******-----**------******- -**------**----**-----**----**-----**----** ---------**----**-----**-----------**----** --------**-----**-----**----**-----**----** ---****--------**-----**----**-----**----** --**-----------**-----**----**-----**----** --**-----------**-----**----**-----**----** --**-----**----**-----**----**-----**----** --********------******-----**------******-
------------------------------------------------
<
Does It Make Difference>
? - ? - ? - ! - !


(Happy New Year)

----------------------

WINTER...
...Snow
...

...The Snow is wonderful,

....Among the three most beautiful
things on Earth.

...Definitely.







----------------------------------

...Reverend, sirs,
For you there's rosemary and rue – these keep
Seeming and savour all the winter long:
Grace and remembrance be to you both,
And welcome to our shearing”


Shepherdess, A fair one are you!

Well you fit our ages With flowers of winter.”


Sir, the year growing ancient -

Not yet on summer's death nor on the birth

Of trembling winter – the fairest flowers o'th' season,

Are our carnations and streaked gillyvors,

Which some call nature's bastards.

Of that kind, Our rustic garden's barren, and I care not

To get slips of them.”


Wherefore, gentle maiden, Do you neglect them?”


For I have heard it said

There is an art which in their piedness shares

With great creating nature.”


Say, there be;

Yet nature is made better by no mean,

But nature makes that mean: so, over that art

Which you say adds to the nature,

is an art that nature makes. You see, sweet maid, we marry

A gentler scion to the wildest stock,

And make conceive a bark of baser kind

By bud of nobler race. This is an art

Which does mend nature – change it rather, but

The art itself is nature.”


(“So it is.”)


Then make your garden rich in gillyvors,

And do not call them bastards.”


- from The Winter's Tale

(Act 3, Scene 4, 'Shepherds cottage')



12/17/09

Cooking Companion VII


This time the Cookings companion contains even some beef. Also a few other recipes with the purpose of having selections from the 'International kitchen', sort of. These are very mixed, random choices; the Russian Stroganoff, some specialities from Lebanese kitchen and the Greek Dolmadakia. (And, they can be prepared as a whole meal for two, suitable variation for the food servings at these after X-mas days, say...)

From the origins of the main dinner (Stroganoff), my cookbook tells this, probably fictitious, but equally funny tale: The food is named after the Stroganoffs, a Russian merchant family since about the 16th century. They were in close relations with the Tzars and so at the time of Catherine the Great it happened that the Queen(/Tzarina) was on hunting trip at the woods next to Stroganoffs mansions. They didn't get anything and decided to drop by the mansion. The kitchen of the house hadn't been prepared for such a visit, but for the high class guest something naturally had to be prepared, soon. The cook took what was to be found from the larder; left-overs and additionals - So creating this renown regular food. Catherine also is mentioned of been fond for all kinds of luxurious servings and exuberant parties, not much differing in that from her comtemporary royal(ists). According the book, and contrary to popular claims, no actual food was ever named after her, however (if you see one on the restaurants it's a later inventions by the cooks).


Stroganoff

Ingredients: Beef chops (recipe says 800 g, but I used 400 g, pork goes as well, though not according the original recipe, probably); 2 onions; 1 tbs tomato sauce; 1/2 tbs mustard; (fresh) mushrooms (about 100 g); 2-4 dl Smetan (Cream if you can't obtain some); 30 g butter; white pepper; salt.

First slice the onion, fry in the pan slightly. Add mushroom slices. Pour in the kettle and fry the meat (well) in separate pan. Add tomato and mustard, let be for some minutes and pour whole of it in the same pan with onions, etc. Add smetan and the spices, let cook a few minutes more.



'Aiol' (This is normally enjoyed with the tartar-beef (from lamb), however added it as companion for the main meal in this.)


Ingredients: 4 eggs (not yolk, but the yellow part...); 8-10 garlic gloves(! ! - quite much, I used only about 3...); 2 tsp white vinegar; 2 tsp lemon; 1 tsp mustard (Dijon); 1/2 tsp salt; 4 dl(?) olive oil (But I used about 1/2 - 1 dl...)


Garlics, vinegar, and mustard are first crushed together in the blender machine. Next add the eggs and mix briefly some time, then, finally the olive oil is poured to it (slowly) and finally blended (with full power) for about a 1/2 min or so.



(Lebanon) lens soup (No more beans recipes as was promised, but I guess that doesn't prevent us from advertising this delicious soup...)


Ingredients: 200 g red or green lens; 3 l water (I only used 1 l...); 50 g (basmati-)rice (But I noticed it actually better without...); about 3 tsp paprika (original recipe uses some other spice, actually); about 2 tsp salt; 3 onions; 2 dl olive oil; juice of (about) half the lemon


Wash the lenses, and add for the kettle with water. Cook about 20 min (less if kept in water overnight), add rice, spices. Meanwhile fry the onions slightly, add for kettle with the olive oil. Cook some time extra and finally add squeezed lemon juice. (The recipe advices to mash ingredients lastly, but I noticed it better when prepared for a regular soup...)



Dolmadykia (wrappings in vine leaves)


Ingredients: 250 g (fresh) vine leaves; 150 g rice (soaked in water for overnight); 275 g (various) onions; 3 tbs dill (chopped); 2 tbs mince; 3 tbs parshley; 1 ½ dl olive oil; 1 lemon; 3 dl hot water; (some) salt; black pepper

Vine leaves are first cooked a few moments in the boiling water and next lifted up. Chopped/sliced ingredients then blended with rice and half the olive oil, add in middle of the leaves (which are blend from sides, making wrapped rolls). Place side by side on pan, pour over rest of the olive oil, lemon, and carefully add the water. Plate over the pan and let cook in low heat for about 50 min. (However, since my efforts to make these more usually tend to fail, I more often rather choose to buy some ready-made canned ones...Also, according to my findings, they're better when served coollen.)


...And that's from the recipe's now, (not so) easy and quickly prepared foods this time perhaps... (G.U.J.)

--

(P.S., Serving order: Dolmadykia, Soup with Aioli, Stroganoff.)


----------

( The latest posts! - @ Mulskinner Blog @ )


----------
Powered by ScribeFire.




12/8/09

Species Endangered (MS-Blog Series from) XIII / 09


Ganges Gharial


(Gavial)





Class: Reptile
Order: Crocodylia
Latin name: Gavialis gangeticus
Range: India, Nepal (Survives in scattered populations at some larger rivers; mainly the Ganges, Brahmaputra and Indus) – Earlier also at Bangladesh, Bhutan, Myanmar, Pakistan, but these populations now probably lost or nearly so.
IUCN: CR (Critically Endangered) / CITES: Appendix I

(about a 2008 situation)


Crocodiles from outer appearance are large aquatic (predatory) animals with strong bite and powerful armor. Because of that, the adult specimen have few potential threats at the nature, except that of man. In during the past decades(/centuries), the hunt for fx crocodile leather used in the various manufactures has taken it's toll on wild populations. More recently additional threats have emerged, as they also suffer from increased pollution of waters, ao.


In lack of any especial knowledge from that (ie hunt of crocodiles in the pasts, which probably was at most intensive before 20th century) it's noticed many of them been classed for the threatened already at 1970s. Actually, in that recent past, most/all of the species were found endangered, nowadays some are considerably better and only about a one third are more severely threatened. By very brief look one can also notice captive-breeding and farming of captured animals been sometimes found having had positive effect, although usually in the cases when crocodiles have been of some use/benefit for humans (in purposes of crocodile leather and meat production, etc). Because many of the species also mature rather young, the releases of the captive-bred animals have sometimes been of effective help in recovery of the wild populations.


As a group, the crocodiles are often said little changed during their long history, belonging for the most distant of surviving animals – kind of summarizing that, Halliday-Adler book mentions the Crocodylia having “Seen the Dinosaurs come and go” (in during about 150-65 Million year in the past). In overall (on the basis of fossil record), crocodylia at first raised as animal order about some 240 Myr ago. They are estimated have separated for their main lineages (commonly known Alligatoridae and Crocodylidae), around the Cretaceous (roughly before 65 Myr ago). After that, in later periods are the currently extant species evolved. The 3rd from main lineages (the Gavialidae), separated of its own around Paleocene (around 50 Myr), perhaps even already during preceding Cretaceous. It is also considered more closely related for the crocodilians than alligatoridae. According to the traditional categorization Gharial (Gavialis gangeticus) is the sole extant species left in group, others having gone extinct well before the Pliocene (ca 5-2.5 Myr). (There's closer to 30 different Crocodylian species in the main order, if the some recently divided (sub-)species are counted as species on their own.)


Like the reptiles usually, crocodiles also give birth by laying clutches of eggs that hatch outside females body (so called oviparous form of reproduction). More especial for the crocodilians (and perhaps even surprising it being so) is their long period of parental care, which for some species lasts several months - Since less usually the reptiles fx guard their nests and more commonly juveniles just develop on their own once hatched. But in the crocodiles the parent (usually the mother) even helps the juvenile to hatch and carries recently born at its mouth. (As well, loosely related to previous perhaps, but according the book mentioned above the crocodile eggs are predated by various species ranging from ants to bears. But, like said, the adult specimen rarely have any natural enemies.)


More typical to reptile/not so unique for the crocodiles, is fx so called TSD (Temperature dependent sex determination). It's been shown that TSD imposes the sex ratio in many reptiles, but it is the sole governing factor for that in the Crocodylia, Tuatara and in some of the Turtles – The mammals, birds, frogs, etc generally instead have GSD (Genotypic sex determination). The latter probably is more recently evolved mechanism, supposedly. For the lizards and in some of the turtles (acc. to my understanding) both mechanisms are found in use; TSD appearing generally more common for the turtles, while (vice versa) GSD is more usual in the lizards.

In practice this means that from a complete clutch of eggs once laid by 'TSD-parent', the reptile juveniles born are usually of the same sex - However, the eggs laid on different levels (under the sand, fx) may develop in the varying temperatures and as result both male/female juvenile may develop. Generally, in case of the (many) turtles low incubation temperatures produce males and higher the females. At the crocodylia, this largely goes similarly like in the example from Nile Crocodiles, from which the book mentions study showing that incubation temperatures above 34.5 and below 31.7 (C) mostly resulted for female offspring, while in the intermediate temperatures male offspring was dominating. (For the crocodiles, TSD is likely universal – and no GSD is found to affect for their reproduction). (Halliday-Adler, p. 116-7; 215) To make things more complicated, however, various things have effect for the incubation, and not solely it is left for the surrounding temperatures to 'decide'; fx some turtles seem to select nesting locations favorable to particular sex ratios. As well, some of turtles - and perhaps other reptiles too - may even be able to manipulate their sex ratios (ie sex of their offspring) by altering level of hormones they allocate to their egg yolk, like also is mentioned. Even in case of crocodiles, hormones play some part in the process, especially at the transition temperatures that usually produce both male and female. All in all, the process (TSD) in the reptiles isn't yet completely understood; fx some lizards are known to have GSD, but certain temperatures in spite of that seem to favor producing merely females, the other males.(Halliday-Adler 2002, p. 116-7; 215) (And from the reason that any general source – as usual here - doesn't seem to show us any additional information, we can leave the subject for these brief simplified and very concise remarks.)


However, as the case of sex determination appears a rather significant question, also the concerns from current climatic effects have been raised aforth; especially how might the warming influence the sex ratios in some (TSD-)reptiles (various already vulnerable as result of other reasons)? Whatever most likely, usually they're also mentioned having survived past somewhat resembling periods and changes through the millions of years. So – simplifying the matter a lot, making guesses – one could suppose that reptiles which evolved in times of the warmer global climates by origin, maybe also have some other effective 'mechanisms' to protect their continuation and sex ratios from consequences of (climatic) changes. Not the least because they 'get by' with such curious manners as using external heat sources for to behaviorally adjust their bodily temperatures (like do the ectothermic / poikilothermic species); and contain also others that reproduce via ovoviparous birth and parthenogenesis, (fx). Or at least so we could assume...


More worrying, probably, appears the problem from the human created chemical pollutants. There's reasons say that sheer speed of current changes and various threats affecting the sex ratios (in reptiles) may hold possibilities of more severe changes than usually believed. Some reptiles are been shown/found noticeably highly susceptible for hormone-mimicking chemicals, such as the breakdown products of some commonly used herbicides, (fx). Also some pollutants, (the DDT-derivatives mentioned) are known to have feminizing effects on alligators as well as the turtles eggs. (For the positive side it's also mentioned that using certain hormones in captive breeding for produce females may be of some help in conservation efforts.) But, as well book mentions studies from the chemical alteration and environmental contaminants as causes of reduced egg hatching and neonatal mortality in reptiles (Although the example is from some time past, 1980s Florida, where the alligator populations of some lakes were found with abnormalities in their reproduction and endocrine systems, probably as result of pesticides exposure and nutrient pollution.) In overall, during the 20th century man-made chemical compounds have reached numbers of tens or hundreds thousands. Not all appear harmful by effect, but some very potentially can influence the biology of animals altering their endocrine system. More typically noticed are the effects from certain chemicals which are used on agricultural purposes, but also there's some other mentioned of little concern until recently; the “inert” chemicals contain such as plasticizers, surfactants, and flame retardants, whose impacts on reptiles and amphibians not adequately known or haven't been studied so far – recent studies also are mentioned to have found (ao) the polybrominated biphenyls (Pbb) ubiquitous pollutants and as powerful hormone system modulators. (Halliday-Adler 2002, p. 215; 222-223) No wonder there's arguments presented against the use of above mentioned every once in a while...And since we're basically altering ourselves to same compounds we're spreading for the nature, one could say that (some chemicals) probably have part on the male sex hormone declines and the reduced overall fertility, often more commonly noticed topics at the usual discussions.

But seriously, its by all means reasonable to notice that the possible impacts from many of these aren't probably at all sufficiently known. Also since some pollutants are been in use only for some decades until present, their long-term effects and consequences are still unknown. Even that a certain particularly harmful have been prohibited for some time, like the DDT. (In spite of that, it is also mentioned still used as a pest killer in some countries, usually in the tropical regions.)


Less especially a matter concerning the reptiles but many other animals as well, are problems from 'regular pollution' that contaminates many the larger river systems and small seas. Unfortunately, many species living in them are endangered/affected by various other factors - in addition to some most typical are the past and current hunt of animals, and the damming of the rivers (can have harm the animal reproduction success, survival, etc., although other aspects concerning the human water use are perhaps more often noticed.)


Anyway, the stress on river systems for uses of energies production is more likely to increase, than the reverse. According to World Development Report 2010, from planets freshwater only tiny small percentages are in the rivers and lakes, and further from that only about 10 per cent used in the renewable energies production (agricultural uses make the largest part, closer to 70 per cent – although these types of use aren't strictly comparable). But, about half of the total renewable electricity of the South Americas, fx, is mentioned produced with hydro, and in some other parts of the world where there's still 'unbuilt' water power (rivers) the use is expected to still increase. (Above information from various parts of the report; Overview, p 6.; Chapt. 1 and 3) Likely, the hydro remains a source for large part of renewable produced electricity in future. However, there's also various co-effects from the water power if it's built on riverine systems.



In addition to fx crocodiles, there's plenty unique large species that live in the rivers at various continent (or in the river deltas). The threatened (from various reasons, of course) contain fx most of the river dolphin species, like Yangtze river dolphin (CR - mentioned possibly extinct), Ganges river dolphin (Platanista gangetica, EN), Indus river dolphin (P. minor, EN), Amazon river dolphin (Inia geoffr., VU) and La Plata Dolphin (VU – appears on Amazon delta and/or some S.A. coastal shores). From the Crocodylia similarly threatened are at least the Philippines crocodile (Crocodylus mindorensis, CR, - probably rarest from crocodiles), Siamese crocodile (C. siamensis, CR, - equally rare) Orinoco crocodile (C. intermedius, CR), Mugger (marsh crocodile)(C. Palustris, VU), Cuban Crocodile (C. rhombifer, EN), Chinese crocodile (C. Sinensis, CR) - Listing based on information from Beer-Morris book, mostly, and not generally checked other sources for their more recent situation. Also there's various other; like many (larger) fishes (ao), from which the common knowledge also tells that in the past the fishes used to be not only more plenty, but also larger from size. (Again, possibly as much variety as river systems appears, some being at recovery from past effects, and some perhaps only recently have come under increases of waste and other consequences of human large-scale uses of land and waters.)


Gharial is an ancient species, and the young specimen at least appear very vulnerable to pollution (a serious concern hampering the recovery, like noticed in this news-briefing.) It is also been protected from since 1970s fx to prevent the poaching losses and there's been captive-breeding programs to aid its recovery for some time. India being a country with large population and a lot of poverty, it's mentioned that gharials earlier breeding areas have in time become occupied by human settlements. Decline at the latter part of the 20th century was rather steep since still in the 1940s there probably was about 5000 – 10000 animals left in the wild - the page also lists some other reasons for decline like the humans collecting the crocodile egg, reduction of available diet (the fishes decline), and as well specimen harvested and killed for human uses, ao in the (traditional?) medicinery. (Also mentions from the establishment of Gharial Conservation Alliance, GCA). Additionally, fishers often regard gharials as direct competitors and destroyers of their nets. From other things, it's noticed that Gavials only lay their eggs on sandy shores of river (those are only places where they come ashore), but such peaceful breeding sites have become rarer too. Eggs are also often washed from the nesting areas by floodings, etc.


Crocodiles in general also suffer largely from being feared as threat to humans. Indeed they are effective predators that can attack any kind of suitable prey coming for river sands/water edges (But, just two species – the largest - are mentioned as reputable man-eaters; the Nile Crocodile (C. niloticus) and the Salt-water Crocodile, Estuarine.) But not the Gharial. Although they can grow about as large as the above mentioned species, they are almost exclusively fish-eating from diet. Larger individuals supposedly sometimes also eat smaller birds and reptilia. Although, they may scavenge anything found on the rivers, also perhaps remains from the corpses placed on river in funerals; But as result they're also believed as man-eaters.


So, more generally, in addition to hunt, pollution and changes of their natural eco-systems (among other things), there seems been various things causing it becoming conservation dependent and nowadays classed among the more severely endangered. The decline can be timed in the modern times, since traditionally they are mentioned been considered as sacred animals. However, since we find it rather recently classed as CR – downlisted from earlier status - but have no further information to present, it's better to check some other sources for additional information too, (fx) the links in the text. Not the least because our sources – as usual here at MSW – appear to present rather differing figures from the total amount of individual animals left in wild populations (;fx Beer-Morris book lists fewer than 2500, but often only 200 is mentioned.) So in this case, one who's interested can probably also check the species status from IUCN Red list (on Gavialis gangeticus) – as it also presents the information from amount of the adult breeding specimen, fx (and has also other more precise information from their current conservation status).

----

Sources:


Beer-Morris, 2005, Encyclopedia of the endangered animals. Grange books.

Halliday, T. – Adler, K., [2002], The New Encyclopedia of Reptiles and Amphibians. N.Y.

[W.B's] World Development Report 2010: Development and Climate Change (2009); at http://go.worldbank.org/ZXULQ9SCC0 [ Pre publicat. version?? ; read pre 15th Oct.]



[Pics from Halliday-Adler : Above; Three Gavials on river bench , Below; Alligator juveniles, Florida]

----------

( The latest posts! - @ Mulskinner Blog @ )


----------
Powered by ScribeFire.

11/30/09

Species Endangered (MS-Blog Series from) XII / 09


Gastric-brooding Frog

Class: Amphibia
Order: Anura
Latin name: Rheobatrachus silus / R. Vitellinus
Range: (Australia) - Inhabited a limited ranges at eastern Queensland.
IUCN: EX (CR) / EX (CR)1, CITES: -/- (not checked)

(a 2009 situation)
Sometimes word of the day, frogs are more important than people usually realize. Them are – like echoed also by us in our earlier amphibian post – supposed most threatened from the animal orders, not the least by the climatic change, etc. But, as they also are often mentioned having been first species that moved from seas to the land, one easily presumes them most 'primitive' of the terrestrial animals. In fact that appears false assumption, for we learn that their extant main groups (Frogs, Salamanders, and limbless Caecilians) actually are timed roughly for the same periods as the modern reptiles. Oldest from reptiles still extant genera, turtles and crocodiles therefore appear slightly more distant from evolutionary origins than current amphibians families, it seems. (However, also appears stated that earliest amphibians were around some 300+ Million years in the past, already). In spite of how exciting these preceding view-points might be, our interest in this (brief) text is delimited for the variety of colourful amphibian species. Since the rain forest species are not only most numerous but most impressive from looks (as well most threatened of them, also often said), this consists largely from representing them.


So, the above frog(s) examples for this part, are not selecte from the reason of being extinct – actually they represent only singular species among several mentioned in this text. Nevertheless, and like we find mentioned, the Rheobatrachus (genus of frogs) contained above mentioned two species (R. Silus/.Vitellinus), both rather exceptional. Mentioned as gastric-brooding frogs from the reason that in both the reproduction was by female frog ingesting it's (fertilized) eggs, which then developed for juveniles in the frogs stomach (and were finally vomited as juveniles from it's mouth). Unique manner even among the frogs which show multitudes of variety and peculiar examples at their reproduction. In our only marginal acquaintance from the life of the frogs, this makes us almost to think the truth often being stranger than fiction.

Anyway, sad part of course is that no Gastric-brooding frog seems been found after their rapid disappearance during brief period in begins of 1980s (Been only known for science since about 1972/3). At that time the reasons and causes for frog extinctions in general weren't yet too clearly understood, and so, in lack of any especial knowledge from the species we're not focusing on that here more precisely. However, at the amphibian declines generally, an increased vulnerability of the small frog populations is nowadays often mentioned. Most alarming prospect, equally often noticed, is their habitat fragmentation(/destruction), like mentioned in following paragraphs:

"Shrinking Habitats. Pressure generated by the world's expanding human population creates an insatiable demand for land that results in the destruction of the natural habitat of plants and animals. This process is offset, to a very small degree, by the creation of natural reserves, but these can become prisons rather than havens for animals such as amphibians. Many amphibians live in small, local populations, the longterm survival of which depends on the occasional immigration of animals from other such populations elsewhere. Increasingly, amphibians are being forced to live in fragmented landscapes within roads, built-up land, and agriculture separating one population from another. There is growing evidence that this isolation leads to an inbreeding and a consequent loss of genetic diversity, decreased survival rates and an increased incidence of anatomical deformities.”(Halliday-Adler 2002, p. 32-33)

As well is said: “Although amphibian population declines have attracted a great deal of scientific and media interest, there is no reason to think they are unusual or unique. All the factors that adversely impact upon amphibians pose a threat to other forms of wildlife. [...]"(Halliday-Adler 2002, ibid.) ...Remarks at the book then continue with mentioning the disappearance in freshwater habitats noticeably having impaired the amphibians populations for some time (other wildlife as well). Also, fx how the protected areas should be designed to create optimal conditions in nature reserves is stated being increasingly important, since the populations based on single limited area are more likely to face eventual extinction, sometimes despite protection. As well appears noticed, that for smaller part/some level the diminished habitat can be replaced by habitat creation - like the underpasses and tunnels built in some places to create amphibians some safety from roadkills, fx on routes for their breeding sites (ao efforts at their protection mentioned). (Halliday-Adler, p. 33-35) Remembering that (in cases) populations of thousands individual frogs have been noticed rapidly vanished (as result of increased vulnerability to variety of threat), also gives some importance for the above mentioned.


The amphibian decline in overall presented at our earlier post, we'll leave that for these few words and the following text mostly serves the purpose of presenting examples from variety in the amphibian lifes. But, fx the Amphibia web's pages about the global decline contain some further information, probably (also seems contain the downloadable Amphibian Action Conservation Plan). And for the interested, from various threatened amphibian around world, EDGE's Amphibian top 100 list presents many, any of those less usually or not commonly noticed. (And – further more - not forgetting to mention this word on behalf the amphibians ; we also learns from it about another exciting frog species, the Phantasmal poison frog (EN), whose skin secretions contain some particular compounds, possibly found of use in the human medicinery as well as aid in the research of pain-killer medicines (or something like that, sounds not at all too unsual or surprising, concerning the amphibians have especial skin formations in overall, etc) - Even though I find that least interesting from aspects presented on the text (Maybe so 'cause I don't much care from the medicines markets and labs, and even less from the prospective views of the global medical businesses or firms. Nevertheless, despite my slight antipation, it's sometimes mentioned that penicillin probably has been one of the most benefiting inventions in the preceding century - for human kind.)

...But for to stay on our main topic in this; following paragraphs are focused on colourful and exciting characteristics of the amphibians. Many of the species mentioned in the following, I suppose, are from the better known colourful and sometimes also the most usually represented examples. In spite of that, there's a lot especial and interesting in them to familialirize with (So I noticed when writing this...).


Often in the nature, bright colour serves purposes of aposematism (ie as warning sign to potential predators from species being distasteful/of it's toxic defenses). Some frogs also exhibit polymorphic appearance (different colour patterns found even in the individuals of same species). From this, again the most popular examples are to be found in the small toxic frogs of South American forests (Presented in the pic above), that appear in variety of species (there's at least three separate genera of these tiny frogs with toxic defenses). Variability in the skin colour and pattern also more generally appears typical to amphibians, as well as does the sexual dimorphism; In several cases male and female frogs exhibit rather different looks, fx. Further more, some are mentioned changing their overall skin color according to body temperatures – not quite same manner or as impressively as the chameleons, but some fx change their tones of color according the surrounding environment or frogs mood (like mentioned from the European leaf frog, Hyla arborea (LC) - also, when exposed to sunlight it appears paler by color.)

Colour patterns appear as method to warn their would-be-predators, but it's also found commonly used as camouflage by the frogs - to avoid detection from potential prey. Most frogs are carnivores - about majority eat insects but larger species also various other prey and fx typically the diet of some rain forest frogs ranges from worms and little snakes to even small mammalians (like bats, fx). To hide from their prey, certain species are found having adopted/imitating the usual background colors, even to level their skins reflecting smaller variations of litter and leaves found on the forest ground. Some horned frog species most typically mentioned examples from such adaptations. (Another interesting example, ao, we find presented in the pocket guide from East African frogs [2006]; in form of (Tanzanian) reed frog species (Hyperolius Orkarri), whose overside colours are mentioned closely matching the granite rock environment it lives at – Acc. book species is only known from few areas).


From the use of colour as warning from species palatability, there's also plenty examples at the Salamander (Caudata) families (Perhaps, not so evident of the species in pic above, Golden-striped Salamander, Chioglossa Lusitania, VU) - Salamanders and Newts form a parallel group for Frogs and Toads, the Newts being (in general) more accustomed to watery environments and Salamanders usually more terrestrial, except during their breeding periods. They typically are impressive from appearance and colour; An european species most renown of them, Fire Salamander (Salamandra salamandra, LC) represents very bright yellow colours. It has also interestingly given reasons for many odd beliefs in the past. According to the most usual from these, it was in the Middle Ages widely asserted capable of setting up fires by its sole presence and also (was believed) resistant to flames. According to another often mentioned anecdote, this false belief was already widespread and common during the Antique; Even to the level that Pliny the elder (23-79 A.D.) experimented it's accuracy when preparing his renown book, Naturalis Historia; - by throwing the fire salamander into flames, with expectable result of course. As noticed, that apparently didn't prevent the same false belief to persist through centuries for hundreds years afterwards.(...the underline on this added 28.08.2015) (Serves well also to show how a mistaken belief and fallacy can remain, and in time become part of the shared common consciousnes.)

But, from the real qualities of the Fire Salamander, it's fx mentioned that a lot variation appears between coloration of the individual animals. Some are almost completely yellowish, some represent only small bright dots. Many other salamanders as well represent by bright color a warning from their toxic defences (even though that doesn't completely prevent them being predated) – however, I've not checked if that the case also in genus plethodontidae, salamanders that are mostly renown from breathing only through their skin since they do lack the lungs completely. As for other interesting salamander characteristics, it is mentioned that some species - like the N. American Eastern newt (LC)(Pic below from Eastern Newt in the eft phase, adults are mentioned differing from color) - can find their routes from several kilometers distance for the watery streams and ponds they've been taken far away from. Even more, it's mentioned that they are able to use the position of the sun, with the aid of sensing polarized light to perceiving their position and using that (information) for directioning. As well mentioned, it been demostrated that they are able to detect Earths magnetic field and use that to form some kind of 'maps' from the surrounding environments - having sort of "GPS-system" of their own; ie it is noticed suggesting that the Newts nervous system maybe able to develop and store some detailed information from their living regions. (Halliday-Adler book, on p. 52). (How precisely/how well that mechanism is understood/studied, I've not checked, but there's a few researches from the subject listed at the end of this post). Actually, various animals similarly use some kind of 'compass' to make their routes and journeys, most renown are the migrating birds. Salamanders, whose plentiful families are distributed around the most continents (excluding the Africa and Australia), appear likewise threatened as the other amphibians by varying degree – 3 species are listed critically endangered, at least (Halliday Adler, p. 56-59).

Next we briefly devote also few words for other amphibian typical features, mainly on the diversity in their reproducing. First, there's this exceptional case in point in form of the South-American mouth-brooding frogs. In their case (the male) frog carries small tadpoles/froglets in it's vocal pouch, also providing nutrition them, and from where the fully developed little frogs then emerge.(Halliday-Adler, p 27-28). Mouth-brooding frogs include at least the species we find presented with the name Rhinoderma darwinii (VU) - listed so from it's observed decline in part of range, though mentioned still rather common on some places (acc. its IUCN Red list data sheet on Rhinoderma darwinii). Most frogs, however, do reproduce by their more common manner, laying amounts of eggs on water sources (which usually are fertilized externally). Especially the rain forest species, however, have developed additional strategies to their breeding and protection of the juvenile.

A manner used by many from tree frogs is to deposit eggs on vegetation/leafs overhanging the water, (also typical to the reed frogs, a group in the African arboreal frogs with over 120 species)(Spawls-Howell-Drewes 2006, p 184). The eggs later drop for the water where the tadpoles then start their metamorphose (for a frog). There's also species whose eggs are developed in certain 'foam-nests'. When the edges of the nest dry it falls for waters below. The inner in the foam nest remains moist some days, allowing the tadpoles to emerge in it. In some cases the creation of the foam nests involves lot group-behavior by frogs, the foam released by female frog(s) and forming the nest between leaves, which is then 'hardened' from it's outer surface by several male frogs hangin' on beside nest's edges.
Further more, there's as well many that use some alternative method like depositing them eggs in the burrows dug near the edges of the seasonal (water) pools - after the rainwater floods for pools and finally enters burrows, tadpoles swim for the open water.
(Like in the exemplary case from (East-)African Guinea Snout-burrower, interesting looking species from genus we find provided with the name hemisotidae, mentioned at Spawls-Howell-Drewes (2006) book). (Species pic above)

Somewhat more especial, may appear the reproduction of some of the earlier mentioned tiny (S. American) Poison dart frogs (from genus Dendrobates), species that live mostly within the leaf litter on level of the rain forest floor. Fx, in the case of some of the Strawberry poison frogs (D. Pumilio, LC), the frog first lays its eggs on leaves and carries the hatched tadpoles (under the protective foil on frogs back) to the axils of certain plants, or, to cloaks of trees in some cases. These contain small level of water in which the tadpoles grow to small froglets (number of other species also live in these aquatic micro-environments). The female frog also feeds tadpoles with the unfertilized eggs. Some Madagascar frogs are mentioned with somewhat resembling manner at their reproduction and 'parental care'.(Halliday-Adler 2002, p 28-29) Yet, further another exceptional method (in the variety of frog breeding) is maintained by some another South-American species that we find presented as 'Marsupial frogs', or Rana marsupial (Gastrotheca ovifera, EN). In that case eggs are first directly fertilized and each is placed to a certain protective 'pouch' on females back, where they remain in moist and pretty safe until emerging as fully developed froglets from there - and the juveniles when 'born' seem to bop directly from the frogs back. The species also is mentioned endangered acc. it's IUCN listing (IUCN Red List data sheet; Gastrotheca ovifera). Various other frog species carry their fertilized eggs on the adults back (/or, fx attached beside frogs legs like the Midwife-toads). Most usually the developed tadpoles are just dropped for water to develop. (I guess this variety of frog breeding methods only presented by brief look for the topic in above sentences... but, seems quite adequately covered, so let's leave it for that now.)

Finally, this kind of gallery of frog wonders and especial features cannot do without mentioning the 'flying frogs'; A species group comprising from the Asian (arboreal) forest frogs, that glide long distances (from tree to another) with particularly developed formations in limbs (webbings, spread for like parachutes/gliding surface, that 'permit the kermit' for “fly”, very seemingly) Among these we find a species provided with name Rhacophorus nigropalmatus (LC); or Wallace's flying frog after A.R. Wallace, 19th century naturalist explorer also presented in our recent post. (The Indo-Malaysia islands Wallace journeyed contain various animals first recognized by Wallace and therefore named after him ; from the birds most renown are probably the Moluccan Megapode (Eulipoa wallacei, VU) and a paradise birds species Wallace's Standard Wing (Semioptera Wallacei). He also describes both quite thoroughly in the book.) For the flying frog(s) Wallace also devotes a few paragraphs, though far less in lenght than descriptions from the above mentioned species - But, it wouldn't feel too surprising if some frog species would also be named after him. In overall the Rhacophorus frogs belong for the Afro-Asian tree frogs, and in addition to this example mentioned genus/group contains number of other glider frogs. Recognized as separate species only later, perhaps. (Pic below; Wallace's flying frog)


But, for now we'll have to cut this in brief, since this only was meant to present some ordinary examples from that variety and overwhelming richness of life - From the amphibians in their about 6300 recognized species in existence worldwide and some even mix together and/or are not clearly differentiated from near similar/co-species. Many of them vulnerable to various threats, Climatic Changes the most often mentioned of those. Anyone can also easily search further details from the mentioned few species we were able to present in this (and from various other; fx, nothing we were having time or space to present from the vocal communications of the frogs, or about some other things - like from the species especially adapted for watery environments/lifes; the leaps and bounds of the frogs; not much anything from most of the popular families – like the arboreal tree frogs of the Central-/South Americas noticeable from them slender and curious looks, and most often presented in the natural books pics...And whatever else has recently been researched from amphibians and their evolutionary histories, obviously.)
-------
Note:

1. Species also presented with the CR listing, since both seems been moved to the category/status of EX rather recently. (In the IUCN fact sheets listed as extinct about the turn of the century. But, what a happy surprise it would make if some surviving specimen/individuals still would turn out to be found, somewhere, even that it seems very unlike possibility.)

----
Sources/other information:


La Marca - Manzanilla 2004. Gastrotheca ovifera. In: IUCN 2009. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. [Version 2009.2.] <www.iucnredlist.org>. Downloaded on 19 November 2009.

Ed Meyer (et al) 2004. Rheobatrachus silus. In: IUCN 2009. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.[Version 2009.2.] <www.iucnredlist.org>. Downloaded on 19 November 2009.

Jean-Marc Hero (et al) 2004. Rheobatrachus vitellinus. In: IUCN 2009. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. [Version 2009.2.] <www.iucnredlist.org>. Downloaded on 19 November 2009.

Carmen Ubeda (et al) Rhinoderma darwinii. In: IUCN 2009. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. [Version 2009.2.] <www.iucnredlist.org>. Downloaded on 21 November 2009.

Halliday, T. -Adler, K., (2002), The New encyclopedia of Reptiles and Amphibians. N.Y.

Spawls-Howell-Drewes, (2006), Pocket guide to the Reptiles and Amphibians of East Africa. London.

Magnetoreception at (some) amphibians;
(Both studies from The Journal of Experimental Biology)

Brassart, J [et al], 1999, Ferromagnetic material in the eastern red-spotted newt Notophthalmus viridescens., (JEB) Vol 202, Issue 22 3155-3160


[ Pics at the text from Halliday-Adler book; except the Guinea-Snout burrower from Spawls-Howell-Drewes.]

----------
( The latest posts! - @ Mulskinner Blog @ )


----------
Powered by ScribeFire.